Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What the heck does nomination by acclamation mean? (Original Post) bigdarryl Jul 2016 OP
He released his delegates to have Clinton unanimously nominated. nt BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #1
After every delegate vote recorded. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #5
For some reason, no one noted that Tennessee passed BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #6
You must have missed it. yallerdawg Jul 2016 #8
Okay. I had been sitting here watching CSPAN for the entire roll call when Rawlings BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #10
It basically means that everybody agrees on the nominee The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2016 #2
Not quite. It means candidate gets unanimous nomination. Bernie didn't want that Panich52 Jul 2016 #19
"This is our nominee; all in favor?" "AYE!!!!!!" LongtimeAZDem Jul 2016 #3
Except that he didn't quite marybourg Jul 2016 #7
Ah well; close enough :) (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jul 2016 #11
I think what he did was actually part of formal parliamentary procedure BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #13
I think he forgot his lines rurallib Jul 2016 #16
IMO I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt DLCWIdem Jul 2016 #18
I think you're right. nt. marybourg Jul 2016 #20
Thanks guys bigdarryl Jul 2016 #4
HE. DID. NOT. DO. THAT. trof Jul 2016 #9
Really does not matter. GreenPartyVoter Jul 2016 #12
I don't think parliamentary procedure would allow him to do that BumRushDaShow Jul 2016 #14
give it a break awake Jul 2016 #15
It's nomination by unanimous consent. EffieBlack Jul 2016 #17

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
8. You must have missed it.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jul 2016

C-SPAN transcript:

>> MADAM SECRETARY, THE GREAT STATE OF TENNESSEE, THE STATE THAT RATIFIED THE 19TH AMENDMENT TO GIVE WOMEN THE RIGHT TO VOTE HAPPILY CAST 23 VOTES FOR SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS AND 50 VOTES FOR THE FIRST WOMAN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?412846-1/hillary-clinton-officially-nominated-democratic-presidential-nominee&live=&start=7730

Also:

MR. SANDERS: THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR. I MOVE THAT THE CONVENTION SUSPEND THE PROCEDURAL RULES. I MOVE THAT ALL VOTES CAST BY DELEGATES BE REFLECTED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORD, AND I MOVE THAT HILLARY CLINTON BE SELECTED AS THE NOMINEE OF THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

BumRushDaShow

(128,258 posts)
10. Okay. I had been sitting here watching CSPAN for the entire roll call when Rawlings
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 07:47 PM
Jul 2016

got to them and I saw the camera focus on a group waving as if requesting to skip and she stumbled and then went to Texas. Maybe the feed skipped/cut out on my cable (while they did a short reporting of the votes)?

Odd. But then I have Comcast in the home of Comcast where this is going on about 20 miles from me in the arena where Comcast Spectacor lives.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,536 posts)
2. It basically means that everybody agrees on the nominee
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 07:25 PM
Jul 2016

and they suspend the ballot counting. They went through the roll call process to give all the states a chance to cast ballots but Bernie moved to suspend the rest of the process, release his delegates and nominate HRC by acclamation. It was a perfect move.

Panich52

(5,829 posts)
19. Not quite. It means candidate gets unanimous nomination. Bernie didn't want that
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 10:11 PM
Jul 2016

The way Sanders phrased it, the votes he got will be on record, no unanimous nomination f/ HRC. (He's just narcissistic enough to want it that way.)

marybourg

(12,583 posts)
7. Except that he didn't quite
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 07:34 PM
Jul 2016

do it. He asked for the rules to be suspended. But he didn't ask for nomination by acclamation. The chair had to do it. Maybe he was confused, since he never participated in a convention before (as far as I know). He was pretty much a party of one.

BumRushDaShow

(128,258 posts)
13. I think what he did was actually part of formal parliamentary procedure
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 08:17 PM
Jul 2016

which he should have down pat having been in Congress for 25 years... Where he requested to "move" (motion) to suspend, etc. ---- Afterwhich the chair would ask the body for a 2nd to the motion, and then upon receiving that, would bring it before the body for a vote (the acclamation).

DLCWIdem

(1,580 posts)
18. IMO I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 09:45 PM
Jul 2016

While he was sitting there in the Vermont delegation his mouth was moving with obviously no sound, I really think he was practicing his part. I really do think he was nervious.

trof

(54,256 posts)
9. HE. DID. NOT. DO. THAT.
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 07:37 PM
Jul 2016

The word 'acclamation' did not leave his mouth.
Watch the video.
The chairwoman made that motion.
He should have, but he didn't.

awake

(3,226 posts)
15. give it a break
Tue Jul 26, 2016, 08:21 PM
Jul 2016

what is it you are looking for?

What Bernie did was ask that all of the votes 1st be recored then he asked that Hillary be recognized as our nominee.
So he did not use the words 'acclamation' what difference does it make?

Are you really that interested in fighting over Bernie? Hillary is now our nominee and we must do everything we can to get as many people to vote for her as we can.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»What the heck does nomina...