Thu Jul 16, 2015, 05:45 PM
BooScout (10,406 posts)
I'm a woman and I support Hillary Clinton.....
When in 2015, I see someone say that some women won't vote or support Hillary because she didn't leave her husband when their marriage was going through a rocky period, not to mention it was all being smeared across the tabloid press at the time.....tells me that people who say that do not know what Hillary Clinton is all about AT ALL.
I love Hillary Clinton. She has been a hero to me as a woman for much of my adult life. She is a fantastic mother, she's a wife who loves her husband and who has stood by him through thick and thin, for better or worse. She has never, ever run from a fight. For anyone to pass judgement on her for not abandoning her marriage is incredibly sad that they just dont 'get' Hillary. Hillary has paved paths for women like no woman has before her. She took on the battle for National Healthcare before it's time....but that didn't stop her from trying. She paved the way for what would take two more decades to achieve....and even now, the thought of National Healthcare is still being attacked. When it comes to women's issues, children's issues, education and other social issues, she has fought for what is important and been a true champion around the world for them. After 8 years of George Bush, she travelled over a million miles to 112 countries restoring the reputation of America and repairing the damage that the Bush administration had wrought. She was relentless and undaunted and she damned well did her job....and did it better than I think anyone else could. While she was restoring America's reputation she was also still fighting for women's and children's rights around the world. So if Hillary decided to stay with her husband and decided that her marriage was worth fighting for....all those that want to judge her for doing so can kiss my feminist ass and grow themselves a vagina. Thank you for allowing me to get up on my soapbox.
|
154 replies, 7678 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
BooScout | Jul 2015 | OP |
gwheezie | Jul 2015 | #1 | |
billhicks76 | Jul 2015 | #105 | |
SCantiGOP | Jul 2015 | #122 | |
billhicks76 | Jul 2015 | #132 | |
SCantiGOP | Jul 2015 | #135 | |
billhicks76 | Jul 2015 | #136 | |
SCantiGOP | Jul 2015 | #141 | |
DemocratSinceBirth | Jul 2015 | #144 | |
calimary | Jul 2015 | #149 | |
BooScout | Jul 2015 | #142 | |
NCTraveler | Jul 2015 | #146 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #2 | |
SamKnause | Jul 2015 | #3 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #5 | |
riversedge | Jul 2015 | #7 | |
840high | Jul 2015 | #10 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #11 | |
840high | Jul 2015 | #12 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #13 | |
ismnotwasm | Jul 2015 | #16 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #17 | |
99Forever | Jul 2015 | #22 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #24 | |
randys1 | Jul 2015 | #36 | |
okasha | Jul 2015 | #130 | |
99Forever | Jul 2015 | #39 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #43 | |
99Forever | Jul 2015 | #50 | |
Martin Eden | Jul 2015 | #67 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #79 | |
passiveporcupine | Jul 2015 | #99 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #65 | |
ismnotwasm | Jul 2015 | #131 | |
840high | Jul 2015 | #23 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #26 | |
London Lover Man | Jul 2015 | #31 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #37 | |
Android3.14 | Jul 2015 | #93 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #110 | |
840high | Jul 2015 | #55 | |
nc4bo | Jul 2015 | #134 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #64 | |
quickesst | Jul 2015 | #96 | |
Walk away | Jul 2015 | #116 | |
BainsBane | Jul 2015 | #153 | |
London Lover Man | Jul 2015 | #27 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #33 | |
London Lover Man | Jul 2015 | #35 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #40 | |
London Lover Man | Jul 2015 | #45 | |
Duval | Jul 2015 | #85 | |
Chan790 | Jul 2015 | #138 | |
George II | Jul 2015 | #60 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Jul 2015 | #25 | |
JaneyVee | Jul 2015 | #28 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #30 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #44 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #47 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #59 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #62 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #68 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #70 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #73 | |
Walk away | Jul 2015 | #117 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #46 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #52 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #58 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #63 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #66 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #69 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #76 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #78 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #83 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #84 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #86 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #88 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #90 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #92 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #98 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #100 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #104 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #107 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #113 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #121 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #124 | |
