Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 03:09 AM Sep 2016

Hillary Clinton is now the only candidate not pandering to the anti-vaccine movement

Hillary Clinton is now the only candidate not pandering to the anti-vaccine movement
Updated by German Lopez @germanrlopez german.lopez@vox.com Aug 1, 2016, 1:30p

The science is clear on vaccines’ safety and efficacy. But the presidential candidates’ thoughts on vaccines? Well, they’re a mixed bag.

Over the past week, Green Party candidate Jill Stein — who’s a medical doctor by trade — entered the heated political debate over vaccines by suggesting there are still "real questions" about the medical devices that scientists say are generally effective and safe. She later added that she supports vaccines, but has questions about how they’re regulated.

The small blow-up put attention on yet another bizarre element of the 2016 election: Out of the four big presidential candidates, only Hillary Clinton seems to be fully pro-vaccine, meaning she’s the only one aligned with the scientific consensus on this issue.

http://www.vox.com/2016/8/1/12341268/jill-stein-vaccines-clinton-trump-2016
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton is now the only candidate not pandering to the anti-vaccine movement (Original Post) workinclasszero Sep 2016 OP
Jill is not anti-vaccine. She wants to regulate the drug companies. immoderate Sep 2016 #1
Jill Stein Continues Pandering to Anti-Vaxxers Major Nikon Sep 2016 #3
Wrong -- she is AT BEST using anti-vaxx language and talking points obamanut2012 Sep 2016 #5
yes she is. stonecutter357 Sep 2016 #6
She is anti vax workinclasszero Sep 2016 #8
No, she's an anti-vax asshat. nt Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #10
American election 2016: Democrats vs 3 fringe parties GoDawgs Sep 2016 #2
QFT---American election 2016: Democrats vs 3 fringe parties workinclasszero Sep 2016 #9
are anti-vaxers getting the new shingles and pneumonia vaccines? greymattermom Sep 2016 #4
Why the need for this? HockeyMom Sep 2016 #7
No, they're anti-all vaccinnes. Bunch of nutty dangerous asshats. Dr Hobbitstein Sep 2016 #11
 

immoderate

(20,885 posts)
1. Jill is not anti-vaccine. She wants to regulate the drug companies.
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 03:16 AM
Sep 2016

Does anyone else want to do that?

--imm

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
8. She is anti vax
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 11:05 AM
Sep 2016

She just dances around the subject because she doesn't want to lose the green party anti-science nutters.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
4. are anti-vaxers getting the new shingles and pneumonia vaccines?
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 03:24 AM
Sep 2016

and keeping up on their tetanus shots? Is anti vaccine only for kids, or do they include themselves? Is it only for babies, or do older kids get the HPV vaccine?

 

HockeyMom

(14,337 posts)
7. Why the need for this?
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 07:53 AM
Sep 2016

Very long but it does give CDC statistics. Shingles vaccination rates are the lowest of all, and that one is for older adults. There are many adults who vaccinate their children, but not themselves. Would you include adults who don't get their flu shots every year in the category of anti-vaxxers? That would be half the country then.

http://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/nvpo/national-adult-immunization-plan/naip.pdf




 

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)
11. No, they're anti-all vaccinnes. Bunch of nutty dangerous asshats.
Thu Sep 29, 2016, 12:12 PM
Sep 2016

You should see/hear the conspiracies they have about the HPV vax.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton is now th...