2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIt’s already happening! Yes, Trump is closing in on the polls, but here’s why that’s meaningless
The numbers might show that Trump is inching closer to the White House, but the truth is he remains miles awayGARY LEGUM
As you read this, pollsters are preparing to release surveys conducted over the past weekend and its immediate aftermath, when Hillary Clinton made her accurate but perhaps poorly phrased comment about Donald Trumps deplorable fans, then nearly passed out at a 9/11 memorial service in New York before revealing she had been trying to power through a case of walking pneumonia. This allowed the media to start reporting on rumors about her health, which had previously been the province of the right-wing fever swamps from which Trump has drawn much of his support and campaign staff.
In other words, the news of the moment will likely result in some polls at both the national and swing-state level that do not look so good for Clinton. Hey look, it is already happening!
These polls will lead partisans to add to an already-vibrant chorus of grumbling about Clintons inability to already demolish Trump and political writers who will tell you that the carrot-colored real-estate mogul has momentum. Hey look, that too is already happening!
This would all be a lot more frightening if the narrowing polls had not been totally predictable, independent of any caterwauling from the media about health scares and Kinsley gaffes. For we have now come to the Great Tightening, that point of every recent presidential election cycle when the candidates see their numbers in national and swing-state polls inch closer to each other. Predictably, this is being followed by the Great Freak-Out, when supporters of the leading candidate set their hair on fire and run through the public square screaming for water. But this weekends stumbles by Clinton are also why articles that claim Trump has momentum tell us nothing more than that the writer had a quota to fill for the day. Momentum is an overrated concept in national elections at the presidential level, especially this late in the game.
In 2012, for example, Mitt Romney was supposed to have momentum after he performed much more strongly in his first debate against President Obama than most people expected. During this years primaries, Bernie Sanders was said to have momentum when he won the Michigan primary, and again when he won Wisconsin a few weeks later.
-snip-
http://www.salon.com/2016/09/15/its-already-happening-yes-trump-is-closing-in-on-the-polls-but-heres-why-thats-meaningless/
madaboutharry
(40,206 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,835 posts)Yes and people on DU lit their hair on fire and pronounced Obama DOA. Election over.
sarae
(3,284 posts)Referring to Trump...
"hes got skin so thin hes liable to order an invasion of China if Panda Express forgets to include a fortune cookie with his take-out order."
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)and, sadly, probably not much of an exaggeration.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)Ligyron
(7,627 posts)and even then she'll prob be OK.
What I'm worried about are the down ballot candidates 'cause without a Dem Senate it will be hard to get anything truly worthwhile done.
Last edited Thu Sep 15, 2016, 10:03 AM - Edit history (1)
that could be next week the way his model has been trending. Right now it is 62.6% for polls only and 61.7% for polls-plus forecast...
Ligyron
(7,627 posts)It pays to be optimistic around here.
berksdem
(595 posts)I am typically optimistic but the thought of DT becoming POTUS has me on edge lately!!
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... models this year are all over the place CNN going back to 2004 when black voting in Ohio were outrageously suppressed
berksdem
(595 posts)is usually fire. I am not saying that HRC is dead in the water but I feel like her campaign needs to make a major shift in the eyes of the public. Her secrecy in the eyes of the voting public makes her look distrustful. Anymore these days I feel like the only liberal that believe Don the Con has a very real chance of winning this election.
This election is not in the bag and that is why we should all be working to GOTV. Don't underestimate the Trump folks...
sobenji
(316 posts)It's getting scary, but it's also going to make me work harder.
berksdem
(595 posts)that I am not the only one!
Most of my compadres believe this will be a landslide after the debates. I dont believe it for a minute. We can post every scandal and lie that comes from the Trump campaign - and you know what? It will do nothing to damage him in the eyes of his voters.
DownriverDem
(6,228 posts)but in the eyes of the rest of the voters it might make a difference. About the Ohio poll showing Trump up 5 points? CNN reporter that they under polled those under 50. WTF????????
catbyte
(34,371 posts)It's up to us to GOTV to ensure that there are more of us than there are of them at the polls on November 8, and to the polls before that day in states where early voting is allowed.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
Post removed
agree with this... although, right now that is not an option and HRC needs to win. Trump can't get to the White House.
book_worm
(15,951 posts)be the case right now when the media & Republicans would go into overdrive against him and his "socialistic" views which would raise taxes, etc. We can't go by polls that were from months ago to know what the result would be today. I believe Clinton will win just as I think that Bernie would win, too.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)R B Garr
(16,950 posts)until that happened. He was in an enviable but unrealistic position of not being accountable for any of his positions.
Response to DonViejo (Original post)
mark67 This message was self-deleted by its author.
berksdem
(595 posts)with the polls showing what they are today how do you predict a landslide?
Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)She starts with over 240 EC votes baked in. Trump needs a virtual sweep of the swing states to pull this off. Very unlikely.
