Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:37 AM Nov 2016

Clinton Strategist Karen Finney Blames Election Loss on Sexism from Bernie Bros

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/clinton-strategist-karen-finney-blames-election-loss-on-sexism-from-bernie-bros/

In an interview with CNN Newsroom Wednesday, Hillary Clinton senior advisor Karen Finney blamed the Democratic candidate’s loss on the fact that male supporters of Bernie Sanders made young women feel hesitant to express their support for Clinton online.

Finney was asked what factors she believed contributed to Clinton’s loss. “Electing the first woman president was always going to be tough,” she responded. “I think given the level of sexism and misogyny that we saw come to the surface and be very public, I think that supports the fact that in this country, we are going to have to have a real conversation about that.”

Host John Berman returned to that point a few minutes later.

“You said you thought that sexism and misogyny may have played a role in Hillary Clinton’s defeat… What evidence do you have that voters made their decisions based on sexism or misogyny?” he asked. “I think one of the things we never really had a conversation about– but again, I think going forward we should talk about– is how this country, how people feel about women in power,” Finney repeated.

“Some of my colleagues won’t like this, but I think even in the primary, some of what we saw with the Bernie Bros had a real chilling effect on a lot of women, and young women in particular,” she argued. “We learned about during the primary, there were a number of these secret Facebook groups of young progressive women who were supporting Hillary, but frankly they didn’t want to deal with the backlash online from some of the Bernie Bros.”