artislife | Jul 2015 | #148 | |
Bryce Butler | Jul 2015 | #94 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #97 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #102 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #109 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #111 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #112 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #115 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #118 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #125 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #114 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #119 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #123 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #127 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #128 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #129 | |
redstateblues | Jul 2015 | #89 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #91 | |
tymorial | Jul 2015 | #18 | |
Maedhros | Jul 2015 | #19 | |
SamKnause | Jul 2015 | #56 | |
beam me up scottie | Jul 2015 | #34 | |
SamKnause | Jul 2015 | #51 | |
arcane1 | Jul 2015 | #38 | |
SamKnause | Jul 2015 | #53 | |
MissDeeds | Jul 2015 | #49 | |
SamKnause | Jul 2015 | #54 | |
timdog44 | Jul 2015 | #80 | |
peacebird | Jul 2015 | #126 | |
Rockyj | Jul 2015 | #143 | |
MoonRiver | Jul 2015 | #4 | |
SunSeeker | Jul 2015 | #6 | |
R B Garr | Jul 2015 | #8 | |
sufrommich | Jul 2015 | #9 | |
Fearless | Jul 2015 | #14 | |
ismnotwasm | Jul 2015 | #15 | |
sheshe2 | Jul 2015 | #21 | |
Maedhros | Jul 2015 | #20 | |
Chan790 | Jul 2015 | #139 | |
Maedhros | Jul 2015 | #140 | |
Tikki | Jul 2015 | #29 | |
Aerows | Jul 2015 | #32 | |
Thinkingabout | Jul 2015 | #41 | |
Helen Borg | Jul 2015 | #42 | |
hedgehog | Jul 2015 | #48 | |
Rosa Luxemburg | Jul 2015 | #57 | |
freshwest | Jul 2015 | #61 | |
KMOD | Jul 2015 | #71 | |
SheilaT | Jul 2015 | #72 | |
William769 | Jul 2015 | #74 | |
Autumn | Jul 2015 | #75 | |
Ino | Jul 2015 | #77 | |
Bohemianwriter | Jul 2015 | #81 | |
840high | Jul 2015 | #137 | |
mikehiggins | Jul 2015 | #82 | |
BooScout | Jul 2015 | #133 | |
Stellar | Jul 2015 | #87 | |
YOHABLO | Jul 2015 | #95 | |
MisterP | Jul 2015 | #101 | |
whatchamacallit | Jul 2015 | #103 | |
Dr Hobbitstein | Jul 2015 | #106 | |
Name removed | Jul 2015 | #108 | |
Pastiche423 | Jul 2015 | #120 | |
stevenleser | Jul 2015 | #147 | |
NCTraveler | Jul 2015 | #145 | |
gwheezie | Jul 2015 | #150 | |
BooScout | Jul 2015 | #152 | |
silenttigersong | Jul 2015 | #151 | |
riversedge | Sep 2015 | #154 |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 05:54 PM
gwheezie (3,580 posts)
1. Couldn't agree more.
When people drag this old news out, its hard to believe they're dems. They sound just like Rush and Drudge.
|
Response to gwheezie (Reply #1)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:05 PM
billhicks76 (5,082 posts)
105. My Name Is George Bush Sr And I Support Hillary Clinton
I selected her as the back up in case we can't insert a Bush family member by name. Just like her husband I hand picked her as she is an "honorary" Bush family member.
|
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #105)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:37 PM
SCantiGOP (13,117 posts)
122. Nice attempt at hijacking the thread
Think you're getting senile, Poppy.
|
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #122)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:25 PM
billhicks76 (5,082 posts)
132. It's Called Reality
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #132)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:47 PM
SCantiGOP (13,117 posts)
135. Reality??
George Bush has endorsed Clinton? That's what passes for 'reality' these days?
If we disagree, let's at least try to discuss things rationally and remember that, at the end of the day, we're on the same team. |
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #135)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 11:11 PM
billhicks76 (5,082 posts)
136. I Didn't Say That
Clinton is the Bush enterouge back up candidate.
|
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #136)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:11 AM
SCantiGOP (13,117 posts)
141. That.s not delusional
It's batshit crazy, in the same league as FEMA tunnels under Texas WalMarts.
|
Response to SCantiGOP (Reply #141)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:00 PM
DemocratSinceBirth (98,693 posts)
144. That left a mark./nt
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #144)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:37 PM
calimary (74,759 posts)
149. GOOD!!!
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #136)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 09:19 AM
BooScout (10,406 posts)
142. Clinton is Bush's worst nightmare.....
You know it and I know it....and more importantly the GOP knows it and can't do one freaking thing about her except make spurious attacks on her that she smacks down with aplomb.
I would say 'nice try' regarding your spurious attack....but in all honesty, it's pretty pathetic. |
Response to billhicks76 (Reply #132)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:06 PM
NCTraveler (30,481 posts)
146. That really clears a lot up. Well, pretty much everything. nt.
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 05:55 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
2. Same here.
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 05:57 PM
SamKnause (12,708 posts)
3. I am a woman and I don't support Hillary.
I don't give a squat about her personal life.
