2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIowa JJ: Clinton attacks Republicans, Sanders attacks Clinton
DES MOINES Hillary Rodham Clinton used a speech here to tie herself closely to President Obama and attack Republicans on Saturday, avoiding criticism of her two rivals for the Democratic nomination after a string of recent successes that have lifted her candidacy.
In sharp contrast, Senator Bernie Sanders, after saying for months that he did not want to attack Mrs. Clinton, came at her hard on Saturday night, criticizing her as a shape-shifting politician and inconsistent progressive.
She called for a country in which there are no ceilings for anyone and where a father can tell his daughter, You can be anything you want to be, including the president of the United States of America.
And she was the only candidate at the dinner in the largely white state to use the phrase Black Lives Matter.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/25/us/politics/in-iowa-bill-clinton-denounces-hit-strategy.html?_r=0
riversedge
(70,077 posts)for the USA. and yes I listened to both in their entirety.
pandr32
(11,553 posts)...and after being treated like a rock star by his rallying supporters who showed up in droves in the kind of "happening" style of the sixties that some may remember, he must be worried, and therefore is doing what he said he wouldn't do previously...attacking her.
Hillary Clinton only really started actively campaigning after the summer holiday. The GOP and the media had been focusing on pushing the now discredited right-wing attack rhetoric on her pretty much exclusively all Spring and Summer in order to weaken her support. Bernie Sanders had not yet been given much media attention other than stories mentioning the numbers of his supporters swarming rallies which made him seem, and possibly feel, invincible.
That has ended.
Hillary Clinton is now actively engaged in her campaign and her numbers are reflecting it. Bernie's numbers go down as her's go up. It will continue.
After the eleven hour GOP-led witch-hunt Hillary has revealed what we can expect of her during the remaining debates. Bernie must have noticed her mastery of facts along with her very presidential demeanor under pressure.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)record, I think most of which is yet to be written.
I do not know for certain who Obama favors of the three, but I have my educated suspicions.
Obviously Clinton heard the message in the Biden announcement loud and clear and so did the 20% or so of the Democratic Party members who are now disappointed Biden supporters.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)mcar
(42,278 posts)Armstead
(47,803 posts)Bernie's remarks were a love letter compared to what the GOP will be bringing out
Response to Armstead (Reply #8)
Ed Suspicious This message was self-deleted by its author.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)Don't worry about it.
Orrex
(63,172 posts)It's been repeatedly claimed that the GOP is "scared of" Sanders. We can see this is true by the decades they've spent trashing him, the phony scandals they've dreamed up to smear him, and the hours they've spent haranguing him and his associates in phony hearings.
Oh, wait--they've done none of these things? That's because they don't see him as a threat. All of the blather about Clinton being cut from the same cloth as Republicans is simply a retread of 2000's Nader-esque fantasy, and anyone who seriously believes it at this point hasn't been paying attention for the past 15 years or so.
If Clinton were the same as the GOP, then they wouldn't waste their time, resources and political capital to destroy her. The fact that she's weathered all of it with grace and diplomacy demonstrates very clearly that she's ready to fight them now and will be ready after she's inaugurated.
If Sanders' supporters would caution Clinton to brace for the GOP's attacks, then they'd do well to advise their candidate to batten down the hatches. He has simply never had to deal with anything like the onslaught that Clinton has faced non-stop since the 70s.
Clinton has repeatedly demonstrated that she can take with the GOP can dish out. Can Sanders say the same?
George II
(67,782 posts)Last night he reminded me of Walter Matthau in "Grumpy Old Men".
Omaha Steve
(99,494 posts)OOPS!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1241655
Source: Time
Hillary Clinton sharpened her attacks against Bernie Sanders Friday as her campaign gains confidence, criticizing his gun control record and subtly accusing him of making a sexist remark in the recent debate. During a sunny campaign event in Alexandria, Virginia, on Friday, Clinton apparently referred to a moment in the Democratic debate when Sanders said that all the shouting in the world will not improve gun laws.
Ive been told to stop shouting about guns, Clinton said to cheers. Actually I havent been shouting, but sometimes when a woman talks, some people think its shouting!
