Reached the same conclusion recently. We have already have a couple of years of seeing how the obstructionist neo-GOP Congress can prevent meaningful and constructive change. They are quite willing to screw the nation for the sake of political power and they don't care who gets hurt. Telling the uninsured man to die was perfectly typical of how they think.
The problem with the OP is that Romney does NOT look like one of the three stooges. In addition to his money, Romney looks quite presidential, probably more presidential than President Obama. If he fights him one-for-one on the money and the looks, it's a bad sign.
You want three stooges? Let me nominate Allen West, Joe Walsh, and Peter King. These are colossal fools and it would take NO effort for Obama to portray them that way. I think Obama should basically turn his back on Romney and go after these LOSERS and flip their districts HARD. Two probable responses: (1) Rove will pour a flood of black money into those districts, but it will be relatively visible precisely because they are small districts, not national or even statewide races. (2) Romney is possibly stupid enough to rush to their defense, which will link him closely to the fools. In the first case, the multiplier effect may be infinite. I think these guys are such black holes that no amount of money can make them look like they deserve being in Congress. In the second case, Romney will be tainted as a loser, and much more so if they first pour lots of money into those districts and then drop them.
Here is a link to my original suggestion along these lines, as part of a general thread I started about anti-Romney advertising.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=52676
= new reply since forum marked as read
