Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 930 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is this necessary? (Original Post)
madamesilverspurs
Sep 2015
OP
Half-Century Man
(5,279 posts)1. Only to describe a behavior.
never an appearance.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)2. judging by the font, I thought this was another Santorum sign.
I don't get it.
(If the question is about the word "Fugly", sure, it's mean, but then so is just plain old "ugly". )
Juicy_Bellows
(2,427 posts)3. The Fugs are necessary.
But I am not sure of what context you are referring to?
The word itself doesn't bother me.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)4. Well, now I want ...
bvf
(6,604 posts)5. I was kind of surprised to find it here:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fugly?s=t
Did not expect that.
And I agree, for behavior, I could see it.
Not to be nosy, but is there a reason you're asking?
Did not expect that.
And I agree, for behavior, I could see it.
Not to be nosy, but is there a reason you're asking?