2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWell, I see we've gone full on marginalizing BLM again
That went so well last time, we might as well double down.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)They're marginalizing themselves if, as a movement, they think this is going to correct the problem of racism
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)try that in your personal relationships and see how well it works
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Oh my god. Here we go...
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)because if they aren't affiliated, they just eighty-sixed their group. Speak up or bear the load deserved or not. Right now, I am pissed.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)But it is only a guess at this point.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Saying BLM is a political weapon of one person instead of a movement around achieving change is the very definition of poo-pooing their concerns.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)BLM is a much needed movement but there was no need to hit Bernie. He has always supported Black people and he has said so.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)It implies concerns are not real, or they're a front, or they're able to be bought.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)there are some people who will stop at nothing.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Protest and they're doing well.
"Poll Shows Why Black Lives Matter Activists Should Be Proud"
snip//
The poll saw increases in the number of blacks, whites and Hispanics who felt more changes were needed. In 2014, only 39 percent of whites said more needed to be done. In 2015, that number jumped to 53 percent. For blacks, the numbers increased from 79 percent to 86 percent, and for Hispanics, 54 percent to 70 percent.
Pew surveyed 2,002 adults between July 14 and July 20, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cell phones.
A Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, asked the same question as the Pew Research Center and got very similar results.
The Pew poll comes after a year of heightened Black Lives Matter activism, including numerous rallies, die-ins and acts of civil disobedience. A Gallup poll released Tuesday showed comparable results.
More..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/poll-black-lives-matter-activists_55c24a2de4b0d9b28f0525e9?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&kvcommref=mostpopular&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000051
ismnotwasm
(41,976 posts)Now THAT is activism for change
Cha
(297,154 posts)ARLINGTON, Texas (AP) A police officer in suburban Dallas shot and killed a college football player during a struggle after the unarmed 19-year-old crashed a car through the front window of a car dealership, authorities said.
The Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office identified the dead man as Christian Taylor, of Arlington. Taylor was a sophomore at Angelo State University in San Angelo.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/08/08/christian-taylor-killed_n_7959440.html?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067
romanic
(2,841 posts)Oh wait, I already know "who" and it ain't black folks.
Cha
(297,154 posts)stranger81
(2,345 posts)instead of simply the rudest and ugliest opposition to a single political candidate, maybe they will be treated like a movement. Right now, they're just people who can't stand the sound of anyone else's voice besides their own.
zazen
(2,978 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)candidate other than Bernie, a choice every voter in the country will have to weigh at some point.
We are in campaign season, and what they did is a campaign strategy. It doesn't not diminish my total support for the cause one bit. But I wholeheartedly disagree with the tactic and I think it will not advance the cause. Firstly, because I think any expectation that Hillary will expend any political capital on tough race issues and risk alienating her billionaire Wall Street donors is misguided. And second, because I think trying to embarrass your most allied candidate by taking over his stage and silencing him will not motivate fence-sitters to jump in and support your cause, and may alienate some current supporters.
Cha
(297,154 posts)ARLINGTON, Texas (AP) A police officer in suburban Dallas shot and killed a college football player during a struggle after the unarmed 19-year-old crashed a car through the front window of a car dealership, authorities said.
The Tarrant County Medical Examiner's Office identified the dead man as Christian Taylor, of Arlington. Taylor was a sophomore at Angelo State University in San Angelo.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/08/08/christian-taylor-killed_n_7959440.html?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067
A lot of "who"s..
Bernie has spoken up for all Black people who have been subjected to horrific abuse and killing by police. Who?
Cha
(297,154 posts)snip//
The poll saw increases in the number of blacks, whites and Hispanics who felt more changes were needed. In 2014, only 39 percent of whites said more needed to be done. In 2015, that number jumped to 53 percent. For blacks, the numbers increased from 79 percent to 86 percent, and for Hispanics, 54 percent to 70 percent.
Pew surveyed 2,002 adults between July 14 and July 20, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cell phones.
A Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, asked the same question as the Pew Research Center and got very similar results.
The Pew poll comes after a year of heightened Black Lives Matter activism, including numerous rallies, die-ins and acts of civil disobedience. A Gallup poll released Tuesday showed comparable results.