I don't care who stays married or gets divorced. She is not trustworthy. She is too friendly with Wall Street. She is too willing to support wars and invasion. She is too willing to give tax cuts to corporations. She lied and included her daughter in that lie. (Sniper fire in Bosnia) |
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:00 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
5. Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
There's way too much at stake.
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #5)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:09 PM
riversedge (65,335 posts)
7. so very true
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #5)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:17 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
10. I won't vote for her. A better Democratic
party is at stake.
|
Response to 840high (Reply #10)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:20 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
11. Chalk another one up on the list:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=448722
Republicans thank you for your lack of participation. |
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #11)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:21 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
12. Your comment has no meaning for me.
Response to 840high (Reply #12)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:24 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
13. Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
Thank you in advance.
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:31 PM
ismnotwasm (40,959 posts)
16. Another one?
*sigh*
|
Response to ismnotwasm (Reply #16)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:33 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
17. Is that really too much to ask on a site called DEMOCRATIC Underground?
I think I'm being pretty reasonable here.
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #17)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:41 PM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
22. Going into the voting booth with them?
They frown on that here in Minnesota. I fairly certain it just might get your ass arrested. Even put curtains on the booths so people with nose problems can't stick them into other people's PRIVATE business.
Must suck to live somewhere there isn't a secret ballot. |
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #24)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:46 PM
randys1 (16,286 posts)
36. What part of SC appointment overturns ROE and kills Women in back alleys dont they get?
Response to randys1 (Reply #36)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:08 PM
okasha (11,573 posts)
130. The "Women" part.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #24)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:48 PM
99Forever (14,524 posts)
39. You are demanding a Loyalty Oath.
How do you plan to enforce it?
Telepathy? Spy cameras? Hypnotism? |
Response to 99Forever (Reply #39)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:51 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
43. A loyalty oath on Democratic website? Crazy.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #43)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:15 PM
Martin Eden (11,942 posts)
67. I'm not loyal to the Democratic Party
Loyalty must be earned, and far too many elected Democrats have betrayed The People they ostensibly represent.
I vote for good public policy, and for results. Sadly, the choice often comes down to status quo vs horrible public policy. I will vote AGAINST Republicans in the general election, but my faith in the American Dream dies a little bit every time I do that instead of casting my vote FOR a candidate I truly believe in. I don't think I'm alone in this regard. I also think GOTV -- motivating people to come to the polls who often don't bother -- is the key to winning the White House and regaining the houses of Congress. The People need/want something to vote FOR. I believe in Bernie Sanders. I cannot in good conscience vote for Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary, partly because of her close ties to Wall Street but mostly because of her vote for the IWR. That's a deal breaker for me, period. I will vote in the general election, and if my blue state of Illinois is even close to being up for grabs I will vote for the Dem presidential candidate regardless of who it is. If that candidate is Hillary Clinton, I will vote AGAINST the Republican. |
Response to Martin Eden (Reply #67)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:32 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
79. ^^^THIS^^^ No, Martin, you're not alone.
You should repost that as an op.
BRAVO! ![]() |
Response to Martin Eden (Reply #67)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:54 PM
passiveporcupine (8,175 posts)
99. Thank goodness we have a real progressive running this year
"I will vote AGAINST Republicans in the general election, but my faith in the American Dream dies a little bit every time I do that instead of casting my vote FOR a candidate I truly believe in."
This is probably a much better way to respond to those who say they refuse to vote for Hillary or Bernie in the general. Just say "please vote against Republicans", rather than staying home...even if it makes you die a little bit inside each time. It's still better than the real people who will die a real death because of Republican policies if we lose the White House in 2016...especially if that means more conservative Supreme Court nominees. It's not all about you. Your vote matters for everyone, not just you. (You in general, not you Martin) |
Response to 99Forever (Reply #39)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:15 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
65. By bullying anyone who doesn't support Hillary.
They really need to calm down.
They're turning people off to Hillary. |
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #17)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:12 PM
ismnotwasm (40,959 posts)
131. Yes you are.
Some of the responses are not, and that's really sad and pathetic.
