2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders Wants The "Capitalist v. Democratic Socialist" Subject Debated.
When he answered "no" to being asked if he was a Capitalist on MTP there was a reason for it. He has been winning this exact same fight for 35 years.
(R)s will call any (D) a "Socialist" so our best bet is to nominate someone who knows how to win that fight. I am sorry if Clinton supporters can't understand this, but it is true.
We will see round one of that fight tonight, but it won't be over for months. Maybe this time he will lose the fight, but this is his strategy for winning and to assume that it will fail before the fight has even begun is foolish.
Everyone looking for a candidate who is not the status quo has a real option this time around. Lets see how many take it.
jfern
(5,204 posts)So while he's a democratic socialist, he's not opposed to working constructively with business groups and Republicans.
After he was re-elected in 1983, and voters swept in a more progressive City Council, Sanders gained a stronger foothold in City Hall. With the support of local Republicans and business leaders, he created the Community and Economic Development Office (CEDO) to carry out his vision for more affordable housing, more locally owned small businesses, greater community engagement in planning, and job development.
http://www.thenation.com/article/bernies-burlington-city-sustainable-future/
stone space
(6,498 posts)...the day when they stopped running away and came out of the closet in favor of equality.
It's hard to fight back when you are busy running away.
And the fact that you are not fighting back lends credibility to the original notion, because...well...you aren't fighting back, and are likely taking quite a beating as a result.
It's a self-fulfilling prophesy.
The same principle applies here.
wyldwolf
(43,867 posts)cpompilo
(323 posts)Indepatriot
(1,253 posts)Vattel
(9,289 posts)exactly what his brand of socialism is. I know it is democratic and that he favors more democratic control of the economic system, including some state-owned resources and some worker-owned businesses with workplace democracy, but beyond that things get fuzzy for me.
pinebox
(5,761 posts)then look at Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Switzerland, Germany, France, etc. It's all right there.
Rose Siding
(32,623 posts)He didn't qualify it so that graphic doesn't really clarify it.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Those words would make sense to a lot of Americans.
Sanders screwed up.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)What exactly is involved in running the economy democratically to meet human needs? Doesn't the public need control over the means of production to run an economy? And how is such control consistent with private enterprise? I still have more questions than answers.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)mmonk
(52,589 posts)Gothmog
(144,945 posts)The Washington Post has a good article on this https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/10/12/why-bernie-sanders-isnt-going-to-be-president-in-5-words/
Americans might be increasingly aware of the economic inequality in the country and increasingly suspicious of so-called vulture capitalism all of which has helped fuel Sanders's rise. But we are not electing someone who is an avowed socialist to the nation's top political job. Just ain't happening.
phantom power
(25,966 posts)You'd think, after 40 years of trying to appease the conservative movement by running away from democratic socialism and having the conservatives just keep pushing the Overton Window farther and farther to the right, that the Democrats would finally realize that they have to stop running.
Sanders understands that, and a few others like Senator Warren. I hope the rest of them eventually catch up, while we still have a country left to save.
Response to Motown_Johnny (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)nt