Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:17 AM Dec 2016

Blaming external problems is just asserting weakness

Re: the numerous blame threads

I agree that lots of bad things happened that hurt Clinton and were beyond her control. But you can't fix any of that by sheer force of complaining, and focusing on it quickly turns into 16 years of crying about little old Nader. How do you think that hostility towards rinky-dink bit players fares in the face of being utterly feckless against a party that produced: monstrous debt, mass incarceration, Bush, the Iraq debacle, a policy of torture, mass financial industry corruption, legendary congressional inaction, government shutdowns, and now TV's Trump?

I know it's hard work, and people just love to distract themselves by blaming the hostile universe around us, but the democrats desperately have to focus on fixing the internal failures consuming them since those are something they do actually have control over.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blaming external problems is just asserting weakness (Original Post) hellofromreddit Dec 2016 OP
this assumes we lost fair and square. unblock Dec 2016 #1
white working class people don't face these obstacles... but guess who does. boston bean Dec 2016 #2
+1, yeap... seems the exit poll skewing etc is happening in the voter suppression states and uponit7771 Dec 2016 #6
Of course it's not fair! In what world do you think we live? hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #8
Burying your head in the sand isn't strength kcr Dec 2016 #3
+1, "It's nothing but a false sense of control." uponit7771 Dec 2016 #5
You're right, Comey, Voter suppression and Russia were the only DOCUMENTED reasons she uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4
Why lead in by calling me Comey? I know that you mean it as an insult. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #9
sry bout that...edited uponit7771 Dec 2016 #10
When you've won the PV twice in the last 16 years and all you get is Dubya and Trump BeyondGeography Dec 2016 #7
Does that apply to Bernie too? BainsBane Dec 2016 #11
Sure, have at it. But mind the context. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #13
Push votes away? BainsBane Dec 2016 #15
Congress got decimated. States got decimated. If you have internet access, it's easy to check. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #17
Nonsense TwilightZone Dec 2016 #12
Address? Sure. Scapegoat? No. hellofromreddit Dec 2016 #14
No, you really aren't. TwilightZone Dec 2016 #16
You misunderstood GummyBearz Dec 2016 #18
From the "blame the DNC, DWS, blacks/gays/women for Bernie's loss" crowd, this argument is BobbyDrake Dec 2016 #19

unblock

(51,974 posts)
1. this assumes we lost fair and square.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:37 AM
Dec 2016

we can fix all the internal problems we want, then our candidate might be more popular by 5% or 10% instead of 2%

but we will continue to lose as long as republicans are removing eligible voters from the rolls, reducing the number of polling places, preventing mail-in voting, requiring onerous identification, using unverifiable and easily manipulated voting machines, and otherwise playing around with the actual vote numbers.

uponit7771

(90,225 posts)
6. +1, yeap... seems the exit poll skewing etc is happening in the voter suppression states and
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:50 AM
Dec 2016

... I'm going to be far from trying to blame ourselves for it.

I think a 50 state all county pre election YEAR strategy will work better but there's not much I'd change about this election

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
8. Of course it's not fair! In what world do you think we live?
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 07:53 PM
Dec 2016

If your strategy is to passively wait until the day that things are fair, I've got terrible news for you. There are no fair fights. The only things you can do are prepare for all the unfair shit the world throws your way and know that there will be no end to it. How many actually important struggles were won through people bitching and crying about unfairness?

Zero. They all took actual work, which included a hell of a lot of self-doubt and improvement to fix the flaw or fix the doubt.

You prepare as best you can and go face it toe-to-toe. The Clinton campaign failed because it was preoccupied with shooting holes in its own feet or hiding out at fundraisers. The party keeps failing because so far the response to every loss is to (1) double down on feel-good bullshit about how awesome we all are, (2) punch down at third party candidates and young voters, and (3) abandon the base, like we did when ACORN was under bullshit attack from the republicans.

So, no, I did not assume fairness.

kcr

(15,300 posts)
3. Burying your head in the sand isn't strength
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:45 AM
Dec 2016

In fact, it's quite stupid. It's nothing but a false sense of control. It also emboldens the evil. This is the rallying cry of those who want to assert that might makes right. The world is a harsh place, and everyone is meant to turn away and ignore the bad that is done. There's no point in fixing it because that's how it's meant to be. There are no bad people, only the weak that they preyed upon. They are always the ones at fault if something bad happened to them, therefore they must be weak. It's meant to give people the false comfort that nothing bad could ever happen to them as long as they do everything right.

uponit7771

(90,225 posts)
5. +1, "It's nothing but a false sense of control."
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:47 AM
Dec 2016

Thank you for this... that's been my life for a second

uponit7771

(90,225 posts)
4. You're right, Comey, Voter suppression and Russia were the only DOCUMENTED reasons she
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:46 AM
Dec 2016

Last edited Thu Dec 8, 2016, 08:12 PM - Edit history (1)

... could've lost by slim margins in the voter suppression states but lets ignore those well agreed upon factors and point towards Clinton :rolleyes:

BeyondGeography

(39,283 posts)
7. When you've won the PV twice in the last 16 years and all you get is Dubya and Trump
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 10:06 AM
Dec 2016

for your trouble, I think people can be excused for railing at the system. We've won the PV 6 of the last 7 times, in fact, more people (again) voted for Democratic candidates than Republicans, our positions on the issues consistently poll better than Republicans and all we get is the hope that Chuck Schumer will be able to keep his minority caucus in line.

