Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:18 PM Oct 2015

Forget trying to use Elizabeth Warren to influence my opinion of Hillary Clinton

It won't work. I like and respect Elizabeth Warren a lot, but her opinion of Hillary has no direct bearing on mine. Maybe Hillary supporters are susceptible to VIP persuasion, and therefore figure everyone else is too. It's nice to have influential people validate your opinions, not create them. Add to that the fact that EW has been alternately supportive and critical of Clinton, and this approach strikes me as a lame waste of time.

63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Forget trying to use Elizabeth Warren to influence my opinion of Hillary Clinton (Original Post) whatchamacallit Oct 2015 OP
That video from 2004 wasn't an opinion. It was a recount of facts. Bonobo Oct 2015 #1
Um... I'm referring to recent reposts of old stories aiming to show EW's support for Hillary whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #7
Gotcha. It wasn't very clear from the OP. nt Bonobo Oct 2015 #10
That wasn't my goal. Agschmid Oct 2015 #2
What did I miss? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #4
Someone posted a video of Warren talking about Clinton. Agschmid Oct 2015 #5
followed by a slightly more recent comment... brooklynite Oct 2015 #9
One really does not invalidate the importance of the other. Bonobo Oct 2015 #11
In not saying that either invalidated the other. Agschmid Oct 2015 #12
Yes, but it is not necessary to say that Warren is "Anti-Clinton" in order to learn something Bonobo Oct 2015 #17
Have you ever lived in DC? n/t winter is coming Oct 2015 #19
Nope. Agschmid Oct 2015 #21
Not necessarily true. Many DUers who were Hillary supporters posted things like merrily Oct 2015 #29
You mean it became a competitive election? Agschmid Oct 2015 #31
Not quite. I mean that welcoming people into a race and supporting them are not the same. merrily Oct 2015 #36
So now she is Chaffee it was her first day and she get pressure? Agschmid Oct 2015 #41
Not what I said. merrily Oct 2015 #42
It's exactly what you said. Agschmid Oct 2015 #43
Did someone say Warren was anti-Clinton? (n/t) thesquanderer Oct 2015 #51
Wasn't it Liz Warren who urged Hillary to run? JaneyVee Oct 2015 #20
She certainly was one of the co-signatories. Agschmid Oct 2015 #22
Please see Reply 29. merrily Oct 2015 #30
correction marym625 Oct 2015 #24
Yes... I did. Agschmid Oct 2015 #25
They think we're going to throw her under the bus. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #3
No I don't think you are going to throw her under the bus... Agschmid Oct 2015 #6
I wasn't referring to you. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #15
Okay thanks. Agschmid Oct 2015 #18
Violent little group - throwing under the bus, hair on fire, exploding heads - djean111 Oct 2015 #14
It's DU we talk about stuff. Agschmid Oct 2015 #16
Endorsements don't mean squat to me either. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #23
I like when someone I respect endorses someone else I respect marym625 Oct 2015 #28
If Warren did endorse Hillary at this point I would lose a lot of respect for her. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #33
As are the folks acting as if she signed the letter with no meaning. Agschmid Oct 2015 #34
That's the point whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #37
That's fine. Agschmid Oct 2015 #38
No, it had meaning. Perhaps not the meaning you are trying to superimpose upon it, though. merrily Oct 2015 #44
I am not claiming it's an endorsement by any means, nor have I at any point. Agschmid Oct 2015 #46
"what is wrong is people on DU repeatedly trying to have it both ways" Priceless! merrily Oct 2015 #47
Did I say you? Agschmid Oct 2015 #49
Yep. marym625 Oct 2015 #52
Manny's taking bets but I don't want any of that action. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #53
just love him marym625 Oct 2015 #56
He made GDP bearable when I thought I couldn't take it anymore. beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #57
he sure did marym625 Oct 2015 #58
me2 840high Oct 2015 #59
it's a Manny appreciation subthread marym625 Oct 2015 #61
Indeed! beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #62
Not to mention all the references to "hate." merrily Oct 2015 #32
Well, we figured we'd give you someone other than Trey Gowdy to listen to. NuclearDem Oct 2015 #8
Cute. whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #13
LOL nt SunSeeker Oct 2015 #55
It may not work on you, but it's going to work on millions of lukewarm Hillary fans. reformist2 Oct 2015 #26
Elizabeth Warren has also been very critical of Hillary. AtomicKitten Oct 2015 #27
Indeed she has, and over a period of years, too. merrily Oct 2015 #45
Not trying to influence your vote, just trying to negate the right wing narative that Hillary is the uponit7771 Oct 2015 #35
If I conclude Hillary is unworthy through my own observation whatchamacallit Oct 2015 #39
True and expected, Hillary is not the evil though... many "progressives" believe so uponit7771 Oct 2015 #40
You have every right to disagree with Elizabeth Warren about stuff (nt) Nye Bevan Oct 2015 #48
Why not guide your opinion of Hillary simply by researching the facts on her? DrBulldog Oct 2015 #50
I have followed Hillary quite closely... Thespian2 Oct 2015 #54
....x10+ 840high Oct 2015 #60
but your double standards will be observed treestar Oct 2015 #63