snip


video at link
160 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Strategist Karen Finney Blames Election Loss on Sexism from Bernie Bros (Original Post) Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 OP
I don't know if that actually played any part in losing the election radical noodle Nov 2016 #1
Disengagement of Indy/Rep/Bernie support during primary, V.P selection & co-opting. But, whatever. TheBlackAdder Nov 2016 #97
Most DUers OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #109
That is bullshit. lonestarnot Nov 2016 #2
Bullying is Not Bullshit otohara Nov 2016 #6
Not in the voting booth! Bullshit! Stolen maybe, but not bullied on the vote. lonestarnot Nov 2016 #9
Bet you had no problem with caucuses otohara Nov 2016 #13
Exactly. The caucuses were the ultimate exercise in peer pressure, pnwmom Nov 2016 #17
It still blows my mind how they continue to yell stolen otohara Nov 2016 #19
And they were so paranoid pnwmom Nov 2016 #28
The Primary wasn't stolen. Hillary won it. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #34
How do we know? What about the supporters pnwmom Nov 2016 #53
They didn't cause her to lose a whole ton of rural rust belt counties that Obama carried in '12. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #56
She lost by very small margins, and with depressed turnout due to voter suppression. pnwmom Nov 2016 #58
I do think voter suppression was a factor. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #62
she lost those states because the campaign treated them like safe blue states when they should have JI7 Nov 2016 #69
How do you know she lost PA fairly? They have a type of voting machine pnwmom Nov 2016 #78
i don't think she lost fairly but that was mostly due to comey, media and other crap. but i'm JI7 Nov 2016 #79
Hillary couldn't be in all swing states at the same time, and just 11 days pnwmom Nov 2016 #80
i'm not blaming her for that. i'm referring to regular GOTV efforts . and people in michigan JI7 Nov 2016 #82
Clinton loses 32 IOWA counties to Trump won by Obama in 2012 Omaha Steve Nov 2016 #112
Best point of this thread. Thanks, Warren DeMontague. The Wielding Truth Nov 2016 #155
bingo Champion Jack Nov 2016 #159
Proof that it is not bullshit pnwmom Nov 2016 #15
Mostly harassed by Trump voters. redwitch Nov 2016 #86
That group was the only thing that has helped me keep it together. JTFrog Nov 2016 #98
Wish I'd Known About This otohara Nov 2016 #105
race was more a thing than sexism JI7 Nov 2016 #3
The Racist Side of Bernie Sanders Supporters Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #8
I have never been a racist JonLP24 Nov 2016 #114
so you are calling the reporter and thousands of others Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #122
Some were. Here they stalked AA posters relentlessly ... bettyellen Nov 2016 #138
Race was more of a thing, for those that voted for trump, concern about the "browning of America" still_one Nov 2016 #21
Yes, why hack election machines when you can hack the election *process*? Beartracks Nov 2016 #38
Women can be just as sexist as men. athena Nov 2016 #94
A good article about that in History of Feminism right now. JTFrog Nov 2016 #99
are white women more sexist than non white women AND JI7 Nov 2016 #100
You're mixing up sexism and racism. athena Nov 2016 #107
that's my point. race plays a huge part in voting JI7 Nov 2016 #110
They are more easily co-opted into a patriarchal worldview, particularly when they are bettyellen Nov 2016 #139
Intimidated Into Silence otohara Nov 2016 #4
This is EXACTLY why so many of them refused to vote for our candidate when it came down to it. onecaliberal Nov 2016 #5
At a minimum that could be called a stretch. ... spin Nov 2016 #7
A stretch. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #10
I will totally agree that it's long past time for our first woman President. ... spin Nov 2016 #22
Bernie and Trump offered no change. sheshe2 Nov 2016 #12
I have been living in an alternate universe the last 8 years phallon Nov 2016 #14
what exactly do you mean? sheshe2 Nov 2016 #16
Trump will be the 45th President but the 44th President was not ... spin Nov 2016 #30
He could not. sheshe2 Nov 2016 #40
I agree that was a significant factor however ... spin Nov 2016 #50
your take makes me laugh my ass off. sheshe2 Nov 2016 #76
I know gun owners and the fact that gun control was not a significant factor ... spin Nov 2016 #85
"They ain't Christians. They are pathetic hypocrites." Yep - its laughable a lot are 1 issue voters. jmg257 Nov 2016 #104
from mediaite... tenderfoot Nov 2016 #11
it about a CNN interview, so bee ess back at you Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #18
Finney nailed it. nt SunSeeker Nov 2016 #20
Alot of fingerpointing, so little introspection. Everyone, prepare to get drubbed in 2018 Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #23
2018 (unless Trump implodes in fantastic way) is shaping up as a Senate bloodbath Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #24
The fingerpointing circular firing squad going on with the Democrats isn't fucking helping our Feeling the Bern Nov 2016 #25
I think everyone is still in a daze of anger still, and shock Grey Lemercier Nov 2016 #26
Agree. (nt) PotatoChip Nov 2016 #130
An astonishing lack of introspection. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #116
Yup n/t TexasBushwhacker Nov 2016 #152
It couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Hillary-the most beloved politician in the US, jalan48 Nov 2016 #27
Berniebros forced young Hillary supporting women to set their facebook groups to private Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #32
And, don't forget, the Bernie Bros forced young women to think about dates instead of politics. jalan48 Nov 2016 #35
Remember when Bernie went to the NY Times and Insulted Millennial Women? Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #36
You're on a roll. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #119
... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #118
Too intimidated to vote because of some assholes on Facebook. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #117
If it was only in Facebook, you'd have a point. This was at caucus sites and parties, bettyellen Nov 2016 #141
Say that's true, what prevented these women from voting on election day? SMC22307 Nov 2016 #148
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #89
well, who could have seen that narrative spin coming. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #29
I'm a year older than Hillary and I never could have endured a presidential ... spin Nov 2016 #31
I think trying to blame this on "berniebros" is beyond fucking ridiculous. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #33
I could be wrong but in my opinion this was a change election. ... spin Nov 2016 #39
I agree. And I think there was a combination of messaging and tactical errors by her campaign Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #42
There is no doubt that Comey did no favors for Hillary in the end. ... spin Nov 2016 #52
he knew exactly what he was doing, he had to. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #54
That does seem logical to me. ... spin Nov 2016 #71
Kellyanne, what if there is nothing there, what if there is no indictment? Raster Nov 2016 #115
Ding! Ding! Ding! TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2016 #129
I reckon Karen Finney should keep her opinion to herself. yallerdawg Nov 2016 #41
yeah, someone who is calling bullshit on a patently ridiculous narrative. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #44
No Hillary bashing? yallerdawg Nov 2016 #49
except there is actual objective evidence that gels with this explanation. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #51
Are you talking about the primary or the general? yallerdawg Nov 2016 #65
I suppose it could have, particularly if one buys the line that Sanders support was motivated by Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #72
This message was self-deleted by its author spin Nov 2016 #37
It isn't spin. Remember what happened to Barbara Boxer in Nevada? ucrdem Nov 2016 #46
And yet Hillary won Nevada. I'm pretty sure she won California, too. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #47
She won CA but it was a fight and shouldn't have been ucrdem Nov 2016 #55
Bill Clinton was apparently telling the campaign to focus on the rust belt, & they didn't listen. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #57
You're quoting something else. Please rephrase your question okay? ucrdem Nov 2016 #59
You claimed she was forced by berniebros to expend energy for the GE in California. Warren DeMontague Nov 2016 #64
Look I live here. I saw the effects of that disgusting melee in Nevada. It hurt the campaign. ucrdem Nov 2016 #68
She put some effort into CA during the primary Retrograde Nov 2016 #144
Nevada was always going to be in play. it leans blue but like wisconsin can easily go the other way JI7 Nov 2016 #66
Possibly but my point is that Boxer didn't help in CA because she got trashed in Nevada. ucrdem Nov 2016 #73
Jerry Brown didn't campaign for himself either , she had california because of the hispanic vote JI7 Nov 2016 #74
She should have had CA, but the support she'd been getting from Boxer and others including Brown ucrdem Nov 2016 #75
you are probably thinking of fundraisers. JI7 Nov 2016 #77
By surrogate support I mean media availability and campaign events. ucrdem Nov 2016 #84
That was part of the reason I picked Nevada's senate race to help.... bettyellen Nov 2016 #90
Disgraceful & Disrespectful otohara Nov 2016 #106
There were a lot of problems with the NV convention. aikoaiko Nov 2016 #132
lol, I know right? She is either 100% delusional, or deliberately misleading people. closeupready Nov 2016 #96
Sexism was a part of the equation, but not by and large from the real Bernie supporters. herding cats Nov 2016 #43
Amen!! Duppers Nov 2016 #61
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #45
Seems like pretty ancient history by now. BlueProgressive Nov 2016 #48
A reminder to not forget implementing the "Sanders Rule" before the next election? yallerdawg Nov 2016 #60
Sounds like a good way to keep the party from expanding. BlueProgressive Nov 2016 #67
OJFC! Duppers Nov 2016 #63
This silly shit again? Chakab Nov 2016 #70
Am I reading this data correctly to say.. aidbo Nov 2016 #91
No, you're not. Additionally, the mud slung at the Clinton campaign by Sanders, which was all Chakab Nov 2016 #92
Sexists living in Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan and Wisconsin. And Liz Warren? lostnfound Nov 2016 #81
REC.But the title is wrong. She said partly a factor. riversedge Nov 2016 #83
In other words Cobalt Violet Nov 2016 #87
My goodness BeyondGeography Nov 2016 #88
So it's back to bashing Bernie? Guess you have to blame someone. left-of-center2012 Nov 2016 #93
She is right about the addle brained male dudes on the so-called left, BUT duffyduff Nov 2016 #95
also covertly racist heaven05 Nov 2016 #101
One of several factors that tipped the scale, the Bernie Bros were definately a factor. Lil Missy Nov 2016 #102
Kinney should've listed the "Comey Factor" as being the number one cause oasis Nov 2016 #103
Guess that means she's off the hook. OrwellwasRight Nov 2016 #108
It was up to HILLARY CLINTON to make up the difference. She failed. Her team failed. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #111
Nice Try otohara Nov 2016 #113
If they were that "clever" it was up to her and her team to counter that. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #126
ONLINE assholes prevented women from getting their asses to the polls? SMC22307 Nov 2016 #120
Not just online: ucrdem Nov 2016 #121
I bet every one of those women voted. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #134
I hope so. But the point is that the intimidation was real ucrdem Nov 2016 #136
You're seriously trying to convince us that Brooklyn-born, bird-flipping Barbara Boxer... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #140
You don't think there was a target on her- and she declined because of concern there'd be more ugly bettyellen Nov 2016 #142
Boxer, a woman with an NRA "F" rating was *concerned* about.... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #147
After Nevada Boxer basically retired from the campaign. ucrdem Nov 2016 #143
So rather than campaign for Hillary, she chose to promote her latest book?! SMC22307 Nov 2016 #146
Can you blame her? ucrdem Nov 2016 #149
OK, so it wasn't *BernieBros*, but age, a newly released book... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #150
You do realize that her life was threatened in Nevada? ucrdem Nov 2016 #151
Blowing kisses, flipping the bird, and confidently walking off stage? SMC22307 Nov 2016 #156
Boxer: "It was frightening. I was on the stage and people were six feet away from me. ucrdem Nov 2016 #158
I like Ms. Finney a lot. But she's wrong here. rec, nT. Mc Mike Nov 2016 #123
So women are so weak and easily led in their eagerness to lick the feet of their boyfriends Ligyron Nov 2016 #124
Bernie would have been pulp after the first week. Don't delude yourself. KittyWampus Nov 2016 #127
Given the outcome, athena Nov 2016 #160
Oh good grief nt geek tragedy Nov 2016 #125
Not surprising that a HRC strategist blames others and not herself. aikoaiko Nov 2016 #128
Too bad, she is right. nt JTFrog Nov 2016 #131
Exactly. And who's the putz who gave us "basket of deplorables"? SMC22307 Nov 2016 #135
I felt Hillary was a weak candidate, too much latent resentment of the Clintons. Not Misogyny Denis 11 Nov 2016 #133
OMG-enough already with the lame excuses. jalan48 Nov 2016 #137
Clearly sexism is the main factor BootinUp Nov 2016 #145
Iraqi women managed to vote... SMC22307 Nov 2016 #153
Stop the presses! HassleCat Nov 2016 #154
And there it is. SMC22307 Nov 2016 #157

radical noodle

(8,000 posts)
1. I don't know if that actually played any part in losing the election
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:46 AM
Nov 2016

but I will testify loud and long that there were either Bernie supporters or people pretending to be Bernie supporters who harassed and intimidated Hillary groups and individuals all over Facebook. They were as bad as Trump supporters with a great deal of anti-Hillary lies. I'm not sure I feel like it necessarily changed the vote but I know a lot of women went behind closed doors to post after a while which I believe is one reason people thought there was no enthusiasm. There were a lot of enthusiastic supporters for Hillary, but we just got tired of the constant battering.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
97. Disengagement of Indy/Rep/Bernie support during primary, V.P selection & co-opting. But, whatever.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 12:38 PM
Nov 2016

.


