Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GusFring

(756 posts)
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 08:33 PM Jun 2013

I've been reading some right wing sites take on Obama and the Naval Judge

I just don't get why everything turns political. Instead of being disgusted with the Judge and the rapists, they find another way to take a shot at Obama. It's just sickening. What can Obama do to this judge? And why can't he sign an executive order to put rape cases in federal court?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I've been reading some right wing sites take on Obama and the Naval Judge (Original Post) GusFring Jun 2013 OP
Absolutely--and Jackpine Radical Jun 2013 #1
I like the idea that a President can't change military law by executive order. In this instance okaawhatever Jun 2013 #2
Correct. There would be less room for those Skidmore Jun 2013 #3
That's no different than what goes on here at DU! Liberal_Stalwart71 Jun 2013 #4
K&R AD INFINITUM!!!!!!!! rury Jun 2013 #5

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Absolutely--and
Sat Jun 15, 2013, 09:54 PM
Jun 2013

the garbage collectors always make such a racket at 6:30 in the goddam morning. Why won't Obama do something about it?

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
2. I like the idea that a President can't change military law by executive order. In this instance
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 02:18 AM
Jun 2013

it's worthy, but the precedent is scary. Important separations of power exist in our gov't to separate the President from the military. Look at every bad country and their leaders were probably military leaders who led a coup against the gov't. That's why the military is overseen by the civilian President. The President can't use the military within the country for law enforcement purposes. The upper level military are not supposed to speak about politics or the military in public. I think this should and will be appealed. scotus may ultimately hear this case. I tried to do a little research on the judge. I didn't find much, but he doesn't seem like a rwnj. Could be wrong. I think the larger problem is that many soldiers think it's okay to talk the shit they do about the President. This wouldn't have happened in the military twenty years ago. I think both the rape problem and the CIC problem are that the commanders have lost control of their soldiers. It's sad and scary. I think the multiple deployments have contributed to that.

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
3. Correct. There would be less room for those
Sun Jun 16, 2013, 08:21 AM
Jun 2013

who are always screaming for the President to issue executive orders in response to every issue or grievance if Congress hadn't blurred the separation between the legislative and the executive branches by abdicating its oversight role and legislating away its war power. They are usually the same people who shriek the loudest when he uses them. I think that he has been trying to force Congress to do its job but it has become a haven for teabagger scoundrels. When the branches of government do not do their assigned jobs, a vaccuum is created and someone seeks to fill it.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»I've been reading some ri...