Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 01:11 PM Aug 2015

K Street betting on Hillary

K Street is banking on Hillary Clinton, with more than twice as many Washington lobbyists donating to the former secretary of State’s presidential campaign than any other candidate.

While many lobbyists are holding their pocketbooks in the early stages of the 2016 election cycle, Clinton — the frontrunner for the Democratic nomination — received at least $625,703 from 316 registered lobbyists and corporate PACs during the first half of the year, according to disclosure forms.

“She’s going at it for the second time, and there is a list of people who are very committed to her from eight years ago,” said Al Motteur, senior Democratic lobbyist at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck and longtime Clinton supporter. Motteur has not only given to the campaign, but is also bundling cash from other donors.

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush ranks as a distant second in the influence industry, collecting $444,500 from 140 lobbyists.
Source: The Hill
http://thehill.com/business-a-lobbying/251456-k-street-betting-on-hillary
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
3. K Street might think that the current GOP "clowndidates" don't have a chance in winning...
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 01:33 PM
Aug 2015

Therefore, back someone who they believe will win and represent their interests.

Remember the "K-Street Project?" --

The K Street Project is an effort by the Republican Party (GOP) to pressure Washington lobbying firms to hire Republicans in top positions, and to reward loyal GOP lobbyists with access to influential officials, an arrangement known as crony capitalism. It was launched in 1995 by Republican strategist Grover Norquist and then-House majority whip Tom DeLay. It has been criticized as being part of a "coziness" between the GOP and large corporations which has allegedly allowed business to rewrite government regulations affecting their own industries in some cases (see Dick Cheney energy task force).

Shortly after the 1994 elections which gave a majority of seats to Republican candidates, DeLay called prominent Washington lobbyists into his office. He had pulled the public records of political contributions that they made to Democrats and Republicans. According to Texans for Public Justice, "he reminded them that Republicans were in charge and their political giving had better reflect that—or else. The "or else" was a threat to cut off access to the Republican House leadership."[1]

The project is named for K Street in Washington, D.C., where the largest lobbying firms once had their headquarters. Lobbyists are, in some circles, referred to as the "fourth branch of government," as some have great influence in U.S. national politics due to their monetary resources and the "revolving-door" practice of hiring former government officials. It is widely believed to be common practice for politicians to solicit money from lobbying firms in exchange for better access to officials, especially members of the United States Congress, and to buy favoritism in policies[source?].

Candidates seeking to succeed DeLay as majority leader sought to distance themselves from the project, and as of January 15, 2006, all three announced candidates had vowed to dismantle it and overhaul the lobbying process. The fundamental quid pro quo at the center of the K Street Project -- the withholding of policy favors from interest groups and lobbying firms that hire Republicans -- is now illegal: the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007, Sec 102, bans members of Congress and staffers from using their political power to influence the employment decision of any private entity "on the basis of partisan political affiliation".[2]

Wikipedia

blm

(113,044 posts)
4. How many are EXPECTED to win? Would YOU bet your future on any candidate YOU
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 02:45 PM
Aug 2015

knew would not win and that YOU didn't expect to win?

Rupert Murdoch donated to Kerry for the imagery only, so no one could CLAIM Murdoch was personally biased against him - only cost him a couple thousand for that 'protection' while he and the GOP used billions of dollars worth of airtime to attack Kerry at every turn. Hedging for real or for show happens in every cycle.

Not sure how old you are, but, are you new to presidential campaign financing? Had Bernie run in an earlier election his numbers would surpass most Republican candidates running now, too.

And, just to be clear, Common Sense Sanders is my primary vote.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
5. Of course, K St. buys candidates, ALL the time
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

and hedge their bets as well. I didn't just fall off the turnip truck. duh.

What I find troubling -- even alarming -- is how utterly 'bought' our Democratic front-runner is;
and how this glaring fact doesn't seem to concern her supporters whatsoever.

No wonder Bernie decided to run, bless his big heart.

blm

(113,044 posts)
7. If Bernie ran before in a competitive presidential cycle his numbers would be higher
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:28 PM
Aug 2015

than most Republican candidates.

I don't PLAY the 'numbers tell the story' game. Context is everything. And so are TIMELINES.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
6. They do have a lot of money riding on it.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:05 PM
Aug 2015

We the people, not so much, just Bernie and a clean conscience.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»K Street betting on Hilla...