2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Strategist Karen Finney Blames Election Loss on Sexism from Bernie Bros
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/clinton-strategist-karen-finney-blames-election-loss-on-sexism-from-bernie-bros/In an interview with CNN Newsroom Wednesday, Hillary Clinton senior advisor Karen Finney blamed the Democratic candidates loss on the fact that male supporters of Bernie Sanders made young women feel hesitant to express their support for Clinton online.
Finney was asked what factors she believed contributed to Clintons loss. Electing the first woman president was always going to be tough, she responded. I think given the level of sexism and misogyny that we saw come to the surface and be very public, I think that supports the fact that in this country, we are going to have to have a real conversation about that.
Host John Berman returned to that point a few minutes later.
Some of my colleagues wont like this, but I think even in the primary, some of what we saw with the Bernie Bros had a real chilling effect on a lot of women, and young women in particular, she argued. We learned about during the primary, there were a number of these secret Facebook groups of young progressive women who were supporting Hillary, but frankly they didnt want to deal with the backlash online from some of the Bernie Bros.
snip
video at link
radical noodle
(8,000 posts)but I will testify loud and long that there were either Bernie supporters or people pretending to be Bernie supporters who harassed and intimidated Hillary groups and individuals all over Facebook. They were as bad as Trump supporters with a great deal of anti-Hillary lies. I'm not sure I feel like it necessarily changed the vote but I know a lot of women went behind closed doors to post after a while which I believe is one reason people thought there was no enthusiasm. There were a lot of enthusiastic supporters for Hillary, but we just got tired of the constant battering.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
I emailed an analysis of what appeared to happen for posting, from a neutral poli-sci standpoint, when the site was under initial repair. After the submission and a follow-up inquiry as to why it was not posted, it remained unpublished.
I am not going into further detail, as it will probably be flagged for takedown. What's really the point now?
If that's is the result of the failed introspection into the 2016 campaign loss, there is little hope for repair.
.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)seem to think the party does not need to change anything. There's nothing to learn and only people to blame.
And I guess it is fun to pretend that all Bernie supporters are dudes. They are not.
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/31/the-bernie-bros-narrative-a-cheap-false-campaign-tactic-masquerading-as-journalism-and-social-activism/
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)Of course I wouldn't expect a bully to own up but one doesn't have to look far to find how horrible it was for female supporters.
And the memes my God deplorable
Good on Karen for speaking out
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)otohara
(24,135 posts)In blue Colorado mere 127,000 participated because it's voter suppression at its worst. What a clusterfuck. Shoved into teeny classrooms cat hear shit. Hill won our room then some Sanders guy with a pen and clipboard talking about a weird rule math equation and Sanders ends up the winner? Whuuut the fuck?
Million registered Dems here what happened to a million voters? Large groups of voters unable to spend 4 hours with people you don't know. Can't vote in the privacy of your own home like every god damn election we have including municipals.
Spare me there's an article one The Nation (who endorsed Sanders) if anyone lost millions of votes, was her.
Volunteers from three candidates did not pull off stealing 3.4 million votes. But in caucus states like mine I can easily show you how one million people could not vote. Colorado has the highest voter participation in the country
It's exactly how Obama won in 08 low voter turnout. Hillary again did better in states where people are allowed to vote. All day long Not during a specific inconvenient time when most people are preparing dinner. All the ladies in my aunts assisted living home who wanted to vote for Hillary couldn't go. PM workers the list goes on and on.
She didn't whine or complain. Here's the article read it FACTS. Oh and by the way 4 states will no longer have caucus including Colorado. People were furious.
https://www.thenation.com/article/the-democratic-primary-wasnt-rigged/
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)with the Bernie guys doing their best to take over.
otohara
(24,135 posts)My Millennial was all into conspiracy Bullshit for years
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)that as we waited the FULL HOUR just to go inside the caucus rooms, they were trying to get people to take photos of their ballots on their cell phones -- so there would be proof of how people voted. Then we went inside and sat around tables where all the ballots were counted in full view of everyone. No paranoia turned out to be necessary.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But she also lost the GE. It wasn't the fault of those all purpose villian "berniebros", FFS.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)who pushed for a Bernie write-in?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Hell, if we want to go into speculative narrative territory, maybe the fact that DWS was such an awful front person for the campaign who spent months doing terrible moves like going to the Times and insulting millennial women, maybe that hurt us in FL, where we lost by about a percentage point?
