Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:38 AM Oct 2015

A vote for Bernie Sanders is a vote in support of single payer health care insurance

Vote your values. Vote your conscience . Vote for Bernie Sanders.

Here's a Map of the Countries That Provide Universal Health Care (America's Still Not on It)

The U.S. stands almost entirely alone among developed nations that lack universal health care.



http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/heres-a-map-of-the-countries-that-provide-universal-health-care-americas-still-not-on-it/259153/
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A vote for Bernie Sanders is a vote in support of single payer health care insurance (Original Post) think Oct 2015 OP
A vote for a Democrat is a vote in support of single payer health care insurance. nt onehandle Oct 2015 #1
What other Democratic candidate for president is running on single payer healthcare? /nt think Oct 2015 #2
Really? 99Forever Oct 2015 #3
Nope. Obamacare was a step in the opposite direction Armstead Oct 2015 #4
HRC Will Make No Changes To The ACA cantbeserious Oct 2015 #5
Hillary does NOT support single payer pinebox Oct 2015 #21
Bernie voted for Obamacare, which is closer to HillaryCare than it is to BernieCare. LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #6
Got any sources for your claims? think Oct 2015 #7
Here's the vote roll call: LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #8
To begin with the single payer health idea was around long jwirr Oct 2015 #11
It's just not a vote FOR single payer health care... brooklynite Oct 2015 #9
Did I not put in the right in the title a vote IN SUPPORT OF? think Oct 2015 #12
You did..and I'm suggesting that there's no great value if it's not achievable brooklynite Oct 2015 #13
Yes because your candidate won't even fight for it. Thanks! think Oct 2015 #15
there will be plenty of congressional support restorefreedom Oct 2015 #16
Care to tell me who they are? brooklynite Oct 2015 #20
so if bernie is president, restorefreedom Oct 2015 #33
Bernie will just wave his magic wand workinclasszero Oct 2015 #32
Until we have an unassailable majority in both houses MineralMan Oct 2015 #10
Hillary's not even fighting for it. When Sanders has America fired up for it then she'll chime in... think Oct 2015 #14
me too! nt restorefreedom Oct 2015 #18
Uhhhh, no. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #17
We agree. If Hillary is president we won't see single payer for sure. Thank you. think Oct 2015 #19
IT doesn't matter who is president, we won't see single payer. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #22
Vermont actually passed Single Payer. LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #23
Why is it working in Canada and other countries and NOT America? It would be one thing if our system think Oct 2015 #24
Okay. So Canada did it province by province over time,... LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #26
The governor who backs Hillary but ran on single payer changed his mind and decided he CAN'T do it. think Oct 2015 #30
Vermont failed to implement single payer. MohRokTah Oct 2015 #25
Perhaps Bernie could form the Single-Payer Party. LuvLoogie Oct 2015 #28
That would set back movement towards single payer by about a century. eom MohRokTah Oct 2015 #29
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Oct 2015 #27
Thank you Uncle Joe. /nt think Oct 2015 #31

99Forever

(14,524 posts)
3. Really?
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:50 AM
Oct 2015

I voted twice for Barrack Obama. Where my Universal Health Care? Seems all I ended up with is expensive mandatory, crappy private insurance.

 

Armstead

(47,803 posts)
4. Nope. Obamacare was a step in the opposite direction
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:55 AM
Oct 2015

Obamacare further embedded Private For Profit Health Insurance as the basis of health coverage in the future.

If the public option had not been thrown under the bus, it wold be a different story.

But Obamacare combined the worst of the overly-complicated,oppressive combination of government programs and private insurance, and -- with some exceptions like the "pre-existing condition" -- did severe damage to the public perception of social insurance.

So far, Clinton has shown no indication that she is in favor of unseating the primacy of private health insurance. I hope she does, and means it. But so far...

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
21. Hillary does NOT support single payer
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:53 PM
Oct 2015
Hillary Clinton Likes Obamacare, And Opposes Single-Payer Health Insurance
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-zuesse/hillary-clinton-likes-oba_b_4881399.html

Hillary Clinton has confirmed, to a paying audience of 20,000 sellers of electronic health records systems, that she supports Obamacare, and opposes single-payer health insurance.

Speaking to a closed-to-the-press meeting of the "HIMSS14" (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Conference 2014) in Orlando Florida on February 26th, she condemned the Canadian and other nations' single-payer healthcare systems by saying, "We don't have one size fits all; our country is quite diverse. What works in New York City won't work in Albuquerque." The presumption is that what works in Canada cannot work here, that local control must trump everything in order to fix what's wrong with American health care.

The data prove her statement to be false, if not irrelevant. America's healthcare problems are deeper than that. The latest OECD data on healthcare costs show that the U.S. spends by far the world's highest percentage of GDP on healthcare, 17.7 percent; and also show that the average U.S. life expectancy is 78.7 years; by contrast, Canada spends 11.2 percent, and their life expectancy is 81.0 years. The OECD average expenditure is 9.3 percent , and life expectancy is 80.0 years. So: the U.S. spends twice as high a percentage of GDP as every other OECD nation, and gets markedly inferior results. This makes the U.S. far less economically competitive than it otherwise would be; but, the healthcare industries finance conservative politicians such as Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and all Republicans; so, those politicians don't like single-payer -- it would take much of the excess profits out of exploiting the sick, and those excess profits help to fund their campaigns.

The American people's financial losses produce exceptional financial gains for the investors in healthcare-related stocks, and also inflate the pay for executives in those firms. This helps to fund lots of what conservatives such as Antonin Scalia lovingly call "free speech" -- campaign commercials.

