2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumDear Sanders Supporters
Please stop the condescending and inaccurate idea that Clinton supporters need to "understand" something, or that they need a heart-to-heart talk, or that they should be afraid or that they need to choose which Hillary they support.
The Hillary supporters are well educated, thoughtful, progressive democrats who understand very well the stakes of the election.
I know you are afraid, and so you must lash out and attack us at every opportunity. But, I please stick to the issues rather than attempt to demean the Hillary supporters.
So...
Stop it. Just stop it.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)You could not have more perfectly illustrated the smug attitude of Hillary's supporters. And then there is this -
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=643334
Got condescending down to a science, I think. Doesn't matter. Has no effect. But something may be getting under your skin - my advice - just don't click!
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)I just do not understand how they refuse to see it.
mythology
(9,527 posts)Neither side are saints.
Babel_17
(5,400 posts)Ok then, I'm cool with that, and it's kind of funny, all things considered.
"The Hillary supporters are ..." If you'll indulge my making a good natured joke, I'll say it's easy to so generalize, given their numbers.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I admire her work. I see what she has succeeded in doing while in public life. I see what she has reached for the American Dream and caught it. I believe her experience in foreign and domestic affairs is unmatched. And I believe that the alternatives are lacking on a number of fronts.
riversedge
(70,087 posts)Great article and I agree.
http://www.wdsu.com/politics/clinton-pleads-guilty-to-being-a-moderate/35201626
By Dan Merica
Clinton 'pleads guilty' to being a moderate
Published 12:52 PM CDT Sep 10, 2015
COLUMBUS, Ohio (CNN) Hillary Clinton confessed Thursday to something liberals have long suspected: being a moderate Democrat.
"You know, I get accused of being kind of moderate and center," Clinton told the audience at a Women for Hillary event in Ohio. "I plead guilty."
The line is new for Clinton, who spent a large portion of her early campaign casting herself as a liberal fighter who has been progressive for her entire life. To many on the left, those lines never really rang true.
..................
On Thursday, Clinton reiterated that willingness to compromise, telling the audience that while she would "meet anytime, anywhere with anyone to find common ground," she would also "stand my ground" on issues like abortion and women's rights, among others.
Clinton argued at the Columbus event that being in the "center" is a positive, not a negative.
....................
Before Clinton came on stage, Dana Ellis, a digital marketing strategist from the Columbus area, said that while Sanders has captured "the really progressive liberal arm of the party," Clinton's "more centrist Democrats understand that in order to win the White House you have to have a broader appeal."
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)riversedge
(70,087 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)To me the "center" is my beliefs. To you, the "center" is your beliefs. To that guy over, the "center" is his beliefs.
Trying to constantly appeal to the "center" is like trying to sculpt with water.
OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)I in no way consider my beliefs to be centrist, nor do I suspect that of the vast majority here.
treestar
(82,383 posts)for purposes here. No need to exaggerate to make a point.
It's like the right wingers calling Hillary a communist while you call her a conservative (or whoever on DU that does that).
The center is a fact people don't want to admit to. I can admit to being left of center without having to deny what the center is.
Centrist should not be used as an insult as we need at least some of those voters to win. We need a win to the left of center rather than handing them to right of center as we did in the midterms.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)Don't go away mad...just capitulate and let Hillary be driven from this primary race.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)-Chan790
I am not going anywhere. I would literally rather be shot in the head, point blank, than capitulate. Cowards capitulate and DemocratSinceBirth is no coward.
Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #14)
Name removed Message auto-removed
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)But, that is not going to happen. So, instead of "Dear Hillary supporter" suggestions, why not place your attacks where they belong? The clown car.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)in this tent.
You are part of the clown car as far as I am concerned. The Clintons, their allies and their supporters are nothing but displaced Republicans.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I do not have to justify my life long status as a democrat to you. It sounds as if you are listening to the cabal rather than thoughtful analysis.
I hope you can open your mind and your eyes, for your own sake. I feel a bit sorry for you.
artislife
(9,497 posts)How??
Unless, being rude, condescending and basically, asshatlike, is a one way street in your mind.
"meritless"
"reveals part of the problem"
"I do not have to justify"
"listening to a cabal"
"rather than thoughtful analysis"
"I hope you can open your mind and eyes"
and the grand finale
"I feel sorry for you"
Crickey, I think you had less than 10% of your post be anything but condescending.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)Calling people clowns isn't very nice, Chan.
