Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:26 AM Jul 2012

Brian Wms' fateful question for Romney: "Do they look ready to your experienced eye?"

I'm struck by how Mitt Romney's epic fail in London seems to have been set up by the framing of the question Brian Williams asked him--regarding Brits' preparation for the Olympics--"Do they look ready to your experienced eye?"

Not realizing that accepting this framing certainly would insult his British hosts, Romney went on to answer about glitches he'd seen in security and a catalog of other basic Olympics management tasks.

Later, Prime Minister Cameron would retort, "It's easy to run an Olympics in the middle of nowhere" (meaning 2002 Utah). And Romney would add gaffes including mentioning a meeting with most-secret MI6, referring to "the backside of Number 10 Downing Street", and fundraising with bank executives ensnared in the Libor price-fixing scandal. But it seems to me Romney's steep public relations slide began with falling into an easily-foreseeable "trap" question from Brian williams.

WHAT'S YOUR OPINION?

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Brian Wms' fateful question for Romney: "Do they look ready to your experienced eye?" (Original Post) ProgressiveEconomist Jul 2012 OP
Hmmm fugop Jul 2012 #1
Is that what you read in the OP? I said it was an "easily foreseeable" ProgressiveEconomist Jul 2012 #4
Actually, I think Mitt WANTED to answer the question... brooklynite Jul 2012 #6
Mittens doesn't understand basic diplomacy. The Velveteen Ocelot Jul 2012 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author ProgressiveEconomist Jul 2012 #3
"he had to be the big know-it-all". Exactly. This appears to be ProgressiveEconomist Jul 2012 #5

fugop

(1,828 posts)
1. Hmmm
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:30 AM
Jul 2012

Oh yes. Right up there with Katie and her GOTCHA question: What newspapers and magazines do you read, Gov. Palin?

And Charlie Gibson with his Bush Doctrine iinterrogation!

Poor Mitt. Mean old journalists!

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
4. Is that what you read in the OP? I said it was an "easily foreseeable"
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:40 AM
Jul 2012

"trap" question. I was admiring Brian Williams's writers' simple ingenuity and marveling at Mitt Romney's naivete

brooklynite

(94,333 posts)
6. Actually, I think Mitt WANTED to answer the question...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:48 AM
Jul 2012

He can't talk about his Bain experience; he doesn't want to talk about his term as Governor; I think he felt he could reiterate his experience with the SLC Olympics by opining on the London Games.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,586 posts)
2. Mittens doesn't understand basic diplomacy.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:31 AM
Jul 2012

Instead, he had to be the big know-it-all and show off his Olympic "expertise," never mind that he was insulting his hosts by questioning their preparations. All he had to do was say something like, London is a great city and I'm sure they will have a successful Olympics. And then STFU.

Response to The Velveteen Ocelot (Reply #2)

ProgressiveEconomist

(5,818 posts)
5. "he had to be the big know-it-all". Exactly. This appears to be
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:42 AM
Jul 2012

a fundamental character flaw that the Obama campaign could exploit in the future.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Brian Wms' fateful questi...