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:42 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
23. I'll vote for whoever I damn please.
Response to 840high (Reply #23)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:44 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
26. Just not the Democratic nominee. Got it.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #26)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:45 PM
London Lover Man (371 posts)
31. Bernie will be the Democratic nominee at the end.
And you can thank the inept campaign staff of Clinton's for not fully preparing her against the progressive wave.
|
Response to London Lover Man (Reply #31)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:46 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
37. Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #37)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:45 PM
Android3.14 (5,402 posts)
93. I hate bullies
They bring nothing of value.
|
Response to Android3.14 (Reply #93)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:10 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
110. That's hilarious. Advocating for the unnamed 2016 Dem Primary winner
is now discouraged and of "no value."
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #26)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:59 PM
840high (17,196 posts)
55. U don't get shit. I'll vote for Bernie.
Response to 840high (Reply #55)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:27 PM
nc4bo (17,651 posts)
134. Jury decision results.
On Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:56 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
U don't get shit. I'll vote for Bernie. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=450019 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS Vulgar reply that is uncalled for. You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jul 16, 2015, 10:23 PM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: It is a vulgar reply, but it's also an easy idiom (Doesn't require much thought) and not over the top. Perhaps the best way to ensure we get every Democratic vote after the Primaries, is to not burn bridges at this early juncture. Juror #2 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: This alert is for real? This alert is just......argh spare me. Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT Explanation: No explanation given Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future. |
Response to 840high (Reply #23)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:13 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
64. +1
Stand up to the bullies.
![]() |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #64)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:50 PM
quickesst (6,247 posts)
96. haha...
If you think Clinton supporters are bullies, then this ought to scare the shit out of you.🐀
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #13)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:25 PM
Walk away (9,494 posts)
116. It will be so nice when these fake Democrats (anyone who won't vote for....
the Democratic candidate in the general election) are gone! It really stinks up the place!
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #11)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:44 PM
London Lover Man (371 posts)
27. Republicans are not scheduled to win in 2016.
Massive progressive wave with Bernie as the head is heading towards 2016.
|
Response to London Lover Man (Reply #27)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:45 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
33. Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #33)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:46 PM
London Lover Man (371 posts)
35. Yes and it will be Bernie, not Clinton.
Are you committed to voting for Bernie at the end?
|
Response to London Lover Man (Reply #35)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:49 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
40. Are you really asking me that question???
I just spent 10 minutes of my life typing "Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee" into numerous posts here. Pffft. Will you be voting for 2016 Dem nominee?
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #40)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:51 PM
London Lover Man (371 posts)
45. Yes, if it's Bernie, and yes, if it's Clinton..
But for Clinton, I must be stinking drunk to fill out the ballot and then sober enough to place two stamps on it and mail it in.
|
Response to London Lover Man (Reply #45)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:39 PM
Duval (4,280 posts)
85. Well, I'll hold my nose if it's not Bernie and vote against the Republicans.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #11)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:17 AM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
138. Maybe the fact that there are so many of us...
might suggest the imperative necessity of working to insure that a person so many of us will not vote for doesn't become the nominee.
![]() |
Response to 840high (Reply #10)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:09 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
60. With a republican in charge, there might not be much of a Democratic Party remaining...
.... to be "at stake" after four years.
|
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #5)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:43 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
25. Don't worry I will be voting for Berns
If Martin or Hillary wins then I will vote for them. Cheers!
|
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #25)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:44 PM
JaneyVee (19,877 posts)
28. A voice of reason.
Response to JaneyVee (Reply #5)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:45 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
30. Stop telling people who they have to vote for.
Aren't you guys the ones constantly complaining that Sanders' supporters are trying to control who DUers vote for?
Hypocrites. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #30)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:51 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
44. Which Hillary supporters are claiming they won't vote for the democratic
nominee? I've been here a long time, I don't ever remember a time when it was cool to say "if candidate X wins the primaries,I'm not voting democratic",do you?
|
Response to sufrommich (Reply #44)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:55 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
47. What does that have to do with demanding people vote for Hillary if she wins?
I don't think it's liberal to demand loyalty to any candidate.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #47)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:07 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
59. What? It's not "demanding people vote for Hillary" in the primaries.
You're completely ignoring what I said.I'll say it again this way, on DU you can argue for whomever you want during the primaries but what you've never been able to do here is advocate not voting for the democratic nominee or a third party,is that not true? Surely you're not really saying that anyone on any forum can actually demand you vote a certain way? All forums have rules,the only thing capable of being "forced" here is the TOS.
|
Response to sufrommich (Reply #59)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:11 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
62. I didn't say in the primaries, stop misrepresenting my post.
Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
That's telling someone who to vote for. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #62)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:15 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
68. You're on a Democratic discussion board that has a TOS.
Claiming that someone can "tell you who can actually vote for" is pure,silly hyperbole.
|
Response to sufrommich (Reply #68)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:19 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
70. Telling people to vote for the nominee is telling people who to vote for.
Sorry you can't see that but considering who your candidate is I'm not surprised you expect everyone here to swear out a loyalty oath.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #70)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:20 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
73. Oy. Nevermind. nt
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #47)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:28 PM
Walk away (9,494 posts)
117. Just to the party. But then you would have to be a committed Democrat.
![]() |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #30)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:55 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
46. LOL, how is it hypocritical to advocate for the 2016 Dem Primary winner?
Because that's all that was said...
|
Response to R B Garr (Reply #46)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:58 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
52. Because HC supporters accuse others of wanting to control who they vote for.
Don't tell me who to vote for.