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)How do you know that the Bernie-write-in campaign didn't further depress Hillary's vote count in PA?
http://www.theskanner.com/opinion/commentary/24576-op-deny-70-urges-voters-to-write-in-bernie-sanders
Heres what Op Deny 270 says in a letter they sent to The Skanner News:
There are 10 states in which no prior registration is required for write-ins to be counted for Bernie Sanders. These states are Vermont, Oregon, Washington, Iowa, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, Wyoming, Alabama, New Jersey.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)As to your question, it seems there were 732,635 write-in votes cast nationally. Nationally, as in all 50 states total.
My guess is most of them were cast either for Harambe or Deez Nuts, but since official tallies are hard to come by, we may never know.
For the rest of it, I think trying to blame this loss on "berniebros" is ridiculous. Period. Full Stop. Predictable, though.
People want to do it, hey, who am I to tell anyone what to expend their energy on. Knock your bad selves out.
JI7
(89,246 posts)put more resources into it.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)that computer scientists at Princeton proved could be easily hacked, without leaving traces. And these machines can't be audited because they leave no paper trail.
JI7
(89,246 posts)specifically talking about what the campaign itself had control over and could have done.
pnwmom
(108,974 posts)before the election the polls had her substantially ahead in Pennsylvania. The numbers dropped after Comey dropped his bomb. She shouldn't be blamed for not anticipating that.
JI7
(89,246 posts)said they asked for help and they were dismissed by the campaign.
Omaha Steve
(99,577 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)pnwmom
(108,974 posts)is that when a couple women decided to make a "secret" FB group to talk about how Hillary inspires them, the membership went from 2 to 600K in a couple weeks, and it's at about 3.7 million now, four weeks from when it started.
These are all Hillary supporters who came together in a group that doesn't show on searches, and you can only join by invitation, because they were tired of being harassed online for supporting her.
redwitch
(14,944 posts)Family and colleagues and friends. I belong to that group and that is my take on it.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)I was actually kind of glad that DU was down for so long because that group is absolutely amazing. I am so thankful to all the people who have been there for each other.
This place is right back to where Skinner said he didn't want it. But I'm sure that comes as no surprise to many of us.
otohara
(24,135 posts)instead I deactivated Facebook until after the primary - silly me thought the hate would subside after Hillary won, but the RIGGED claims kept coming. The bullshit Hillary hate never stopped.
Now I'm off for good.
JI7
(89,246 posts)when you look at non white men v white women votes.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)For decades, one narrative has dominated American politics: That while white liberal Democrats may not be perfect, they are far more trustworthy and far less scary when it comes to race than conservative Republicans. The backers of Bernie Sanderss never-ending kamikaze campaign remind us of an older truth: that there are good people and terrible people in both parties and that Republicans do not have a monopoly on intolerance.
Donald Trump has without question run one of the most racially and ethnically divisive presidential campaigns in recent memory. So much so that as former Senator Bob Bennett lay dying, he asked his loved ones if there were any Muslims in the hospital. His reason? So that he could go up and apologize to each one of them for Donald Trump.
snip
While high-profile Republicans step forward to denounce one of their own and to argue that minorities should be treated with courtesy and respect, plenty of white progressives seem intent on putting us in our place, so to speak, and keeping us there. Though much of the media coverage of so-called Bernie Brosoverzealous, predominantly white, young, and male Sanders supportershas focused on their treatment of female journalists online, their lack of respect for racial and ethnic minorities who deign to challenge Sanders has been perhaps more chilling.
The Washington Post noted that at one point #MississippiBerning became a hashtag used by Sanders supporters on social mediaa witty and clever turn of phrase unless of course you are a black American who hears the words Mississippi burning and immediately thinks of church bombings and lynchings.
Black writers and activists who have had the temerity to challenge Sanderss record have been targeted by his supporters in ways that go against not just civility but even decency. I should know. Im one of them. For having the gall to share my perspective, buoyed by polling data, that self-described socialists are pretty much unelectable to the American presidency, his supporters attempted to harass me offline. (Emphasis on attempted.)
snip
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I have challenged many racists here at DU going back to 2008 (some of those were PUMAs) but I supported Bernie Sanders.