How did we get here? Here's where I agree wholeheartedly with you: The mind-numbing failure of Democrats, from President Obama on down, to brand the Republicans for the soul-sucking, economy-killing, planet-destroying thugs that they are is killing us. From now on, no Democrat, and that starts with you, Barack Obama, once you no longer have the responsibility of the presidency pushing you in the direction of decorum, should be allowed to say, "Congress," when talking about what ails our politics and our country. It's "the Republicans." Stop overselling the average American's ability to "get it." If we keep saying when they go low, we go high, we might as well just get high because that will be our only consolation.

This should be easy, with a Republican in the WH, Republicans controlling the house and Senate, a Republican majority in the SC and Republican Governors heading 2/3 of the states. Shame these bastards! We've been taking it on the chin from these assholes since the 60s. They have branded us as unacceptable, anti-American freaks, and now we're looking at a 6X bankrupted failed casino owner, compulsive liar and thrice-married certified sexual predator as President who is already basically guaranteeing us (with full Republican support) that he will be the most corrupt occupant of the White House in history. They are asking us to go on the ideological warpath, begging us, in fact. Will we? It's pathetic that we even have to wonder.

BainsBane

(53,001 posts)
11. Does that apply to Bernie too?
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 08:43 PM
Dec 2016

Are people going to admit he played a role in his own loss? Or is it somehow limited to Clinton?

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
13. Sure, have at it. But mind the context.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:30 PM
Dec 2016

He wasn't the nominee and didn't push votes away from the down ticket races. Losing at the top of the party in a presidential general election is a very big deal.

BainsBane

(53,001 posts)
15. Push votes away?
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:39 PM
Dec 2016

What evidence do you have for that? You claim expertise with no data. All this reveals is your dislike of Clinton, and you've decided she is personally to blame for failing to accomplish what no Democrat has since Harry Truman.

I never saw you here once during the GE campaign, yet now you think you have some expertise to declare that no external factors were any way relevant, which is a nonsensical. External factors are always relevant. And if you truly believe the only problem was Hillary, there is nothing to discuss since she won't be a candidate in the future. Therefore there is no reason to try to get others to accept your one-dimensional explanation.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
17. Congress got decimated. States got decimated. If you have internet access, it's easy to check.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:52 PM
Dec 2016

Not to mention that every single time a presidential candidate fares poorly, the party fares poorly. It's sort of a common knowledge thing.

All this reveals is your dislike of Clinto,

As long as you equivocate criticism and 'dislike' you have no ability to improve.

failing to accomplish what no Democrat has since Harry Truman

Lame excuse. Truman pulled it off.

I never saw you here once during the GE campaign

Neat. I really don't see how your personal perception of my username from across the internet governs my skill set.

you think you have some expertise to declare that no external factors were any way relevant

Never said that.

TwilightZone

(25,342 posts)
12. Nonsense
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 08:45 PM
Dec 2016

If we don't address outside influences, there's nothing stopping them from being used again in the future.

I know this is difficult for some to understand, but it is possible for an event to have multiple causes. Trying to boil this election down to one or two soundbytes completely ignores the big picture.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
14. Address? Sure. Scapegoat? No.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:33 PM
Dec 2016

I said nothing about excluding everything else from consideration. I'm only advocating to also include some self-reflection.

TwilightZone

(25,342 posts)
16. No, you really aren't.
Thu Dec 8, 2016, 09:50 PM
Dec 2016

You're posting over and over with variations of a theme: it's all Hillary's fault. We shouldn't have run her. She was a horrible candidate. Blah, blah.

You're not really fooling anyone.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
18. You misunderstood
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 01:18 PM
Dec 2016

The "postmortem" board isn't where we brainstorm to solve problems or figure out why things happened as they did. It is a place for supporters of a certain candidate to blame everyone else for what happened without any introspection. If you suggest anything else you are risking alerts

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
19. From the "blame the DNC, DWS, blacks/gays/women for Bernie's loss" crowd, this argument is
Fri Dec 9, 2016, 01:51 PM
Dec 2016

...ridiculously hilarious.

Thanks for the laughs though.

"Of all the words of mice and men, the saddest are, "It might have been." -Kurt Vonnegut

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Blaming external problems...