She used the same line earlier in the day at the Democratic National Committees Womens Leadership Forum. Friday was the first time Clinton has implied Sanders showed sexism in the Democratic debate by remonstrating Clinton for raising her voice. (Sanders also said in the debate in response to former Maryland Gov. Martin OMalley that we can raise our voices.)
...
Gun control is one of the few issues where Clinton is further to the left than Sanders, and it is an issue she believes will help her win over the Democratic base. One of her strongest moments during the debate last week came when host Anderson Cooper asked Clinton whether Sanders is strong enough of on gun control. No, Clinton said in the debate, not at all.
Read more: http://time.com/4085578/hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-sexism/
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)In sharp contrast, Senator Bernie Sanders, after saying for months that he did not want to attack Mrs. Clinton, came at her hard on Saturday night, criticizing her as a shape-shifting politician and inconsistent progressive.
Nothingcleverjustray
(37 posts)Holy shit! Pot meet kettle.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Sanders does contrast his policy record with his opponent's.
msrizzo
(796 posts)Don't forget that.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)Yeah go figure eh? No flip flop here either
leftupnorth
(886 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,682 posts)NorthCarolina
(11,197 posts)Bernie brings up Clinton's pandering = NFW man, not fair.
Gotcha....
msrizzo
(796 posts)Bernie can bring it on. He just can't do it and continue to say that he doesn't.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,708 posts)eom
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)spyker29
(89 posts)Each attacked their biggest obstacle to becoming president.
azmom
(5,208 posts)in the primary because she has no chance in the General. Kick ass Senator Sanders.
The people's president.
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)Sanders' problem in three words: self proclaimed socialist.
If you do not think the GOP will run footage of Soviet May Day parades, announce to the world that Sanders will take your guns on January 21 and nationalize every family farm in America on January 22, start Young Patriots Clubs that teach communist ideals and force every child in America into them, shut down Congress, declare himself president for life, make all small businesses government property, take away your house and move three illegal immigrant families into it, and double your taxes to pay for it all (or some combination that adds up to Commie America)...well brother, you'd best think again.
Clinton is far from ideal but she's a known quantity. The only people who know Sanders are the 600,000 people who live in Vermont and a handful of serious political junkies. If the GOP superpacs decide to sell Sanders as the demon love child of Kim Jong Un, Fidel Castro, Leonid Brezhnev and Wojciecz Jaruzelski, enough people will believe it to give us not only a GOP president but an even bigger GOP Congressional majority.
azmom
(5,208 posts)jmowreader
(50,528 posts)The only reason he won't do it on January 20 is it'll take the White House cleaning team at least half a day to sweep up enough half-smoked joints and used rubbers from the all night Weed Smoking Bash and Roman Orgy inauguration party so he can find the door to the Oval Office.
azmom
(5,208 posts)Take it easy on that stuff.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)I saw nothing in the article.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...of trade agreements.
Sanders said that he was against TPP yesterday, he's against it today, and he'll be against it tomorrow.
(Hillary Clinton called the TPP the "gold standard" in 2012, then said she's against it recently as a Democratic primary candidate.)
bunnies
(15,859 posts)omg. Hardly an attack. Thats nothing.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)(a bill signed by President Bill Clinton which says that states don't have to recognize gay-marriages performed in other states.)
He disagreed with Hillary Clinton's position that DOMA was needed as a compromise to prevent a US Constitutional amendment against gay-marriage.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)dare the say anything about Bernie!"
bunnies
(15,859 posts)Its an attack. Not a valid point.
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)I didn't hear any extremism from anybody. Each one had a couple of digs for the others.
The audience was different though.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)How was the audience different?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Her opponents are the other Dems right now.
Why is this so hard to understand? Does she not get it?
Sanders realizes he's in the primaries, He doesn't think he's already been appointed.
"criticizing her as a shape-shifting politician and inconsistent progressive. " which is accurate. Theres lots of examples...
for instance: "And she was the only candidate at the dinner in the largely white state to use the phrase Black Lives Matter.
because she got called out for not doing so at the debates!
jwirr
(39,215 posts)is some thing personal like saying something about a candidates personality or looks. A comment of no importance to the question of who to vote for.