The idea that he or his supporters are racist sounds like a smear to me.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)who have been attacked online liars? I NEVER said all Sanders supporters were racist, but some unfortunately are.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)As well as feminists. There wasn't a lot to distinguish the attacks when they were coming from Trump supporters, in fact they cribbed a lot of their script from the Bros.
still_one
(92,122 posts)Comey started the ball rolling 11 days before the election by providing the opportunity to the republicans in congress to LIE that the "email investigation was being reopened". MSNBC was the first network who grabbed that headline, and then proceeded to trot every right wing hack across their screen amplifying the same LIE. The other networks then followed suit.
That was the catalyst, and significant damage was done by that lie, along with the news media, and the fake news from Facebook and Google insuring maximum exposure of that lie.
But in the end, it was the self-identified progressives who refused to vote for Hillary that did the fatal blow.
Beartracks
(12,807 posts)The media is so dependably manipulatable.
==================
athena
(4,187 posts)Doesn't anyone read anything about feminism? What is this crazy assumption that only men can be sexist?
People love to assume that sexism doesn't exist. That, in fact, is in itself sexist. To someone who believes deep down that women are second-class citizens, it is not sexist that women are treated as second-class citizens. It's completely natural and acceptable.
DUers may scream all they want that this election was not about sexism. A hundred, two hundred years from now, historians will not have the sexist hangups that men and women are drowning in today. They will see what happened very clearly, and they will look down on us for being so bigoted against women.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)I am just flabbergasted that this shit still needs to be explained on a Democratic website.
JI7
(89,246 posts)Non white men ?
athena
(4,187 posts)Nonwhite people tend to vote overwhelmingly Democratic. So it's not surprising that they voted for Hillary in larger numbers than white people.
JI7
(89,246 posts)bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Surrounded and their survival in that environment depends on supporting it. You should ask Priyanka about this, it's part of her field of study.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Shit parents were intimidated.
Being called every nasty name they could think of was fare game. And the memes were disgusting.
I have a great article to post tomorrow that addresses the abuse and online bullying millions suffered.
So glad it's finally coming out.
onecaliberal
(32,816 posts)The verbal attacks and accusations kept coming even when the primary was over. I do not agree with what they did in any way. But this stupid bullshit needs to stop or we will continue to lose. People are OVER the top fed up.
spin
(17,493 posts)Hillary was definitely well qualified but she does lack charisma. In the modern age charisma obviously trumps charisma (no pun intended).
Bernie had charisma in spades and while Trunp is an asshole he managed to win the electoral college. Trump and Bernie offered change while many seen Hillary as the establishment candidate and this has been described as a change election.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Now it's 45 men and not one woman.
Republicans claim it's all about opportunity.
Democrats focus on outcomes - the proof is in the pudding.
"No, there's no sexism here. We let her run, right?"
spin
(17,493 posts)Unfortunately it appears that it was the wrong time for Hillary. Now we are stuck with Trump.
I really feel Trump thought he would lose but now he is stuck with the fact that he won. Often it seemed that he was trying his best to give the election to Hillary. Perhaps he planned to launch a new right wing cable network. Who knows.
However I may still live long enough to see a female President but I have to take in consideration that I am now 70 so it better soon. I feel our nation will be ready for a female President after four years of Trump.
I hope and pray Trump works out well but I lack confidence that he will.
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)Just two more old white men, we have 45 of them now. So happy for the change....not.
phallon
(260 posts)and had a paranoid aura that I was drinking the media koolaid
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)spin
(17,493 posts)another old white man.
If Obama could have run one more time he would have won by a landslide.
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)She should have won by a landslide. She was the candidate, yet white misogynist men won the day, they preferred the white man that eats a tic tac and then grabs a woman's p**sy. Gawd bless Amerkkka.
spin
(17,493 posts)there are other factors to consider that were in play. The combination resulted in the surprising result.
I will admit that I thought for certain Hillary would win in a landslide. So did a lot of other people, many who decided to avoid standing in a long line to vote. The media basically said Trump had no pathway to win the electoral college based on early voting and the polls. That is one of the factors in play during the final days of the election. Since Hillary obvious had the election in the bag why bother to even vote.
Another rarely mentioned factor is the Democratic Party's position on gun control. There are at least 80,000,000 gun owners in this nation and they saw Hillary and the Democratic Party as a serious threat to their Second Amendment rights. Gun owners are often one issue voters and a high percentage vote.
