Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lunamagica

(9,967 posts)
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 01:21 PM Sep 2016

MSNBC just asked if recent revelations by Powell will "effect" trump's surge in the polls

OK, my grammar is far from perfect, but then again I'm not a professional journalist and English is not my first language (and even *I* caught that).

Isn't anyone proof-reading anything before it airs?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC just asked if recent revelations by Powell will "effect" trump's surge in the polls (Original Post) lunamagica Sep 2016 OP
No. Each outlet will write one article about it molova Sep 2016 #1
"Surge?" Blue Idaho Sep 2016 #2
MSNBC has professional journalists? GeorgeGist Sep 2016 #3
They don't seem to care about hennything - least of asiliveandbreathe Sep 2016 #4
No. It's deplorable. Maru Kitteh Sep 2016 #5
it's not necessarily an error. RoBear Sep 2016 #6
There quite sloppy over at MSNBC. Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2016 #7
 

molova

(543 posts)
1. No. Each outlet will write one article about it
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 01:22 PM
Sep 2016

Then poof!

Hillary's issues generate daily, multiple articles, commentary, TV talk, etc. etc.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
4. They don't seem to care about hennything - least of
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 01:44 PM
Sep 2016

all, journalistic talent - lack of research, and NO credibility from the gate...affect - effect..who cares..they certainly don't - but then, I turned away from watching news local, or cable long ago - (seems much to the chagrin of some here) - oh well, just follow the $$$...

I give those at DU so much credit for gutting it out...

Maru Kitteh

(28,339 posts)
5. No. It's deplorable.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 01:51 PM
Sep 2016

English classes appear to have slipped away from the requirements for journalism degrees.

RoBear

(1,188 posts)
6. it's not necessarily an error.
Wed Sep 14, 2016, 03:29 PM
Sep 2016

To "affect" something means to have an influence on. To "effect" something means to cause. This was a continuing point of information for me when I was teaching Freshman English classes at the University here. God knows if they absorbed it, but there it is.

I do have to agree that if the speaker really MEANT "effect," it's extremely awkward phrasing, not to say misleading to most people. Considering that the "news" media gears their crappy workmanship to people with 5th grade educations, they should speak more clearly. However, considering their quest to skewer HRC on every conceivable fault they perceive (or in some cases, manufacture), you'd think they'd make an effort to speak more plainly.

I apologize for that paragraph's uppity-sounding language. I know I sound like an insufferable jackass, but sometimes, as Penny put it on Big Bang Theory, "a suitcase just won't do."

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSNBC just asked if recen...