Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBoston Globe: Hillary's email "scandals" are pure fiction. "Sound and fury signifying nothing."
https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/08/23/clinton-mail-scandals-are-pure-fiction/ryXZoEeqANOPSiL7O33QuJ/story.htmlTake, for example, the imbroglio over newly released e-mails regarding interactions between the Clinton Foundation and the State Department when Clinton was secretary of state. These exchanges, primarily between Clintons assistant Huma Abedin and Clinton Foundation top honcho Doug Band, have become Exhibit A in efforts to brand Clinton as a corrupt figure and the Foundation as a pay-for-play operation. The evidence, however, speaks to a different reality.
SNIP
The scandal here seems to be that people who gave money to the Clinton Foundation had e-mails sent to the Clinton State Department requesting favors that were repeatedly denied. Still, evidence has never been the key ingredient of a Clinton scandal. Optics and the appearance of scandal are always where the action has been.
The recent e-mail revelations illustrate the way the Clintons international network of friends and donors was able to get access to Hillary Clinton and her inner circle says the Post. All this adds to the controversy about major donors to the foundation getting access to other power players, says Politico. Or, as shown by the evidence, not getting access.
SNIP
That those questions were raised and answered in a way that exonerated Mrs. Clinton is seemingly secondary to the fact that questions had been raised. Even when cleared of wrongdoing, the Clintons cannot escape the ever-creeping shadow of the dark insinuations of their political enemies.
SNIP
Clinton is running for president and thus merits the scrutiny she is receiving. But the American people deserve an investigation into her record that separates fact from fiction and relies on evidence, not innuendo. So far, thats not happening.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1937 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Boston Globe: Hillary's email "scandals" are pure fiction. "Sound and fury signifying nothing." (Original Post)
pnwmom
Aug 2016
OP
Hekate
(90,560 posts)2. This goes well with the John Dean article on HRC being framed
http://www.newsweek.com/squalid-case-against-hillary-and-her-emails-492017
Someone else posted it earlier; I'm just passing it along.
Someone else posted it earlier; I'm just passing it along.
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)5. Yes, it certainly does. n/t
TwilightZone
(25,428 posts)4. Just like everything else they've tried to pin on her for 30 years.
This really shouldn't surprise anyone, especially those supposedly on our side.