More..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/poll-black-lives-matter-activists_55c24a2de4b0d9b28f0525e9?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&kvcommref=mostpopular&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000051
They're not going to stop.. nor should they.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Why all the hostility toward him? He's no whiter than Hillary.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They're marginalizing themselves, but I'm sure Soros will kick them a few more million.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)bahrbearian
(13,466 posts)Its probably comes from a server in someones Garage.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)moondust
(19,972 posts)Git 'im!!!!!!!!!!!!
gollygee
(22,336 posts)and they wanted to get attention again. This is the one-year anniversary of Michael Brown's death. Sanders was speaking on this anniversary, and their earlier protest at one of his events was successful. They got tons of press. They want attention because nothing is changing and they're pissed off about it, and they're going to keep trying to get attention until something changes. Bernie's events appear to not have much security so they're able to protest there, and it is an effective way to get attention.
This is how protests work. They piss people off and get attention for their cause. They're getting attention. And yes, they're pissing people off. Protests are messy.
The people attending Bernie's event might have responded more kindly, because that would have reflected well on Bernie.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)then yeah, you need to be kind, and maybe try to get some kind of dialog going to find out why they feel that way. It's easier to just get pissed off and not listen, but that doesn't help get votes.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)It is apparent that BLM will never be satisfied with anything Sanders does or says. It is also apparent that BLM has no interest in disrupting Clinton events.
It's also apparent that BLM has no interest in disrupting Obama or Lynch events, and they could do something about it right now instead of January 2017 at the earliest.
TM99
(8,352 posts)This event was NOT a Sanders event. It was a Social Security and Medicare rally where he was invited to speak. There were numerous poc who spoke prior to Sanders. There were other whites who spoke prior to Sanders.
BLM Seattle only began their protest when Sanders took the stage.
Their Facebook statement clearly states that they are targeting Sanders and Sanders alone. Why?
The people who responded less kindly were not just Sanders supporters. They were there for a rally on Social Security and Medicare. They were also being called 'white liberal supremacists'. One of the heads of the protests has photos online of her with a T-shirt about 'drinking white tears'. And BLM Seattle has said that 'white liberal allies are useless'.
I love activism and protest movements. I and my family have been involved with them for decades. I am a bi-racial man who groks institutional racism having experienced it first hand.
What is happening now is something very different. I do not know why this is happening. It is not logical. It is not even reasonable. It is not a uniform protest movement with regards to all candidates either Dem or GOP. This is solely aimed at one of the most progressive candidates with some of the best history on civil rights for all persons of color.
This stinks, and I am very upset.
The empressof all
(29,098 posts)I personally don't get how the actions in Seattle today were helpful to the cause. Seriously, it looked like two kids having a hissy fit and when they got what they wanted they upped the ante. Not cool and not helpful If anyone is marginalizing the BLM movement it is stunts like this.
Cha
(297,154 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Thats going to go well for the cause.
Cha
(297,154 posts)snip//
The poll saw increases in the number of blacks, whites and Hispanics who felt more changes were needed. In 2014, only 39 percent of whites said more needed to be done. In 2015, that number jumped to 53 percent. For blacks, the numbers increased from 79 percent to 86 percent, and for Hispanics, 54 percent to 70 percent.
Pew surveyed 2,002 adults between July 14 and July 20, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cell phones.
A Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, asked the same question as the Pew Research Center and got very similar results.
The Pew poll comes after a year of heightened Black Lives Matter activism, including numerous rallies, die-ins and acts of civil disobedience. A Gallup poll released Tuesday showed comparable results.
More..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/poll-black-lives-matter-activists_55c24a2de4b0d9b28f0525e9?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&kvcommref=mostpopular&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000051
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Those positive poll numbers will plummet.
The supposedly BLM individuals who are preventing Bernie from speaking are either puppets of status quo Democrats or Republicans who wish to suppress the African-American vote in the next election.
Cha
(297,154 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)If BLM keeps this up, they may actually suppress AA voters in 2016 with the Republicans winning the White House. If African Americans feel their lives have been hell up until now, just wait until the White Supremacists take over the government at all levels.
