WI Recount Pics of ballots not counted by machines, but manual recounts is including

http://www.palmerreport.com/news/wisconsin-votes-uncovered-recount-counting-machines-missed/329/

(photos couldn't be taken of the actual ballots, so observers created these using sample ballots to show the type of votes that the machines missed and are now included due to the manual votes)

Voter wrote in name versus filling in the bubble
[img]

[/img]

Voter circled the name versus filling in the bubble
[img]

[/img]

4 replies, 2561 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

4 replies	Author	Time	Post
WI Recount Pics of ballots not counted by machines, but manual recounts is including (Original post)	iluvtennis	Dec 2016	OP
Obvious examples of Russian hacking n/t	MichMan	Dec 2016	#1
No kidding	FBaggins	Dec 2016	#2
I thought we are the educated ones? n/t	MichMan	Dec 2016	#3
You'd be surprised at how creative people are	DeminPennswoods	Dec 2016	#4

Response to iluvtennis (Original post)

Sat Dec 3, 2016, 07:10 AM

MichMan (10,410 posts)

1. Obvious examples of Russian hacking n/t

Reply to this post

Response to MichMan (Reply #1)

Sat Dec 3, 2016, 09:33 AM

FBaggins (26,184 posts)

2. No kidding

Then there's this:

The author claims

In other instances, voters circled the name of the candidate they were attempting to vote for, because the instructions never did say anything about how they were supposed to mark the candidate they were voting for

Despite clear instructions right there on the sample ballot he uses add an illustration.

Are we down to hoping that thousands more democrats are unable to follow instructions than republicans?

Reply to this post

Response to FBaggins (Reply #2)

Sat Dec 3, 2016, 01:03 PM

MichMan (10,410 posts)

3. I thought we are the educated ones? n/t

Reply to this post

Response to iluvtennis (Original post)

Sat Dec 3, 2016, 01:29 PM

DeminPennswoods (15,115 posts)

4. You'd be surprised at how creative people are

when you don't want them to be. Years ago, I helped process forms for procurement quantities. The codes were few and simple, but there were always forms that had revisions with the codes in the wrong place or codes written wrong and what-have-you. That was why the forms had to be checked by a person before being sent for automated processing.

Reply to this post

2016 Postmortem (Forum)