Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:42 AM Jul 2015

Darling of the Drug War: Hillary Clinton Campaign Funded by Private Prison Lobby



(ANTIMEDIA) A new report released by The Intercept confirms that two of Hillary Clinton’s top campaign donors are the biggest private prison contractors in the world, Corrections Corporation of America and Geo Group.

The report underscores the role of lobbying “bundlers,” which the Hillary campaign refers to as “HillRaisers.” Bundlers are extra powerful fundraisers—almost like super lobbyists—who act as financial intermediaries when candidates acquire campaign funds. Most major candidates use them. Five of the Clinton campaign’s bundlers work for lobbying and law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, which received lobbying fees totaling $240,000 from Corrections Corporation of America last year.

Another bundler for Corrections Corporation of America, Brian Popper, who lobbies for the Clinton campaign, most recently worked to shield CCA from Freedom of Information Act requests.

Clinton bundler Richard Sullivan, who works for Capitol Counsel, garnered $44,859 from another giant private prison company, Geo Group, which also runs for-profit immigrant detention centers.

Clinton isn’t the only presidential candidate using bundlers; in fact, she’s not even the only candidate hiring Akin Gump. The company also touts both Marco Rubio and Jeb Bush as clients.

http://theantimedia.org/hillary-clinton-campaign-funded-by-private-prison-lobby/
45 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Darling of the Drug War: Hillary Clinton Campaign Funded by Private Prison Lobby (Original Post) Katashi_itto Jul 2015 OP
Been through this latest faux boring point. Conclusion: No candidate controls who wants to donate to them. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #1
OMG you mean she was forced to keep the money? Katashi_itto Jul 2015 #3
until Citizens United is dismantled, to pretend that money doesn't matter is childish Sheepshank Jul 2015 #14
Bernie seems to be doing pretty good without madokie Jul 2015 #33
Whether you admit it or not, Bernie has PACS working on his behalf Sheepshank Jul 2015 #38
Bundles = PAC and candidates can't return PAC $ because it isn't theirs to return Sheepshank Jul 2015 #40
Absolutely true! It is also true that any candidate can return any donation or reject any donor. Kip Humphrey Jul 2015 #4
Bernie cannot return finance and energy PAC money. It's not his to return or spend. Sheepshank Jul 2015 #39
I believe I have seen this posted at least four times on DU Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #2
The smear keeps getting shot down....these are the follow up Zombie smears. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #5
Ok. That was funny. Evergreen Emerald Jul 2015 #6
Is HRC or isn't HRC heaven05 Jul 2015 #7
Good question! artislife Jul 2015 #8
Truth is highly overrated in political discussions. zeemike Jul 2015 #10
but it's zombie truth azurnoir Jul 2015 #26
I kind of like that definition...zombie truth. zeemike Jul 2015 #41
Hillary Clinton has bundlers at a big law firm... Eric J in MN Jul 2015 #11
yup ^^^^^ this ^^^^^^ Sheepshank Jul 2015 #15
Quite Rovian, don't you think? George II Jul 2015 #30
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jul 2015 #9
LOL...repeating one of your own failed posts and you rec another one..typical n/t Sheepshank Jul 2015 #16
That post got 77 recs, 134 replies, and almost 2700 views. nt Zorra Jul 2015 #17
many of the replies soundely disproved the OP in that other thread Sheepshank Jul 2015 #20
Dear shank... Are You Having A Sad ??? WillyT Jul 2015 #18
Nope...what makes you think so? Sheepshank Jul 2015 #21
Big Money? Bring It On! Gamecock Lefty Jul 2015 #12
Is this false "story" going to be reposted weekly until the first primary in February? George II Jul 2015 #13
What's false about it? beam me up scottie Jul 2015 #27
Thought Experiment: jomin41 Jul 2015 #19
Depends on the lobbyist and the favor. George II Jul 2015 #22
Weak! jomin41 Jul 2015 #23
Also relates to immigration. JEB Jul 2015 #24
Why would these corporations donate money JEB Jul 2015 #25
Corporations can't donate money to candidate committees. George II Jul 2015 #29
OFFS. No corporations donated money here Recursion Jul 2015 #42
Nope. Agschmid Jul 2015 #43
Someone needs to point out that the private prison industry makes its profits Maedhros Jul 2015 #28
That would be racist to point out, since it posits a connection between economic and racial justice. Romulox Jul 2015 #31
The prisons don't just go out and snatch inmates. Our judicial system oasis Jul 2015 #32
No, Lets fix ALL of the laws about drugs. nt jomin41 Jul 2015 #34
I'll second that. (eom) oasis Jul 2015 #36
They don't need to point it out. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #37
They know she isn't in their pockets. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #35
What are Hillary and Bernie's positions on legal marijuana and the states that have legalized? hollowdweller Jul 2015 #44
Here... Agschmid Jul 2015 #45

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. Been through this latest faux boring point. Conclusion: No candidate controls who wants to donate to them.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:23 AM
Jul 2015

Secondary conclusion: Being the prohibitive favorite to win the White House for an historic 3rd consequetive term for any party is going to get the attention of all kinds of desperate folks yearning for the job.