Also, from what I have seen of the BLM interrupters, there is no "engaging" them in any rational discourse. I do not believe this of the movement itself. But those who have seized the movement to silence Bernie are doing the movement serious harm and I feel pity for them. The two in Seattle come off as twits but the one now appears to be a "burn the place" down activist.
The tragedy that African Americans have every right to fear the police, that African American parents watch their children leave the house not knowing if they will return alive--these
horrors must be addressed. If it means profiling police and firing those who are racists, then so be it. If it means firing all police on all police forces and starting over with higher standards and better criteria, then so be it. This murder MUST stop. However, silencing Bernie only undermines their cause.
Bill Clinton was no friend to the African American community. Obama has not been much better. As long as we have corporate-controlled candidates, the murder will continue and the suppression and marginalization of African Americans will not end. Bernie is not controlled by corporations yet he is the target of BLM. Why should he engage them? His record speaks for itself. You can not engage ideologues in meaningful debate and the BLMers interrupting Bernie's speeches are ideologues.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)How's that working out? Oh wait, another black was killed by a Texas cop today...they need to protest Bernie some more. What dumbshits...
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)HOWEVER-Correlation does not imply causation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causation
Cha
(297,154 posts)permission.
catnhatnh
(8,976 posts)Post hoc ergo propter hoc
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Post_hoc_ergo_propter_hoc
Cha
(297,154 posts)Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)Bernie and those who support him also support blm-so why treat us like the enemy>
Bernie's campaign gets it and has done nothing to deserve the hostility.
OK?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)and if anyone BLM should go after the Republicans who in general couldn't care less about Black people.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Used effectively it can bring attention to issues. Overused it can cause people to start tuning out. My fear is that by continuing to target one candidate this organization is going to delegitimize themselves in the minds of many people. That is a horrifying thought.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Funny how so many people here tried so hard not to see it. An attack on the candidate who actually is a threat to monied interests, to HRC, and who actually would, if elected, make serious efforts towards reducing incarceration, reining in the police state, any number of things that disproportionately help POC.
Money and access to power is corrupting beyond our wildest imagination.
The Clinton call to Trump urging him to run, another part of the game.
I fully support what BLM claims to support. I don't support their focus on Bernie, and in my mind it absolutely delegitimizes those doing it.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Bernie supporters.
Cha
(297,154 posts)NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)snip//
The poll saw increases in the number of blacks, whites and Hispanics who felt more changes were needed. In 2014, only 39 percent of whites said more needed to be done. In 2015, that number jumped to 53 percent. For blacks, the numbers increased from 79 percent to 86 percent, and for Hispanics, 54 percent to 70 percent.
Pew surveyed 2,002 adults between July 14 and July 20, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cell phones.
A Washington Post survey, released Wednesday, asked the same question as the Pew Research Center and got very similar results.
The Pew poll comes after a year of heightened Black Lives Matter activism, including numerous rallies, die-ins and acts of civil disobedience. A Gallup poll released Tuesday showed comparable results.
More..
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/poll-black-lives-matter-activists_55c24a2de4b0d9b28f0525e9?utm_hp_ref=black-voices&kvcommref=mostpopular&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000051
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)after their last couple of bonehead moves.
Cha
(297,154 posts)the Police.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)but as a group BLM makes one misstep after another. I get that you're a fan. I'm not.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Too bad there isn't a president or attorney general they could try to "talk" to. Oh well.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Non sequitur activism.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)the very status that they claim to be challenging.
They are doing a serious disservice to a very serious problem: The cold-blooded murder of African-Americans by the police.
romanic
(2,841 posts)We know what's up with those BLM "protestors".
Cha
(297,154 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)aikoaiko
(34,169 posts)Until then....
whathehell
(29,067 posts)medeak
(8,101 posts)baby sat my kids (that tells you how old I am) He is constantly putting out fires. What is the latest?
ok...blm is now black lives matter and not beuro of land management
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Some people here decided that they either work for Clinton or Clinton put them up to it.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)"You all better STFU lest we insinuate you're racists"
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)They aren't doing one thing positive to move their cause forward. They are doing just the opposite. Marginalize them now to stop further damage to the cause.