What is NOT an attack is talking about issues. Issues are important to the question of who to vote for.
This is just one more media source that is out of touch.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Hillary Clinton attacked Bernie Sanders at the Iowa dinner.
When Clinton said that she's "a progressive who likes to get things done" the implication is that Sanders doesn't.
When Clinton said that others accuse her of "shouting" about guns but they must think women are always shouting, that was twisting Sanders' words (Sanders said we can't solve the gun problem though shouting).
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)"I like to get things done" is only an attack on Sen. Sanders in the minds of people with a victim mentality.
Omaha Steve
(99,494 posts)Hillary once.
jmowreader
(50,528 posts)Sanders has lost four elections - a House election, a Senate election and two mayoral elections. Clinton won both her elections.
Hillary Clinton won the election Thursday by peeing on the GOP's powder. They still have warehouses full of dry powder for Sanders.
Omaha Steve
(99,494 posts)And we know many D's that say socialists can't get elected is the point.
OK 2 wins and a national loss.
Hillary was well know as the First Lady even though she was broke at the time. If she had not been first lady, do you think she would have won with previous experience or been an I socialist?
Bernie built a name and didn't get to the upper class doing it.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Here is a list of other things which Bernie Sanders accomplished.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251605502
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)He should stick to policy differences etc.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)He discussed policy differences. He implied that he has a stronger record than Hillary Clinton:
-in opposing the TPP.
-in supporting gay-marriage.
elleng
(130,732 posts)and who has described his record as governor as one of actions, not words, said that a weather vane shifts its position every time the winds change. Effective leaders do not. I know who I am, I know what I believe, and I am willing to fight for it.
We need new leadership, he added. New ideas. Someone with the courage to stand up for whats right even when its not always popular.'
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)how can you sleep at night after pointing out the truthful comments about------ one candidate----hillary cough cough from another?
elleng
(130,732 posts)And the NRA!!! Anyone notice the HUGE applause he received for that???!!! Attack Attack Attack, and even these 'heavy duty' attacks didn't get him recognition by msm!!!
THAT is what keeps me from sleeping!
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)Bravo O'Malley, Bravo!
elleng
(130,732 posts)THANKS!
Renew Deal
(81,846 posts)The debate and Hillary's testimony made a difference.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)Mrs. Clinton also offered an oblique criticism of Mr. Sanders over his record on guns.
Ive been told to stop shouting to end gun violence, she said, repeating a line she has begun using since Mr. Sanders said in the debate that all the shouting in the world would not keep guns out of the wrong hands. I havent been shouting, but sometimes when a woman speaks out, some people think its shouting.
Bernie comparing and contrasting their records close to what, unchivalrous?
That's no defense for or of her failures he noted, now is it? It's just a deflection/distraction in lieu of a defense of/for her bad marks.
ANd the question as to how this comports to the "The Liberal media is out to destroy Clinton!!!!" meme can await another time...
I suppose they had no choice but to print this eh...
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)At the Iowa dinner, they criticized each other without using names.
This article is bogus in using wordplay to pretend otherwise.
SandersDem
(592 posts)policy is fair game and what people WANT to know.
You won't see:
Sanders attack HRC over emails or
Benghazi or
Whitewater or
any made up Republican nonsense.
However, I expect HRC to go after on Bernie where she differs (NRA was fair game, F vs D-, we're Democrats, splitting hairs is fair game) so don't cry when Sander's calls out HRC on the ISSUES.
This OP is a yawn.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)m$m cannot be trusted to be fair to any of the candidates. they are drumming up a contentious primary because it gets ratings. they don't care about us or the candidates!!
George II
(67,782 posts)He always seems to be complaining about something or someone.
AzDar
(14,023 posts)Bern, Baby, BERN!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)hypocritical
easy
DianeK
(975 posts)on the issues is hardly an attack! it is exactly what the primary process is for! You will never see Bernie go after Hillary or anyone else personally..but issues are, of course..fair game
Persondem
(1,936 posts)But he is the shining prince of purity!! (Except for that NRA thing, and he doesn't work well with others, but hush, hush now)
Clinton is right to go after the GOP. They are the real enemy.