Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"McConnell: Disclosure of Political Spending Is Government - Supported Harassment & Intimidation"
McConnell: Disclosure of Political Spending Is Government - Supported Harassment & Intimidationby Josh Israel at ThinkProgress
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2012/06/15/500575/mcconnell-disclosure-of-political-spending-is-government-supported-harassment-and-intimidation/
"SNIP.........................................................
In a speech today to the conservative American Enterprise Institute, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) took the stunning view that attempts to let voters know who is paying for political messages amounts to a political weapon aimed at intimidating political critics.
Though Justice Anthony Kennedys controversial 5-4 majority opinion Citizens United case specifically endorsed the idea of campaign finance disclosure, calling it the less-restrictive alternative to more comprehensive speech regulations, McConnell embraced the partial-dissent of Justice Clarence Thomas which argued that even that was unconstitutional.
McConnell told the group:
MCCONNELL: Now, to most people the idea of disclosure sounds perfectly reasonable. and throughout my career I, too, have consistently called for full and timely disclosure for all contributions to candidates and parties. Candidates and to parties. But what were talking about here is entirely different. What this bill calls for is government-compelled disclosure of contributions to all grassroots groups, which is far more dangerous than its proponents are willing to admit. Because disclosure is forced upon some but not all, its not an act of good government. Its a political weapon. And thats precisely what those who are pushing this legislation have in mind. This is nothing less than an effort by the government itself to expose its critics to harassment and intimidation, either by government authorities or through third-party allies, and that should concern every one of us. Those pushing the DISCLOSE Act have a simple view: if the Supreme Court is no longer willing to limit the speech of those who oppose their agenda, well find other ways to do it.
............................................................SNIP"
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1636 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"McConnell: Disclosure of Political Spending Is Government - Supported Harassment & Intimidation" (Original Post)
applegrove
Jun 2012
OP
freshwest
(53,661 posts)1. As opposed to what you intend to do to us. Sorry, Mitch, that dog won't hunt.
Warpy
(110,900 posts)2. Talk about completely missing the point!!
I don't know whether this guy is stupid or evil or just a sick mixture of both of them. I do know he is seemingly clueless about the way this country was founded and why.
Retire, Mitch. Please. Just go away and stay gone.
Sorry I hurled, did Mitch McF*uckstain say something?
-p