Number of female US Senator after 2016.

[NPolitics1979]

Last edited Sat Mar 14, 2015, 11:52 PM - Edit history (1)

1)Murkowski-AK
2)Feinstein-CA
3)Harris-CA
4)Hirono-HI
5)Duckworth or Bustos-IL
6)Ernst-IA
7)Collins-ME
8)Warren-MA
9)Stabenow-MI
10)Klobuchar-MN
11)McCaskill-MO
12)Fischer-NE
13)Shaheen-NH
14)Ayotte or Hassan or McLane Kuster-NH
15)Gillibrand-NY
16)Heitkamp-ND
17)Murray-WA
18)Cantwell-WA
19)Capito-WV
20)Baldwin-WI
21) Assuming Edwards-MD wins the primary.

[MiniMe]

1. You have Mikulski in there twice with 2 different results

Don't know which will happen, or if somebody else steps up, but we may lose a house seat since they can't both be elected to the House and Run for the Senate

[Retrograde]

3. Don't count your senators before they're elected

Harris has a good chance of taking over Boxer's Senate seat - but she has to make it through the primary first. Landrieu got voted out last year: I don't see the current LA political climate making it easy for her to get elected next year. While Giffords has recovered remarkably from her injuries, I think she's retired from politics.

[longship]

4. Your table is difficult to understand.

24) Giffords or Sinema-AZ.

You don't mean Gabby Giffords, do you?

Why mix Mikulski and Duckworth in item 20)?

And like another poster asked, why two Mikulskis, once replaced by Van Hollen, and once by Edwards?

And all under the title, "Not up for reelection in 2016"?
I confess that I am confused.

[brooklynite]

5. Mary Landrieu isn't in the Senate.

Are you assuming she runs for Vitter's seat?

[RussBLib]

6. not many in the "south"

gee, I wonder why?