I emailed an analysis of what appeared to happen for posting, from a neutral poli-sci standpoint, when the site was under initial repair. After the submission and a follow-up inquiry as to why it was not posted, it remained unpublished.


I am not going into further detail, as it will probably be flagged for takedown. What's really the point now?


If that's is the result of the failed introspection into the 2016 campaign loss, there is little hope for repair.


.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
109. Most DUers
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:39 PM
Nov 2016

seem to think the party does not need to change anything. There's nothing to learn and only people to blame.

And I guess it is fun to pretend that all Bernie supporters are dudes. They are not.

https://theintercept.com/2016/01/31/the-bernie-bros-narrative-a-cheap-false-campaign-tactic-masquerading-as-journalism-and-social-activism/

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
6. Bullying is Not Bullshit
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:59 AM
Nov 2016

Of course I wouldn't expect a bully to own up but one doesn't have to look far to find how horrible it was for female supporters.

And the memes my God deplorable

Good on Karen for speaking out



 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
13. Bet you had no problem with caucuses
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:46 AM
Nov 2016

In blue Colorado mere 127,000 participated because it's voter suppression at its worst. What a clusterfuck. Shoved into teeny classrooms cat hear shit. Hill won our room then some Sanders guy with a pen and clipboard talking about a weird rule math equation and Sanders ends up the winner? Whuuut the fuck?

Million registered Dems here what happened to a million voters? Large groups of voters unable to spend 4 hours with people you don't know. Can't vote in the privacy of your own home like every god damn election we have including municipals.

Spare me there's an article one The Nation (who endorsed Sanders) if anyone lost millions of votes, was her.

Volunteers from three candidates did not pull off stealing 3.4 million votes. But in caucus states like mine I can easily show you how one million people could not vote. Colorado has the highest voter participation in the country

It's exactly how Obama won in 08 low voter turnout. Hillary again did better in states where people are allowed to vote. All day long Not during a specific inconvenient time when most people are preparing dinner. All the ladies in my aunts assisted living home who wanted to vote for Hillary couldn't go. PM workers the list goes on and on.

She didn't whine or complain. Here's the article read it FACTS. Oh and by the way 4 states will no longer have caucus including Colorado. People were furious.

https://www.thenation.com/article/the-democratic-primary-wasnt-rigged/

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
17. Exactly. The caucuses were the ultimate exercise in peer pressure,
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:54 AM
Nov 2016

with the Bernie guys doing their best to take over.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
19. It still blows my mind how they continue to yell stolen
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:58 AM
Nov 2016

My Millennial was all into conspiracy Bullshit for years

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
28. And they were so paranoid
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:35 AM
Nov 2016

that as we waited the FULL HOUR just to go inside the caucus rooms, they were trying to get people to take photos of their ballots on their cell phones -- so there would be proof of how people voted. Then we went inside and sat around tables where all the ballots were counted in full view of everyone. No paranoia turned out to be necessary.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
34. The Primary wasn't stolen. Hillary won it.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:47 AM
Nov 2016

But she also lost the GE. It wasn't the fault of those all purpose villian "berniebros", FFS.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
56. They didn't cause her to lose a whole ton of rural rust belt counties that Obama carried in '12.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:22 AM
Nov 2016

Hell, if we want to go into speculative narrative territory, maybe the fact that DWS was such an awful front person for the campaign who spent months doing terrible moves like going to the Times and insulting millennial women, maybe that hurt us in FL, where we lost by about a percentage point?

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
58. She lost by very small margins, and with depressed turnout due to voter suppression.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:27 AM
Nov 2016

How do you know that the Bernie-write-in campaign didn't further depress Hillary's vote count in PA?

http://www.theskanner.com/opinion/commentary/24576-op-deny-70-urges-voters-to-write-in-bernie-sanders

Here’s what Op Deny 270 says in a letter they sent to The Skanner News:

“There are 10 states in which no prior registration is required for write-ins to be counted for Bernie Sanders. These states are Vermont, Oregon, Washington, Iowa, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Alabama, New Jersey.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
62. I do think voter suppression was a factor.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:34 AM
Nov 2016

As to your question, it seems there were 732,635 write-in votes cast nationally. Nationally, as in all 50 states total.

My guess is most of them were cast either for Harambe or Deez Nuts, but since official tallies are hard to come by, we may never know.


For the rest of it, I think trying to blame this loss on "berniebros" is ridiculous. Period. Full Stop. Predictable, though.


People want to do it, hey, who am I to tell anyone what to expend their energy on. Knock your bad selves out.

JI7

(89,246 posts)
69. she lost those states because the campaign treated them like safe blue states when they should have
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:40 AM
Nov 2016

put more resources into it.

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
78. How do you know she lost PA fairly? They have a type of voting machine
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:52 AM
Nov 2016

that computer scientists at Princeton proved could be easily hacked, without leaving traces. And these machines can't be audited because they leave no paper trail.

JI7

(89,246 posts)
79. i don't think she lost fairly but that was mostly due to comey, media and other crap. but i'm
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:55 AM
Nov 2016

specifically talking about what the campaign itself had control over and could have done.

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
80. Hillary couldn't be in all swing states at the same time, and just 11 days
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:17 AM
Nov 2016

before the election the polls had her substantially ahead in Pennsylvania. The numbers dropped after Comey dropped his bomb. She shouldn't be blamed for not anticipating that.

JI7

(89,246 posts)
82. i'm not blaming her for that. i'm referring to regular GOTV efforts . and people in michigan
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:23 AM
Nov 2016

said they asked for help and they were dismissed by the campaign.

pnwmom

(108,974 posts)
15. Proof that it is not bullshit
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:53 AM
Nov 2016

is that when a couple women decided to make a "secret" FB group to talk about how Hillary inspires them, the membership went from 2 to 600K in a couple weeks, and it's at about 3.7 million now, four weeks from when it started.

These are all Hillary supporters who came together in a group that doesn't show on searches, and you can only join by invitation, because they were tired of being harassed online for supporting her.

redwitch

(14,944 posts)
86. Mostly harassed by Trump voters.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 06:03 AM
Nov 2016

Family and colleagues and friends. I belong to that group and that is my take on it.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
98. That group was the only thing that has helped me keep it together.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 12:56 PM
Nov 2016

I was actually kind of glad that DU was down for so long because that group is absolutely amazing. I am so thankful to all the people who have been there for each other.

This place is right back to where Skinner said he didn't want it. But I'm sure that comes as no surprise to many of us.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
105. Wish I'd Known About This
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:09 PM
Nov 2016

instead I deactivated Facebook until after the primary - silly me thought the hate would subside after Hillary won, but the RIGGED claims kept coming. The bullshit Hillary hate never stopped.

Now I'm off for good.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
8. The Racist Side of Bernie Sanders Supporters
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:01 AM
Nov 2016
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/05/26/the-racist-side-of-bernie-sanders-supporters.html

For decades, one narrative has dominated American politics: That while white liberal Democrats may not be perfect, they are far more trustworthy and far less scary when it comes to race than conservative Republicans. The backers of Bernie Sanders’s never-ending kamikaze campaign remind us of an older truth: that there are good people and terrible people in both parties and that Republicans do not have a monopoly on intolerance.

