2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRepublican Long Term Strategy
The way it went and goes:
Reagan gets elected and simultaneously demonizes and de-funds government. He uses his 8 years to plaster the federal bench with like-minded corporate welfare judges. The judges, using the precedent of the Air Traffic Control Strike begin to remove the labor unions from our political system. Labor Unions find it more difficult to resource their efforts and and organized labor activity drops greatly over the next 20 years. These judges play a great role in keeping alive the impeachment efforts against Bill Clinton and consequently, with the aid of the Republican Supreme Court we get the Shrub for 8 years. The Shrub continues to destroy good governance, "heck of a job Brownie," so that in 2008, after the economic meltdown, when a Democrat is elected Tea Party Thugs are able to build a forest fire against government, and not the Wall Street Banksters. The Republicans, seeing their ground gain electoral efforts being destroyed by Obama's election team get Citizens United passed so that corporate money can overtake shoe leather election efforts. The Tea Baggers and their corporate paymasters can't steal the Presidency, but manage to help state republicans gerrymander their districts so that the Tea Thugs hold onto the House of Representatives, despite losing the popular vote. It seems with this hold onto the House they can force the government into default and then blame the government. Their answer will be to privatize all activities the government has "failed" to do after the self-inflicted wound of the Debt Ceiling default.
Their strategy is diabolical, but can be defeated. An all out effort, Presidential election year effort, to rid the country of the tea party thugs who control the House. In addition, President Obama must make a priority getting his judges through the Senate. These two things will go a long way to derail Republican long-term plans. Just my thoughts.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)kairos12
(13,353 posts)One might say it even began with General Electric supporting a failing actor to become Governor of California back in the 60s. In some cases Nixon was too pro-government, creation of the EPA, for example, for the anti-government corporate crowd. But I agree, the win at any cost and destroy the other side with impunity, was certainly a tactic Nixon brought to the table and was carried on by Republicans.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I'm reading "America's Stolen Narrative" by Robert Parry which begins with Nixon doing everything possible to block the Paris Peace process Johnson was desperate to achieve. My brother died in Vietnam in 1969...had he not interferred, it is entirely possible there would have been a cease fire and I would still have 2 brothers. Reagan was a self-serving idiot but Nixon was downright evil...IMHO
We People
(619 posts)It was still a very good summary of what's gone on and what needs to happen.
Edit to add: I hadn't refreshed my browser in time to realize that the OP agreed. Never mind!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)When some of these people like Roberts were in college and recruited by the Federalist Society. I recommend both of Jeffery Toobin's books, The Nine and The Oath. Both talk about how the Supreme Court justices (past as in the four that recently left the bench, and the current ones) grew up, went to college and began their careers up until they were appointed.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I'm almost finished with "America's Stolen Narrative" by Robert Parry. Another hair raiser and he indicts the media as well.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)It goes a lot into the history of Obama and Roberts which is interesting. Also talks about the two new justices (Kagen and Sotomayor)
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)if I disagree.
Just downloaded The Oath to my Kindle Paper White...a new toy I absolutely love!
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I haven't adapted well to reading text on a screen. I do that a lot for my doctoral work and it strains my eyes too much. I am still the kind of person that likes to touch what I read. Printing things out is such a waste though. It leaves me torn sometimes as which to do.
I will say that every time I read Toobin's books I come away hating Scalia even more because he so accurately covers what an ass he is.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)I downloaded it yesterday and began reading it late last night. So, now I know that we didn't always think the second amendment pertained to individuals owning whatever guns they wanted and that Obama doesn't believe in using the court system to change society. I agree with him...we need to use the ballot. I'm up to Chapter 4...Appendix E. My son is a new Tax Attorney...completed his LL.M. in 2011 and went to work for a small firm in Miami...wonder how familiar he is with the work of Ruth and Marty.
Scalia gets all of the little things right and the big things wrong. His opinions make for hilarious reading, however. I read "Scalia Dissents" a few years ago and laughed all the way through it. If Scalia wasn't such an ass O'Connor would have voted his way more often...it was his obnoxious personality that moved her to the liberal side on important votes. I find Roberts and Alito much more dangerous. Roberts used his vote on the ACA to begin building a fence around the commerce clause. I think Toobin has rightly pointed out that Dems tend to ignore the courts unless the rethugs become too aggressive....It has allowed the GOP to build up a powerful force within the entire court system. Blocking Obama's appointments on all levels has become a real problem, both for the mechanics of the system and the ideology. He will have to fill those seats this term or we are screwed if the Rep. take the WH in 2016. (I am a believer in planning for the worst while hoping & working for the best.)
