2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhen will the media honestly explain the amount of taxes actually paid by our corporations and
businesses? When will they be honest about anything?
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)unblock
(52,205 posts)so, don't hold your breath, sorry to say.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)Disclosure agreements don't permit it.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)So, I think the answer is no!
Remember, too, that Chuck Todd said that it's not his ("journalists" responsibility to factcheck or hold lying politicians accountable.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... for the sake of democracy. Public schools, libraries, government-funded newspapers (through the postal system), etc.
Socialists!
rjsquirrel
(4,762 posts)I was taken aback.
lapucelle
(18,252 posts)for years Senator Sanders frequently and powerfully explained the difference between actual corporate tax rates and nominal corporate tax rates. Bernie was brilliant at clarification. I hope we hear from him nationally on this issue. It's great op-ed topic for the firebrand from Vermont.
procon
(15,805 posts)They ask about feelings. They ask about likability. They never challenge anything or ask deeper questions. Who needs 'em? No, seriously, the media could save a fortune by getting rid of all their so called reporters, and just let the vidographer stand there for 60 seconds and film whatever BS the politicians want to say.
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)for the first time in years because of the Olympics and Tom Foreman actually explained it very clearly more than once.
Though the tax rate for business is 35% plus state and local taxes of about 6%, the average business tax paid is more like 12.6%, because of deductions and tax credits. Meanwhile, 2/3rds of American corporations have no tax liability at all! Also America does not have the highest business tax rates in the world, it is more like the 16th among developed nations.
I was pretty impressed with how he explained it, as I actually remembered it all! This high American business tax BS has been floated around by Republicans for a long time, with it rarely being challenged.
glennward
(989 posts)I'd be for lowering the rate to 25% or 20% if they got rid of all the write-offs, subsidies and loop holes.
PatSeg
(47,418 posts)understandable to the average person. I generally am not good at remembering statistics like that, but Foreman made it quite clear.
Both Bill Clinton and Elizabeth Warren are great communicators. Maybe Hillary should make Warren the economic explainer-in-chief. Before Warren was in the senate, she would go on TV programs and make economics actually interesting. She must have been an amazing professor.
Unfortunately, Hillary and Obama just don't have that gift and I'm not sure it can be taught. Meanwhile, however, it can be delegated to a gifted surrogate.
Response to glennward (Original post)
Shandris This message was self-deleted by its author.