2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum538: Trump Now Has 44.5% Chance of Winning Election
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=rrpromo#plusOh, don't worry: I'm not concerned. Not at all. I'm merely fucking terrified!
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)...
George the Retiree
(50 posts)Hopefully you, DU, and I will still be here 6 months from now.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Doctor Jack
(3,072 posts)jcgoldie
(11,625 posts)I saved it on my phone and have a feeling I'll be spreading it liberally
GoDawgs
(267 posts)susanna
(5,231 posts)Dem2
(8,168 posts)Y'all keep us entertained tho.
unblock
(52,164 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)A new national poll has her back up to +5. And same for Florida.
George the Retiree
(50 posts)instead of making chickenshit insinuations.
LAS14
(13,777 posts).... today with Hillary ahead in FL 44.6 to 39.6. There's just a one point difference tipping FL to light pink in 538. If they include this poll (haven't at this point) maybe things will tip in a better direction. Something to watch, anyway.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512429553
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)of the trendlines on those polls.
It's major methodological error on Silver's part imo
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)triron
(21,988 posts)latest estimates are mostly resulting from an Ipsos 50 state online poll which for instance said Trump was winning Florida and Pennsylvania was too close to call plus supposedly Trump was winning in NM and Colo.!
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)But there is an ~2 point reduction in her average numbers in FL due to trend line subtractions. Pitches that state from blue to red.
triron
(21,988 posts)your other post in regard to this. I agree Silver has a questionable approach if that is what he is doing.
Wang is at 81% (which caught me by surprise) but don't think he has plugged in the latest Florida nor the NBC GE polls today
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)and some not so great new stuff got in. He predicted this about a week ago. It may stabilize at this level, or not. One week of solidly bad polling is hurting us all over.
I think the "right" number is probably where Predictwise has it. I am coming to trust markets more and more on this.
Nate's a smart guy, but he puts so many parameters in his model it's impossible to fit properly.
He's been doing this for 3 elections now. He really only has 3 data points on which to validate his model. But he has a zillion parameters.
You just can't fit statistical models like that.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)anyway...take a look at this site
http://www.nytimes.com/section/upshot
Then scroll down to the article go to the article - 2016 Election Forecast - who will be President..I had the same reaction as you - I have 538 on call..LOL -
Then I read upshot at NYT.....
I have already looked into moving to Ireland..too rainy...it's going to be okay..she said....
George the Retiree
(50 posts)RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)George the Retiree
(50 posts)I'm retired, having worked all my life till the day I hit 65. I served a stint in the military. I will thank you not to impugn my character. Good day.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)RonniePudding
(889 posts)Cattledog
(5,914 posts)book_worm
(15,951 posts)both state and national. Two polls out of Florida today both give Hillary a five point lead.
saltpoint
(50,986 posts)coverage of Trump's having used charitable contributions to cover his legal fees.
That and his getting his sorry butt kicked all over the debate stage Monday evening.
I think the poll following those two variables could be quite clarifying.
still_one
(92,110 posts)polls that Nate had at the time. It didn't include the Florida poll which showed Hillary leading +5 points today by Mammoth, and that also had stein and johnson in the race.
Todays NBC national poll which also included stein and johnson had Hillary +5
Nevada had a Rasmussen poll having trump +3, but that isn't bad since Rasmussen over samples republicans in the poll.
All signs are pointing to a turn around after the media distorted anti-Hillary feeding frenzy from 10 days ago, which included misrepresenting and lying about the deplorable statement, the unequal treatment by matt lauer, and the insane coverage of the pneumonia incident. In addition, the illustrious press has been giving trump a free pass on everything from his foreign entanglements, his tax returns, and questionable charity and business ventures.
That is and will be changing this week, and I anticipate Hillary will hit it out of the park with the debate
Democat
(11,617 posts)I wonder why?
Demsrule86
(68,539 posts)She is up in PA...she will win.
radius777
(3,635 posts)I didn't believe his model when it said she had a 95% chance of winning, nor do I believe his model now showing Trump with a 44% chance of winning.
None of these website prediction models, imo, are as accurate or objective as the political betting markets, which since March have given Hillary about a 70% (it bounces around but always settles around this number) of winning the presidency. The trendlines are in her favor. I agree that Team Hillary needs to do much better than they have, but as long as she does good in the debates and they execute their strategy properly, she should win. Remember also that the past 2 weeks were probably the lowest point of her campaign, and she's still (even in Nate and other prediction models) holding the advantage.