You would love the Kindle Paper White... You can adjust the lighting and the font sizes. An avid reader told me he gets through books faster on his Kindle. I think he was being absolutely truthful. I seem to breeze through a book on my Paper White. Like you, I'm not a big fan of reading from a computer screen. I find I can read longer and faster on the Paper White. My Kindle arrived Tuesday and I'm on my second book....
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Which would be a nice benefit.
Toobin makes so many good points in both his books and he continues to spur my interest in the Supreme Court. Personally I think Scalia's decision should be used as toilet paper as that is all they are worth. I'm not kidding the more I read about him the more he pisses me off. There is one part in the book that talks about Scalia making jokes during oral arguments and Roberts finally has to tell him to shut his yap.
Obama needs to start building for the court of the future by getting nominees appointed and purging the conservatives. That will take decades and a few more D presidents though.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)Finished The Oath last night...Thank you so much for the rec!
Funny, I think the egomaniacal Kennedy comes off much worse in this book. Scalia is a buffoon, always has been...Kennedy enjoys wielding his power way too much. Thomas has done the most damage to the nation with his rabid originalism...according to Toobin, it was Thomas who introduced the language which framed the second amendment as an individual's right to bear arms into the court record.
Certain things have been made very clear to me lately... It has been the failure of Democrats to fight back that is responsible for the mess we're in. I almost fell out of my chair when I read that Biden made the decision to not call the witnesses who would have backed up Anita Hill's testimony. If he enters the primary for the Dem nomination, he will not get my vote.
I am thoroughly disgusted with the lack of judicial appointments...he is not carrying out his constitutional responsibilities.
Yes, the e-books are bit cheaper, but not as cheap as they used to be. I just can't get over the ease and speed with which I can now get through a book. It is going to take a lot of self discipline in order to plow through the stacks of hard copy books I already own...
Again, thanks for a great rec.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)If you get a chance, go back and read The Nine. That one was just as good.
Sekhmets Daughter
(7,515 posts)We People
(619 posts)Sooooo.....K&R!
samsingh
(17,904 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Oregon's is 8.95, Washington State is 9.19 I think. Increases according to the urban CPI in both States....the State by State list:
http://www.ncsl.org/issues-research/labor/state-minimum-wage-chart.aspx
meow2u3
(24,958 posts)and install a dictator or gang of dictators. And they have the nerve to call us tyrants?
Jamaal510
(10,893 posts)as long as it's on the state level. They feel they can do whatever they want state-by-state whether it's denying people access to Obamacare, make voting more inconvenient for low-income people, outlawing abortions, raising sales taxes (like with Jindal), or even a certain failed presidential candidate who inspired the creation of Obamacare.
11 Bravo
(24,078 posts)kairos12
(13,353 posts)If 11 Bravo is your MOS than we share that designation.
11 Bravo
(24,078 posts)HOOAH!
kairos12
(13,353 posts)BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)So that President Obama can nominate young liberal justices to replace them. There's no telling who will be president after 2016 and the last thing we need is to have Ginsburg and Breyer replaced with another Alito and another Scalia.
kairos12
(13,353 posts)Your post is thinking ahead, however the Senate will never confirm any judge who leans as far to the left as Alito and Scalia are to the right. Obama is faced with appointing mild-mannered centrists who can't or won't fight the rightist jurists from a true left leaning perspective. It is a shame, but any truly leftist judge will be filibustered.
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)...Sotomayor and Kagan are arguably "leftist" judges and both were confirmed easily with significant Republican support. The Democrats didn't filibuster either Roberts or Alito, either. Although a few judges appointed to the federal bench have been filibustered, every Supreme Court justice nominee in my lifetime has received a straight up-or-down vote (except for two who withdrew before their hearings even began).
kairos12
(13,353 posts)I think his two picks are good ones. I am thinking however of a true ideological warrior like Goodwin Liu from Berkeley who was blocked by the Republicans. I believe he, or someone like him, is the ideological answer for swinging the direction of the court against Roberts and Alito.
BlueDemKev
(3,003 posts)...we don't need a left-wing ideologue to balance out Alito and Scalia. All we need is to get at least five liberal judges on the court from the Souter/Breyer mold and we'll have a majority. Unfortunately, I don't see any of the five conservative justices stepping down over the next four years, do you? Kennedy and Scalia are both in their mid-70s, Thomas turns 65 this year, and Roberts and Alito are under 60. At the very least, we need to HOLD the four liberal seats we currently have, which is why Ginsburg and Breyer need to step down--preferably this year or next while we have a solid Democratic majority in the Senate which will confirm Obama's appointments.
stultusporcos
(327 posts)which is what we are seeing today which is practical, moderate and centrist.