Period. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #52)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:06 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
58. This is pure fabrication or willful misrepresentation.
The post didn't tell you WHO to vote for. No one was named except for the primary winner.
So just answer the poster's question about the primary winner or move on. Quit spinning. |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #58)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:12 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
63. "Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee"
That's telling someone who to vote for.
Quit spinning.
I believe you're the one guilty of that. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #63)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:15 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
66. You do realize you contradicted yourself?
"Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee"
Are you saying that couldn't be Bernie? ![]() That's how it's obvious you are spinning. |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #66)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:17 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
69. How so? I never told anyone how to vote.
It's a sacred duty and I take it seriously.
This isn't a game to me. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #69)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:23 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
76. LOL....
"This isn't a game to me."
![]() Yes, deciding whether to vote for the Dem 2016 primary winner is so tough, lol. Uh huh. ![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #76)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:30 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
78. Watching PUMAs tell Sanders supporters to vote for the nominee is hypocrisy squared.
But then after 2008 nothing surprises me.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #78)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:35 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
83. What is a PUMA? Let me guess, you're resorting to personal insults?
See how you spun that?? That's what I'm talking about...
|
Response to R B Garr (Reply #83)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:37 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
84. PUMA is not an insult.
They wore that label proudly just a few short years ago.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #84)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:40 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
86. mmm hmmm. Sure thing.
"they"
You are still spinning the fact that the question in this thread was about the 2016 Dem Primary winner. Just answer the question or move on. Quit spinning. |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #86)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:42 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
88. "Just answer the question"
Why?
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #88)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:43 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
90. More confusion?!
Oh dear.... I've seen this scam before.
![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #90)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:45 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
92. I just want to know why you're demanding I answer your question.
Why should I?
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #92)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:52 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
98. Oh, dear...
Nice spin.
![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #98)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:56 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
100. Nope, just want to know why I'm expected to answer your question.
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #100)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:04 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
104. Let's get back to honesty. You responded to Post #5
with nothing but unrelated spin. Its' either intentional spin or willful misrepresentation.
We're starting over now with this whole charade now as this was my response upthread; remember? Post No. 5: "Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee. There's way too much at stake." The question was about voting for the Dem 2016 Primary winner. No one knows yet who that is, so it's a yes or no question. This isn't tough if you honestly answer the question instead of axe grinding. ![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #104)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:07 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
107. I don't see the need for loyalty oaths.
Honestly.
And I've already explained how I would vote if Bernie doesn't win the nomination. I just resent it when people are badgered about it. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #107)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:18 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
113. I only see one person "badgering" and spinning, and
it's not who you've directed any posts to. It was a simple question about the 2016 Dem Primary winner. Not hard to answer. It's not honest to twist something so simple as Post No. 5 into a 20-something-response subthread of feigned confusion.
|
Response to R B Garr (Reply #113)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:35 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
121. How am I badgering anyone or spinning this? It's simple: it's none of your business who I vote for.
Got it?
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #121)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:41 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
124. LOL...
![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #86)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:09 PM
artislife (9,497 posts)
148. PUMA--Party unity my ass
![]() You can still buy at cafe press Here's a little article on who they were and where they are now http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/they-were-hillary-clintons-die-hard-loyalists-heres-where-they-are-now/2015/05/02/82025cf2-e92a-11e4-aae1-d642717d8afa_story.html They existed, still exist. They really don't like being told what to do. I understand.. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #78)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:48 PM
Bryce Butler (338 posts)
94. AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your Jury Service
On Thu Jul 16, 2015, an alert was sent on the following post:
Watching PUMAs tell Sanders supporters to vote for the nominee is hypocrisy squared. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=450101 REASON FOR ALERT This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate. ALERTER'S COMMENTS Calling Hillary supporters PUMA's is an insult.Especially considering that Clinton/Obama supporters on DU seem to be one and the same. It's an insult aimed at painting Clinton supporters as DUers who did not vote for Obama.It's a stereotype created by Rove and pushed by Rush. You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Thu Jul 16, 2015, and the Jury voted 0-7 to LEAVE IT. Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: Alerter needs to toughen up. This comment is not worth a hide. Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: puma was a pac that was in protest of bo's nomination. I believe the poster was tring to point out that hrc supporters now want bs supporters to accept her inevitability. Given the history of puma, the hypocrisy angle is a fair argument to make imo. Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE Explanation: No explanation given Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future. |
Response to Bryce Butler (Reply #94)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:51 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
97. Wow. Good jury. Thanks!
Alerter either needs a history lesson or a spanking for being so dishonest.