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
1. That video from 2004 wasn't an opinion. It was a recount of facts.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:21 PM
Oct 2015

If you cannot honestly deal with what her account reveals about Hillary, I think you are in denial.

whatchamacallit

(15,558 posts)
7. Um... I'm referring to recent reposts of old stories aiming to show EW's support for Hillary
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:30 PM
Oct 2015

If that helps.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
5. Someone posted a video of Warren talking about Clinton.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:28 PM
Oct 2015

It reflected both positive and negative aspects of Clinton, then I posted the letter that Warren signed saying she encouraged Clinton to run. I got annoyed people want to consistently have it both ways... You can't.

It's clear Warren has/had some level of support for Clinton, she wouldn't sign that letter if she didn't mean it.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
11. One really does not invalidate the importance of the other.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:32 PM
Oct 2015

I think your logic is a bit flawed on this.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
12. In not saying that either invalidated the other.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:33 PM
Oct 2015

I'm saying that someone who was anti Clinton would NOT have signed the letter.

Bonobo

(29,257 posts)
17. Yes, but it is not necessary to say that Warren is "Anti-Clinton" in order to learn something
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:35 PM
Oct 2015

about Hillary -something that should NOT be ignored- from the video I am speaking of. Namely, Hillary's tendency to place political expediency over principles.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
29. Not necessarily true. Many DUers who were Hillary supporters posted things like
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:48 PM
Oct 2015

the more the merrier about Sanders--meaning the more who ran in the Democratic primary, the better. Of course, after he announced, they seemed much less merry about his challenge, but they did say it originally.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
31. You mean it became a competitive election?
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:49 PM
Oct 2015

This Hillary supporter says there is nothing wrong with that, and if anything it just makes our nominee stronger... Whoever that ends up being.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
36. Not quite. I mean that welcoming people into a race and supporting them are not the same.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:53 PM
Oct 2015

Especially when you are under pressure to "urge" someone to run and you have not been a Senator very long.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
41. So now she is Chaffee it was her first day and she get pressure?
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 11:02 PM
Oct 2015

No, that's not how my senator acts, every word, and action is something she means.

The "she succumbed to peer pressure" theory is moot.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
3. They think we're going to throw her under the bus.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:22 PM
Oct 2015

Sorry to disappoint but oh well, they'll have to find something else to throw at Bernie's supporters.


Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
6. No I don't think you are going to throw her under the bus...
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:28 PM
Oct 2015

But that letter shows some level of support, so IMO it's not fair to say or represent that Warren is anti Clinton.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
15. I wasn't referring to you.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:34 PM
Oct 2015

HC supporters have been gleefully predicting that we'll throw Warren under the bus for days.

