2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Embraces Obama After Sanders Suggests Need for Break
Democrat Hillary Clinton says at Virginia rally that as president, she would build on the progress weve made under President Obama.
http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/trackers/2015-10-23/clinton-embraces-obama-after-sanders-suggests-need-for-break
mmonk
(52,589 posts)artislife
(9,497 posts)in the Parent Trap. Which twin is she?
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Obama has an 86% approval rating among liberal dems and an 84% approval rating among blacks. It doesn't make any sense to try to break away from him in the primaries.
Sanders is a fool if he thinks that's a winning strategy.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)The Hillary people took me in and kept me safe while I was gone! But I did catch Stockholm Syndrome.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Next prez to continue and build on Obama policy.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)life better for more Americans. Right now in 29 States people can be and are denied employment and housing for being LGBT. Right now in all States there is a lack of equality in the justice system, the courts and the police forces. So when you say you do not agree that we have accomplished much but still have much more very important work to be done you are saying those 29 States are fine with you and that the injustice and racism we see needs no further effort, we have arrived, we are there, this is it, as good as it gets. I do not accept that.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... and also the whole "revolution" thing without details is starting to sound like pie in the sky
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)relies too heavily on one office to do the entire work of all government and ignores the make up of the Congress, state executive and legislative bodies, county and municipal offices, and all levels of the courts. The Koch machine didn't ignore even the office of dogcatcher. The presidency is important now for Supreme Court appointments and veto powers. Beyond that, there is much heavy lifting to be done all over the nation.
enid602
(8,615 posts)Where is the list of congressional candidates who are running on Bernie's platform? I have a feeling the number is proportional to the number of congress people that have endorsed him.
Skidmore
(37,364 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Like people are going to be forced to abide by the principles of a segment of society.
"up against the wall muther fucker!"
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Of a segment if society . The Ruling Corporate Class.
That was the impact of the Reagan Revolution.
At some point we have to start countering that.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)You are proving a stereotype yourself.
Hell, if you'd said "You're wrong. Corporations don't have too much power. Here's why....." It might be easier to take you more seriously.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It only scares Hillary and the Republicans
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)during campaigns, but we also know her record on major issues.
Watch what they DO not what they SAY.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Seems that would be a pretty noteworthy change of position. When did he move to endorse clinton's desire for a unilateral no-fly zone?
...Oh wait. "that doesn't count"?
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)mean? Maybe we should understand what is being proposed first. You don't have to agree with it but at least understand it.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I.e., you fucking get shot at. What, do you imagine Commander in Chief Clinton out there with a bullhorn, telling Russian pilots "Hey! You! Cut it out!" or something?
Whatever you think a no-fly zone is, the fac remains? Clinton supports putting one in effect over Syria. President Obama does not.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Most of the voters cheer for any war started by a Republican President. They ignore any war started by a Democratic President.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)you'd know all about that.
Vast numbers of voters who are not as sensitive as we are to foreigners dying.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)You're coming up with arguments why Clinton's plan to start an armed conflict with Russia over Syria is okey-dokey, based on the presumed apathy of voters... And you're saying WE care about foreigners dying?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Even though the President approval ratings are a bit underwater he is still a strong political force and loved and respected in this country. He is an asset.
Cha
(297,166 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)on this very forum!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)pretty much the same thing, give credit to the President where it is due and then 'we need to do more'.
I know I am glad I supported Obama over Hillary in 2008. While she pushes for war, see Libya and Syria (and Iraq of course) he and Biden have restrained the war hawks as much as he could.
Same thing with Ukr. He is far too smart to go along with the neocons pushing for a war with Russia, see Nuland et al.
Hillary however in his position, I have no doubt the neocons would have had a much easier time. Another reason I support Sanders.
Big issue now for most Americans, our Imperial wars. We need to know where candidates stand on these disastrous invasions.
treestar
(82,383 posts)You may have voted for him in 2008 but you have been relentlessly critical ever since.
You are only proving you are looking for a New Messiah, and have not learned about Congress over the years.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and worked hard for his campaign and wth are YOU to question that?
