2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhat are the chances Hillary's private servers were hacked?
I think it's time to have this discussion.
The largest retailers in the world, with all their money, are NOT immune to hacking. We know this. Millions upon millions of $'s to throw at the problem, and they get hacked. Enough money to employ the brightest minds in the industry to protect their systems, and they get hacked. Millions upon millions of American Citizens have had their personal information exposed to "bad guys" (with guns and without) who will wait until the opportunity presents itself in order to do THE FUCKING WORST THINGS IMAGINABLE with the information.
I want someone to tell me Hillary Clinton's server(s) were NOT hacked. I want them to tell me how they know. I want them to PROVE it. I want them to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt.
Let's have a discussion about what's possible if they WERE hacked. Do we really want a President whose supposedly "private" emails could possibly be in the possession of foreign governments that our OWN governments treat as hostile entities?
Fuck Benghazi. Fuck Whitewater and EVERYTHING in between. Those are bullshit, made-up NON scandals. Fuck the "Grand Right-Wing Conspiracy".
It's time to talk about whether or not electing Hillary Clinton might be detrimental to national security.
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-03-18/hillary-clinton-s-e-mail-was-vulnerable-to-spoofing-
http://gawker.com/how-unsafe-was-hillary-clintons-secret-staff-email-syst-1689393042
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)They may or may not have. My guess is the were probably not hacked but I do not know for sure.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Oops... no. Hers were off-site and therefore off-system.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Who decided to climb the fence and run INTO THE WHITE HOUSE with it.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)Did Hillary's private servers have the same grand protection?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Have you noticed that goverment computers are not exactly secure either?
I said it because you said you wanted to hear someone say it so i said it.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Rounding to the nearest integer.
Can you fathom foreign governments not taking a crack at a server used by the SoS? And since we've heard zip about security measures in her basement, it's hard to believe that China, Russia, Israel, and many others were reading every email.
uppityperson
(115,895 posts)ETA. To start with : How do you prove a negative?
LuvLoogie
(7,665 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Geek Squad guy.
DURHAM D
(32,862 posts)and gave them to Wikileaks. Sounds like the servers of an ex-President run by the Secret Service might be a better way to go than anything the State Department is using.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)email server administrator does? System checks and all that? Somehow I doubt that.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Former presidents are entitled to see classified information and they wish to make suretheir computers are secure.
Yes it is very logical that the ss would do this.
Especially when they knew the SOS decided to use the system.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)because SS guarded the house. Which, of course, only means it's physically secure. I have not read anywhere that SS actually administers ex-Presidents' home computer networks.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Service is in the business of overseeing their cybersecurity. If that's true, then GWB's family wouldn't have been email-hacked.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Is there anothr quote that I missed?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)She used the system they had in place for her husband.
Didn't you watch her press conference?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)But the only relevant quotes by Hillary that I can find is that the server was physically guarded by the Secret Service.
Maybe my Google-fu sucks tonight?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I want to make sure I don't watch the wrong one.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)CLINTON: Well, the system we used was set up for President Clintons office. And it had numerous safeguards. It was on property guarded by the Secret Service. And there were no security breaches.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)You mean these guys?
http://time.com/3449641/secret-service-scandal/
Earlier this year, three agents were sent home from a trip to the Netherlands after getting drunk the night before the President was set to arrive.
In 2013, two agents were removed from Presidential security detail after sending sexually inappropriate emails to a colleague, which was uncovered when one of the agents was discovered trying to forcefully enter a womans hotel room after forgetting a bullet inside.
In 2012, eight agents were fired after it emerged that they had allegedly solicited prostitutes while on an on-duty trip to Colombia.
In 2001, an agent admitted to having stolen nearly $3,000 in cash that the Secret Service had taken as evidence in the years prior.
Forgive me if that doesn't give me a warm and fuzzy feeling.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)But you can prove that it was hacked. So go for it and let us know what you found out.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Where is your outrage on that one?
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/09/politics/office-of-personnel-management-data-breach-20-million/index.html
Doesn't matter where/who has the server everything is hackable.
tularetom
(23,664 posts)The question is, what information was on them that could possibly threaten national security.
Like you, I'd like that question answered, but I don't think it ever will be.
And I'd like to know if she has learned anything from the experience, but I doubt that's gonna happen either.
So if she tells us it won't happen again I guess we'll just have to have faith in her.
Is that good enough for you?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)Wikileaks made that perfectly clear and I think it's reasonable to assume they do the same to us.
Did Hillary have some kind of advanced security protocol in her basement that was better than the State Department's to prevent this from happening? Doubt it.
I really hope she knew her correspondence was vulnerable and kept a lid on anything damaging. If we find out later during the general election campaign that she was hacked and sensitive information got out it's going to look like negligence and she'll be attacked for incompetence.
Capn Sunshine
(14,378 posts)Certainly she just used an out of the box server she bought second hand from hackersRus. Despite Secret Service protection and administration by their agents, she insisted on ignoring their pleas and used "password " for her password. And never installed any security software.
Because, all along, she wanted you and the others at DU to have a reason.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,095 posts)I think it is time we had this conversation.
Of course she does. Why wouldn't she? She is evil, as we all know.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)This just makes Hillary Clinton appear to be special,regarding her private emails ect as opposed to us little people and our privacy.Thank you Edward Snowden.
DemocratSinceBirth
(100,451 posts)eom
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Didn't think so.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)silenttigersong
(957 posts)Probobly just emails from her "Foriegn friends"and donations for the Clinton Foundation.