Donald Trump has without question run one of the most racially and ethnically divisive presidential campaigns in recent memory. So much so that as former Senator Bob Bennett lay dying, he asked his loved ones if there were any Muslims in the hospital. His reason? So that he could go up and apologize to each one of them for Donald Trump.


snip

While high-profile Republicans step forward to denounce one of their own and to argue that minorities should be treated with courtesy and respect, plenty of white progressives seem intent on putting us in our place, so to speak, and keeping us there. Though much of the media coverage of so-called Bernie Bros—overzealous, predominantly white, young, and male Sanders supporters—has focused on their treatment of female journalists online, their lack of respect for racial and ethnic minorities who deign to challenge Sanders has been perhaps more chilling.

The Washington Post noted that at one point #MississippiBerning became a hashtag used by Sanders supporters on social media—a witty and clever turn of phrase unless of course you are a black American who hears the words “Mississippi burning” and immediately thinks of church bombings and lynchings.

Black writers and activists who have had the temerity to challenge Sanders’s record have been targeted by his supporters in ways that go against not just civility but even decency. I should know. I’m one of them. For having the gall to share my perspective, buoyed by polling data, that self-described socialists are pretty much unelectable to the American presidency, his supporters attempted to harass me offline. (Emphasis on “attempted.”)


snip

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
114. I have never been a racist
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 10:04 PM
Nov 2016

I have challenged many racists here at DU going back to 2008 (some of those were PUMAs) but I supported Bernie Sanders.

The idea that he or his supporters are racist sounds like a smear to me.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
122. so you are calling the reporter and thousands of others
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:43 AM
Nov 2016

who have been attacked online liars? I NEVER said all Sanders supporters were racist, but some unfortunately are.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
138. Some were. Here they stalked AA posters relentlessly ...
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:28 PM
Nov 2016

As well as feminists. There wasn't a lot to distinguish the attacks when they were coming from Trump supporters, in fact they cribbed a lot of their script from the Bros.

still_one

(92,122 posts)
21. Race was more of a thing, for those that voted for trump, concern about the "browning of America"
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:06 AM
Nov 2016

Comey started the ball rolling 11 days before the election by providing the opportunity to the republicans in congress to LIE that the "email investigation was being reopened". MSNBC was the first network who grabbed that headline, and then proceeded to trot every right wing hack across their screen amplifying the same LIE. The other networks then followed suit.

That was the catalyst, and significant damage was done by that lie, along with the news media, and the fake news from Facebook and Google insuring maximum exposure of that lie.

But in the end, it was the self-identified progressives who refused to vote for Hillary that did the fatal blow.

Beartracks

(12,807 posts)
38. Yes, why hack election machines when you can hack the election *process*?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:53 AM
Nov 2016

The media is so dependably manipulatable.

==================

athena

(4,187 posts)
94. Women can be just as sexist as men.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:40 AM
Nov 2016

Doesn't anyone read anything about feminism? What is this crazy assumption that only men can be sexist?

People love to assume that sexism doesn't exist. That, in fact, is in itself sexist. To someone who believes deep down that women are second-class citizens, it is not sexist that women are treated as second-class citizens. It's completely natural and acceptable.

DUers may scream all they want that this election was not about sexism. A hundred, two hundred years from now, historians will not have the sexist hangups that men and women are drowning in today. They will see what happened very clearly, and they will look down on us for being so bigoted against women.

 

JTFrog

(14,274 posts)
99. A good article about that in History of Feminism right now.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:02 PM
Nov 2016

I am just flabbergasted that this shit still needs to be explained on a Democratic website.

athena

(4,187 posts)
107. You're mixing up sexism and racism.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:25 PM
Nov 2016

Nonwhite people tend to vote overwhelmingly Democratic. So it's not surprising that they voted for Hillary in larger numbers than white people.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
139. They are more easily co-opted into a patriarchal worldview, particularly when they are
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:31 PM
Nov 2016

Surrounded and their survival in that environment depends on supporting it. You should ask Priyanka about this, it's part of her field of study.

 

otohara

(24,135 posts)
4. Intimidated Into Silence
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:54 AM
Nov 2016

Shit parents were intimidated.

Being called every nasty name they could think of was fare game. And the memes were disgusting.

I have a great article to post tomorrow that addresses the abuse and online bullying millions suffered.

So glad it's finally coming out.

onecaliberal

(32,816 posts)
5. This is EXACTLY why so many of them refused to vote for our candidate when it came down to it.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:57 AM
Nov 2016

The verbal attacks and accusations kept coming even when the primary was over. I do not agree with what they did in any way. But this stupid bullshit needs to stop or we will continue to lose. People are OVER the top fed up.

spin

(17,493 posts)
7. At a minimum that could be called a stretch. ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:59 AM
Nov 2016

Hillary was definitely well qualified but she does lack charisma. In the modern age charisma obviously trumps charisma (no pun intended).

Bernie had charisma in spades and while Trunp is an asshole he managed to win the electoral college. Trump and Bernie offered change while many seen Hillary as the establishment candidate and this has been described as a change election.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
10. A stretch.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:17 AM
Nov 2016

Now it's 45 men and not one woman.

Republicans claim it's all about opportunity.

Democrats focus on outcomes - the proof is in the pudding.

"No, there's no sexism here. We let her run, right?"

spin

(17,493 posts)
22. I will totally agree that it's long past time for our first woman President. ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:19 AM
Nov 2016

Unfortunately it appears that it was the wrong time for Hillary. Now we are stuck with Trump.

I really feel Trump thought he would lose but now he is stuck with the fact that he won. Often it seemed that he was trying his best to give the election to Hillary. Perhaps he planned to launch a new right wing cable network. Who knows.

However I may still live long enough to see a female President but I have to take in consideration that I am now 70 so it better soon. I feel our nation will be ready for a female President after four years of Trump.

I hope and pray Trump works out well but I lack confidence that he will.



sheshe2

(83,729 posts)
12. Bernie and Trump offered no change.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:43 AM
Nov 2016

Just two more old white men, we have 45 of them now. So happy for the change....not.

phallon

(260 posts)
14. I have been living in an alternate universe the last 8 years
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 02:49 AM
Nov 2016

and had a paranoid aura that I was drinking the media koolaid

spin

(17,493 posts)
30. Trump will be the 45th President but the 44th President was not ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:41 AM
Nov 2016

another old white man.

If Obama could have run one more time he would have won by a landslide.

sheshe2

(83,729 posts)
40. He could not.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:57 AM
Nov 2016

She should have won by a landslide. She was the candidate, yet white misogynist men won the day, they preferred the white man that eats a tic tac and then grabs a woman's p**sy. Gawd bless Amerkkka.

spin

(17,493 posts)
50. I agree that was a significant factor however ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:15 AM
Nov 2016

there are other factors to consider that were in play. The combination resulted in the surprising result.

I will admit that I thought for certain Hillary would win in a landslide. So did a lot of other people, many who decided to avoid standing in a long line to vote. The media basically said Trump had no pathway to win the electoral college based on early voting and the polls. That is one of the factors in play during the final days of the election. Since Hillary obvious had the election in the bag why bother to even vote.