![]() |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #97)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:58 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
102. Speaking of honesty...this is the post #5 that you responded to:
"Just make sure you vote for the 2016 Dem nominee.
There's way too much at stake. " To twist that into saying someone is telling you who to vote for is simply not honest. |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #102)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:10 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
109. So did you learn anything about PUMAS?
I'd hate to think someone wasted that alert and got a 24 hour break for nothing.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #109)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:13 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
111. "This is not a game to me."
Uh huh
![]() btw, not my alert, but it looks like your motives are transparent to others. |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #111)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:16 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
112. I didn't say you alerted, I asked if you learned anything from their attempt to silence me.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #112)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:23 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
115. Oh, dear...are you sure you're not spinning this, too?
![]() |
Response to R B Garr (Reply #115)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:30 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
118. Just borrowing a page from Hillary supporter's persecution playbook & list of conspiracy theories:
Sanders supporters have rec squads and alert patrols who will try to silence you and purge DU of any and all dissent.
See chapter on Big Rec™. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #118)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:42 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
125. Ahh, finally you admit your participation in this thread!
I KNEW you weren't *that* confused..
![]() |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #78)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:23 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
114. This is hilarious, you spent this whole thread accusing Hillary supporters of
demanding loyalty oaths and then turn around and try to smear them with the old Hillary supporters are disloyal PUMAs insult?
![]() |
Response to sufrommich (Reply #114)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:33 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
119. What do you expect when DUers tell others who to vote for?
It's not like people forgot about what happened in 2008.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #119)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:41 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
123. What happened in 2008? Were there actually a large contigent of PUMAs
or was it mostly a small group of malcontents that the GOP gave disproportionate attention to out of mischief? Have you ever seen the breakdown of democratic primary voters who voted for Obama after their candidate lost? It's out there,do some googleing. Are you accusing Hillary supporters here on DU of being PUMAs?
|
Response to sufrommich (Reply #123)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:49 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
127. I can't answer that for sure, but it's probably the latter.
And I'm not accusing you of anything.
It's nobody's business who they vote for. |
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #127)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:52 PM
sufrommich (22,871 posts)
128. Then stop using right wing smears to prove your point. nt
Response to sufrommich (Reply #128)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:53 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
129. Take your own advice. nt
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #52)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:42 PM
redstateblues (10,559 posts)
89. Link? I don't see that
Response to redstateblues (Reply #89)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:44 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
91. Do a search. I was accused of it quite recently but I'm not calling out the poster.
|
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:36 PM
tymorial (3,432 posts)
18. This.
Especially the last one. It shows a distinct lack of character. Creating fairy tales about war for personal gain is disgusting and lacks honor.
- Oh, and before I click post. I know someone is going to respond with misdirection stating "Bush did this...." or "Bernie did that..." It isn't relevant. We're talking about someone running for office who lied about an experience that our soldiers go through everyday. It is quite frankly, offensive. |
Response to tymorial (Reply #18)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:38 PM
Maedhros (10,007 posts)
19. It's playing to the Armchair Warrior crowd, and I find it off-putting. [n/t]
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:46 PM
beam me up scottie (57,349 posts)
34. +100
Thank you.
|
Response to beam me up scottie (Reply #34)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:57 PM
SamKnause (12,708 posts)
51. You are welcome.
![]() |
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:46 PM
arcane1 (38,613 posts)
38. There is too much at stake to allow another corporatist in the White House n/t
Response to arcane1 (Reply #38)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:58 PM
SamKnause (12,708 posts)
53. I agree 100%.
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:56 PM
MissDeeds (7,499 posts)
49. +1000
Well said.
|
Response to MissDeeds (Reply #49)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:59 PM
SamKnause (12,708 posts)
54. Thank you.
![]() |
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:34 PM
timdog44 (1,388 posts)
80. I am a man
And I feel the same way.
