HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » Shouldn't it be a crime f...

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:07 AM

Shouldn't it be a crime for Russia/Wikileaks to use altered documents to influence

our elections? Surely, Putin and Assange should be permitted to express their support for Trump, but should the American electorate have to put up with purposeful distortions of reality designed to deprive voters of the truth?

Russian Hackers Altered Emails Before Release to Wikileaks:

https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughTrumpSpam/comments/4uyih3/russian_hackers_altered_emails_before_release_to/

I think that a grand jury should investigate the Russian/Wikileaks campaign activities. I suspect that when the truth comes out, some of these activities will be found to be criminal.

8 replies, 934 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 8 replies Author Time Post
Reply Shouldn't it be a crime for Russia/Wikileaks to use altered documents to influence (Original post)
Tal Vez Aug 2016 OP
MineralMan Aug 2016 #1
Tal Vez Aug 2016 #2
Demsrule86 Aug 2016 #3
Tal Vez Aug 2016 #4
LoverOfLiberty Aug 2016 #5
Recursion Aug 2016 #6
LoverOfLiberty Aug 2016 #7
Buckeye_Democrat Aug 2016 #8

Response to Tal Vez (Original post)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:20 AM

1. It's a matter of jurisdiction.

U.S. courts have no jurisdiction internationally. That's the core of the problem.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MineralMan (Reply #1)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:29 AM

2. Yes, I see your point. But, doesn't some of this activity take place in the United States?

Are there no Wikileaks operations or employees based here in the United States?

I know that the world is becoming a smaller place, but distributing altered documents is more than just expressing an opinion. I really wish that we could find a way to protect our country from foreigners who are engaging in what amounts ro a form of political terrorism. I am certain that I would face severe consequences if I had an office in Moscow and began distributing phony documents designed to disrupt Russian elections. Putin would never tolerate that.

I understand your point though and it's a good one. This problem is not simple to solve.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tal Vez (Reply #2)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:31 AM

3. It is espionage.

Trump could be in trouble too...if he is colluding with them. Another poster said Trump seemed to know what was in the emails before they were released.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #3)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 09:38 AM

4. I hate to think that Trump could be that stupid, but I suspect that you're right.

I usually think of espionage as collecting accurate information rather than distributing lies and phony documents. The damage is certainly similar either way and a democratic nation should be capable of protecting the integrity of its elections.

I recognize that in a way Assange is already locked up in that he is dodging the rape charges by hiding in an embassy. However, he continues to be free enough to play the lead role in this Russian operation. Something should be done, but I'm not clear as to what it should be.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tal Vez (Original post)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 10:55 AM

5. Isn't it a crime to hack into a computer?

Isn't it a crime to publish classified information?

This is a criminal outfit no matter how you look at it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to LoverOfLiberty (Reply #5)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:30 AM

6. Yes to the first question; the second one is more complicated

Classification does not automatically give a legal responsibility to a random person who does not have a clearance.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Recursion (Reply #6)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:37 AM

7. Certainly it depends on jurisdiction

but I believe that if you receive what you know to be classified information and you disseminate it improperly, you can be charged with a crime, whether you were actually cleared to receive that classified information or not.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Tal Vez (Original post)

Sun Aug 7, 2016, 11:45 AM

8. Truth question.

"Should the American electorate have to put up with purposeful distortions of reality designed to deprive voters of the truth?"

I wish it wasn't the case, but we've had AM talk radio and FOX News for years.

I honestly wouldn't care so much about the right-wing attack machine EXCEPT for their frequent dishonesty! When people make appeals for the return of "The Fairness Doctrine" in our media, I'd argue that we more need of an "Accuracy Doctrine." Of course, it's then a debate of who decides what's inaccurate, what's an intentional falsehood, etc.. Ugh, it saddens me. I suppose that better education is the best counter-attack.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread