Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 08:57 AM Sep 2016

MSM pundits, CNN and MSNBC, twisting themselves into pretzels trying to figure out how Rump wins.

It really is pathetic to watch. They all agree that Hillary has an electoral college, and probably popular vote, advantage, but just can't let go of that 'Rump can do this, if 10 things all come together perfectly,' meme.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSM pundits, CNN and MSNBC, twisting themselves into pretzels trying to figure out how Rump wins. (Original Post) MoonRiver Sep 2016 OP
Yeah Morning Joe panel gave him Wisconsin to get him to 270. Nt helpisontheway Sep 2016 #1
That despite them just having discussed how she is ahead there, in most recent poll. MoonRiver Sep 2016 #2
Hillary does need to come to WI to campaign herself --then a few good riversedge Sep 2016 #8
Yes, that makes perfect sense! MoonRiver Sep 2016 #9
He won't get Wisconsin. Demsrule86 Sep 2016 #19
Sometimes this is difficult to figure out. gordianot Sep 2016 #3
Hillary is the one spending millions in ad dollars stopbush Sep 2016 #13
The greed wants more and it seems to work. gordianot Sep 2016 #15
I think it's more about ratings = dollars bettyellen Sep 2016 #17
yes, especially when you consider that TV news in the US is pretty much a reality show JI7 Sep 2016 #21
Trust they will do everything in their power to help the Con Man liberal N proud Sep 2016 #4
My take.... Old and In the Way Sep 2016 #5
Wow, if you are correct, what a miserable joke our media has become. MoonRiver Sep 2016 #6
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2016 #10
Exactly, in the media age, they almost always radius777 Sep 2016 #22
The media today is about 5-10% news, and 90% commentary which they try to push still_one Sep 2016 #7
Social media participation is much higher than in 2004. MoonRiver Sep 2016 #11
True, but that is a double edged sword also. Not everything posted on social media still_one Sep 2016 #14
Didn't take them long to revert back. Iliyah Sep 2016 #12
I think I saw Jake Tapper adding extra states Blue Idaho Sep 2016 #16
Sam Wang triron Sep 2016 #18
The Trump talk is all about ratings. sarcasmo Sep 2016 #20

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
2. That despite them just having discussed how she is ahead there, in most recent poll.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:06 AM
Sep 2016

CNN same thing, basically. I flip back and forth, depending on my level of disgust, so I often miss key points of their delusional reasoning.

riversedge

(70,187 posts)
8. Hillary does need to come to WI to campaign herself --then a few good
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:47 AM
Sep 2016

surrogates.

Way back in Aug? the first time Obama and Hillary were to be together was to be in Green Bay WI. then a terroist struck. So it was cancelled.

Now they need to reschedule the stop.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
3. Sometimes this is difficult to figure out.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:06 AM
Sep 2016

M$M media would suffer greatly under a thin skinned authoritarian like Trump. I think it all comes down to political ad revenue. Give Trump a chance and encourage your random billionaire to float money on a lost cause.

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
13. Hillary is the one spending millions in ad dollars
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 10:42 AM
Sep 2016

and it gets her nothing but biased, negative coverage.

JI7

(89,247 posts)
21. yes, especially when you consider that TV news in the US is pretty much a reality show
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 01:02 AM
Sep 2016

these days.

i watch bbc and other foreign news media and you can tell a huge difference.

you aren't getting economists , foreign policy experts , etc to discuss and debate the policies of candidates .

Old and In the Way

(37,540 posts)
5. My take....
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:32 AM
Sep 2016

A Clinton/Kaine win will make life tough for the talking heads. Who wants to tune in and watch them talk about a competent administration that actual runs the country in a steady, predictable manner? Trump/Pence will provide all kinds of issues to talk about...idiotic missteps, disasterous policy decisions, unprecedented diplomatic buffoonary. Maybe even a criminal indictment of a sitting President, Which would you prefer if your making your living as a Washington political commentator?

radius777

(3,635 posts)
22. Exactly, in the media age, they almost always
Fri Sep 23, 2016, 01:48 AM
Sep 2016

choose to hype the more exciting candidate or storyline, whether Dem or Repub, whether qualified or not.

Remember that the media is in the business of ratings/viewers, and each reporter/journalist and talking head's career advancement is based on exciting or compelling stories.

still_one

(92,138 posts)
7. The media today is about 5-10% news, and 90% commentary which they try to push
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:44 AM
Sep 2016

off as news.

It is actually a con game intentionally or unintentionally perpetrated on the American public.

The poster child case of this was the swift boating of John Kerry, where the media took it upon themselves to incorporate the swift boat liars ad in a large number of their reporting back then, by continuously playing that ad as part of the "news", which gave the swift boaters free advertising.

The Hillary "is not likable" was a creation of the media for years, which started in 1993 when she introduced her healthcare plan. That plan was the Health and Security Act, and the media quickly embraced the term "Hillarycare", from the Hillary haters, in a similar way that the Affordable Healthcare Plan was replaced by "Obamacare".

Opposition to the plan was heavy from conservatives, libertarians, and the health insurance industry. A television ad, "Harry and Louise", was produced to rally public support against the plan, and the media was only too willing to accommodate.

In my view that is when the media's sexist colors were made quite obvious.

There is a doubt standard about a "strong woman", that bother them, verses a "strong man".

Hillary has been constantly criticized for years by the media as not "smiling, looking angry, always yelling or shrill". It is the not so subtle why the media has characterized her as the B word.

Is it any wonder after years of demeaning characterizations of Hillary by the illustrious media, that when pollsters ask about Hillary's likability, they numbers come in low?

It is the medias way of molding public opinion, and it is a form of indirect push polling.

It is these commentaries, that are incorporated along side news that distorts the whole picture. There was actually a time when television news' outlets spent most of their coverage on reporting news. Now they intersperse it with commentary and opinion.

What is the first thing done when a major event occurs? They start parading so-called experts, many times with hidden political agendas, to spew their opinions, which of course the public unquestionably eats up.

The invasion of Iraq was one of the most lethal examples of this.

It is way past due that the media start cleaning up their act. Gossip and rumors have taken over hard cold facts


MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
11. Social media participation is much higher than in 2004.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 09:51 AM
Sep 2016

The lying, corrupt MSM can't get away with their scams as much.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
12. Didn't take them long to revert back.
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 10:02 AM
Sep 2016

I honestly believe a lot of t-rump's presidential donations are lining the pockets of many media types.

Blue Idaho

(5,048 posts)
16. I think I saw Jake Tapper adding extra states
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 11:29 AM
Sep 2016

To get Trump to 270... it's getting rediculous.

No matter what - our job is to make the margin as big as possible. This election is in our hands along with Sec. Clinton. It's time we all put them to work!

triron

(21,999 posts)
18. Sam Wang
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 03:53 PM
Sep 2016

has hrc win back at 80% (Bayesian), going up again finally. Hope trend continues especially after 1t debate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSM pundits, CNN and MSNB...