Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

helpisontheway

(5,007 posts)
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 11:59 AM Sep 2016

History shows that candidate leading in polls prior to debate won the election

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-presidential-debates/do-presidential-debates-impact-election-outcomes-n653801

"The presidential debates are generally considered the last big opportunity to move voters before the election. They offer rare moments for Americans to do some head-to-head comparison shopping between two candidates on the same stage discussing the issues.

And yet, according to the numbers, the debates have done little to change the fundamental structure of recent presidential races. Looking at pre-debate NBC News/Wall Street Journal presidential polls and the final election results since 1992, there is only one campaign where the debate may have made a serious difference — 2000.

In every other case, the candidate that led going into the debates wound up winning on Election Day."
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
History shows that candidate leading in polls prior to debate won the election (Original Post) helpisontheway Sep 2016 OP
ummm I think the Supreme Court and Jeb made the difference in 2000 minoan Sep 2016 #1
It's great that Clinton is leading before the debates Democat Sep 2016 #2

Democat

(11,617 posts)
2. It's great that Clinton is leading before the debates
Sun Sep 25, 2016, 12:06 PM
Sep 2016

Let's hope that she can put Trump away during the first debate.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»History shows that candid...