Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

pnwmom

(108,976 posts) Tue Sep 27, 2016, 09:08 PM Sep 2016

Reports say in the first 25 minutes he interrupted her 26 times.

So why are any pundits claiming that he did well in the beginning, and only afterwards things fell apart?

I doubt that he gained many new WOMEN voters in that first third of the debate.

I found myself clapping the second he dismissed profiting off the millions of people who lost their homes during the housing crisis. That wasn't a good look for him.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Reports say in the first 25 minutes he interrupted her 26 times. (Original Post) pnwmom Sep 2016 OP

He became increasingly incoherent BainsBane Sep 2016 #1

BainsBane

(53,031 posts)

1. He became increasingly incoherent

Reply to pnwmom (Original post)

Tue Sep 27, 2016, 09:09 PM

Sep 2016

In my view he didn't do well at the beginning, but he fell apart as the debate wore on.

Reply to this discussion