2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumTPM: Trump Could Be in Big Trouble
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-could-be-in-big-troubleOur reporter Tierney Sneed spent the day reporting on the latest information on the Trump Foundation. We now have clear evidence of self-dealing in the payouts made by the Foundation and as of yesterday pretty clear evidence that Trump has used the Foundation to avoid paying taxes on income. The combination could spell real legal trouble for Trump, possible even criminal penalties. In short, you're not allowed to use a family foundation as a piggy bank or slush fund for tax avoidance and personal or business purposes. We've proceeded cautiously in what we know and what we don't. We've also tried to be cognizant of the fact that this is an area of criminal law where intent is critical - which is to say, ignorance of the law is a defense. That said, one top former IRS official involved in oversight of tax exempt organizations told TPM, "Once you see a pattern of that kind of egregious nature, you start to think if whether theres an appropriate criminal referral there." Here's the story.
Maeve
(42,279 posts)C_U_L8R
(44,997 posts)There's this and whole lot more still to drop on Donald's head.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)They are doing awesome job...
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)madaboutharry
(40,207 posts)Trump's foundation is a sham. It's a tax evasion scheme.
Also, a sign that this story is scaring them is that they are attacking the reporter from The Washington Post.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)ALBliberal
(2,339 posts)This would be an IRS agent's dream audit. I will deeply disappointed if the IRS doesn't open up some audits on Trump his businesses his kids and of course the foundation.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)of 3 years
unblock
(52,196 posts)but if they find something suspicious, they can go back much longer, maybe something like another 10 years.
ALBliberal
(2,339 posts)Three years from filing date is normal "statute of limitations". However there is no statute of limitations for fraud.
The Trump family and their businesses and foundation are very exposed for audit. They should all be very worried as should their CPAs and tax attorneys.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)MyOwnPeace
(16,925 posts)Campaign signs:
TRUMP FOR PRISON
2016
(Hmmmmm, wonder where I got that idea?)
JHB
(37,158 posts)Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)ALBliberal
(2,339 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)ALBliberal
(2,339 posts)Ligyron
(7,627 posts)otherwise they'll just deny all your exemptions.
eShirl
(18,490 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)a kennedy
(29,647 posts)and we ALL know she'll be able to kick his arse on this debate.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Who knows if Justice Dept and IRS opens an investigation...
SHRED
(28,136 posts)Then yes...maybe.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)He would have to admit that he was "too stupid" to understand that he couldn't break the law for several decades by using his foundation to evade taxes and buy himself crap paintings and flagpoles?
would open this Criminal Investigation?
kimbutgar
(21,127 posts)The public needs to start being mad about this.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Astraea
(467 posts)whenever Trump's name is mentioned. This is a MAJOR issue, and people who are electing the next President of the United States should know about it.
Gabi Hayes
(28,795 posts)than he does
didn't this come up at debate? I no watch
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)David Cay Johnston
?@DavidCayJ David Cay Johnston Retweeted #MediaHasFailedUs
I think you mean the tax of evasions that I dug up as well as Bill Bastone & Wayne Barrett long before xlent WashPost reports
https://twitter.com/DavidCayJ/status/780776132010475520
I also like him. Read his 2016 book on Trump: The Making of Donald Trump
SleeplessinSoCal
(9,110 posts)We can count on more from them and Assange. Isn't it wise to expose them to a wider audience first? A national audience and not just liberal websites?
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)The rich and the Republicans NEVER PAY FOR ANY MISDEED.
phallon
(260 posts)MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Oh every week investigation being reported... this dude is fucked.
Sunny05
(865 posts)Gothmog
(145,129 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Prosecuting the wealthy and powerful is definitely a down side for them of the intensely liberal principle that "all men are created equal."
Criminals should not run for president, even billionaires, making quiet settlements with the government impossible. Just more indication of Trump's obvious mental dysfunction. Bet his heirs have been sleeping badly for a long time now...
Hubris.
CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)trueblue2007
(17,205 posts)HERE
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/trump-income-charity-tax
A new Washington Post report this week presented cases where Trump directed third parties to pay monies owed to him or his businesses directly to the Donald J. Trump Foundation--monies that arguably should have been taxed as income to Trump.
The Trump campaign has said that the payments were all aboveboard and proper, and slammed the Post's reporter for trafficking in speculation about possible but not proven legal problems. All of this comes against the backdrop of Trump refusing to release his tax returns, a stance unprecedented among modern major party presidential nominees. Without those tax returns, the exact handling of the payments and any associated taxes remains murky.