Another rarely mentioned factor is the Democratic Party's position on gun control. There are at least 80,000,000 gun owners in this nation and they saw Hillary and the Democratic Party as a serious threat to their Second Amendment rights. Gun owners are often one issue voters and a high percentage vote.

While Trump is obviously not a religious person many fundamental Christians felt Hillary would put enough liberal justices on the Supreme Court to turn it into a liberal court for the next several decades. They decided to hold their nose and vote for Trump as he promised to stack the court with conservative justices if he had the chance. In almost all cases fundamental
Christians are conservative.

sheshe2

(83,729 posts)
76. your take makes me laugh my ass off.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:48 AM
Nov 2016
Since Hillary obvious had the election in the bag why bother to even vote.


Sorry....she beat the p**sy grabber by 2 million popular votes. They did not stay at home.

Another rarely mentioned factor is the Democratic Party's position on gun control. There are at least 80,000,000 gun owners in this nation and they saw Hillary and the Democratic Party as a serious threat to their Second Amendment rights. Gun owners are often one issue voters and a high percentage vote.


Hmmm. I watched the debates pretty closely. Never saw this come up. I never watched Donnie spew his filth, did he say this? Are you making this stuff up?

They decided to hold their nose and vote for Trump as he promised to stack the court with conservative justices if he had the chance. In almost all cases fundamental
Christians are conservative.


Lol! So, what you are telling me is these devout Christians that are bigly conservative dropped all their Christian values to vote for a man that is a misogynist that sexually attacks women after chewing a few tic tacs, then grabs p**sy at will. He groped his own daughter on stage at the RNC. He had his hands all over her ass. He told Howard Stern it was okay to call her a great piece of ass. They did all of this for getting judges on the court? For what? Getting sexual predators like him put away???? They ain't Christians. They are pathetic hypocrites.



spin

(17,493 posts)
85. I know gun owners and the fact that gun control was not a significant factor ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:51 AM
Nov 2016

in the debates would make little difference to many. Many gun owners felt Hillary posed a threat to their rights and their minds were made up to not vote for her long before the Presidential debates. Many gun owners I know are conservative Republicans who simply refuse to vote for any Democrat period.

The NRA ran many ads on TV that constantly reminded gun owners of the importance of their weapons for self defense and freedom. The object wasn't to convince people who don't own such weapons to vote for to protect the Second Amendment but to insure many gun owners would show up and vote. It's my feelings that those NRA ads worked well.

Where I live at there are plenty of fundamental Christians. A large number I've talked with planned to vote for Trump even though they didn't feel he was a practicing Christian.

Oddly enough I have never run across an individual who stated that no woman should ever be our President. Of course that may have been their true feeling and they simply didn't want to mention it to a person they didn't know well.I'm certain that bias against women played a large role in the final result but in my opinion there were other factors in play.

Bias against women in power might even have played a role in turning out the fundamental Christian vote for Trumo.

I knew a fundamental Christian who refused to vote for Romey as in his opinion the Church of Latter Day Saints is a cult. Unfortunately I lost contact with him so I don't know who he voted for this time. I know that he would not permit his wife or daughter to wear pants or dresses So I doubt that he would vote for a woman as President. He eventually ended up divorced when his wife found he had been messing around with a woman he worked with. Don't kid yourself. There are a lot of religious hypocrites to be found. I tend to be more careful when I deal with a person who claims to be a devout Christian from the lessons I have learned in the past. To be fair I have known some people who were Christians who won my admiration and full respect because of their high moral values and their generosity and help for others.



jmg257

(11,996 posts)
104. "They ain't Christians. They are pathetic hypocrites." Yep - its laughable a lot are 1 issue voters.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:55 PM
Nov 2016

Just like gun owners.

It is funny, but abortion & gun rights matter to a lot of people. Especially in the rural areas.

Gun rights did come up in the debates, and Hillary botched it (mis-represented the Heller decision). And the NRA dedicated almost a whole magazine referencing it and her stances, along with all the social media covering the issue.

The abortion thing would be more anecdotal, but I gather quite a few women didn't vote Hillary because of it.

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
23. Alot of fingerpointing, so little introspection. Everyone, prepare to get drubbed in 2018
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:20 AM
Nov 2016

and lose again in 2020 until shit begins to change. This fingerpointing bullshit is annoying.

Next, she lost because of bicycle riders and stale brownies.

No more fucking fingerpointing!

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
24. 2018 (unless Trump implodes in fantastic way) is shaping up as a Senate bloodbath
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:25 AM
Nov 2016

but if we bollocks up 2020 (census year), especially at state legislature level, we will be fucked for another decade due to further gerrymandering

 

Feeling the Bern

(3,839 posts)
25. The fingerpointing circular firing squad going on with the Democrats isn't fucking helping our
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:26 AM
Nov 2016

prospects in 2018.

 

Grey Lemercier

(1,429 posts)
26. I think everyone is still in a daze of anger still, and shock
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:31 AM
Nov 2016

Soon we need to get moving or the austerity-fascism/white nationalist steamroller will flatten us like cookie dough.

jalan48

(13,856 posts)
27. It couldn't possibly have had anything to do with Hillary-the most beloved politician in the US,
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:33 AM
Nov 2016

It had to be those bad Bernie Bros.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
32. Berniebros forced young Hillary supporting women to set their facebook groups to private
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:43 AM
Nov 2016

which, uh, directly led to us losing rural rust belt counties which Obama won in 2008 and 2012.

Clearly.

jalan48

(13,856 posts)
35. And, don't forget, the Bernie Bros forced young women to think about dates instead of politics.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:49 AM
Nov 2016

So says Gloria Steinem.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
36. Remember when Bernie went to the NY Times and Insulted Millennial Women?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:50 AM
Nov 2016

Oh, whoops, sorry, that was Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
141. If it was only in Facebook, you'd have a point. This was at caucus sites and parties,
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:34 PM
Nov 2016

Poker games and Dem meet ups. It was inescapable. And like trying to talk to fundies- only it was Wikileaks and Guccifer.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
148. Say that's true, what prevented these women from voting on election day?
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 03:51 PM
Nov 2016

Go to the polling station, stand in line, vote, and shut up about it.

"Poker games"?

Response to jalan48 (Reply #27)

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
29. well, who could have seen that narrative spin coming.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:38 AM
Nov 2016

Okay, if she really is that great of a candidate, run her again, then.

Sanders certainly isn't going to run again in 4 years. By then we should have straightened all this "berniebro" stuff out, amirite?

spin

(17,493 posts)
31. I'm a year older than Hillary and I never could have endured a presidential ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:43 AM
Nov 2016

campaign. I doubt if she will feel up to trying again in four years but then I could be wrong.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
33. I think trying to blame this on "berniebros" is beyond fucking ridiculous.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:44 AM
Nov 2016

but I could have set my watch by how predictable it would be.

spin

(17,493 posts)
39. I could be wrong but in my opinion this was a change election. ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 03:55 AM
Nov 2016

Unfortunately Hillary was viewed as the establishment candidate by enough voters to lose in the electoral college.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
42. I agree. And I think there was a combination of messaging and tactical errors by her campaign
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:05 AM
Nov 2016

Now I think Hillary overcame some natural skill deficiencies as a politician, grew as a candidate both in terms of performance and message, particularly during & after the convention. She as a candidate did a great job.