Is she a Democrat Or is she a republican is all I care. Does not matter what she claims on the ticket |
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:48 PM
peacebird (14,195 posts)
126. I am also a woman and I do not support Hillary
I do not care about her personal life, I do not care about her gender.
I do care that she lied about coming under sniper fire. I care that she states she will not reinstate Glass Steagal i care that she will not break up the too big to fail banks i care that she voted FOR the Iraq war i care that she talks hawkishly about Iran. I do not trust her, and for the record she was NOT "dead broke" when they left the White. House |
Response to SamKnause (Reply #3)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 11:58 AM
Rockyj (538 posts)
143. Totally Agree! I am a woman too and will never support her...
even if she wins the primary.
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 05:58 PM
MoonRiver (36,926 posts)
4. Agree 100%
![]() |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:06 PM
SunSeeker (49,092 posts)
6. Funny how those "defense of marriage" wingers all attack the Clinton marriage. nt
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:15 PM
R B Garr (16,533 posts)
8. Totally agree. The comments about her marriage in another thread
strike me as disingenuous. Anyone who has read or followed the Clinton's personal story can see that their attraction has a large element of fierce intellectualism to it, and they are both true intellectuals probably unrivaled in ordinary circles. They have a rich and deep history together, not easily thrown away. So attacks on Hillary without considering the depth of their relationship don't ring true.
Great points, BooScout! ![]() |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:27 PM
Fearless (18,421 posts)
14. Such stereotypes and generalizations!
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:30 PM
ismnotwasm (40,959 posts)
15. She's an incredible women and a sublime political figure
I always figured she didn't leave her husband because of the politics of the time-- Republicans were out for blood, one phony scandal after another. So they find a real one. Several male polititical figures who pointed fingers at Bill Clinton got busted for similar or worse behavior later on.
I don't have privy to Clintons hearts or their bedroom. Her decision then was her business, but it helped Clinton's career and legacy, turned the scandal into another Teflon moment. And She certainly bounced back didn't she? Yes indeed look at her now. Madame president has an awfully nice ring to it |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:39 PM
Maedhros (10,007 posts)
20. People should judge Hillary on her own merits (or lack thereof).
Bill's many failings are his to own.
|
Response to Maedhros (Reply #20)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:26 AM
Chan790 (20,176 posts)
139. I'd point out...
that the vast majority of people adamantly opposed to Hillary have judged her on her own merits and found her lacking.
The argument that we're opposed to her because she didn't leave her husband is a strawman meant to marginalize opposition to that free-trading war-hawk corporate-interests-over-people fake-Democrat. I don't care if she leaves her husband...if she wants to stay with him, that's her decision. I care that Hillary has never met a corporatist interest that she won't sell her constituents down the river for; I care that she's an opponent and not a champion of bedrock Democratic values and ideals. I care that she's just not worth voting for. |
Response to Chan790 (Reply #139)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 02:23 AM
Maedhros (10,007 posts)
140. I agree. [n/t]
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:44 PM
Tikki (14,330 posts)
29. I am a woman. I support Hillary.
I will support the Democratic nominee in the General Election.
Tikki |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:45 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
32. Okay, you are welcome. n/t
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:49 PM
Thinkingabout (30,058 posts)
41. I am a woman and I support Hillary Clinton for president.
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:49 PM
Helen Borg (3,963 posts)
42. I have dark hair.
Who should I vote for?
|
Response to Helen Borg (Reply #42)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 06:56 PM
hedgehog (36,286 posts)
48. Depends - is that your natural color?
Response to Helen Borg (Reply #42)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:05 PM
Rosa Luxemburg (28,627 posts)
57. Bernie
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:10 PM
freshwest (53,661 posts)
61. Oh wow! You said it! Thanks! n/t
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:20 PM
KMOD (7,906 posts)
71. The most qualified and prepared candidate running in this election,
and she happens to be a woman. I'm a proud supporter of HRC. I'm especially excited that we have wonderful odds to keep the White House with HRC as our candidate.
![]() |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:20 PM
SheilaT (23,156 posts)
72. I am a woman.
No woman should automatically support Hillary just because she's a woman. But if you have what you find are good reasons to support her, that's quite different.
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:21 PM
William769 (52,908 posts)
74. Great post my dear lady.
Get up on your soapbox anytime you want.