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
3. OMG you mean she was forced to keep the money?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:32 AM
Jul 2015

Glad to hear it. I have stock in Corrections Corporation of America. I like knowing my money is buying the best candidate.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
14. until Citizens United is dismantled, to pretend that money doesn't matter is childish
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:40 AM
Jul 2015

and naive.

Bernie has also explained hed doesn't want PAC money, but the reality is that they are there and they will spend how they see fit, regardless of Berniess desires. Including PACS from energy, defense and finance. Are you calling Bernie a hypocrit or just Hillary?

madokie

(51,076 posts)
33. Bernie seems to be doing pretty good without
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:27 PM
Jul 2015

a shitpot full of money from these kind of people. Looks to me like anyway

His numbers are steadily climbing as he becomes more known.
I think we can win this one without a doubt. We meaning us Bernie supporters that is

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
38. Whether you admit it or not, Bernie has PACS working on his behalf
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:26 PM
Jul 2015

So no good pretending he does like or like..it is what it is. His PAC money granted, is much less, and it will likely show in the end.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
40. Bundles = PAC and candidates can't return PAC $ because it isn't theirs to return
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:36 PM
Jul 2015

Candidates never have control over the money and cannot determine who, how or where it is spent. But you knew this when you wrote the OP.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
39. Bernie cannot return finance and energy PAC money. It's not his to return or spend.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 08:30 PM
Jul 2015

Same goes for every candidate. Direct contributions are limited to $2700. PAC money collected and is spent by outsiders and not the candidates. The candidates never have no control over that money, it's not in their possession. candidates have no say over the spending habits of any PAC. Candidates cannot return what is not theirs in the first place.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,069 posts)
2. I believe I have seen this posted at least four times on DU
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 09:26 AM
Jul 2015

What's the reason for continuing to post the same smear over and over?

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
7. Is HRC or isn't HRC
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 10:08 AM
Jul 2015

accepting money from these clowns that were enabled in the late 90's? Is it true or not? Simple answer will do.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
26. but it's zombie truth
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 06:30 PM
Jul 2015

which means it's significance is dead but just doesn't know it yet or something

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
11. Hillary Clinton has bundlers at a big law firm...
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:31 AM
Jul 2015

...whose clients include private prison companies, among many other clients.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
20. many of the replies soundely disproved the OP in that other thread
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jul 2015

as for the recs...that is an on going issue with Bernie supporters. They rec everything regardless of the content of the post. Even if it's wrong. It's what they do to get a post on the greatest page. Look at the Bernie group...it's what they do.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
21. Nope...what makes you think so?
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:14 PM
Jul 2015

here's hoping mind reading isn't your day job. You're not very good at it.

Gamecock Lefty

(700 posts)
12. Big Money? Bring It On!
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 11:36 AM
Jul 2015

I'm cool with Hillary raking in the big bucks. She's not going to win on the paltry few bucks I give her.

Go get the big donors, Hillary - we have your back!!

jomin41

(559 posts)
19. Thought Experiment:
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 12:12 PM
Jul 2015

Scenario#1: Lobbyist representing drug war profiteer approaches President HRC for "favor".
Scenario#2: Ditto President Sanders.
Question: In which scenario is the lobbyist likely to get a "friendly" reception?

A real poser, eh?

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
25. Why would these corporations donate money
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 06:29 PM
Jul 2015

if they didn't find the candidate amenable to their position?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
28. Someone needs to point out that the private prison industry makes its profits
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:01 PM
Jul 2015

by incarcerating people of color at rates far greater than their proportion of the population at large.

Making money by jailing minorities. Way to go, Hillary.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
31. That would be racist to point out, since it posits a connection between economic and racial justice.
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:18 PM
Jul 2015

We all know that not only does such a connection between economic and social justice not exist, even suggesting one does is offensive.

oasis

(49,376 posts)
32. The prisons don't just go out and snatch inmates. Our judicial system
Tue Jul 28, 2015, 07:25 PM
Jul 2015

puts them there. Let's fix some of the laws which involve drugs.

 

hollowdweller

(4,229 posts)
44. What are Hillary and Bernie's positions on legal marijuana and the states that have legalized?
Wed Jul 29, 2015, 10:08 AM
Jul 2015


Have any made any statements? Webb? OMalley?
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Darling of the Drug War: ...