2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumBernie Who? Hillary Steams Ahead on Endorsements-->NO enthusiam fade in Dem Party
http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-08-26/bernie-who-hillary-steams-ahead-on-endorsements
Party people get on board. Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg
Bernie Who? Hillary Steams Ahead on Endorsements
27 Aug 26, 2015 4:34 PM EDT
By Jonathan Bernstein
Do you think enthusiasm for Hillary Clinton is fading within the Democratic Party? Here's a list of new endorsements she has gathered just in August:
U.S. Representatives Bill Pascrell Jr., Bonnie Watson Coleman, Donald Payne Jr., Xavier Becerra and Scott Peters
Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson
Former South Carolina Governors Dick Riley and Jim Hodges
Former North Carolina Senator Kay Hagan
From Iowa: former U.S. Senator Tom Harkin, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, state Attorney General Tom Miller and state Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald
Twenty of 21 of New Jersey's county Democratic chairmen and a bunch of N.J. state legislators
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey
California Assemblyman David Chiu
In New Hampshire, State Senator David Watters
In Connecticut, Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch
The Cook County (Chicago) Democratic Party
This month's haul swamps anything Bernie Sanders or the draft-Joe-Biden effort has rolled out over the entire campaign. And Clinton already had an intimidating number of endorsements, leaving few available for her to add................
This time, the Democrats have made a clear choice, with continuing endorsements showing that the party remains collectively committed to Clinton. She'll be in trouble if and only if that changes.
Cha
(297,154 posts)Ino
(3,366 posts)And it's not just run-of-the-mill Obama supporters, but the ones whose support for the young insurgent in 2008 felt like major betrayals to the Clintons. In their book HRC, journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes detail how one of the last acts of the defeated Clinton campaign was to finalize a "hit list" of Democrats who were disloyal, with the degree of treachery ranked from one to seven.
http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/bill-clinton-hillary-clinton-friends-benefits
In one memorable moment, Bill Clinton went practically to the hometown of a former Democratic congressman who rebuffed Hillary in order to campaign for a rival in the Democratic primary for attorney general of Pennsylvania.
According to the book HRC, by journalists Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, the Clintons kept a hit list of fellow partisans who had wronged them. I am never going to forget the people who supported Hillary, Bill told a group of Democrats after his wifes presidential campaign failed while staring into the eyes of a then-congressman who did not support her.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)I don't see anything shocking about an establishment candidate being brown nosed by individuals dependent on the establishment for their well being, and getting on The Clintons bad side tends to have less than nice consequences.
George II
(67,782 posts)....are an indication of the support he would get if he were ever elected president.
JackInGreen
(2,975 posts)Mrs.C.
"George? Sit on it."
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)His co-workers in congress don't like him much, that's for sure. It's one of the reasons he has accomplished almost nothing in 25 years in congress.
Not sure why another poster is telling you to "sit on it" simply because you made a very relevant observation like that. Just rude.
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Many of these people I would run a block to avoid being endorsed by.
Huddie94
(25 posts)We just heard how Hillary wants Vice President Biden "to do what's right for himself and what's right for his family."
Getting on the Clintons' Sxxx List part of that calculation? She did seem to be more than usually tight lipped, saying that.
Biden polls more trustworthy, more electable than Hillary Clinton. There's that for democrats.
George II
(67,782 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
frylock
(34,825 posts)but, yeah. Ridiculous statement.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)The banks, corporations, war mongers, etc. all want Hillary. Is this a surprise?
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)Hip, Hip, Hurray for Hillary!
America is just fine as it is. Right on!
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Has anyone told you lately just how smart you are?
tecelote
(5,122 posts)Good for you!
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)You respond well to that one. It was obvious ban-bait designed to make you counter attack. Good job recognizing it.
I agree with you completely. I would add that some of these party endorsements came from well before Bernie Sanders was even running. Some may change their tune as Bernie keeps surging.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I lost a lot of respect when I heard that Howard Dean endorsed Clinton in December of 2014.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)But just as super delegates seem to be a bit problematic at this time it is worth noting that they aren't bound to any candidate. Unlike delegates sent from states that are theoretically bound to their states choice for the first ballot, a super delegate can change their support at any time.
I would not be surprised after this weekend if a few of them slip from Hillary's fingers.
oasis
(49,376 posts)It's tough to talk sense to folks who are chasing a dream.
