HRC should suggest MORE moderators at debates!

[ghostsinthemachine]

A fact checker. Sitting beside the stage fact checking in real time. A "pants on fire" graphic, etc.

Of course T rump would never go for it but it would make him look pretty lame if she proposed it. T rump could never agree to that, no how no way. It would take the fact checking heat off the chosen moderators too.

[metroins]

1. I agree with no moderators.

When I talk to people on the other side, we usually are cordial and end up agreeing on some topics.

A moderator is looking for sound bites and trying to compact complex topics into 2 minutes.

Today's debates are not debates.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

2. You understand that Trump would attempt to monopolize all the time....

....and throw out rumors, lies, innuendos in the hope anything would stick.

Do you know anything about Donald Trump at all?

[ghostsinthemachine]

3. Yeah

That would be crazy, no moderators? Whoa, that would be crazy.

[metroins]

6. I do. But in world politics there are no moderators

Our current debates suck, let the candidates show themselves.

Hillary can hold her own.

[Tommy_Carcetti]

8. I'm sure she could, if she could get an word in edgewise.

We're not dealing with two people of two equal minds and equally stable personalities.

Trump would literally attempt to talk the entire two hours non-stop. And yet have absolutely nothing to say.

[bettyellen]

5. Nope- it would be an ugly sloppy mess. Someone impartial needs to reign him in a little bit.

[metroins]

7. Real life is sloppy

And our current debates are only sound bites.

A healthy discussion is better. There's no moderators in real life.

[Thinkingabout]

4. I would like to see Joy Reid but Trump would refuse her.