Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Johnny2X2X

(19,038 posts)
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 07:55 AM Jul 2016

Clinton Foundation Emails

This is all the Righties are talking about, saying a Wikileaks dump of stolen emails from the Clinton Foundation are coming any day. They are shellshocked and desperate after the last two days of brilliance from the DNC.

No idea what might be in them or if they even have them. I suspect nothing wrong, but the Righties will twist some of the emails and claim they are evidence of pay for play. It's the only thing they have.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

underpants

(182,767 posts)
2. Yes but the whole point was to create a short talking point
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 08:22 AM
Jul 2016

We live in a drama news environment where the headline is enough. It's like clickbait "....and you won't believe what happened next" stories where consumers get so distracted by actually getting to the story that they convince themselves that the headline gave them enough to have been informed.

Squinch

(50,948 posts)
3. Yes, and they were successful in pulling the wool over EVERYONE's eyes, saying there was a
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 08:33 AM
Jul 2016

SCANDAL with capital letters, though there was no scandal there.

And our dummies fell for it.

underpants

(182,767 posts)
4. I was going to start a thread to ask the lawyer types here if there were any damages
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 08:37 AM
Jul 2016

From my limited knowledge of the law aside from stopping actions and criminal charges a lawsuit has to show damages that can be recouped. Were there any damages? I'm not asking you I just think that part of it has been ignored - like the fact that there really isn't any there there.

Squinch

(50,948 posts)
5. PLEASE DO! That is a great idea. I am really flummoxed by this whole thing.
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 08:50 AM
Jul 2016

Scuba and I have been arguing it for days, and the only real argument he has is that Pelosi and Rendell have said the emails were bad, and DWS resigned. He says that is evidence that there is something there.

BUT I've spent a few hours (not going to read all 20K) and found NONE, and I've asked everyone peddling the SCANDAL, and none of them have produced any damaging emails, and I've researched every email that anyone puts up as damning, and all of them are either from after Bernie lost, or they have nothing to do with Bernie and rather have to do with the DNC's relationship with the press.

So I would love for you to put it out there and ask those who know more than we do.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
7. And it did not have any effect
Wed Jul 27, 2016, 09:02 AM
Jul 2016

on anything. Like without that email, Bernie would have won. Not that simple.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Foundation Emails