George II
(67,782 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)They give us crap. I don't much feel like crapola-ade so I will pick someone who will fight them instead.
frylock
(34,825 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)Most people feel that way, or at least close enough to vote for Clinton. That gives her a big advantage. Her supporters, of course, see this as another indication of the inevitable. They believe she will roll over her opponents the way that big green tractor would roll over a bug. The only thing that could prevent that a sudden realization among a big segment of the population that it's time to break out of the rut, time to vote for somebody and something truly different. Or Joe Biden could enter the race.
MADem
(135,425 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)It's hypocritical all right. I agree with Bernie on that.
George II
(67,782 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)rainbows and unicorns???
Shocking.
Go Hillary 2016!!! The candidate that will make change happen, not just make the wish lists of everything that should happen.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)[img][img]
This election will be won by magic!
frylock
(34,825 posts)Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)In any case, we'll continue to discuss the issues, and you guys can post your unicorn smack and piss and moan in the HRC meta forum about how mean the Sanders supporters can be.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Does snark (logic's stupid cousin) from a Hillary supporter really give us license to rhetorically "shoot" or snark at any pro-Hillary or anti-Bernie post we don't like. How does that help Bernie?
I jumped in and started posting / responding in kind, when I saw the way bravenak was treated. Despite not always being on the same side of the argument as she was, I respected her passion and authenticity. Responding in kind felt like defending, the right thing to do. Now I'm not so sure anymore. bravenak is gone, followed by others..the shooting just continues. I became part of the problem....just another shooter.
Do what you will, it's a free country, but this board is what we all make it. I think, after trying it the way you suggest, it's better to just ignore the snark...the snark-ers are the one's who look like fools.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But have you noticed a strong (under)current of fading and eclipsed enthousiasm among the common party members?
riversedge
(70,187 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)Even if your preferred candidate prevails in the primaries, she'll need every Democratic vote to win the General Election. And with faded enthousiasm over a year before the primaries, I can scarcely imagine the bad mood disaster months after the primaries.
George II
(67,782 posts)....but from the INSIDE, not the outside.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)But it eludes me; definition of 'enthousiasm in the party' relies on a good understanding of what a party is. The OP only cites party establishment endorsements as proof of unfading enthousiasm in the (whole) party. There is a narrowness in such a notion.
Your tautology doesn't change that narrowness one bit.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)Truth be told, I'm not impressed when one politician "endorses" another politician. It's just politics.
I'm more impressed by union endorsements and the like. You know, everyday people.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)Of course, if we let them decide the nomination, we might have to change the name of our party...
deutsey
(20,166 posts)You don't want ANY adults in the room?
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And Bernie has none so far.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)She said I think Hillary would not have entered the race unless she knew she had the majority of the delegates on her side.That's a good observation
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And for good reason. She has spent a lifetime advancing the Democratic agenda, including helping Dems get elected.
bigdarryl
(13,190 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I wonder if they will believe all elected Democrats are evil once she sweeps up all the super delegate endorsements. Just waiting for that one.
frylock
(34,825 posts)A whole generation of new voters would see just how badly the system is rigged.
George II
(67,782 posts)1 current member of Obama's Cabinet
7 current state Governors, including the current Governor of Vermont
31 current Senators (70% of 44) including Sanders' fellow Senator from Vermont
95 current Representatives (51% of 188)
28 current Mayors, including the current Mayor of Sanders' home town, Burlington
That's an impressive list of CURRENT non-has-beens and somebodies.
On the other hand, we have to give credit to Sanders for getting the endorsements of the 1%-ers Ben and Jerry!
Joe Chi Minh
(15,229 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)Quid pro quos - not just for Big Bankers/Wall Street firms or private hedge fund owners anymore.
INdemo
(6,994 posts)turbinetree
(24,695 posts)DEEZ NUTS giving his endorsement to Bernie-----------------because he is the future
Honk--------------------for a political revolution Bernie 2016
blackspade
(10,056 posts)By the establishment and I don't plan to now.
Billsmile
(404 posts)But I fear they're for a candidate that will only give the Democratic Party a 50/50 shot at the White House.
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/clinton-begins-the-2016-campaign-and-its-a-toss-up/
brooklynite
(94,502 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)-For one thing Bernie does a better job activating the progressive base which is one of the keys to winning an election.