While Trump is obviously not a religious person many fundamental Christians felt Hillary would put enough liberal justices on the Supreme Court to turn it into a liberal court for the next several decades. They decided to hold their nose and vote for Trump as he promised to stack the court with conservative justices if he had the chance. In almost all cases fundamental
Christians are conservative.
sheshe2
(83,729 posts)Sorry....she beat the p**sy grabber by 2 million popular votes. They did not stay at home.
Hmmm. I watched the debates pretty closely. Never saw this come up. I never watched Donnie spew his filth, did he say this? Are you making this stuff up?
Christians are conservative.
Lol! So, what you are telling me is these devout Christians that are bigly conservative dropped all their Christian values to vote for a man that is a misogynist that sexually attacks women after chewing a few tic tacs, then grabs p**sy at will. He groped his own daughter on stage at the RNC. He had his hands all over her ass. He told Howard Stern it was okay to call her a great piece of ass. They did all of this for getting judges on the court? For what? Getting sexual predators like him put away???? They ain't Christians. They are pathetic hypocrites.
spin
(17,493 posts)in the debates would make little difference to many. Many gun owners felt Hillary posed a threat to their rights and their minds were made up to not vote for her long before the Presidential debates. Many gun owners I know are conservative Republicans who simply refuse to vote for any Democrat period.
The NRA ran many ads on TV that constantly reminded gun owners of the importance of their weapons for self defense and freedom. The object wasn't to convince people who don't own such weapons to vote for to protect the Second Amendment but to insure many gun owners would show up and vote. It's my feelings that those NRA ads worked well.
Where I live at there are plenty of fundamental Christians. A large number I've talked with planned to vote for Trump even though they didn't feel he was a practicing Christian.
Oddly enough I have never run across an individual who stated that no woman should ever be our President. Of course that may have been their true feeling and they simply didn't want to mention it to a person they didn't know well.I'm certain that bias against women played a large role in the final result but in my opinion there were other factors in play.
Bias against women in power might even have played a role in turning out the fundamental Christian vote for Trumo.
I knew a fundamental Christian who refused to vote for Romey as in his opinion the Church of Latter Day Saints is a cult. Unfortunately I lost contact with him so I don't know who he voted for this time. I know that he would not permit his wife or daughter to wear pants or dresses So I doubt that he would vote for a woman as President. He eventually ended up divorced when his wife found he had been messing around with a woman he worked with. Don't kid yourself. There are a lot of religious hypocrites to be found. I tend to be more careful when I deal with a person who claims to be a devout Christian from the lessons I have learned in the past. To be fair I have known some people who were Christians who won my admiration and full respect because of their high moral values and their generosity and help for others.
jmg257
(11,996 posts)Just like gun owners.
It is funny, but abortion & gun rights matter to a lot of people. Especially in the rural areas.
Gun rights did come up in the debates, and Hillary botched it (mis-represented the Heller decision). And the NRA dedicated almost a whole magazine referencing it and her stances, along with all the social media covering the issue.
The abortion thing would be more anecdotal, but I gather quite a few women didn't vote Hillary because of it.
tenderfoot
(8,425 posts)so I call bee ess.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)typical shoot the messenger dodge
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)and lose again in 2020 until shit begins to change. This fingerpointing bullshit is annoying.
Next, she lost because of bicycle riders and stale brownies.
No more fucking fingerpointing!
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)but if we bollocks up 2020 (census year), especially at state legislature level, we will be fucked for another decade due to further gerrymandering
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)prospects in 2018.
Grey Lemercier
(1,429 posts)Soon we need to get moving or the austerity-fascism/white nationalist steamroller will flatten us like cookie dough.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Nothing, and I mean NOTHING, is Hillary's fault.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,170 posts)jalan48
(13,856 posts)It had to be those bad Bernie Bros.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)which, uh, directly led to us losing rural rust belt counties which Obama won in 2008 and 2012.
Clearly.
jalan48
(13,856 posts)So says Gloria Steinem.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Oh, whoops, sorry, that was Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)It gets goofier and goofier every day.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Poker games and Dem meet ups. It was inescapable. And like trying to talk to fundies- only it was Wikileaks and Guccifer.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)Go to the polling station, stand in line, vote, and shut up about it.
"Poker games"?
Response to jalan48 (Reply #27)
Post removed
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Okay, if she really is that great of a candidate, run her again, then.