Actually, it's really messed up! Out of respect for my fellow denizens of this board I used "messed up" in lieu of the colloquialism I really wanted to use.
DSB
P.S. At times I wish I had the forbearance of posters like Evergreen Emerald but alas I don't.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)HassleCat
(6,409 posts)When people support political candidates, they often do so zealously, so Sanders people will not understand how Clinton people feel about their candidate, and vice versa. Some of us (Sanders supporters) feel frustrated because we think Clinton is using big money and the party establishment to deny a fair shot to Sanders. But that's really what it's all about, isn't it? Part of the reason people like Clinton is because she is good at pulling the usual levers of the political machine. She is "good" because she's connected, an insider. That's an issue for us because we think it results in bad legislation, bad policy, bad compromises, etc. About the only thing we can expect to understand about each other is that the things that appeal to me about my candidate seem like drawbacks to you. The things you like about Clinton, some of the things, make us dislike her. I suppose you feel the same way about Sanders, judging by the comments on DU.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I have been on DU since 2004. When I come here and am bombarded with "helpful advice" by people who should not necessarily be giving it, it is insulting.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I think I see your point. There are things you like about Clinton that make her unattractive to me. I can explain what these things are, and why they make me feel the way I do. It would be wrong of me to expect you to "understand" this.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)That is what I have been saying. So please stop the "Dear Hillary supporters" condescending posts. Lets talk issues rather than reduce ourselves to attacks.
Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)think you are not insulting.
To the senses, that is.
You are a stranger and have no bearing on my life, so you cannot insult me personally.
BlueWaveDem
(403 posts)Bless their hearts.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Please take a look around the forum right now. Count the number of "Dear Hillary supporters" threads. And tell me I am wrong.
And your response is part of the problem. "Yeah but look what you did...MOm!"
If you would like to create a thread about Israel and Bernie, be my guest. But, you are non-responsive and completely Self unaware.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Apparently some HC supporters didn't get the memo that accusing Jewish Americans of divided loyalty is anti-Semitic and against the TOS here.
So I guess that makes you the ones who are "non-responsive and completely Self unaware".
Armstead
(47,803 posts)It's called having opinions, and trying to discuss/debate/argue. No matter which candidate one supports or doesn't support.
However, bullshit phrases like "bless their hearts" is not debating or actual argumentation. It's just condescending bullshit.
artislife
(9,497 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... meet kettle.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Put the lid on.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)I don't take orders from hypocrites.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I guess you can't look in the mirror (steam from the kettle). Self-unawareness. shakes head.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Authoritarian wannabes gotta try to give orders.
And fail.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)I decided to delete my response. Have a nice day
artislife
(9,497 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)I haven't had this much fun in awhile.
I guess I do miss the outlandish ops of some H supporters after all.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)please stop the condescending attitude that clinton is inevitable and that there really is no contest here.
please stop assuming that we will all vote for her in the general if she gets the nom. also please stop presenting thirty thousand different versions of the loyalty oath. our votes belong to us and we have the right and obligation to use them as our conscience dictates.
please stop pretending that this is a fair primary and that hillary, the dnc, and dws are not completely orchestrating this in an undemocratic fashion to rig this for hillary
i know you are afraid. hillary is following the same path as 08 and it must be frustrating and difficult. but lets stick to the issues rather than demean bernie or his supporters
so....
stop it. just stop it.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Please look at DU and count the number of "Dear Hillary Supporters" threads. Condescending, factless, baseless and causing acrimony.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)there are not the equivalent number of loyalty oaths, threads about how bernie supporters suck, threads attacking bernie or his family, or threads about how we better support the nom or else scotus, etc?
you need to catch up on your reading
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I think most Clinton supporters simple see her as a very strong candidate our best bet to win the WH. There is nothing condescending about that at all. Its simply our opinion.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but the idea that bernie is in contention is laughable to some and they have made no bones about it
DCBob
(24,689 posts)It would take some horrendous scandal or serious legal issue to force Hillary out then he might have a chance.. but probably not even then since Biden or someone else mainstream would jump in would take most of the Hillary vote and beat Sanders easily.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)the trendlines are with bernie
and there hasn't even been a debate yet
he also has crossover appeal. most repubs would sooner gouge out their own eyes than vote for her.
i also would not discount om at this point
DCBob
(24,689 posts)However, I suspect there will be alot of Republican women voting for Hillary.