-He also does not inflame or agitate the republicans as much as Hillary does.
-Adding to that the republicans haven't been planning for ten years on how to run against him.
-He has lower negatives in some of the swing states.
-If Jeb Bush is the other candidate then we will have a Bush vs Clinton race that will actually turn down overall voter enthusiasm and lower turnout ALWAYS favors republicans. This would also be an invitation for third party spoilage.
-If Trump is the other candidate than we have a situation where populism (albeit, disgusting xenophobic hateful populism) is running hotter on the republican side.
-Almost every issue Sanders speaks to have been issues that the majority of Americans actual support-getting tough on Wall Street, raising the minimum wage, taxing the wealthy etc. And we know with near-certainty that the moment that Hillary gets the nomination nod she will run straight to the middle.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)Very interesting. I thought Bernistas all thought Clinton was a Republican in Democratic clothes. that Republicans like her policies.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)They are basing it on twenty years of irrational attacks on the Clintons and about ten years of attacks on Hillary as a candidate. They don't care about the fact her policies are sort of moderate for a Democrat any longer. Hell, the teahaddists in their party ejected a fair number of republicans that would have been very conservative back in the 90's and unelectably insane back in the 70's.
With Hillary we get someone that has long been DLC/Third way in policy and the absolute hate of the republicans. If we are going to get their hate anyways I would prefer the more progressive candidate. And it would be a candidate that takes a lot longer for them to gin up the hate for since to many he is not known.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)Nitram
(22,791 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Republicans are not attacking Bernie because they would love to have him in the GE. They will have the non-stop ads about him being a socialist who wants to tax you at 95% running the minute he got nominated.
And he hasn't agitated them before because he is wholly ineffective. Bernie's own co workers basically dismiss him. Why should rethugs pay any attention to him given that?
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)In politics it makes more sense to pump up and name-drop the person you want to run against if they are on the opposing team.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts).... just means you are not a factor.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)This is something everyone engages in with politics of this scale during primary season. You pump up the guy on the other team that is most easily defeated. Force the entire party on the other side to try to defend thme or divide themselves. It is one of the reasons we are so willing to talk about Trump (apart from some ridiculous media obsession). We want the GOP to be cartoonishly stupid and bad and with Trump we get that.
The GOP wants to run against the candidate they think they have the best shot at beating. For better or worse that happens to be Hillary.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)So your personal attacks / insults mean nothing to me whatsoever.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I was accusing you of play-acting intentionally simple. I make no bones against your intellect but you seem set on intentionally ignoring a long standing strategy of political campaigns.
Note the use of the word 'intentional' again. I want to make that perfectly clear.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)And if you actually want an actual response from me, you'll need to skip the insults.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I apologize for catching you trying to feign ignorance of a tactic that you and I both know is common practice. You are way too smart for me to believe you are unaware of it.
CanadaexPat
(496 posts)He's apparently said he'd switch to Biden if Biden runs.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)I think it is time for the Dems to get out and begin to support her visibly and vocally. I love Bernie and he is good for generating the enthusiasm. However, if he doesn't get the nomination many of his group will NOT support Hillary but I really think a huge part of his following is from other than Dems. The right, including Mika and Joe, are doing all they can to make HRC a villain (spouse keeps turning them on in the am). That tell me they are still afraid and HRC is doing much better than they thought she would at this point so they have decided to help the anti-HRC crowd demean her.
riversedge
(70,187 posts)riversedge
(70,187 posts)rag on Hillary.
Laser102
(816 posts)Looking forward to it!!!!
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)I, for one, shall not settle for second best. Not when there is someone who is better on the issues, and especially in a primary!
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Why is Hillary standing in front of a tractor?
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)I hope so!
Thanks for the explanation.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)Come on everybody, chant it with me:
"There are no more corporations.. there are no more corporations"
"Everybody in the world is happy.. everybody in the world is happy"
/revision/latest?cb=20140501020117
I genuinely envy being able to be that level of fanatical belief in a presidents capabilities.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Or mine for that matter. Too gaudy, and I hate pointy, heeled shoes.
Amimnoch
(4,558 posts)I like you. We may not be on the same team, but I like your snark and witt.
PS: no sarcasm meant at all.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)We may not be on the same team right now, but definitely after the primary, we will be! No matter who wins it.
