Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 01:02 PM Mar 2015

Guess What Happened When JPMorgan's CEO Visited Elizabeth Warren's Office

A meeting between Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Jamie Dimon deteriorated almost immediately after the JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO visited the recently elected senator and consumer advocate at her Capitol Hill office in 2013.

snip.......

When the conversation turned to financial regulation and Dimon began complaining about all the burdensome rules his bank had to follow, I finally interrupted. I was polite, but definite. No, I didn’t think the biggest banks were overregulated. In fact, I couldn’t believe he was complaining about regulatory constraints less than a year after his bank had lost billions in the infamous London Whale high-risk trading episode. I said I thought the banks were still taking on too much risk and that they seemed to believe the taxpayers would bail them out -- again -- if something went wrong.

Our exchange heated up quickly. By the time we got to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, we weren’t quite shouting, but we were definitely raising our voices. At this point -- early in 2013 -- Rich Cordray was still serving as director of the consumer agency under a recess appointment; he hadn’t yet been confirmed by the Senate, which meant that the agency was vulnerable to legal challenges over its work. Dimon told me what he thought it would take to get Congress to confirm a director, terms that included gutting the agency’s power to regulate banks like his. By this point I was furious. Dodd-Frank had created default provisions that would automatically go into effect if there was no confirmed director, and his bank was almost certainly not in compliance with the those rules. I told him that if that happened, “I think you guys are breaking the law.”

Suddenly Dimon got quiet. He leaned back and slowly smiled. “So hit me with a fine. We can afford it.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/31/elizabeth-warren-jamie-dimon_n_6972182.html?cps=gravity_2425_-4045045229863091840

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guess What Happened When JPMorgan's CEO Visited Elizabeth Warren's Office (Original Post) UCmeNdc Mar 2015 OP
Just a fine? scscholar Mar 2015 #1
Yes the Republican Party is letting the banksters run amok UCmeNdc Mar 2015 #3
Well, Warren's CPFB is the only veto-able administration in the US. joshcryer Apr 2015 #7
Christ, what an insufferable asshole. Arkana Mar 2015 #2
Hit him with a chair lame54 Mar 2015 #4
Better yet davidpdx Apr 2015 #11
What a douche Mz Pip Mar 2015 #5
even better than that Angel Martin Apr 2015 #8
great story! stuffmatters Mar 2015 #6
Where's the French Revolution when you need it? nt TeamPooka Apr 2015 #9
bankers are very quiet about the student loans, yet when you google banks with student loans.. Sunlei Apr 2015 #10
Student Loans = Slavery for life UCmeNdc Apr 2015 #12
Bank Peonage. The bank owns everything the student and their co-signers own until paid in full. Sunlei Apr 2015 #13

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
3. Yes the Republican Party is letting the banksters run amok
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 02:40 PM
Mar 2015

The GOP wanted to give them more TAX payer money.....

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)
7. Well, Warren's CPFB is the only veto-able administration in the US.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 01:14 AM
Apr 2015

Warren didn't fight against it and that's what happens, in the end.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
11. Better yet
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 01:19 AM
Apr 2015

Dangle him outside his highrise office window by his feet for a few hours. Honestly I think they should slap some serious charges against him and give him like 10,000 hours of community service, the type in which a phone can't be used and he would have to work with disadvantaged children.

Mz Pip

(27,439 posts)
5. What a douche
Tue Mar 31, 2015, 03:53 PM
Mar 2015

He makes more money than God and still has the nerve to whine about the government over-regulating his business.

Angel Martin

(942 posts)
8. even better than that
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 04:37 PM
Apr 2015

the govt/Fed have red circled his bank for survival, no matter what they do, what risks they take, and how big a future crisis they create

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
10. bankers are very quiet about the student loans, yet when you google banks with student loans..
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 04:30 AM
Apr 2015

All the banks hand loans out and gather, amass refinance loans.

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=banks+with+student+loans

banks set up another big profit windfall of revenue, gov money, possible bail-out revenue and asset seizures.

UCmeNdc

(9,600 posts)
12. Student Loans = Slavery for life
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 04:50 AM
Apr 2015

Or Indentured Servant

Indentured servitude was a labor system whereby young people paid for their passage to the New World by working for an employer for a certain number of years. It was widely employed in the 18th century in the British colonies in North America and elsewhere.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
13. Bank Peonage. The bank owns everything the student and their co-signers own until paid in full.
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 08:10 AM
Apr 2015

Even death will not settle the debt.

I bet banks already start to bundle and trade the student loans like they did with mortgages. Waiting for Gov. bailout money.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Guess What Happened When ...