(And I am firmly convinced, despite this sort of bargle we've been subjected to nonstop for months, now, that having Bernie Sanders competing against her in a vigorous primary process caused her to hone her message and made her a better candidate)

But her own campaign and people down the pipeline in some of those rust belt states have acknowledged that there were problems. Major strategy and resourcing errors. Taking states for granted.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861

If someone wants to blame a single individual or event, I think a case can be made that Comey threw the election or seriously impacted the results. But to blame it on Berniebros, again...

Honestly, though, the minute I logged back on I said to myself "okay, how long before some folks try to blame this on berniebros?"

Predictable.

spin

(17,493 posts)
52. There is no doubt that Comey did no favors for Hillary in the end. ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:18 AM
Nov 2016

I still can't understand why he made the statements he did.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
54. he knew exactly what he was doing, he had to.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:20 AM
Nov 2016

and it was a gross break from protocol that said "don't do anything that might interfere with an election within 60 days of the thing".

He sent that letter to the GOP congress knowing full well that the Friday News Dump would be 100% "CLINTON INVESTIGATION REOPENED ANTHONY WEINER LOPTOP EMAILS TEEN SEXTING SCANDAL"

You could see the paroxysms of glee on Kellyanne Conway's face.

spin

(17,493 posts)
71. That does seem logical to me. ...
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:41 AM
Nov 2016

He definitely overstepped the boundaries and protocols his job with his last statement.

Raster

(20,998 posts)
115. Kellyanne, what if there is nothing there, what if there is no indictment?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:30 PM
Nov 2016

"Well, the damage is already done to Hillary Clinton..."

TexasMommaWithAHat

(3,212 posts)
129. Ding! Ding! Ding!
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 10:53 AM
Nov 2016

That is it in a nutshell!

I know people who voted for Trump who would have voted for Bernie if Bernie had been the nominee against a Bush or even Cruz.

And that attitude was commonly referred to as "sticking the middle finger to the establishment."

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
41. I reckon Karen Finney should keep her opinion to herself.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:03 AM
Nov 2016

Her bein' a woman and all.

Right, bruh?



You do know what you all sound like - don't you?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
44. yeah, someone who is calling bullshit on a patently ridiculous narrative.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:07 AM
Nov 2016

That's what I sound like.

She's entitled to her opinion, as am I. My opinion is, blaming this on "berniebros" isn't gonna fly.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
49. No Hillary bashing?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:14 AM
Nov 2016

And then a link bashing Hillary at a website that told us not to worry about the entertainer Trump at all. By a "pundit" eating crow every day now!

Karen Finney, no. This guy, yes.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
51. except there is actual objective evidence that gels with this explanation.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:17 AM
Nov 2016

Namely, the fact that we got clobbered in the rural rust belt.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
65. Are you talking about the primary or the general?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:37 AM
Nov 2016

Didn't Bernie do really well in those states up there near Canada?

If there was some residual sexist resentment from Bernie supporters - could that have impacted the results in the general?

Isn't this the point of Karen Finney's comment?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
72. I suppose it could have, particularly if one buys the line that Sanders support was motivated by
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:41 AM
Nov 2016

sexism.

OTOH, if one buys the line that Sanders support was motivated by a perception that he was speaking directly to economic concerns of people who felt HRC represented more of the economic same when they desired change, then that explanation would probably make more sense.

It would also be compatible with the fact that she did just fine in states that Sanders won handily that were not experiencing the same sorts of direct manufacturing job-loss economic distress, like Oregon. Unless people in the Rust Belt are somehow more preternaturally inclined towards sexism.

Response to spin (Reply #31)

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
46. It isn't spin. Remember what happened to Barbara Boxer in Nevada?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:09 AM
Nov 2016

She was booed and harassed like she'd wandered into an NRA convention and that was effectively the end of her efforts as a surrogate. In fact it was the end of just about every high-profile California surrogate's efforts on Hillary's behalf. She was on her own after that and it fell to Bill and Chelsea, basically her and Bill, to get out the vote in California. No wonder Bill looks exhausted. Anyway that's one example of how sexism damaged Hillary's campaign.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
47. And yet Hillary won Nevada. I'm pretty sure she won California, too.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:12 AM
Nov 2016

We can refight the primaries- I suspect some people enjoy it because it brings them back to the happy place they occupied a few months ago, or something - but that has jack diddly shit to do with why Hillary failed to carry a whole fuckton of rural rust belt counties that Obama won easily.

anecdotal tales of "berniebros" forcing young women to set their facebook groups to private didn't lose us the Rust Belt, either.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
55. She won CA but it was a fight and shouldn't have been
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:22 AM
Nov 2016

and she didn't get the surrogate support I'd been expecting. After the Nevada foodfight it fell to her and Bill and they had to waste time in a state that hadn't been in play. The Bernie crowd scared off the CA surrogates who were in cheerful abundance previously meaning Hillary had less time to spend gladhanding in the rust belt as they supposedly needed her to.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
57. Bill Clinton was apparently telling the campaign to focus on the rust belt, & they didn't listen.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:26 AM
Nov 2016

She "spent energy in CA"? According to who? What are you even talking about? There were a lot of states that were assumed to be in the bag that weren't, but CA actually was in the bag, and everyone knew it.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
59. You're quoting something else. Please rephrase your question okay?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:28 AM
Nov 2016

Anyway my point is that bullying Boxer materially damaged her campaign by scaring off not just Boxer but other California Dems who could and should have helped her with that primary.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
64. You claimed she was forced by berniebros to expend energy for the GE in California.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:36 AM
Nov 2016

But whatever. Didn't feel like fighting this mountain of made-up primary bullshit during the actual primaries, certainly not gonna do it now. Enjoy your narrative. Hope it helps.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
68. Look I live here. I saw the effects of that disgusting melee in Nevada. It hurt the campaign.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:38 AM
Nov 2016

Yes she won CA but it took a lot of unanticipated time and effort she could have put into campaigning elsewhere.

Retrograde

(10,132 posts)
144. She put some effort into CA during the primary
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:48 PM
Nov 2016

Noting obvious in the general, but carried the state by almost 30 points over Trump.

JI7

(89,246 posts)
66. Nevada was always going to be in play. it leans blue but like wisconsin can easily go the other way
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:38 AM
Nov 2016

if you ignore it and not put into it what you need.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
73. Possibly but my point is that Boxer didn't help in CA because she got trashed in Nevada.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:41 AM
Nov 2016

And the other CA surrogates went radio silent too, notably Jerry Brown.

JI7

(89,246 posts)
74. Jerry Brown didn't campaign for himself either , she had california because of the hispanic vote
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:44 AM
Nov 2016

there was no help needed in california.



ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
75. She should have had CA, but the support she'd been getting from Boxer and others including Brown
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:47 AM
Nov 2016

disappeared and when the going got tough it fell to her and Bill to do most of the heavy lifting. They were here for weeks doing three and four events a day.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
84. By surrogate support I mean media availability and campaign events.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:34 AM
Nov 2016

Some local pols came to the events but the statewide pols went mum. And yes, Jerry campaigns for himself, and had been making statements favoring Clinton for at least a year.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
90. That was part of the reason I picked Nevada's senate race to help....
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 10:01 AM
Nov 2016

The truth is, there was a lot of "bern it down" bullshitthat was just exhausting to deal with. I really didn't have the energy to keep arguing with my Berner friends and just shook my head in disbelief when they cited "Guccifer" the hacker and various RW sources.
I was kind because I knew I would have fully supported Bernies run. I only put my foot down in May when it was know he had lost. Personally I'm a very vocal person and for too long, the harassment made me less so. Many Clinton supporters have shared their dismay at feeling like they were harassed into silence.
It's actually a thing that many of us have been discussing this year. I'm not surprised to see guys claim it's not relevant or important- that's ALSO part of the thing. Nope.

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)
132. There were a lot of problems with the NV convention.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 12:14 PM
Nov 2016

I also remember the seriously contentious convention process that preceded Boxer's "unity speech".

"You're booing Bernie when you boo me" said Barbara Boxer, was probably the exact wrong thing to say.

You say that HRC surrogates decreased their appearances after that and you may be right, but it may be because the Clinton campaign saw how much Boxer's poor response was helping Bernie. By the end of her unity speech, Boxer was openly antagonizing Bernie supporters.






herding cats

(19,559 posts)
43. Sexism was a part of the equation, but not by and large from the real Bernie supporters.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:06 AM
Nov 2016

Yes, I know there's a real issue with some people's ability to know what's real vs. fake on the internet. Yes, there was a plethora of supposed Bernie supporters who were all kinds of sexist (I encounterd them daily on Twitter and Discus), but I question their credentials. We all should. This election season was owned by trolls, and they did manipulate some of our more emotionally vulnerable fringe. That I'll agree with, but the real (real being people who voted Democratic in US elections previously) Bernie people who went to the darkside on sexism was a very small amount. Those who did were already people who hated Hillary on a personal level, or were emotionally vulnerable on other levels (there's probably more than a little overlap there) and they were easy to be plucked by the quasi professional trolls hunting them. They were not a large group, though. However, a few here, and a few there does make a difference. You hit on enough fronts, and drain off enough votes for various reasons and it will add up.

My belief is Bernie's people were trolled and infiltrated by a rabid group of non Democrat's who did, on some formats, contort his voice into something more ugly, and dark than was intended. Now, oddly, many of these rabid people have vanished from those formats. Huh, I wonder why that is? Sure, their feces hasn't been cleaned up yet, and the damage they inflicted on some people surely hasn't gone away (meaning their victims in both Bernies, and Hillary's camps) yet. Some of it never will. I realize that. That's why these trolls used hyperbole like, "Hillary's going to start a nuclear war!" They preyed on the fears of the weak, and then proceeded to manipulated them when they had them hooked. It was shocking to see people fall for it. But, I'm dangerously close to digressing here.

They were much more successful in that regard than the PUMA's who preceded them. Which was started by a McCain supporter in sheeps clothing, to my understanding. The trolls added success this year makes sense, methods of interaction have changed greatly since 2008, and it now makes it much easier to organize via social media without needing a real leader (who can be vetted), or a "home base" of operations. Which is a perfect storm for a troll army hell bent on harvesting the fringe ideologues and unwitting out there.

This is all JMO, but it's based on what I saw from the many, many, many people I interacted with this election season.

Response to Grey Lemercier (Original post)

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
60. A reminder to not forget implementing the "Sanders Rule" before the next election?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:29 AM
Nov 2016

You know, where each state Democratic Party bars anyone from running as a Democrat unless they identified as a Democrat in the office they hold from the previous election (2, 4, or 6 years depending on office held), or as a first-time candidate who has never publicly identified as something other than a Democrat.

See - we do learn from our mistakes.

 

BlueProgressive

(229 posts)
67. Sounds like a good way to keep the party from expanding.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:38 AM
Nov 2016

We wouldn't want that to happen, of course. Clearly we have everyone we need.

 

aidbo

(2,328 posts)
91. Am I reading this data correctly to say..
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:07 AM
Nov 2016

..that Bernie primary supporters voted for Clinton (85%) in the 2016 general election at a higher rate than Clinton primary supporters voted for Obama (69%) in the 2008 general election?

Let me know if I'm misinterpreting it please.

 

Chakab

(1,727 posts)
92. No, you're not. Additionally, the mud slung at the Clinton campaign by Sanders, which was all
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:12 AM
Nov 2016

related to policy, is nothing like the vitriol that Clinton surrogates directed at Obama in '08.

EG leaking these photos to "otherize" him:





lostnfound

(16,171 posts)
81. Sexists living in Pennsylvania Ohio Michigan and Wisconsin. And Liz Warren?
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 05:18 AM
Nov 2016

What a stupid excuse.
Everyone knows Bernie supporters hate Elizabeth Warren too.

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
87. In other words
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 06:05 AM
Nov 2016

Another Clinton strategist blames voters for not living in her bubble.


Stop blaming voters! How many more losses do we need before they get it.

left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
93. So it's back to bashing Bernie? Guess you have to blame someone.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:18 AM
Nov 2016

Trashing Bernie and his followers during the primary probably caused many to not vote Nov 8th.
Trashing Bernie and his followers now will not help the party moving forward.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
95. She is right about the addle brained male dudes on the so-called left, BUT
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 11:58 AM
Nov 2016

the blame for Trump lies squarely with the media. The media, Jeff Zucker of CNN especially, are solely responsible for pushing this demagogue, this shitbag, on the public:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/jeff-zuckers-singular-role-in-promoting-donald-trumps-rise/2016/10/02/7c3d4366-865b-11e6-a3ef-f35afb41797f_story.html


Interesting this article was put in the "lifestyle" section rather than page one where it belonged.

There are numerous other articles talking about this brazen conflict of interest between Zucker and Trump.

The country is now in a tailspin because of this demented push for ratings and ad revenue.

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
101. also covertly racist
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:25 PM
Nov 2016

bernie bros were a large problem with those type of attitudes, whitespaining, condescending toward AA during primaries. A lot of AA got banned and chastised with the false and stupid charge of being reverse racist here over that fact if I remember correctly. The juries.......well I have an opinion on that but I'll keep my counsel. I wouldn't be surprised if it's found out a majority of them voted for trumpfuhrer. Not surprised at all. And that is what I see as the truth concerning one reason we lost this election to the iron heel of the NNPA.

oasis

(49,375 posts)
103. Kinney should've listed the "Comey Factor" as being the number one cause
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 01:45 PM
Nov 2016

before exploring anything else. Comey's role in Hillary's defeat needs to be brought up in every discussion with the MSM.

OrwellwasRight

(5,170 posts)
108. Guess that means she's off the hook.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 04:27 PM
Nov 2016

I'm shocked that she didn't step up and take any blame at all for her strategic advice.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
111. It was up to HILLARY CLINTON to make up the difference. She failed. Her team failed.
Fri Nov 18, 2016, 07:44 PM
Nov 2016

There are multiple reasons why she and her team failed.

Sanders' supporters and sexism are only the smallest parts.

The fact I've yet to see a Clinton or one of her team do any self-introspection is appalling.

Blame everyone but yourselves

The biggest reason Clinton failed was over confidence and trying to expand the map while failing in the Rust Belt.