Sanders certainly isn't going to run again in 4 years. By then we should have straightened all this "berniebro" stuff out, amirite?
spin
(17,493 posts)campaign. I doubt if she will feel up to trying again in four years but then I could be wrong.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)but I could have set my watch by how predictable it would be.
spin
(17,493 posts)Unfortunately Hillary was viewed as the establishment candidate by enough voters to lose in the electoral college.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Now I think Hillary overcame some natural skill deficiencies as a politician, grew as a candidate both in terms of performance and message, particularly during & after the convention. She as a candidate did a great job.
(And I am firmly convinced, despite this sort of bargle we've been subjected to nonstop for months, now, that having Bernie Sanders competing against her in a vigorous primary process caused her to hone her message and made her a better candidate)
But her own campaign and people down the pipeline in some of those rust belt states have acknowledged that there were problems. Major strategy and resourcing errors. Taking states for granted.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861
If someone wants to blame a single individual or event, I think a case can be made that Comey threw the election or seriously impacted the results. But to blame it on Berniebros, again...
Honestly, though, the minute I logged back on I said to myself "okay, how long before some folks try to blame this on berniebros?"
Predictable.
spin
(17,493 posts)I still can't understand why he made the statements he did.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)and it was a gross break from protocol that said "don't do anything that might interfere with an election within 60 days of the thing".
He sent that letter to the GOP congress knowing full well that the Friday News Dump would be 100% "CLINTON INVESTIGATION REOPENED ANTHONY WEINER LOPTOP EMAILS TEEN SEXTING SCANDAL"
You could see the paroxysms of glee on Kellyanne Conway's face.
spin
(17,493 posts)He definitely overstepped the boundaries and protocols his job with his last statement.
Raster
(20,998 posts)"Well, the damage is already done to Hillary Clinton..."
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)That is it in a nutshell!
I know people who voted for Trump who would have voted for Bernie if Bernie had been the nominee against a Bush or even Cruz.
And that attitude was commonly referred to as "sticking the middle finger to the establishment."
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Her bein' a woman and all.
Right, bruh?
You do know what you all sound like - don't you?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)That's what I sound like.
She's entitled to her opinion, as am I. My opinion is, blaming this on "berniebros" isn't gonna fly.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clinton-campaign-neglect_us_582cacb0e4b058ce7aa8b861
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)And then a link bashing Hillary at a website that told us not to worry about the entertainer Trump at all. By a "pundit" eating crow every day now!
Karen Finney, no. This guy, yes.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Namely, the fact that we got clobbered in the rural rust belt.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)Didn't Bernie do really well in those states up there near Canada?
If there was some residual sexist resentment from Bernie supporters - could that have impacted the results in the general?
Isn't this the point of Karen Finney's comment?
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)sexism.
OTOH, if one buys the line that Sanders support was motivated by a perception that he was speaking directly to economic concerns of people who felt HRC represented more of the economic same when they desired change, then that explanation would probably make more sense.
It would also be compatible with the fact that she did just fine in states that Sanders won handily that were not experiencing the same sorts of direct manufacturing job-loss economic distress, like Oregon. Unless people in the Rust Belt are somehow more preternaturally inclined towards sexism.
Response to spin (Reply #31)
spin This message was self-deleted by its author.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)She was booed and harassed like she'd wandered into an NRA convention and that was effectively the end of her efforts as a surrogate. In fact it was the end of just about every high-profile California surrogate's efforts on Hillary's behalf. She was on her own after that and it fell to Bill and Chelsea, basically her and Bill, to get out the vote in California. No wonder Bill looks exhausted. Anyway that's one example of how sexism damaged Hillary's campaign.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)We can refight the primaries- I suspect some people enjoy it because it brings them back to the happy place they occupied a few months ago, or something - but that has jack diddly shit to do with why Hillary failed to carry a whole fuckton of rural rust belt counties that Obama won easily.
anecdotal tales of "berniebros" forcing young women to set their facebook groups to private didn't lose us the Rust Belt, either.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)and she didn't get the surrogate support I'd been expecting. After the Nevada foodfight it fell to her and Bill and they had to waste time in a state that hadn't been in play. The Bernie crowd scared off the CA surrogates who were in cheerful abundance previously meaning Hillary had less time to spend gladhanding in the rust belt as they supposedly needed her to.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)She "spent energy in CA"? According to who? What are you even talking about? There were a lot of states that were assumed to be in the bag that weren't, but CA actually was in the bag, and everyone knew it.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Anyway my point is that bullying Boxer materially damaged her campaign by scaring off not just Boxer but other California Dems who could and should have helped her with that primary.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)But whatever. Didn't feel like fighting this mountain of made-up primary bullshit during the actual primaries, certainly not gonna do it now. Enjoy your narrative. Hope it helps.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Yes she won CA but it took a lot of unanticipated time and effort she could have put into campaigning elsewhere.
