Don't look at a single poll. Look at a bunch at once. Like this bunch, with a 6.9% average spread.

[pnwmom]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

[MFM008]

1. and then an outlier

brings down the average of the good polls.
Like the new Reuters poll.
If he were truly just 3 points behind it will mean mass hypnosis
or a total nervous breakdown is happening
in this country.

[Johnny2X2X]

2. RCP is OK

But they've been shown to manipulate the polls they put in their average.

The ABC WAPO poll will have her over +7 in the RCP and the internals are devastating to Trump.

[Doctor Jack]

3. I use huffington post/pollster average

They proved to be much more accurate in 2012. RCP had a tie going into election day 2012 and obama won by almost 5 points. They have a right wing slant.

As for the reuters poll, like the la times they are an experimental online poll. Both are erratic and move at random. I dont trust them and neither do most aggregate sites

[pnwmom]

4. If she's doing that well in RCP, that's a great sign. And I fully agree about the Reuters,

which is similar to the worthless Dornsife poll.

[Doctor Jack]

5. LA times, reuters, and rassy

All polls that are garbage.