No way can in hell can we let any member of the clown car become the POTUS!
Aerows
(39,961 posts)17 candidates and hardly a moral or a brain cell put together!
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)Are you 12?
BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Lockheed Martin is good and gun corporations are so special they deserve special immunity from civil liability. So big business: Just make sure you make those billions off killing folks instead of usury.
Isn't she purrty? She only cost $700 Billion, give or take a few hundred billion.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/07/30/f-35-fighter-jet-more-problematic-and-costly-than-ever-imagined-air-force-secretary/
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/24583-bernie-sanders-doubles-down-on-f-35-support-days-after-runway-explosion
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)community college about farm policy.But,as we all know,agricultural students tend to be evil.Eeevvvviiiilll!
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)I need another cup of coffee... or something.
See ya latah.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)undoubtedly in front of well over 28,000 cheering supporters but you can't see them because it's a bad camera angle.
George II
(67,782 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)I welcome him to the party, but his odds are long if he enters the race now.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)But he's not going to win because it's too late. He's too far behind in terms of ramping up a campaign. I know he was focused on his son. The timing just didn't work out for him.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)He's welcome to run, but he's in too late.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)MaggieD
(7,393 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)I think it's a little unfair to say "Bernie Who?" While Sanders endorsements don't compare to Hillary's, he does have some extremely good endorsements. Also, my endorsement of Hillary over the others is what is important to me. As for the topic of enthusiasm, it is simply a campaign gimmick being used by supporters of her opponents. Its fair game even though not based in reality. It's like me saying Sanders has started to clearly plateau in national polls. While that appears to be accurate, it leaves out numerous polls of late from two states showing Sanders with continuing growth.
Clinton has been building coalitions for decades from within the party while Sanders has been pounding his fist on his desk and yelling from the outside. This isn't even questionable to the honest observer. The overall endorsement count isn't really a shock.
MaggieD
(7,393 posts)I don't think Bernie has any, does he? Those will matter since they represent 20% of the delegates needed to win the nomination.
SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)It makes sense and is one of the big reasons I am with her in the primaries. She has built up this clout and that in itself is important when it comes to moving this country forward. Do I want someone yelling from a podium or someone building coalitions in a powerful manner that will help progressive legislation to move forward against enormous odds. Sanders is seriously lacking in these relationships and networking as a whole.
reformist2
(9,841 posts)SouthernProgressive
(1,810 posts)We are clearly talking about the nomination process. And no, after said process the winner won't then simply assume control of these relationships. To think the clout built by the Clintons over decades is transferable is simply not a argument that is based in reality. Interesting thought you hold there. Once again, thanks for the kind words and illuminating insight. It is appreciated.
"has-beens and nobodies " reformist2 Post number 11 to the op.
U.S. Representatives Bill Pascrell Jr., Bonnie Watson Coleman, Donald Payne Jr., Xavier Becerra and Scott Peters
Former New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson
Former South Carolina Governors Dick Riley and Jim Hodges
Former North Carolina Senator Kay Hagan
From Iowa: former U.S. Senator Tom Harkin, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, state Attorney General Tom Miller and state Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald
Twenty of 21 of New Jersey's county Democratic chairmen and a bunch of N.J. state legislators
Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey
California Assemblyman David Chiu
In New Hampshire, State Senator David Watters
In Connecticut, Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch
The Cook County (Chicago) Democratic Party
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)In Clintons corner and we were worried they would usurp the population by nominating Hillary. Same old story, same old song and dance.
frylock
(34,825 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)At the money trough
HERVEPA
(6,107 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)passing themselves off as leaders.
Kiss the ladies, shake hands with the fella's
then it's "Open for business!" like a cheap bordello.
And they call it Democracy...
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)endorse Bernie. I'll take the people, Plato.
earthside
(6,960 posts)That is my un-endorsement.
The intolerance I have experienced here from Hillary supporters has certainly contributed to my decision to pledge my anti-Hillary vote.
Let the politicians and celebrities endorse her, they only have one vote apiece ... just like my one vote.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Gothmog
(145,130 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)Then, this guy named Obama came out of nowhere.
ericson00
(2,707 posts)frylock
(34,825 posts)ericson00
(2,707 posts)so its not an opinion, its cold hard fact.
frylock
(34,825 posts)the more people see of Sanders, the more they like him. Clinton has the opposite effect.