And I remember well the same arguments against his chances of winning as we are hearing now against Bernie's. Exactly the same.
And if Bernie IS elected and focrgets HIS campaign promises, YOU can BET that I will be on his case just as much as I am on Obama's for HIS reversals on policies.
UNeffingbelievable!! Do you IGNORE it when politicians betray their campaign promises?
I do NOT.
You are definitely PROJECTING what YOU want onto me. I want candidates who do NOT say one thing in campaigns, then do something else once elected.
And do NOT expect people to ignore these betrayals. Whether it is Bernie or Obama.
You otoh, seem to turn a blind eye to these things. I'm thinking your 'looking for a Messiah' garbage applies to you rather than ME. I want no messiahs.
I want politicians who TELL THE TRUTH about POLICIES they plan to FIGHT FOR. PERIOD!
treestar
(82,383 posts)for years. How dare you claim to be his supporter?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)And i'm also noting that the same people who were snarling in in fury about Obama's nomination happen to be first in line to get their daily two-minute hate against Sanders nowadays.
Huh. Crazy, irrational hatred directed at a black candidate in 2008 from Clinton supporters... and now crazy irrational hatred directed at a Jewish candidate in 2015 from Clinton supporters. It's almost like some sort of... pattern.
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)Most Obama supporters support Hillary
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)As my post talked about MOST Obama supporters.
Cha
(297,166 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)We should give Obama and Biden credit for what they have accomplished, and understand that we need to go much further, he said.
This is getting ridiculous.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)the full quote and context is clear that Sanders means getting the big $$ and SuperPACs out of politics and the media.
The bullshit is ridiculous and taking it out of context is a Rethug tactic. Ugh
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Give it time.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Didn't stick then. Won't stick now.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)For the life of me I cant wrap my fucking head around it. I used to wonder why some people just give up on politics but I think Im starting to understand.
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)I know because I was that way throughout the Clinton years, all the way to 2003. We experience extreme cognitive dissonance when someone argues against some of our most firmly held beliefs. It's human nature to fight back when it feels like our entire view of the world is being challenged. In this case, it's the belief that Hillary will save us from the Republicans and that Bernie can't.
We're all Dems, but fact based research over many years on DU has helped many of us break through the belief that Hillary and Bill are economic liberals. It's not a pleasant experience.
jfern
(5,204 posts)Like when Hillary claimed there was an Iraq Al Qaeda connection.
Baitball Blogger
(46,702 posts)It is getting ridiculous. They basically said the same thing. If anything, Bernie is adding appeal to new issues that were largely ignored.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)That they feel there is no further work to do yet the state of civil rights in America is abysmal, activists fill the streets and on some days DUers claim to agree with them that we need massive change. But on days when Bernie says we need to go further, those same people are suddenly content with our place on the ladder and declare that we have done enough.
The bulk of this country allows legal discrimination against LGBT but Hillary says we have done enough and her supporters agree with that?
Fuck that.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)ecstatic
(32,688 posts)How does that equate to stopping progress? Oh, that's right. It doesn't. See how easy it to say the same thing without smearing the current president? Like others have already said, that's a losing strategy.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,702 posts)What does that mean as far as investigating the banking industry? Was there anything in the works that we can build on?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)It is my dispassionate observation that nothing can be more stupid than running away from the Obama legacy in the Democratic primary and events will soon confirm my observation.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Sanders said that while on issues like climate change, he could see himself embracing the Obama legacy, on the more significant issue of the influence of Wall Street on public policy, a Sanders administration would be vastly different than its predecessor..
I think weve got to go further, he argued. I think we need to stand up to Wall Street in a way that the President and the Vice President have not.
http://tinyurl.com/neoj4un
The Vermont senator should be applauded for his candor.
In any case, Hillary Clinton is running to continue the Obama legacy, tailored to the demands of a ever changing situation, and Senator Sanders seems to be repudiating it. As a small d Democrat I am content to let my fellow Democrats hash this out in the upcoming primary season, i.e. if you liked the Obama years and thought he did a good job you like Hillary, if you don't, you like Bernie. The voters have a real choice.