Retrograde
(10,132 posts)Noting obvious in the general, but carried the state by almost 30 points over Trump.
JI7
(89,246 posts)if you ignore it and not put into it what you need.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)And the other CA surrogates went radio silent too, notably Jerry Brown.
JI7
(89,246 posts)there was no help needed in california.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)disappeared and when the going got tough it fell to her and Bill to do most of the heavy lifting. They were here for weeks doing three and four events a day.
JI7
(89,246 posts)ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Some local pols came to the events but the statewide pols went mum. And yes, Jerry campaigns for himself, and had been making statements favoring Clinton for at least a year.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)The truth is, there was a lot of "bern it down" bullshitthat was just exhausting to deal with. I really didn't have the energy to keep arguing with my Berner friends and just shook my head in disbelief when they cited "Guccifer" the hacker and various RW sources.
I was kind because I knew I would have fully supported Bernies run. I only put my foot down in May when it was know he had lost. Personally I'm a very vocal person and for too long, the harassment made me less so. Many Clinton supporters have shared their dismay at feeling like they were harassed into silence.
It's actually a thing that many of us have been discussing this year. I'm not surprised to see guys claim it's not relevant or important- that's ALSO part of the thing. Nope.
otohara
(24,135 posts)Like Trump's mobs
aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)I also remember the seriously contentious convention process that preceded Boxer's "unity speech".
"You're booing Bernie when you boo me" said Barbara Boxer, was probably the exact wrong thing to say.
You say that HRC surrogates decreased their appearances after that and you may be right, but it may be because the Clinton campaign saw how much Boxer's poor response was helping Bernie. By the end of her unity speech, Boxer was openly antagonizing Bernie supporters.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)herding cats
(19,559 posts)Yes, I know there's a real issue with some people's ability to know what's real vs. fake on the internet. Yes, there was a plethora of supposed Bernie supporters who were all kinds of sexist (I encounterd them daily on Twitter and Discus), but I question their credentials. We all should. This election season was owned by trolls, and they did manipulate some of our more emotionally vulnerable fringe. That I'll agree with, but the real (real being people who voted Democratic in US elections previously) Bernie people who went to the darkside on sexism was a very small amount. Those who did were already people who hated Hillary on a personal level, or were emotionally vulnerable on other levels (there's probably more than a little overlap there) and they were easy to be plucked by the quasi professional trolls hunting them. They were not a large group, though. However, a few here, and a few there does make a difference. You hit on enough fronts, and drain off enough votes for various reasons and it will add up.
My belief is Bernie's people were trolled and infiltrated by a rabid group of non Democrat's who did, on some formats, contort his voice into something more ugly, and dark than was intended. Now, oddly, many of these rabid people have vanished from those formats. Huh, I wonder why that is? Sure, their feces hasn't been cleaned up yet, and the damage they inflicted on some people surely hasn't gone away (meaning their victims in both Bernies, and Hillary's camps) yet. Some of it never will. I realize that. That's why these trolls used hyperbole like, "Hillary's going to start a nuclear war!" They preyed on the fears of the weak, and then proceeded to manipulated them when they had them hooked. It was shocking to see people fall for it. But, I'm dangerously close to digressing here.
They were much more successful in that regard than the PUMA's who preceded them. Which was started by a McCain supporter in sheeps clothing, to my understanding. The trolls added success this year makes sense, methods of interaction have changed greatly since 2008, and it now makes it much easier to organize via social media without needing a real leader (who can be vetted), or a "home base" of operations. Which is a perfect storm for a troll army hell bent on harvesting the fringe ideologues and unwitting out there.
This is all JMO, but it's based on what I saw from the many, many, many people I interacted with this election season.
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Thank you.
Response to Grey Lemercier (Original post)
Post removed
BlueProgressive
(229 posts)yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)You know, where each state Democratic Party bars anyone from running as a Democrat unless they identified as a Democrat in the office they hold from the previous election (2, 4, or 6 years depending on office held), or as a first-time candidate who has never publicly identified as something other than a Democrat.