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Wow.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)not call allies "liberal white supremacists" and stop singling out the one candidate who would probably do the best by them.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)emsimon33
(3,128 posts)The problem for their puppet masters is that they are just too obvious. The two in Seattle were twits. This BLM interruptus group is going to backfire on their puppet masters. The sad thing is the damage they are doing to a very serious and heart-breaking situation--the murder of African-Americans by police in this country...the shadow that clouds the lives of AA in this country, never knowing when they will be harassed by authorities and that harassment ending in death or serious injury.
stranger81
(2,345 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)They need to figure out who their allies are pretty sharpish before they marginalize themselves....
Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Because it is not in the press release:
While we are drowning in their liberal rhetoric, we have yet to see them support Black grassroots movements or take on any measure of risk and responsibility for ending the tyranny of white supremacy in our country and in our city. This willful passivity while claiming solidarity with the #?BlackLivesMatter movement in an effort to be relevant is over. White progressive Seattle and Bernie Sanders cannot call themselves liberals while they participate in the racist system that claims Black lives. Bernie Sanders will not continue to call himself a man of the people, while ignoring the plight of Black people. Presidential candidates will not win Black votes without putting out an explicit criminal justice reform package. As was said at the Netroots action, presidential candidates should expect to be shut down and confronted every step along the way of this presidential campaign. Black people are in a state of emergency. Lines have been drawn in the sand. You are either fighting continuously and measurably to protect Black life in America, or you are a part of the white supremacist system that we will tear down in the liberation of our people.
----------
Unless I missed a tweet or something, saying someone is part of the system is not the same as saying they are a liberal white supremacist.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Godhumor
(6,437 posts)Well, that certainly changes things a bit. Thanks for the link.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)I'm still stunned it was said....
dangerous dan
(15 posts)when they decided to interrupt Bernie Sanders and literally call him a white liberal supremacist. I would trust someone who has a 100% NAACP record, h as already stood in front of the issues since Ferguson. reflected it on his speech on more criminal justice reform, and it screams to me "NOT ENOUGH BERNIE!" - I really wonder if Hillary will ever have an open event, or keep hiding in those $2,700 fundraisers to prevent BLM protesters from coming in.
Bernie's numbers will only rise then idiots shoot themselves in the foot, like the organization behind #BlackLivesMatter did today, with Bernie.
d_b
(7,463 posts)is that even possible? I'm bad at keeping up with all this shit.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Unfortunately, they are doing real harm to the movement they claim to represent.
PFunk
(876 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)with their mindless hostility and rude tactics. So stupid to target Bernie.
TheProgressive
(1,656 posts)Nobody is marginalizing BLM - just people who write they are...
The *only* presidential candidate who will fight PoC and *everyone* is Senator Sanders.
TNProfessor
(83 posts)I would prefer to focus on Christian Taylor. Black men and women are being murdered. Today, yesterday, everyday at the hands of the system. BLM is much more than the campaign.
MoveIt
(399 posts)The HRC supporters at DU who for some reason support the BLM protestor calling the crowd in seattle "white supremacist liberals" ?
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)d_b
(7,463 posts)Fuck them.
emsimon33
(3,128 posts)Interrupting the only candidate that has consistently fought against legislation, such as mandatory sentencing, which has ruined African-American lives--that is either just plain stupid or they are puppets (which I believe) of the status quo who fear Bernie.
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)Looks to me like BLM is doing it all by themselves.
I am strongly behind the message: Black Lives Matter. I am strongly behind actions that will make this more than just lip service, namely, holding police accountable, investigating the many terrible incidents that have come to our attention (and the ones that haven't for that matter), instituting dash cams and body cams for all police officers, not to mention more money for education and amnesty for nonviolent drug offenders. I'm sure there are many other policy changes that could be instituted to make it better. And yes, this issue is urgent and deserves to be brought to the forefront. It is long past time to acknowledge the shameful fact that black lives are still routinely devalued in our society.
But singling out Bernie Sanders in this way... all I can say is, I smell a rat. And I use the term advisedly.
BeyondGeography
(39,369 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)If they think Sanders is the one they need to go after then they leave me no choice but to believe they are either paid or stupid. Sounds like they tried to force him to have them removed so they could stir more shit with that. Nope, had respect for them but it's obvious that they are being guided.