Also I really doubt the debates will have much impact unless she makes some horrific gaffe.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but i suppose only time will tell.
jfern
(5,204 posts)For example, the NBC poll from about a week ago.
Clinton 49%
Trump 39%
Sanders 52%
Trump 36%
http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/NBCWSJSept2015.pdf
artislife
(9,497 posts)Late spring was basically a multitude of " She's got this in the bag, suckas!" from camp weathervane.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)although the increase in attacks on bernie tells me some are worried
no need to attack someone who is no threat..
riversedge
(70,087 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)trying to intimidate others how to vote, suppression of democracy, and making fun of people who do not want a centrist hawk for president is funny?
where is the comedy?
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Perhaps you should start to read some of your own posts before making such statements. Makes you appear quite foolish.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)There you go again...shakes head.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Did you post an OP hoping that nobody would respond or something?
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)hoping people would be thoughtful....sorry.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)In other words "agree with me"...
Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Sure
Explain exactly what merit you believe your OP deserves because I find it completely lacking of any merit beyond a poor attempt at snark.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)you are not looking hard enough.
NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Gotcha. Good plan.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Afraid that if we don't get the money out of politics during this election, the country is doomed to oligarchy.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)You are funny--like a jester.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)We are not for everybody, I guess.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)I'd think as DU veteran you'd have figured that one out by now.
People argue for their peferrd candidate (or position) and think those with different positions don't "understand" the truth. And they argue about it.
Applies to supporters of Clinton, Sanders, whomever. Always has....always will.
sibelian
(7,804 posts)We are all WELL aware of the site that congealed out of the "well educated, thoughtful, progressive democrats" attitude towards the rest of us. The threads detailing their behaviour are easily accesssible here.
Little evidence is to be found there of their thoughtfulness or education.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)My approach is abundantly clear.
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)sibelian
(7,804 posts)I wonder.
dae
(3,396 posts)What continues to amaze me is anyone who believes they will change the mind of someone in the "other" camp.
I support Bernie as fervently as any other poster on DU supports her/his candidate, threads attacking candidates and/or supporters do nothing but increase animosity and decrease any chance of future reconciliation for the General Election. Everyone should be focused on tearing down GOP candidates not Dems.
Just my opinion, thanks.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Intelligent people what to think. It really does not make you look very good.
ismnotwasm
(41,967 posts)Thank you.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt
Bread and Circus
(9,454 posts)I do think the vast majority of rank and file Hillary supporters are the casual people that don't follow politics and say they are for Hillary "just because". In other words, they are told what to think by the mass media and party elite that have sought to create this manipulative veil of "inevitibility". Naturally people don't really want to think to hard about things if they don't have to. That's just human nature. People want to "go with a winner" and there you have it. The Big Lie. And if you think that is some sort of conspiracy, you don't really understand politics or human nature. People really just sort of go along with what they are told for the most part. That's why propaganda is so powerful.
Right now, a lot of people feel like the whole system is corrupt and has been for a very long time and only getting worse. To many it seems as if incremental half measures and bread crumbs are given with one hand while the other knife reaches around your back to cut your kidney out. The Clintons have been a HUGE part of this. NAFTA is but one very real and impactful example.
NAFTA devastated my home town. Full stop. It saw it happen in real time. It was incredible.
Thus, on my side of the fence there is a massive amount of anger, frustration, and resentment at what the "elites" that both parties have wrought on the vast majority of Americans.
I know this is "Democratic Underground". I used to think it was democratic underground w/ a small d but I do understand it has a party function and at the end is really a capital D. I don't like that, but I can accept it. Thus, once a nominee is selected I and I hope others will respect that and not post too much divisive language once we cross that bridge.
However until then this is a place for debate. And when a certain segment of the Democratic party, spearheaded by Hillary Clinton and her acolytes, has essentially ruined a part of the soul of the party don't expect people to just take it lying down.
The reason why you may feel Sanders supporters come across as if you are condescending it is because it feels as if HRC supporters have their fingers in their ears chanting "la la la" and "Benghazi!!!" while willfully ignoring really important shit. Some of this "really important shit" is the fact that Hillary sounds a fucking lot like neoconservatives and is going to stumble her way into another shitty war where a lot of people fucking really die.
It feels like we need to wake y'all up.
Maybe we don't...
But it feels as if we do.