See - we do learn from our mistakes.
BlueProgressive
(229 posts)We wouldn't want that to happen, of course. Clearly we have everyone we need.
Duppers
(28,117 posts)Chakab
(1,727 posts)aidbo
(2,328 posts)..that Bernie primary supporters voted for Clinton (85%) in the 2016 general election at a higher rate than Clinton primary supporters voted for Obama (69%) in the 2008 general election?
Let me know if I'm misinterpreting it please.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)related to policy, is nothing like the vitriol that Clinton surrogates directed at Obama in '08.
EG leaking these photos to "otherize" him:
lostnfound
(16,171 posts)What a stupid excuse.
Everyone knows Bernie supporters hate Elizabeth Warren too.
riversedge
(70,186 posts)Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Another Clinton strategist blames voters for not living in her bubble.
Stop blaming voters! How many more losses do we need before they get it.
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Trashing Bernie and his followers during the primary probably caused many to not vote Nov 8th.
Trashing Bernie and his followers now will not help the party moving forward.
duffyduff
(3,251 posts)the blame for Trump lies squarely with the media. The media, Jeff Zucker of CNN especially, are solely responsible for pushing this demagogue, this shitbag, on the public:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/jeff-zuckers-singular-role-in-promoting-donald-trumps-rise/2016/10/02/7c3d4366-865b-11e6-a3ef-f35afb41797f_story.html
Interesting this article was put in the "lifestyle" section rather than page one where it belonged.
There are numerous other articles talking about this brazen conflict of interest between Zucker and Trump.
The country is now in a tailspin because of this demented push for ratings and ad revenue.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)bernie bros were a large problem with those type of attitudes, whitespaining, condescending toward AA during primaries. A lot of AA got banned and chastised with the false and stupid charge of being reverse racist here over that fact if I remember correctly. The juries.......well I have an opinion on that but I'll keep my counsel. I wouldn't be surprised if it's found out a majority of them voted for trumpfuhrer. Not surprised at all. And that is what I see as the truth concerning one reason we lost this election to the iron heel of the NNPA.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)oasis
(49,375 posts)before exploring anything else. Comey's role in Hillary's defeat needs to be brought up in every discussion with the MSM.
OrwellwasRight
(5,170 posts)I'm shocked that she didn't step up and take any blame at all for her strategic advice.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)There are multiple reasons why she and her team failed.
Sanders' supporters and sexism are only the smallest parts.
The fact I've yet to see a Clinton or one of her team do any self-introspection is appalling.
Blame everyone but yourselves
The biggest reason Clinton failed was over confidence and trying to expand the map while failing in the Rust Belt.
And after that I put Comey and the Media and Voter Supression.
otohara
(24,135 posts)It was nearly impossible for her to overcome the onslaught of hate from the right/left and Alt-Left especially.
They were so clever with their memes and bros were all to eager to pass around.https://www.google.com/search?q=hillary+memes&rlz=1C1CHZL_enUS694US694&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj70Yel1rPQAhWBSyYKHVTUCNIQ_AUICCgB&biw=1522&bih=714
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)I'm not buying it... makes women sound weak.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)This "women-are-delicate-flowers-intimidated-into-not-voting" bullshit is just that -- bullshit. And it's quite odd that so many on DU are embracing it. Suffragettes were beaten in the streets, but modern American women can't get to the polls because of vocal *Berniebros*? If so, they should be ashamed.
Ada Wright, Black Friday
Anything to counter Gloria and Debbie's digs at millennial women, eh?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)and that it changed behaviors. Heck it changed Barbara Boxer's behavior, and no one would call her a delicate flower, but she fell noticeably silent when her voice was needed most, in the CA primary. Another example: Clinton is winning by over 3 million votes in Calif but I can count the Hillary bumper stickers I've seen here this year on one hand. Why do you think that is?
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)was intimidated by *BernieBros* and declined campaigning for Hillary? Come on. She'd travel with security, so she'd be "safe." She couldn't get to the Rust Belt or North Carolina to help Hillary?