But tax experts interviewed by TPM said the new revelations by the Post include a number of red flags. At best, the practice could be described as sloppy and driven by an extreme ignorance of the law, the experts said. At worst, it fits into a pattern of using the charity as a personal piggy bank. On their own, such allegations could be dealt with a minor slap on the wrist, but coupled with the Posts previously surfaced examples of Trump using foundation money for his own benefit they fuel major concerns about how Trumps charity has operated.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)One former IRS regulator told TPM that, taken all together, the financial dealings surrounding the foundation would have forced him to give some serious thought to recommending a criminal investigation into the foundations practices.
Once you see a pattern of that kind of egregious nature, you start to think if whether theres an appropriate criminal referral there, said Philip Hackney, a Louisiana State University Law Center professor who previously served in the IRS Office of the Chief Counsel as a senior technician reviewer for exempt organizations.
pansypoo53219
(20,969 posts)MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Bucky
(53,997 posts)oh... wait...
Madam45for2923
(7,178 posts)Rezzi1945
(16 posts)Drumpf 's comment that he's smart coz he didnt pay taxes was a stinging insult and verbal abuse to the tens of millions of hardworking Americans who earn far less than he does but still somehow manage to pay taxes... it proved that he's unfit to serve as POTUS!!...
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)No investigation? Why?
Hekate
(90,643 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)election will be decades over and senior trump gone, died from old age by then.
Ligyron
(7,627 posts)and his fans will love him for it.
bigbrother05
(5,995 posts)The payer can write off a charitable contribution at 100% vs. listing it as a business expense. Trump avoids paying any taxes on the income, but appears to have gotten direct benefit from the Foundation paying personal and business debts out of their funds. Looks like a lot of potential for forensic accountants to rip him, his businesses, and the foundation to shreds.
Sounding like RICO charges beyond the tax issues. Pablo Escobar thought he was smart too.
treestar
(82,383 posts)napkinz
(17,199 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)breathless wondering "will this sink Hillary's chances?"
dae
(3,396 posts)vi5
(13,305 posts)Everything that comes out is just a lie from the liberal media and "the haters".
I'm not saying it shouldn't come out and be reported on, I just wouldn't count on it having any impact on his voters or his numbers or the polls or whatever.
Wounded Bear
(58,645 posts)You're right, they won't care, and will probably think of it as some kind of bizarre positive.
It's the middle, undecideds that need to have this info force fed to. Trump is obviously a crook, and that needs to be proven in the press.
ginnyinWI
(17,276 posts)The "Trump Family Crime Organization".
onlyadream
(2,166 posts)If Trump has been audited none stop, shouldn't this have come out years ago? Was there a payoff for a blind eye?
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)TonyPDX
(962 posts)Nitram
(22,791 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,127 posts)Only for insider trading, and then only when they look hard and
it's not a good ol' boy Wall Street favorite.
Are any Bankster Gangsters in jail? What was the last one, one of the
Enron understudies? Did Ken Lay do time? The Keating Five Senators?
Worldcom? And any of those were for financial crimes. Charitable entities
have more leniency. Chris Christie is still in office.
They bagged very few. Senator Harrison Williams in Abscam, a Democrat.
Martha Stewart. The former Kmart CEO Conaway got off for a fine I think.
So I'm not optimistic this Foundation investigation is going anywhere.
MyNameIsKhan
(2,205 posts)Any investigation will happen after elections.
strategery blunder
(4,225 posts)Bernie Madoff was an example.
Trump effectively blew up the Republican party electorally by exposing its basket of deplorables for all to see. The party insiders (who include a lot of elite CEO types) are not very happy with him about that.
I'd not be surprised to see Trump "allowed" to become a sacrificial lamb to appease public anger about the inequality of justice in America. They might actually be willing to throw him under the bus and allow the DoJ to do its job.
bucolic_frolic
(43,127 posts)Madoff was a financial crime, and too widespread to ignore.
I think Trump would get the deference usually afforded to the rich,
a fine and slap on the wrist. To go full throttle would be viewed as
too partisan. Or maybe I'm just too cynical, we'll see how it plays out.
This stuff sounds like Leona Helmsley. She got caught by subcontractor billing
to her hotels for work on her home. Contractors had - guess what? - difficulty
collecting their payments.
Ironically the US Attorney prosecuting that case was - Rudy Giuliani.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leona_Helmsley
Kablooie
(18,625 posts)UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)before the election
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Maybe this time it'll be different
StevieM
(10,500 posts)ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)but are keeping it quiet. Then... POW