And I never claimed she was anti-Clinton.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
14. Violent little group - throwing under the bus, hair on fire, exploding heads -
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:33 PM
Oct 2015

wishful thinking? projecting? watching too many violent movies or video games?

There is literally NO endorsement that could get me to support someone i do not want to support because of issues. I understand that Congress answers to its donors and the DNC and RNC. And someone - Price? said there was lots of arm-twisting or something. So whatever. Still think it bizarre that we are even talking about this stuff. And the talk started early this year; I did a search on Pledge-y Thing.

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
23. Endorsements don't mean squat to me either.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:38 PM
Oct 2015

It's great if someone I like and respect endorses Bernie but it doesn't influence me one way or the other.

And I already declared my intentions if Bernie doesn't win the nomination so if anyone wants to find out if I took "the pledge" they can search my posts.


marym625

(17,997 posts)
28. I like when someone I respect endorses someone else I respect
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:45 PM
Oct 2015

And support. But, if not, that's fine. Won't change my mind. Especially endorsements that happen long, long before everyone is in the race.

This wasn't an endorsement anyway. It was an almost 3 year old undisclosed letter saying something to Hillary Clinton about her running for President. Obviously, saying something good about it. But not an endorsement

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
33. If Warren did endorse Hillary at this point I would lose a lot of respect for her.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:50 PM
Oct 2015

She may have to eventually but I don't see that happening anytime soon.

The people who are implying she's a HC supporter are being disingenuous at best.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
34. As are the folks acting as if she signed the letter with no meaning.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:53 PM
Oct 2015

That being said you are correct the letter is not in any way and endorsement of any kind.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
46. I am not claiming it's an endorsement by any means, nor have I at any point.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 11:34 PM
Oct 2015

It certainly does show some level of support and that is well after the "trust issues" video.

Look Warren will endorse whoever she wants to and there is nothing wrong with that, what is wrong is people on DU repeatedly trying to have it both ways.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
47. "what is wrong is people on DU repeatedly trying to have it both ways" Priceless!
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 11:44 PM
Oct 2015

I do not try to have it both ways. People who say or imply that I do are clueless.

marym625

(17,997 posts)
52. Yep.
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 12:17 AM
Oct 2015

I truly can't imagine that she'll endorse Hillary. But, you never know. I mean in the primary of course

reformist2

(9,841 posts)
26. It may not work on you, but it's going to work on millions of lukewarm Hillary fans.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:44 PM
Oct 2015

The fact is, Elizabeth Warren has a LOT more honesty, integrity, and credibility than HRC. When she says that Hillary changed positions because of Wall Street pressure, most people believe her.
 

AtomicKitten

(46,585 posts)
27. Elizabeth Warren has also been very critical of Hillary.
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:44 PM
Oct 2015

Other than a point of interest, endorsements don't really do anything for me either.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
35. Not trying to influence your vote, just trying to negate the right wing narative that Hillary is the
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 10:53 PM
Oct 2015

... evil

 

DrBulldog

(841 posts)
50. Why not guide your opinion of Hillary simply by researching the facts on her?
Sun Oct 18, 2015, 11:55 PM
Oct 2015

That's what most intelligent rational people do.

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
54. I have followed Hillary quite closely...
Mon Oct 19, 2015, 12:31 AM
Oct 2015

I gather she is a corporate shill who has voted against many progressive ideas and policies and principles...she is beholding to wall street, Big Pharma, the military industrial complex...and many other organizations determined to control America for the people who control global corporations...I have found absolutely nothing that says she will not sell out America and be much worse than Obama...

You may now begin to state chapter and verse about her "amazingly great record" from her Walmart connections, to her connections with Goldman Sachs, CIBC, etc., to her disastrous votes as senator, including her vote for killing American soldiers in Iraq...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Forget trying to use Eliz...