![]() |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:23 PM
Autumn (42,593 posts)
75. I'm an old woman and I don't support Hillary Clinton..... and Bill has nothing to do with it.
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:27 PM
Ino (3,366 posts)
77. How do you know why she stayed with Bill?
Could be she stayed with him because she thought it was the smart thing, the expedient thing, the thing that furthered her ambitions the most. That's the calculating Hillary I've seen -- the one who is always triangulating, strategizing, choosing her words oh-so-carefully, her silly canned "listening tour" (as if she didn't have a clue what the peons care about?), not taking a position on anything until she sees what will serve her plans best.
I don't really care why she did or didn't leave her husband. And I think she would be all right on equal rights, LGBT, and other such social issues. But she always has, and always will, fall on the side of the corporations, the rich, the military. She is not on my side. |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:34 PM
Bohemianwriter (978 posts)
81. Except that she is...
as trust worthy as the millions from Wall Street allows her to.
|
Response to Bohemianwriter (Reply #81)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:09 AM
840high (17,196 posts)
137. That's why she'll never get my vote.
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:35 PM
mikehiggins (5,614 posts)
82. I'm a guy, and I do not support Hilary's run BUT
people who criticize her because she stuck by Bill despite his wandering ways are, IMHO, sanctimonious buffoons.
People should try to remember the old cliche about walking a mile in her shoes before finding fault with her. I support Bernie but I wouldn't miss a second's sleep if Hilary won. She'd be a very good president. I just happen to think Bernie would be better. That's just my opinion, not a slam at a remarkable and inspirational woman. And if he does win I hope he offers her that old Sec of State job. |
Response to mikehiggins (Reply #82)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 09:50 PM
BooScout (10,406 posts)
133. Thanks Mike!
I glad you understand what my message was!
![]() |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:42 PM
Stellar (5,644 posts)
87. This woman says to stick to your guns and support Hillary if that's your choice.
I'm still looking.
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:49 PM
YOHABLO (7,358 posts)
95. How was she restoring American's reputation (whatever that is)?
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:57 PM
MisterP (23,730 posts)
101. the Khaleeji fighters we hired for Libya and the transvestite-butchering cartel enforcers
in the Honduran military are hardly the vanguard in protecting women, children, and education
she's repeated every stupid FP initiative Bush has brought us and in fact built on them women's orgs veritably spit at her name, and wonder why we delude ourselves into thinking she's the best human being in existence because she has both power and a vagoo |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 07:58 PM
whatchamacallit (15,558 posts)
103. I'm a wombat and I support cloning the thylacine n/t
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:06 PM
Dr Hobbitstein (6,568 posts)
106. My wife is a woman, and she supports Hillary.
Coincidentally, I'm a man and I ALSO support Hillary.
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Thu Jul 16, 2015, 08:33 PM
Pastiche423 (15,406 posts)
120. I am a woman and I will never support Hillary Clinton
She offers me nothing but more of the same.
|
Response to Pastiche423 (Reply #120)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:09 PM
stevenleser (32,886 posts)
147. Bernie will offer you more of the same too. Because nothing will pass the GOP House
and we cannot win back the House until 2022 at the earliest and most likely not until 2024.
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:05 PM
NCTraveler (30,481 posts)
145. Couple of questions.
1) How long have we been electing Presidents?
2) How many Presidents have there been? 3) How many have been women? 4) What percentage of the population is women. Anyone who says this should play no role is a flat out fool who does not support equal representation. To be clear, I am not talking about those who will not vote for Hillary for good reasons. Just those who say her gender should play no role at all. It's complete bullshit and goes against our fight. |
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 12:48 PM
gwheezie (3,580 posts)
150. It's primary season, support who you want but
To drag out the Clinton marriage as a reason not to vote for Hillary is right-wing bullshit. I support HRC but don't doubt the sincerity of dems who question some of her positions, let's find the best nominee but to repeat Rush talking points?
|
Response to gwheezie (Reply #150)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 05:44 PM
BooScout (10,406 posts)
152. My point exactly n/t
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Fri Jul 17, 2015, 01:58 PM
silenttigersong (957 posts)
151. The Question could be
Is Bernie a feminist?I think so ,if you are talking about income equility,edjucation,fair wages.I would argue that Hillary Clintons World tour was doing damage control on The NSa wiki leaks,the apology tour.Furthermore the Scotus argument is a moot argument at this point in time .Does anyone believe Bernie would appoint activist Judges?As far as a vote about Hillarys marriage you are right her buisness .But Bill to many Feminists abuse his power with Monica Lewinsky,to me that is relevent.For instance ,Bill Cosby is in the news ,are you going to say that men in power do not get away with more?
|
Response to BooScout (Original post)
Tue Sep 29, 2015, 10:22 PM
riversedge (65,335 posts)
154. So do I.
![]() |