National polls of the popular vote are not completely meaningless, but they are more of an indicator than a real data point.
Even with the polls this close, if the election was held now she would carry over 300-350 ECV easy.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)LS_Editor
(893 posts)It's all about how the states breakdown.
sweetapogee
(1,168 posts)to which candidate gets on message and stays on message.
A question to ponder is who at this point in time has control of the playing field?
Loge23
(3,922 posts)Perhaps the campaign is banking on the debates, as I am ever so hopefully.
Sadly, this country is easily fooled - see 2004, Election.
Through all of the lies and bombast, momentum is trending for the Racist candidate. Do the voters of this country have no shame?
The ramifications of a Trump election win will be devastating and not only to those of us who reject the hatred of the right, but also to many uneducated and under-informed Trump voters.
The SCOTUS situation will be long-lasting and potentially fatal to any notion of a truly free democratic nation.
I predict at least hundreds of thousands of people will leave the country, making it even harder to overcome the virus of intolerance and hatred that has infected this country.
Whatever the plans of the DNC and HRC campaign, it's clearly not working. We need a reboot but fast.
The prevailing negative image that Hillary is dealing with is based on lies and innuendo. Why can't the campaign present her in a more agreeable light? If they can't, we're screwed and screwed badly.
Does Hillary want this or not? It's time to show it.
You put into words exactly how I feel... well done
radius777
(3,635 posts)Kerry ran a much better campaign than Gore did, and made a clear enough case to the country that Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld was dangerous and had rushed into Iraq under dubious pretense. Kerry was not exciting (like Hillary), but (also like Hillary) was imminently qualified, a good debater (especially compared to Bush) - and yet the voters still chose Bush.
Kerry also had the benefit of the left being fully mobilzed and strongly behind him, having been burned in 2000 by Nader the left all vowed 'anybody but Bush' even though they may've not loved Kerry.
Hillary has issues with the left and with young voters, although she is certain to do much better with latinos (40% of whom voted for Bush, Trump is lucky if he gets half that number), blacks and women.
Ultimately Team H/Dems must get its act together or it will start to slip away. Trump's deplorables are highly energized, while our side is not. Obama, who is a great campaigner, is our secret weapon, who can rally enthusiasm and the youth vote in a way that Hillary cannot.
Loge23
(3,922 posts)NHDEMFORLIFE
(489 posts)Kerry's great flaw: He failed to forcefully respond to the swift-boat crap. He has admitted this countless times in the last 12 years. He thought it was so outrageous that it would just fade away. He was a Purple Heart winner, after all, and Bush had daddy pull strings to keep him out of harm's way, so people would be savvy enough to see through all the nonsense.
Fatal miscalculation there.
And, as horrible a president as Bush II was, incumbency has at least a small benefit, certainly one that comes in handy in a close election. Some thugs in Ohio helped him, too.
Hillary has been a punching bag for the past week, but once the dust clears Trump's big mouth and leaky brain pan will regain the media's attention. Actually, I think they already have.
radius777
(3,635 posts)in responding to outlandish rightwing memes that fester and eventually make their way into the mainstream media and wind up framing the race.
Clinton/Gore campaigns in the 90's are the exception to this. Carville/Begala et al had the 'war room' and they obsessively monitored the news/memes and responded quickly and effectively to everything. They were sharp and tough, and that is what is sorely lacking in Dems since then.
Team H has run a very mediocre campaign, they need to connect better with voters (throw more 'red meat' to excite the base especially), simplify and clarify the message, and most importantly - take back control of the media narratives.
tonyt53
(5,737 posts)Easy to take a poll around a state. But if the people responding are out in the middle of nowhere, then their response "encompasses" far fewer voters than a person living in a densely populated area. The state of OH is dominated by a some very large population centers. The more rural areas will vote for Trump. The population centers will vote for Hillary. She will have more votes and take the electoral votes. Same as PA
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)It seems people forget that.
There was a LOT of concern and then shit really hit the fan after the first debate.
Obama ended up winning by 4-5 points.
michreject
(4,378 posts)How did Bernie win?
I don't trust any poll.
muntrv
(14,505 posts)colsohlibgal
(5,275 posts)I think he could be getting a ridiculous share of the vote in serious yahoo states loaded with Bundy types.
Hillary should win in the important states with more big metro areas. She should but....maybe this nation is even more widely ignorant than I believe.
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)losing in most battleground states (and if her numbers somehow tank after the debates), then I'll panic. But right now, this is just noise. Elections aren't won based on the popular vote, anyway, plus she is actually polling slightly better than how Obama was this time in 2012 against Romney.
Monk06
(7,675 posts)This is the same pattern we will see this time and is in fact already trending in the same direction
Now everyone can just calm the fuck down Expect a lot of give and take in the next six weeks but Trump is going to die after the debates
He knows is that is why he's trying to control the moderating