Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politifact: Hillary Clinton called for Wall Street reform in 2007. (Original Post) JaneyVee Oct 2015 OP
Sorry, but this is outside the newly-defined window of positions. jeff47 Oct 2015 #1
I think she cancelled it artislife Oct 2015 #10
What? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #24
It's a joke about the selective use of Clinton's record jeff47 Oct 2015 #25
Wall Street has no concerns over her campaign trail "populism" modestybl Oct 2015 #26
politico is a rightwing rag. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #34
And what makes you say that, and what does that have to do with the gist of the article?... modestybl Oct 2015 #47
That's why Wall St banks and law firms are her biggest donors. HooptieWagon Oct 2015 #2
Do you have a link and quote to this claim? tia uponit7771 Oct 2015 #4
Why yes, I do. TM99 Oct 2015 #13
thx uponit7771 Oct 2015 #14
So Robert Hormats and Thomas Nides contributed "billions" to her campaign? George II Oct 2015 #19
Hillary has Billions from banks? upaloopa Oct 2015 #6
Her biggest donors are unions. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #9
As are Sanders' donors. George II Oct 2015 #21
No, they're not contributing to her campaign. Period! George II Oct 2015 #18
Her biggest donors are unions. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #23
Lol no they're not. tinyhowls Oct 2015 #50
More proof its not about policy with Clinton, they just don't like her. I myself would like another uponit7771 Oct 2015 #3
The replies thus far are completly unresponsive to this OP. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #5
You made a comment about the responses to the OP.... daleanime Oct 2015 #8
Yes. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #12
I believe the other poster is insinuating that you're adding to what you're bemoaning. nt DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #17
If so, I believe the other poster is confused. OilemFirchen Oct 2015 #20
I'm not confused.... daleanime Oct 2015 #30
Na.... daleanime Oct 2015 #28
Sorry, I should have seen that the first time around. DisgustipatedinCA Oct 2015 #29
No problem... daleanime Oct 2015 #31
Your pool of responses is too small..... daleanime Oct 2015 #27
Yeahup, she's more then willing..... daleanime Oct 2015 #7
Hillary Clinton's Wall Street Dilemma TM99 Oct 2015 #11
HRC: My Plan to Prevent the Next Crash William769 Oct 2015 #15
+1000~ sheshe2 Oct 2015 #35
Of course she did. Is there any position on any issue she hasn't had? Live and Learn Oct 2015 #16
K&R! hrmjustin Oct 2015 #22
K&R mcar Oct 2015 #32
Yes she did ismnotwasm Oct 2015 #33
Thank you JaneyVee sheshe2 Oct 2015 #36
Really? 99Forever Oct 2015 #37
Show me other candidates bills prior to 2007 regarding this. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #38
Not gonna play your move the goalpost bullshit. 99Forever Oct 2015 #40
Ok. Are you unhappy that she has been calling for and writing bills to regulate Wall St. since 2007? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #41
Uh no. 99Forever Oct 2015 #42
You told me to stay on topic, so I did. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #44
Yeah... sure... 99Forever Oct 2015 #46
Did you really just say that Hillary Clinton is vermin? Wow mythology Oct 2015 #48
Oh noez. 99Forever Oct 2015 #49
k&r Starry Messenger Oct 2015 #39
Hillary Clinton called for Wall Street reform in 2007 - Another perspective. kenn3d Oct 2015 #43
Did you miss the part about her bringing bills to the floor also? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #45
As a Bernie Supporter... JonLeibowitz Oct 2015 #51

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
1. Sorry, but this is outside the newly-defined window of positions.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 01:36 PM
Oct 2015

Since her 2010 position on the TPP is now off-limits due to being "so long ago", then 2007 is definitely outside the window.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
25. It's a joke about the selective use of Clinton's record
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 03:30 PM
Oct 2015

That some things are "ancient history", while some even older things are posted as showing what Clinton "really believes".

 

modestybl

(458 posts)
47. And what makes you say that, and what does that have to do with the gist of the article?...
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 08:58 PM
Oct 2015

... HRC will say anything to get elected. She'll tack immediately back to Wall Street (she was on the board of directors for 6 years at Walmart ... this would be totally in character).

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
2. That's why Wall St banks and law firms are her biggest donors.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 01:39 PM
Oct 2015

They know they're greedy SOBs, but just can't help themselves. So they're donating billions to Hillary to cure them of their addiction and put limits on how much they can steal.

George II

(67,782 posts)
19. So Robert Hormats and Thomas Nides contributed "billions" to her campaign?
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 03:08 PM
Oct 2015

Each can only contribute $2700.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
6. Hillary has Billions from banks?
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 01:45 PM
Oct 2015
Wow I was so worried she might run out of money in the general. I feel better now.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
3. More proof its not about policy with Clinton, they just don't like her. I myself would like another
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 01:42 PM
Oct 2015

... Obama to fall in like with but I'd take someone who can be just as effective.

Sanders will be pointing out what he can do with executive powers here soon, following Clinton's lead

OilemFirchen

(7,143 posts)
5. The replies thus far are completly unresponsive to this OP.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 01:43 PM
Oct 2015

How weird.


ETA: When composing this reply, only two other replies had been made.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
29. Sorry, I should have seen that the first time around.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 05:12 PM
Oct 2015

I didn't mean to misrepresent what you were saying.

Have a great weekend.

