Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

racaulk

(11,550 posts)
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:41 AM Jan 2012

Nate Silver: Romney’s ‘Prevent Defense’ Yielding Big Gains to Opponents

Most football fans have learned to hate the “prevent defense,” a strategy that is employed when a team holds a lead late in the game. In theory, the strategy involves being willing to yield short completions to the offense in an effort to prevent a big gain. In reality, it seems to yield plenty of short completions — but also its share of big gains as the offense takes advantage of the soft coverage. Hence the aphorism “the prevent defense only prevents you from winning.”

During Monday night’s debate in Myrtle Beach, Mitt Romney seemed to be engaging in a political version of the strategy, avoiding direct confrontation with his opponents while giving evasive answers on issues ranging from his tax returns to the role of “Super PACs.” Fox News, which hosted the debate, encouraged viewers to use the Twitter hashtag #dodge to indicate when they thought candidates were not giving a straight answer — and Mr. Romney received considerably more dodges than the other candidates.

I wrote on Twitter during the Monday night debate that I thought this was a smart strategy for Mr. Romney. At the time, he held a reasonably large lead in South Carolina and was also in a very strong position in Florida and in subsequent states. Sometimes a risk-averse strategy is the right one, even if it isn’t viscerally pleasing.

What has happened since then, however, has frankly surprised me a great deal. The momentum in South Carolina shifted literally overnight; one pollster showed an incredible 22-point swing against Mr. Romney and toward Newt Gingrich over the course of a 24-hour period after the Monday night debate.

<---snip--->

Link: http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/20/romneys-prevent-defense-yielding-big-gains-to-opponents/

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nate Silver: Romney’s ‘Prevent Defense’ Yielding Big Gains to Opponents (Original Post) racaulk Jan 2012 OP
I hope Mittens gets beat big time in SC WI_DEM Jan 2012 #1
So do I! racaulk Jan 2012 #2
Romney is not only a bystander, participant cilla4progress Jan 2012 #3
Wow, I think Nate has his finger on the pulse of the dying Romney campaign. Major Hogwash Jan 2012 #4
nate nails it hallowell Jan 2012 #5
What Nate didn't anticipate, and most here don't understand, grantcart Jan 2012 #6

racaulk

(11,550 posts)
2. So do I!
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:45 PM
Jan 2012

And based on recent polling it looks like Newt might pull out a victory there. Anthing that challenges the assumption that Mitt will be their eventual nominee, and thus drags out the nomination process even longer, is good with me!

It's just too bad that Bachmann and Perry dropped out so quickly. They were great for entertainment value!

Major Hogwash

(17,656 posts)
4. Wow, I think Nate has his finger on the pulse of the dying Romney campaign.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 04:23 PM
Jan 2012

We need to revive him somehow.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)
6. What Nate didn't anticipate, and most here don't understand,
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 06:21 PM
Jan 2012


is the DEPTH of dislike that people who don't like Romney have.


So his numbers may not show a huge number of Republicans that don't like Romney but they don't show how very deeply those that don't like him really despise him.

My dad hated left wing Democrats. He would have voted for Obama over Romney because of his deep feelings on Mormonism,
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver: Romney’s ‘Pr...