I too live in a major blue bubble and didn't see many Hillary stickers, either. Most in my circle weren't that inspired by her, but were stoked about voting for the first woman president. And against Trump, who is absolutely dreadful.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Shit in the press? When all the media wanted to do was show ugliness and strife the BOBs rose to the occasion and gave it to them. A lot of us felt it was worse than what the Trump folks dished out, and that's because we knew we were 90% aligned on issues and being bullied by a bunch of obnoxious men.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)"ugly shit in the press"? The woman who vociferously opposed the Iraq War, getting quite personal with Condoleezza Rice? The woman with a "100%" NARAL rating? She's suddenly afraid of... *BernieBros*?
I just learned down-thread that she didn't campaign for Hillary because she was promoting her latest book. Wasn't she afraid that *BernieBros* might show up at Barnes & Noble during a book signing?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Instead she focused on promoting her latest book which came out in June. I'm not pretending to read her mind, just noting that as a Californian her sudden absence from the campaign trail in the heat of the CA primary was noticeable and weird.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)WOW. Wasn't she afraid that *BernieBros* would show up at Barnes & Noble during a book signing?
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)She didn't need that crap. She's in her 70s and done with elections. I imagine she was involved as a favor to the Clintons and only because of their family connection. She backed Obama in 2007 and it was a long time before Bill and Hill forgave her..
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)and only recently being allowed back into the Clinton fold. Interesting.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)So she found better things to do, yes.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)No, just no.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/boxer-i-felt-threatened-by-sanders-supporters-at-nevada-convention/article/2591683
The fact is that Sanders partisans unhappy about losing the NV primary acted out by physically threatening a 76-year old woman who is also a respected US Senator. That's what she said and I believe her.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)Ligyron
(7,624 posts)that they were intimidated into silence? Did they then vote for Trump, 'cause 53% of the white ones sure did.
Clinton failed period.
8 years to plan her campaign and with the DNC firmly in the bag for her, tons of money, (some of it mine) and she loses to the most un-electable candidate the GOP could possibly put up and she friggin' loses?
Bernie could have won this.
So could Biden, O'Mally or Liz Warren if our main objective was to have a woman be President, 'cause it IS about time - but fact is we ran someone with too much baggage and all of it BS and all of it unfair, but we ran her anyway and she fucking lost.
Yeah, she won the primary but with the DNC (who all need to be fired) with their thumbs on the scale and no serious competition (out of respect for her) except Bernie.
I guess winning the popular vote is our conciliation prize but that and three dollar will get you a decent cup of coffee - and that's about it.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)athena
(4,187 posts)I almost wish Bernie had been our candidate so that his supporters would have seen how badly he lost to Trump in the General Election. We would still have had President Trump, but at least we wouldn't have had to continue to put up with this endless Hillary hatred.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)aikoaiko
(34,165 posts)Not campaigning in Wisconsin or very much in the rust belt was a key strategic move that failed.
JTFrog
(14,274 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)And how does one get a gig as a highly paid, perpetually wrong strategist?
So much finger-pointing, with no one accepting blame. The Democratic Party better get its shit together.
Denis 11
(280 posts)I dreaded the battle with my in laws trying to defend the Clintons again, they were unhinged in their hate for the Clintons and Obama. They watch Fox news and are not rooted in reality. The Right Wing propaganda machine had plenty of dirty tactics already at their disposal and I believe Hillary faced their weakest candidate and still lost.
However I believe Bernie Sanders would not of been allowed to carry the day either. Our Democratic leadership needs to be completely overhauled.
The deranged Republicans get to define us as weak leaches looking for free hand outs and our leadership as pandering, corrupt and unpatriotic. Trump dodged the draft, paid no taxes for years, had to settle the Trump university scam case, but none of that matters to the die hard Republican voters.
I will have a tough Thanksgiving this year and I am usually the lone Dem at the table although I live in a blue state.
I dread a recession that nearly always occurs when the Republicans have the Executive and both houses of Congress
Michael Moore seems to have a good handle on the current situation, so does Olberman.
I hope there is a Roosevelt in our party to help us survive Trump. God help us.
jalan48
(13,856 posts)Hillary lost to someone who is considered to be the worst Presidential candidate ever. She should have won by double digits, it has nothing to do with Bernie Bros. Look in the mirror Karen, that will give you a better answer as to why Democrats lost.
BootinUp
(47,139 posts)In her loss.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)while their country was destroyed by war:
I've heard some lame-ass excuses about why Hillary lost, but Finney's takes the cake.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Clinton strategist blames everyone but Clinton strategist.
SMC22307
(8,090 posts)The excuses are UFB.