2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumToday's Reuters/Ipsos poll shows Trump and Clinton tied
When Johnson and Stein are included.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-poll-idUSKCN1092M5
The race is going to stay close. PA and OH have me worried.
Hopefully non-white voters will turn out in large numbers in those states.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,000 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Might be a tough fight for some of those.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)The campaign is working PA right now. She's a lock in Philly and Pitts, if she can soften the opposition in some of the areas in between, it's a lock.
VA has been going blue for a while. Kaine should seal the deal there.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In fact, I can't really see how we take North Carolina given the political climate there these days.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)turnout should be very high there
still_one
(92,183 posts)predicts that trump will lose Ohio, does not bode well for trump
DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)TeddyR
(2,493 posts)The RCP polling average has Hillary up 0.8% in OH and the two latest polls there (though I believe both are pre-convention) have it tied. Whatever you think about Trump his message seems to be resonating with the working-class white voters in PA and OH. Even the Dem political operatives admit as much.
the48er
(211 posts)As a matter of fact, if it turns out that you're too bushed to stand in a voting line Nov. 8, just go on home. What's the worst that could possibly happen? It's not as if anyone's going to get gored or anything. This is all supremely inconsequential. You'd think we were courting disaster or something.
auntpurl
(4,311 posts)Shoulda known I couldn't sneak one past my sweet ol' auntie p.
MattP
(3,304 posts)6 point head to head tied with all third party
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It seems to have been buried in the article.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,412 posts)likely to be significant factors in this race? People would not seriously consider throwing this election to Trump, would they? Are they factoring in heavily in individual state races (which is the polling that really matters)?
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)still_one
(92,183 posts)including Stein and Johnson has Hillary ahead by 5
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/latest_polls/
However,elections are not determined by national polls. It is by states, and national polls mislead
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Five point lead coming off a successful convention isn't that terrific.
still_one
(92,183 posts)electoral college distribution is not adequately factored in, where more populated states have a larger weighting on the outcome than smaller states, and that sampling is not adequately addressed in most national polls
In addition, the impact of the Convention won't actually show up until next week. There are some preliminary trends suggesting a 10 o 15 point Convention bounce:
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/07/30/trump-reeling-clinton-10-point-democratic-convention-bounce-15-point-lead.html
but again, I don't put much value in national polls, for the reasons I gave above
There are also a lot of mixed currents difficult to poll:
It appears that moderate republicans are an unknown factor this election that I do not think can easily be determined by national polls
The NRA voting block verses the general public on gun control is difficult to determine.
How much impact will gender play in this election?
How much impact will race play in this election?
Do people want a more conservative or more liberal supreme court?
Plus so many other factors that I do not believe national polls adequately address.
Give me the individual state polls, and that will convey a more accurate picture
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It is definitely all about the individual states. In particular, about six of them.
still_one
(92,183 posts)DemonGoddess
(4,640 posts)and see where she is there, first.
MFM008
(19,806 posts)They are still polling.
Let's see where it's at next week.
Let the Kahn comments settle in.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)The Morning Consult poll does not include Jill Stein as an option.
piechartking
(617 posts)This business with Russia and Khizr Khan will kill him. Unpatriotic, heartless, clueless, all rolled into one.
If Khizr Khan is his "47%" it will be supremely appropriate and ironic.
TeddyR
(2,493 posts)With all the offensive crap that Trump has said so far, why would another one swing the race? The Dems that think Hillary is somehow going to run away with this race aren't paying attention or are ignoring the facts. This race is close and it is going to stay close. It is fantasy to think that those who voted for Romney are going to switch to Hillary in large numbers.
Silent3
(15,206 posts)...is that since we've fully entered the general election, and Trump's remarks are now getting more attention by the country as a whole rather than just rabid Republican primary voters, maybe just maybe the crazy and hateful and insensitive nature of the crap coming out of Trump will finally come into focus.
But yes, it's so hard to understand why that hasn't already happened that it does often seem like it might never happen.
piechartking
(617 posts)I believe that every offensive thing he says erodes his support, in big ways (like with Khan and the Russians) and in small ways. For example, last week he blasted the hotel that he was in - you think the poor employees of that hotel in North Carolina are going to forget that? Today he insulted the fire marshal in the place in Colorado. Great way to turn off the fire marshal and fire department.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)If anything, it will deepen the support for him among his base.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The Khan comments are poison to undecided voters.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)July? I doubt it. It will be added to the long list of vulgar things he said. As for the Russian hack, I'd hope it's a wake up call to the Democratic Party to update their security on the webpages and listen to threats a year out when told about it.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It's not the final blow that breaks the rock but all he blows that came before...
