2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumForget trying to use Elizabeth Warren to influence my opinion of Hillary Clinton
It won't work. I like and respect Elizabeth Warren a lot, but her opinion of Hillary has no direct bearing on mine. Maybe Hillary supporters are susceptible to VIP persuasion, and therefore figure everyone else is too. It's nice to have influential people validate your opinions, not create them. Add to that the fact that EW has been alternately supportive and critical of Clinton, and this approach strikes me as a lame waste of time.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)If you cannot honestly deal with what her account reveals about Hillary, I think you are in denial.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)If that helps.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It reflected both positive and negative aspects of Clinton, then I posted the letter that Warren signed saying she encouraged Clinton to run. I got annoyed people want to consistently have it both ways... You can't.
It's clear Warren has/had some level of support for Clinton, she wouldn't sign that letter if she didn't mean it.
brooklynite
(94,333 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)I think your logic is a bit flawed on this.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm saying that someone who was anti Clinton would NOT have signed the letter.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)about Hillary -something that should NOT be ignored- from the video I am speaking of. Namely, Hillary's tendency to place political expediency over principles.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I know I'm lucky
merrily
(45,251 posts)the more the merrier about Sanders--meaning the more who ran in the Democratic primary, the better. Of course, after he announced, they seemed much less merry about his challenge, but they did say it originally.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)This Hillary supporter says there is nothing wrong with that, and if anything it just makes our nominee stronger... Whoever that ends up being.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Especially when you are under pressure to "urge" someone to run and you have not been a Senator very long.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)No, that's not how my senator acts, every word, and action is something she means.
The "she succumbed to peer pressure" theory is moot.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I don't think you're using "moot" correctly
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)thesquanderer
(11,972 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)marym625
(17,997 posts)You posted an article about a letter.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It was in response to a video, this is a discussion board. We discuss stuff.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Sorry to disappoint but oh well, they'll have to find something else to throw at Bernie's supporters.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)But that letter shows some level of support, so IMO it's not fair to say or represent that Warren is anti Clinton.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)HC supporters have been gleefully predicting that we'll throw Warren under the bus for days.
And I never claimed she was anti-Clinton.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)djean111
(14,255 posts)wishful thinking? projecting? watching too many violent movies or video games?
There is literally NO endorsement that could get me to support someone i do not want to support because of issues. I understand that Congress answers to its donors and the DNC and RNC. And someone - Price? said there was lots of arm-twisting or something. So whatever. Still think it bizarre that we are even talking about this stuff. And the talk started early this year; I did a search on Pledge-y Thing.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)I'm sure your searchy thing turned up a few posts.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)It's great if someone I like and respect endorses Bernie but it doesn't influence me one way or the other.
And I already declared my intentions if Bernie doesn't win the nomination so if anyone wants to find out if I took "the pledge" they can search my posts.
marym625
(17,997 posts)And support. But, if not, that's fine. Won't change my mind. Especially endorsements that happen long, long before everyone is in the race.
This wasn't an endorsement anyway. It was an almost 3 year old undisclosed letter saying something to Hillary Clinton about her running for President. Obviously, saying something good about it. But not an endorsement
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)She may have to eventually but I don't see that happening anytime soon.
The people who are implying she's a HC supporter are being disingenuous at best.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)That being said you are correct the letter is not in any way and endorsement of any kind.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)It may have had meaning to her, it has little to me.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Your vote your choice.
merrily
(45,251 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)It certainly does show some level of support and that is well after the "trust issues" video.
Look Warren will endorse whoever she wants to and there is nothing wrong with that, what is wrong is people on DU repeatedly trying to have it both ways.
merrily
(45,251 posts)I do not try to have it both ways. People who say or imply that I do are clueless.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)No I said people on DU. If I said/meant you I would have used the word "you".
marym625
(17,997 posts)I truly can't imagine that she'll endorse Hillary. But, you never know. I mean in the primary of course
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Even if it is for charity.
marym625
(17,997 posts)I may throw a couple of bucks for that
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)To Manny --
marym625
(17,997 posts)For me too!
To Manny!
to manny
marym625
(17,997 posts)Seems appropriate.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)The fact is, Elizabeth Warren has a LOT more honesty, integrity, and credibility than HRC. When she says that Hillary changed positions because of Wall Street pressure, most people believe her.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Other than a point of interest, endorsements don't really do anything for me either.
merrily
(45,251 posts)uponit7771
(90,301 posts)... evil
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)it won't matter what Warren thinks.
uponit7771
(90,301 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)DrBulldog
(841 posts)That's what most intelligent rational people do.
Thespian2
(2,741 posts)I gather she is a corporate shill who has voted against many progressive ideas and policies and principles...she is beholding to wall street, Big Pharma, the military industrial complex...and many other organizations determined to control America for the people who control global corporations...I have found absolutely nothing that says she will not sell out America and be much worse than Obama...
You may now begin to state chapter and verse about her "amazingly great record" from her Walmart connections, to her connections with Goldman Sachs, CIBC, etc., to her disastrous votes as senator, including her vote for killing American soldiers in Iraq...
840high
(17,196 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)and noted.