Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum"Mitt Romney to be indicted by Justice Department before Dec. 31, 2012" Intrade query
As Romney shares head south for the 40 mark one investor asks
http://www.intrade.com/v4/markets/contract/?contractId=743475
Roothlus wrote on Jul 12, 2012 18:41:39 #
should we make a new market for "Mitt Romney to be indicted by Justice Department before Dec. 31, 2012"?
Why yes we should Roothlus, yes we should, lol.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 3087 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Mitt Romney to be indicted by Justice Department before Dec. 31, 2012" Intrade query (Original Post)
grantcart
Jul 2012
OP
librechik
(30,674 posts)1. ah! the realists weigh in!
thx, intrade--
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)2. Zero chance before the election
Election campaign indictments are never a good idea; such only gives the other side the ability to claim they are politically motivated (even if there is merit to the charges).
The best example here would be Lawrence Walsh's Iran-Contra indictments a few days before the 1992 election. And then of course they were pardoned as George HW Bush was on his way out of the White House.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)3. I believe that the comment was tongue in cheek, and not a serious proposal.
It doesn't augur well for Mitts Presidential Intrade trading, however.
Wouldn't be surprised to see him dip to 40 or below.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)6. "before Dec. 31, 2012"
Yes, zero chance before and during the election.
So that leaves almost two months after the election.
Rosanna Lopez
(308 posts)4. Obama Admin. track record
Considering that the Obama administration hasn't prosecuted anyone on Wall Street yet, I don't see that happening.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)5. Thanks for your concern. N/t
TBF
(32,047 posts)7. She didn't express concern, she stated fact. There's a difference. nt
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)8. What's wrong with 1 October 2012?