The other thing is that I have a problem here with HRC is that it seems as if all that matters is winning. Which, on it's face, kind of makes sense. You can't influence policy if you don't win. However, bit by bit the political capital of the party and its moral center has been sold off. NAFTA is but one example. It's a matter of short term gains have resulted in long term losses. The 90's were great (in some ways). But what were we left with? What was Bill Clinton's true legacy? NAFTA...China...bursting bubble economies...banks too big to fail...DOMA...Don't ask don't tell....injurious welfare reform...a rising police state? And how can we convince working class voters to support the Democratic Party when it was this party that did all this shit? And then there's the Bill Clinton ethical issues... oye vey... how can we defend this shit over coffee or at Thanksgiving?
The only defense of voting for the rightward march of the Democratic Party is avoiding the batshit crazyness of the Republican Party but I feel the rightward march of the Democratic Party has only allowed, if not encouraged the right wing to get every more rightward. By chasing Super Pac dollars the New Democrats are basically right of center when it comes to economic insecurity and more war for more money. Why would the Republicans need to adhere to reality if we have the Democratic Party doing their dirty work for them?
I cannot and will not vote for Hillary Clinton, not now, not ever.
The first Presidential election I was allowed to vote in was 1992.
I voted for Clinton, Clinton again, Gore, Kerry, Obama, and Obama again. I pull the lever almost down the line for Democrats except for save votes where I usually vote a bit more liberal to throw some love to the loveable underdogs.
But I am not going to keep pulling the Democratic lever "just because" or due to some fear that the "crazy Republicans" are going to take over. Because honestly, to me, the Democratic Elite PTB are crazy and injurious in their own damn way.
I truly believe Hillary is going to bumble us into another war. I truly believe Hillary is going to flame up some b.s. hypercharged bubble economy that is going to end up with the predators walking off w/ the golden parachute and the rest of the populace with a big pile of shit. I truly believe Hillary is "in the tank" for AIPAC, the MIC, and Wall Street.
I also truly believe Hillary does care about women, children, and other disenfranchised groups. I don't think she's evil.
However, I don't feel like bread crumbs for women, children, and other social groups that need help will compensate for the huge kitchen knife that will inevitably end up puncturing their backs.
Clinton is the DLC and the DLC has NOT been good for the disenfranchised but it has been very good for the rich assholes that control everything.
Hence, that's why things suck as bad as they do and why everyone is so economically insecure and why so many people are in prison and why so many people are shooting each other. They are frustrated, alienated, disenfranchised, and impoverished in many ways. This isn't an accident this is a by-product of a pay to play corrupt political system.
Bernie is speaking to these fundamental truths whereas Hillary seems to want put frosting on the same 'ol shit cake.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)and, in her own words, Iran--they're all just obstacles to getting the money from Saban to Ipsos, to the happy inaugural fetes and noisy speeches
they always tell us how bad the Pubs are, then turn around and pass Pub laws: this is WHY they have to blame us for any DINO loss
Faux pas
(14,645 posts)a call out thread? Shame shame.
aikoaiko
(34,163 posts)So much so, some prominent HRC supporters say they are voting for her because they can't stand with Bernie supporters (although they like Bernie).
artislife
(9,497 posts)You forgot the sarcasm smilie
jkbRN
(850 posts)LMAO.
Gothmog
(144,928 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I'll support mine.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)I don't know why that reminded me of this video...
Evergreen Emerald
(13,069 posts)Poor bear.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)here in Alaska. "Bear! Bear! Stop it! You're supposed to be sleeping." LOL.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)"Bear! BEAR! Stop it! That doesn't taste good! It's plastic!"
I just cried, laughing so hard.
Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)I've watched it several times now and crack up every time. But she was really stupid. Thank you for not eating my kayak, now I'm going to pepper spray you. What did she think would happen? LOL.
demmiblue
(36,823 posts)karynnj
(59,498 posts)about Sanders supporters. (Or a Sanders support written of Clinton supporters.) The fact is that BOTH sides have many many supporters who fit every one of those descriptions.
Maybe this is another time to apply the golden rule.
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)It all emanates from their firmly held belief that nobody can possibly like or vote for Hillary... That belief will either be confirmed or rejected in the next several months.
Ino
(3,366 posts)The one who says she's progressive, or the more recent Hillary v7.0.2 who says she's guilty of being a moderate centrist.
The one who is scripted, or the one who is "spontaneous."
The original Hillary, or the evolved Hillary.
There's a Hillary for everyone!
Best of all, you don't need to choose.... cuddle with all versions simultaneously if you like!