Getting in a swearing match with Fallen Muslim American Hero Soldier Mom and Dad is not a good look.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)I can pretty much guarantee that. As usual, the anti-Trump ads sort of write themselves.
Hell, just play clips of Khan's speech, and then play Trump's counter to them.
I don't really give a shit about Trump's base. They're out of reach anyway. Moderates and Indies should hear these things. There is a lot of room to collect support in the middle, especially if the Clinton economic plans get out there.
MattP
(3,304 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)From July 25 - 29.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)RABA had her up 15
PPP had her up 5
Morning Consult had her up 3
I expect her to be up by 5-8 points in the Huff Po agggregate by 8/8.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It should not be given the same weight as more longstanding polling outlets.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The assertion embodied in my statement was that I wasn't hanging my hat on any one poll.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)renie408
(9,854 posts)And current polls haven't absorbed his straight up batshit performance on Friday.
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)from convention. Important points along the way.
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)and DC, with 4 states pending submitted-signature review. The deadline for Mo was Friday; they were still collecting signatures. PA's deadline is tomorrow. NJ's appears to be as well. (The web page does not note the states where they failed to get enough ballots; you need to click on the state name for the status, if it interests you.)
http://www.jill2016.com/ballot_access
The Libertarians are on the ballot in 36 states. The status of the others re: signature collections/deadlines are unclear, since this page solicits donations rather than help.
https://www.lp.org/2016-presidential-ballot-access-map
oberliner
(58,724 posts)In 2012, they were on 48.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)in 2016.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But he will be on the ballot in all 50 states in 2016 according to most people who have looked into that question.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)which is a good thing, he draws from Trump mainly
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Thank you in advance.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)From 538:
But its also possible (and, I would argue, probable) that because Clinton and Trump are two of the most disliked presidential candidates of all time, third-party candidates are going to do better than usual. Johnson looks especially likely to peel votes from Clinton and Trump because he will probably achieve ballot access in all 50 states, which is unusual for a non-major-party candidate.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/election-update-is-gary-johnson-taking-more-support-from-clinton-or-trump/
From NBC News:
The Libertarians, meanwhile, are on track to make the ballot in 50 states in a year where ballot access is the biggest barrier to third-party challenges.
http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/libertarian-party-ready-prime-time-n582351
From Huffington Post:
Johnson and Weld offer a (to borrow a phrase from this election season) YUGE alternative to the presumptive Republican nominee, businessman Donald Trump, as well as the Democrats presumptive nominee, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and could potentially be an electoral threat as well, as the party is on track to be on the ballot in all 50 states in November.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/travis-irvine/could-2016-finally-be-the_b_10210756.html
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)molova
(543 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)Overlapping much of the convention.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)part of the convention bounce appears after the messages are digested, after what happens in the convention gets covered, etc.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)That would be great!
Wounded Bear
(58,648 posts)in strength. Hopefully it's a good one. I remember seeing one where Hillary's approvals got a bounce, too. Hope that continues.
WhiteTara
(29,704 posts)she is even with Drumpf, even though he was at 31 yesterday. So, does that mean that Johnson and Stein are both taking away from Clinton? Stupid polls.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)and ye shall find them.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)But that doesn't mean they are not there. Pretending they aren't isn't wise, in my opinion.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)Morning Consult, for instance, has Hillary up 3, but up 5 including Johnson. This is a drastic change from their previous poll that had Trump +4.
http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/morning-consult-25023
But the recent batch of polls that are coming out today show a pretty close race, with Hillary having a small lead.
Dem2
(8,168 posts)6 points including 3rd party: http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/cbs-25024
Her bump is definitely more pronounced than Trumps IMO, a good sign I hope.
LenaBaby61
(6,974 posts)For another week or two to see how post-convention polling shakes out. Yesterday this same poll had HRC leading tRump by 15 (Didn't believe that by the way), but 24 hours later she's tied with tRump @ 37 % with 2 other candidates are thrown into the mix?po
Yeah, it's still a bit too early to take polling ultra serious right now for me.
LAS14
(13,783 posts)... says they're tied, but the article referenced shows a 6 point Clinton lead. I didn't find anyone else confused, so it must just be me. Could someone explain?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Clinton has a 6 point lead in the one that is just Trump/Clinton.
They are tied in the one that includes Stein and Johnson.