William769

(55,142 posts)
15. HRC: My Plan to Prevent the Next Crash
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 02:40 PM
Oct 2015

Seven years after the financial crash, despite important new rules signed into law by President Barack Obama, there are risks in our financial system that could still cause another crisis. Banks have paid billions of dollars in fines, but few executives have been held personally accountable. “Too big to fail” is still too big a problem. Regulators don’t have all the tools and support they need to protect our economy. To prevent irresponsible behavior on Wall Street from ever again devastating Main Street, we need more accountability, tougher rules and stronger enforcement. I have a plan to build on the progress we’ve made under President Obama and do just that.

In the years before the crash, as financial firms piled risk upon risk, regulators in Washington either couldn’t or wouldn’t keep up. Top regulators under President George W. Bush posed for a picture literally taking a chain saw to banking rules. Before the crisis hit, as a senator from New York, I was alarmed by this gathering storm, and called for addressing the risks of derivatives, cracking down on abusive subprime mortgages and improving financial oversight. Unfortunately, the Bush administration and Republicans in Congress largely ignored calls for reform. The result cost 9 million Americans their jobs, drove 5 million families out of their homes and wiped out more than $13 trillion in household wealth.

Thanks to President Obama’s leadership and the determination and sacrifice of the American people, we’ve worked our way out of that ditch and put our economy on sounder footing. Now we have to keep going.

First, it’s time for more accountability on Wall Street. Stories of misconduct in the financial industry are shocking -- like HSBC allowing drug cartels to launder money or five major banks pleading guilty to felony charges for conspiring to manipulate currency exchange rates. This is criminal behavior, yet the individuals responsible often get off with limited consequences -- or none at all. I want to change that.

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2015-10-08/hillary-clinton-s-plan-to-prevent-the-next-crash

ismnotwasm

(41,956 posts)
33. Yes she did
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 05:55 PM
Oct 2015

And I'm proud and happy to cast my vote for a true progressive who actually can accomplish forward looking changes.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
37. Really?
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 06:43 PM
Oct 2015

At the rate she flip/flops on almost every issue, who can keep track?

I'm pretty freakin' sure she's been on both sides of every issue, depending on which way the wind was blowing at that moment.






 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
41. Ok. Are you unhappy that she has been calling for and writing bills to regulate Wall St. since 2007?
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 06:58 PM
Oct 2015

I think this is something we can all agree on.

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
42. Uh no.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 07:11 PM
Oct 2015

I just detest lying liars, especially the pandering, self-serving political vermin variety. Flip-flopping is just another form of lying lies.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
44. You told me to stay on topic, so I did.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 07:16 PM
Oct 2015

And the op is proving that not only isn't Hillary a lying liar, but she also didn't flip-flop.

kenn3d

(486 posts)
43. Hillary Clinton called for Wall Street reform in 2007 - Another perspective.
Fri Oct 9, 2015, 07:15 PM
Oct 2015

Hmmm, well... yes. She called for Wall Street reform in 2007. That's true. She was running for president back then, right? Her husband was president a decade earlier and actually set in motion many of the Wall Street reforms which ultimately got us into so much godamn trouble to begin with.

Sadly no such reform Hillary called for ever came to prevent the Wall Street meltdown in 2008, which nearly destroyed the global economy and did destroy the already precarious financial lives of millions of "everyday Americans". And in pulling the US economy back up out of the ashes, Obama saved the "too big to fail" banks, financial institutions, and corporations using taxpayers' money. But we can't blame Hillary for all that of course. In fact, let's make her Secretary of State. She did lose the election after all.

Since then Wall Street has recovered beyond quite nicely indeed thankyouverymuch, although that recovery has not really "trickled down" to most of those busted everyday American taxpayers. Many of whom lost their homes, their jobs, and their retirement savings, and now struggle to live on lower wages and/or part-time employment. Hillary came through it all ok though, so at least we don't need to worry about that.

But once again the signs of corporate greed and recklessness threaten to bring it all crashing down again. So now she's calling for Wall Street reform again in 2015. Hmmm... And just when it was really becoming obvious that Sen.Sanders was drawing huge crowds and rising fast in the polls, she gave her Manhattan economic platform speech on July 13, 2015, declaring that income and wealth inequality and raising the incomes of "everyday Americans" so they could live the middle-class life to be the "defining economic challenge of our time". Gee, doesn't that sound familiar? Hmmmm... yes.

Hillary Clinton's personal net worth is officially reported to be $31.2 million, and Bill Clinton's personal net worth is another $80 million. They are quintessential examples of the 1%, and powerful representatives of the oligarchic class that now rules our country. Nevermind the humbler roots she came from... she's achieving her "God given potential", and she is not looking back. Her recurring populist proclamations will not survive any given election she aspires to win, and they don't have to, because her only enduring core belief is that she should be president, just like her husband.

JonLeibowitz

(6,282 posts)
51. As a Bernie Supporter...
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 02:44 AM
Oct 2015

...I am glad that Secretary Clinton is in favor of appropriate regulation of wall street. Bringing bills to the floor is a very good sign that she is leaning the right way on the issues.

I do support Bernie (in part) because I think he is more cynical and understanding of the great lengths Wall St. will do to avoid regulation. The donations to her campaign from many bankers also make me uneasy; what do they know that I don't about how to avoid her version of regulations so that they are supporting her? That is a question that bothers me, but it may well not bother you. That's fine.

However, I am glad she takes these positions; much better than how the GOP candidates would treat Wall St. bankers.

Good news no matter who wins the nomination we will have someone harsher (to varying degrees) on the excesses of the financial system than the Republicans.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Politifact: Hillary Clint...