2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDo ex governors make the best Presidents,
aside from foreign policy they have experience running a state and making decisions?
pipoman
(16,038 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I would rather any Dem Washington insider than him...any one at all.
Response to pipoman (Reply #1)
Proud Public Servant This message was self-deleted by its author.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 11, 2014, 05:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Kennedy and Johnson were not. Neither was Obama.
Clinton was. GHW Bush was not.
Jimmy Carter was, he only got one term. Gerald Ford, appointed/interim, was not.
FDR was (corrected); Harry Truman, Ike--they never governed a state.
I think the leadership qualities of the PERSON trump any particular experience requirement. That said, the more "real world" experience a person has, where actual leadership is demanded--be it military or governmental--can often make the difference. A governor from a "weak governor" state where the ability of the governor to actually do anything is constrained (MA is one, TX is another) might not have as much leadership talent as one thinks.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)He was governor of NY!
MADem
(135,425 posts)Too focused on his time with the Navy Department, I was...!!!
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Reagan.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)And I think it's no mistake that conventional lists of our ten greatest presidents generally list 9 with previous executive experience as governors, generals, or both (the exception is Truman, the quintessential example of someone who had greatness thrust upon him).
spin
(17,493 posts)An ex governor has a background in political leadership that can be very beneficial. An ex general or a CEO of a major corporation would also have leadership experience, but the culture of the military or the business world differ considerably from that found in the Washington D.C political environment.
Probably no previous job can adequately prepare you to be the President of the United States.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Any senior leadership position in the legislative administrative end of things helps.
LBJ knew how to arm-twist, as he held leadership positions in the House and was, as Robert Caro termed him, the "Master of the Senate."
Never hurts to know the players and know how to persuade them...
spin
(17,493 posts)whistler162
(11,155 posts)where great Presidents!
yortsed snacilbuper
(7,939 posts)It seems like all the repub governors are dirt bags!
Tom Corbett, Pennsylvania
Nikki Haley, South Carolina
Jan Brewer, Arizona
Paul LePage, Maine
Chris Christie, New Jersey
Rick Perry, Texas
John Kasich, Ohio
Rick Snyder, Michigan
Scott Walker, Wisconsin
Rick Scott, Florida
malthaussen
(17,175 posts)... gives me thoughts that would get me banned if I expressed them.
-- Mal
MADem
(135,425 posts)I'll bet a lot of us share those thoughts!
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Beacool
(30,247 posts)I think that running a state is like running a mini country. A governor has to make many executive decisions throughout his tenure. He needs to balance the budget and handle the state legislature. He also needs to think on his feet when the unexpected happens (such as natural disasters).
I think that executive experience is a plus in a president. Obviously it's not a guarantee of success, Bush Jr. being a prime example, but it sure is a positive. That's why there have been more former governors as president than senators.