LuvLoogie

(6,997 posts)
6. Bernie voted for Obamacare, which is closer to HillaryCare than it is to BernieCare.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 11:20 AM
Oct 2015

Bernie could have leveraged his vote to at least have the Obama administration and Harry Reid go to the CBO to score Bernie's Single-Payer bill. But he didn't do that. Why not?

He had the a good chance to advance a fair hearing on his Single-Payer bill, but passed on it. Why is he not running on it now? Why doesn't he talk about his bill like he used to on Thom Hartman's show?

LuvLoogie

(6,997 posts)
8. Here's the vote roll call:
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 01:48 PM
Oct 2015
http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/senate/1/396

And my bad: the only Single Payer Bill at the time was John Conyers'. I recall Bernie talking about an existing Single Payer bill, but remember it as being his. Bernie didn't actually get around to introducing a Single Payer Bill until 2013. Which is surprising given that he has been in the Senate since 2007 (elected November 2006).

Given that he knew that health care reform was a major campaign issue for the 2008 Presidential election, and at least had the candidates' talking points, there was an opportunity to coordinate with John Conyers to introduce a Senate version of Single-Payer, no?

Here's the point. Bernie instead voted for the ACA, which was an incremental vote which highly benefits private, for-profit insurance companies. The pragmatist in him voted for Richard Nixon's and the Heritage Foundation's baby.

Bernie Sanders excuses his vote by saying there were not the necessary votes for Single-Payer or a Public Option even.

So, given that Hillary has been instituting health care reform since her efforts in the 90s and her work on S-CHIP, why is Bernie more likely than her to push for single-payer? It passed into law in Vermont, but they could not afford it, and so it languishes. How does it get instituted in the U.S. as a whole?

Until the votes are there for Medicare for all, defending the ACA and building a Supreme court firewall is the immediate task. That is Hillary's position. Don't you agree that would have to be done BEFORE the campaign for single-payer ensues?

And you need political capital and key pivotal relationships within the industries and bureaucracies.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
11. To begin with the single payer health idea was around long
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:13 PM
Oct 2015

before anyone introduced it into congress so it does not belong to anyone person. For years a group in my area would go door to door asking for money to keep the campaign going for single payer healthcare.

As to why someone may not have bothered to vote to have it included. Votes. The availability of votes is usually considered before any bill is introduced. Did they have votes in Congress at the time to actually get anything done other than ACA?

brooklynite

(94,511 posts)
9. It's just not a vote FOR single payer health care...
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 01:57 PM
Oct 2015

...because even if Sanders wins, there'll be no Congressional support to revisit health care as an issue.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
16. there will be plenty of congressional support
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:49 PM
Oct 2015

because the wave that brings Bernie into the White House is gonna be the same wave thats gonna bring liberals and progressives into seats all over this country. We will have the Senate and possibly the house too or at least a good chunk of the house. This is the year of the revolt. Third wayers and conservatives are going down. People have had enough.

brooklynite

(94,511 posts)
20. Care to tell me who they are?
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:53 PM
Oct 2015

...because most of the House and Senate races have their candidates at this point (I've talked to most of them) and they're largely mainstream.

restorefreedom

(12,655 posts)
33. so if bernie is president,
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 09:52 PM
Oct 2015

do you really think dems, whether progressive or establishment, are going to pull the obstructionist crap the gop did to obama? i can't see it. if they do that, they will be guilty of what they have been complaining about for 7 years.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
32. Bernie will just wave his magic wand
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:39 PM
Oct 2015

And all the teahaddists will suddenly see the error of their ways and start voting for single payer.

POOF! It's so easy!

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
10. Until we have an unassailable majority in both houses
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:07 PM
Oct 2015

of Congress, there will be no single payer healthcare. You want that? Get to work on electing House and Senate Democrats. No President can get single payer without a supermajority in both houses of Congress.

It's a non-issue in 2016. It's not happening, because there's no way to get that majority in the House. We should be able to get a simple majority in the Senate and gain some seats in the House, though.

Single payer? Think 2024 at the earliest. That's as soon as we'll be able to get a House majority. Until then, it's not happening.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
14. Hillary's not even fighting for it. When Sanders has America fired up for it then she'll chime in...
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:24 PM
Oct 2015
 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
17. Uhhhh, no.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:49 PM
Oct 2015

Sanders cannot do that alone if elected president.

No president can.

Hell, look at how difficult even getting the ACA was.

We won't see single payer for at least another 20 years.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
22. IT doesn't matter who is president, we won't see single payer.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 02:55 PM
Oct 2015

Sanders cannot accomplish what he has promised you.

That makes Sanders a liar.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
24. Why is it working in Canada and other countries and NOT America? It would be one thing if our system
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:06 PM
Oct 2015

was better but it sucks in comparison to the rest of the modern world.

That's why they all have single payer or full universal healthcare...

LuvLoogie

(6,997 posts)
26. Okay. So Canada did it province by province over time,...
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:12 PM
Oct 2015

Not all at once. Why isn't Vermont implementing their state single-player system?

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
25. Vermont failed to implement single payer.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:09 PM
Oct 2015

Plus, Vermont does not have an entrenched rightwing minority holding a majority of seats in one house of the legislative body.

No president will bring in single payer after the next election, I don't care who they are. The Republicans will hold the House for another seven years at a minimum. That's a guarantee, there's no way around that fact.

LuvLoogie

(6,997 posts)
28. Perhaps Bernie could form the Single-Payer Party.
Sun Oct 25, 2015, 03:18 PM
Oct 2015

Do you think he would join it? He would of course bring in a wave of freshman Single-Payer Party Congressmen and Senators, no?

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»A vote for Bernie Sanders...