Dont be surprised if the press turns on clinton soon

[agnostic102]

i was talking with my cousin the other day and he said when he goes to yahoo news or nbc news or politico etc he sees in hes oponion way more anti trump articles then anti hillary articles and he thought that was a good thing. I told him EVEN if that is the case which im not 100 percent convinced it is. at the end of the day THESE are big corps who make money of ratings. IF THEY SMELL blood about clinton they are going to turn on her. The press and media truely ONLY cares about there ratings not always reporting the truth.

[onehandle]

1. Have you ever seen the news? It's Trump propping and Clinton bashing, 24/7.

Last edited Thu Sep 1, 2016, 01:55 PM - Edit history (1)

They couldn't be more 'turned' on her.

[martin mike]

44. yeah

one wonders if the op actually does watch the news!

[nolabels]

47. I check the post counts when issues of concerns pop up

Course is it is a convenient place to ask about things like if the sky is really blue

[doc03]

2. I never noticed they ever turned for Clinton. The media is going to put that asshole in the

Whitehouse, look at yesterday Trump dominated all the networks and they play a few seconds of Clinton speaking to the VFW.
Trump has been pushing her health lately and honestly yesterday she looked awful.

[agnostic102]

3. doc

Please be careful of what you say about hillary negative wise. The freepers and consv pick up on ANYTHING liberals say agianst hillary. SO if we start a thread saying hillary "looked sick or awful" or whatever they will RUN with it. i dont mean so much on here but just on social media and places like twitter when things trend and hashtags and crap.

[doc03]

8. Usually Hillary looks very good for a lady her age but yesterday must have been one of those

bad hair days. You have to admit Trump won the day yesterday and it scares the hell out of me when I see
the poll numbers narrowing. Something else I notice Trump surrogates are everywhere like rats on the news and it seems there
are very few people out there defending Hillary, where the hell are they?

[niyad]

14. der drumpfenfuhrer won the day? granted he got unlimited coverage for his insanity. . .

and, what is so awful about how she looks here yesterday?

[doc03]

16. Well there is nothing I can say other than she looked just great or I will

be attacked for it.

[niyad]

18. you already said she looked awful. the question is, what is awful about her appearance

in this video?

[doc03]

25. In that video she just looks plain tired. I am about the same age and know I

would be dead tired if I worked the hours she does. But I realize I can't do as much physically or mentally as I could 10 or 20 years ago. Knowing my limitations at 68 I would rather see a younger person in the office than her of Trump. Whoever gets elected will be the oldest or almost the oldest person ever elected. Look what happened to Reagan according to reports the last 4 years Nancy pretty much ran things. A man or women got to know their limitations but apparently their ego won't permit that.

[niyad]

37. people of even the exact same age do not necessarily have the same physical limitations.

as others have said, your concern is noted.

[synergie]

20. You could just say you didn't care for her hair and admit that you're using sexist standards,

since Donnie has bad hair days all the time and no one comments. She's busy doing actual things, so she didn't have time for a blowout, she didn't look fatigued, tired, sick or anything else.

If you wish to comment on things like appearance, well ... understand your double standards and where they come from, but she didn't "look awful" she looked healthy, intelligent and energetic. You just didn't care for her hairstyle.

[doc03]

26. Who said Trump didn't look like a corpse with orange makeup and

the hair looks ridiculous.

[synergie]

40. Your posts suggests that her hair lends credence to all the attacks on her health.

[cwydro]

33. "Looks very good for a lady her age"?

Seriously?

[Demsrule86]

35. No he did not win the day and Hillary looked just fine.

Your concern is noted...so nice for women candidates to have their appearances judged constantly...

[annabanana]

32. I know.. concerning isn't it? . . n/t

[BobbyDrake]

11. Fixated on a female candidate's looks?

You're doing politics wrong.

[JCanete]

4. Yes, of course. They want a horse race, and they certainly don't want

an unopposed Democrat. Hell, if you don't have a horse race what are you going to talk about, issues? But at the end of the day, if it ever looks like Trump might win, the media will do its job and take him down hard. They work for the establishment, and he is a loose canon who is going to hurt stability. They don't want him in the White House.

[BlueInPhilly]

5. You mean they haven't yet?

Surprised your cousin only sees Trump negative opinions? Because there aren't any positives there! And the Clinton emails have been rehashed to death, they need to come up with new materials but nothing egregious has come out of her mouth yet.

[Democat]

6. You have a friend who told you that the press is anti-Trump and pro-Clinton

Is he a member of the Democrat Party?

[annabanana]

31. ^^this^^ . . . . . n/t

[Wellstone ruled]

7. What year did this happen?

This morning it sure is all about how the Con Job stuck it up the Mexican Presidents butt. Though it was Fake Noise or are they just reposting their crap.

[synergie]

21. It truly looked like the other way round, he was standing funny while the president berated him

and fact checked his beaten, defeated, cowardly ass.

[Wellstone ruled]

24. Just came back from a look at H-Post,

what the heck is going on over there. Looks like a Campaign site for the Con Job. Pathetic.

[Mike Nelson]

9. Soon...

...

[JoePhilly]

43. +1

[DURHAM D]

10. Are you kidding?

Please watch this clip from her press conference on April 22, 1994.

Note at 40 seconds she gets the "trust" question. This has been going on for more than 20 years.

[agnostic102]

12. good point

good point, the clintons have been bashed more then anyone in politics.

[NCTraveler]

13. You seem to have missed the last thirty years.

Soon?

[LiberalFighter]

17. They haven't for the past several months?

[we can do it]

19. Wen have they been for her?

[relayerbob]

23. You mean

they[re going to stop bashing her and giving her some positive air time?

[molova]

27. You are 24 years late

My friend.

[tavernier]

28. Soon????

She is their personal piñata. I honestly didn't think sexism would play into this election, but boy, was I wrong!!

[Tarheel_Dem]

29. They don't have to turn, they were never on Team Clinton from the start. No worries here. nt

[annabanana]

30. media is currently in 24/7 troll mode . "What does she NEED to do?"

"How can she counteract the 'trust' business?"
"Should she be more 'transparent'?"
"This could spell trouble for Clinton"

[Demsrule86]

36. concern concern and more concern

And of course she i.s not looking that well (she looked fine)... and for her age...blah blah...they are so obvious

[0rganism]

34. how will i know the difference?

will there be something added to the steady diet of tRump worship and email servers we're given already?

[arthritisR_US]

38. Turns on her? They've never been with her. Their double

standards, when it comes to the Clintons, has been on overdrive since the beginning.

[brooklynite]

39. yawn...

Too many people are worried about media conspiracies (which they can't control) as opposed to the candidate itself (which they can).

[DFW]

41. IF??

They did that in 1992. If the automobile industry could come up with a similar self-perpetuating energy source, oil would be 75¢ a barrel.

[workinclasszero]

42. Turn on her soon?

When the hell were they ever on her side?

[Mz Pip]

45. Soon?

It started years ago.

[Vinca]

46. If they turn on her, that means they'll start reporting positive stuff.