And after that I put Comey and the Media and Voter Supression.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
120. ONLINE assholes prevented women from getting their asses to the polls?
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 01:00 AM
Nov 2016

I'm not buying it... makes women sound weak.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
134. I bet every one of those women voted.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:02 PM
Nov 2016

This "women-are-delicate-flowers-intimidated-into-not-voting" bullshit is just that -- bullshit. And it's quite odd that so many on DU are embracing it. Suffragettes were beaten in the streets, but modern American women can't get to the polls because of vocal *Berniebros*? If so, they should be ashamed.


Ada Wright, Black Friday

Anything to counter Gloria and Debbie's digs at millennial women, eh?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
136. I hope so. But the point is that the intimidation was real
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:17 PM
Nov 2016

and that it changed behaviors. Heck it changed Barbara Boxer's behavior, and no one would call her a delicate flower, but she fell noticeably silent when her voice was needed most, in the CA primary. Another example: Clinton is winning by over 3 million votes in Calif but I can count the Hillary bumper stickers I've seen here this year on one hand. Why do you think that is?

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
140. You're seriously trying to convince us that Brooklyn-born, bird-flipping Barbara Boxer...
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:32 PM
Nov 2016

was intimidated by *BernieBros* and declined campaigning for Hillary? Come on. She'd travel with security, so she'd be "safe." She couldn't get to the Rust Belt or North Carolina to help Hillary?

I too live in a major blue bubble and didn't see many Hillary stickers, either. Most in my circle weren't that inspired by her, but were stoked about voting for the first woman president. And against Trump, who is absolutely dreadful.



 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
142. You don't think there was a target on her- and she declined because of concern there'd be more ugly
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:38 PM
Nov 2016

Shit in the press? When all the media wanted to do was show ugliness and strife the BOBs rose to the occasion and gave it to them. A lot of us felt it was worse than what the Trump folks dished out, and that's because we knew we were 90% aligned on issues and being bullied by a bunch of obnoxious men.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
147. Boxer, a woman with an NRA "F" rating was *concerned* about....
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 03:36 PM
Nov 2016

"ugly shit in the press"? The woman who vociferously opposed the Iraq War, getting quite personal with Condoleezza Rice? The woman with a "100%" NARAL rating? She's suddenly afraid of... *BernieBros*?

I just learned down-thread that she didn't campaign for Hillary because she was promoting her latest book. Wasn't she afraid that *BernieBros* might show up at Barnes & Noble during a book signing?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
143. After Nevada Boxer basically retired from the campaign.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:43 PM
Nov 2016

Instead she focused on promoting her latest book which came out in June. I'm not pretending to read her mind, just noting that as a Californian her sudden absence from the campaign trail in the heat of the CA primary was noticeable and weird.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
146. So rather than campaign for Hillary, she chose to promote her latest book?!
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 03:28 PM
Nov 2016

WOW. Wasn't she afraid that *BernieBros* would show up at Barnes & Noble during a book signing?

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
149. Can you blame her?
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 05:18 PM
Nov 2016

She didn't need that crap. She's in her 70s and done with elections. I imagine she was involved as a favor to the Clintons and only because of their family connection. She backed Obama in 2007 and it was a long time before Bill and Hill forgave her..

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
150. OK, so it wasn't *BernieBros*, but age, a newly released book...
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 05:23 PM
Nov 2016

and only recently being allowed back into the Clinton fold. Interesting.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
158. Boxer: "It was frightening. I was on the stage and people were six feet away from me.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 06:13 PM
Nov 2016
"When you have people not listening to a word and angry, their faces red. They were shouting obscenities," Boxer said. "It was a frightening situation. It was not under control."


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/boxer-i-felt-threatened-by-sanders-supporters-at-nevada-convention/article/2591683

The fact is that Sanders partisans unhappy about losing the NV primary acted out by physically threatening a 76-year old woman who is also a respected US Senator. That's what she said and I believe her.

Ligyron

(7,624 posts)
124. So women are so weak and easily led in their eagerness to lick the feet of their boyfriends
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 10:32 AM
Nov 2016

that they were intimidated into silence? Did they then vote for Trump, 'cause 53% of the white ones sure did.

Clinton failed period.

8 years to plan her campaign and with the DNC firmly in the bag for her, tons of money, (some of it mine) and she loses to the most un-electable candidate the GOP could possibly put up and she friggin' loses?

Bernie could have won this.

So could Biden, O'Mally or Liz Warren if our main objective was to have a woman be President, 'cause it IS about time - but fact is we ran someone with too much baggage and all of it BS and all of it unfair, but we ran her anyway and she fucking lost.

Yeah, she won the primary but with the DNC (who all need to be fired) with their thumbs on the scale and no serious competition (out of respect for her) except Bernie.

I guess winning the popular vote is our conciliation prize but that and three dollar will get you a decent cup of coffee - and that's about it.

athena

(4,187 posts)
160. Given the outcome,
Sun Nov 20, 2016, 12:23 AM
Nov 2016

I almost wish Bernie had been our candidate so that his supporters would have seen how badly he lost to Trump in the General Election. We would still have had President Trump, but at least we wouldn't have had to continue to put up with this endless Hillary hatred.

aikoaiko

(34,165 posts)
128. Not surprising that a HRC strategist blames others and not herself.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 10:45 AM
Nov 2016

Not campaigning in Wisconsin or very much in the rust belt was a key strategic move that failed.





SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
135. Exactly. And who's the putz who gave us "basket of deplorables"?
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:12 PM
Nov 2016

And how does one get a gig as a highly paid, perpetually wrong strategist?

So much finger-pointing, with no one accepting blame. The Democratic Party better get its shit together.

Denis 11

(280 posts)
133. I felt Hillary was a weak candidate, too much latent resentment of the Clintons. Not Misogyny
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 01:01 PM
Nov 2016

I dreaded the battle with my in laws trying to defend the Clintons again, they were unhinged in their hate for the Clintons and Obama. They watch Fox news and are not rooted in reality. The Right Wing propaganda machine had plenty of dirty tactics already at their disposal and I believe Hillary faced their weakest candidate and still lost.
However I believe Bernie Sanders would not of been allowed to carry the day either. Our Democratic leadership needs to be completely overhauled.
The deranged Republicans get to define us as weak leaches looking for free hand outs and our leadership as pandering, corrupt and unpatriotic. Trump dodged the draft, paid no taxes for years, had to settle the Trump university scam case, but none of that matters to the die hard Republican voters.
I will have a tough Thanksgiving this year and I am usually the lone Dem at the table although I live in a blue state.
I dread a recession that nearly always occurs when the Republicans have the Executive and both houses of Congress
Michael Moore seems to have a good handle on the current situation, so does Olberman.
I hope there is a Roosevelt in our party to help us survive Trump. God help us.

jalan48

(13,856 posts)
137. OMG-enough already with the lame excuses.
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 02:20 PM
Nov 2016

Hillary lost to someone who is considered to be the worst Presidential candidate ever. She should have won by double digits, it has nothing to do with Bernie Bros. Look in the mirror Karen, that will give you a better answer as to why Democrats lost.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
153. Iraqi women managed to vote...
Sat Nov 19, 2016, 05:40 PM
Nov 2016

while their country was destroyed by war:











I've heard some lame-ass excuses about why Hillary lost, but Finney's takes the cake.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Clinton Strategist Karen ...