2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton declines to take position on legalizing marijuana
As for someone who suffers from chronic pain and stopped taking oxycodone a year ago, I will try to get medical marijuana in January. Of course NYS has one of the most restrictive Medical MJ laws and it will be costly to my family but I must try to get some sort of relief. I feel it would be much easier and cheaper if it was just made legal. Hillary is 68 years old and I think she understands what marijuana does by now but refuses to take a stand.
Hillary Clinton declined to directly weigh in on whether she would support states' moves to legalize marijuana.
Her comment came after Bernie Sanders said he suspected he would support moves by states to legalize marijuana.
"I suspect I would vote yes," Sanders said. "I would vote yes because I am seeing in this country too many lives destroyed over non-violent offenses."
Clinton was then asked if she was ready to take a position on marijuana.
"No," she responded.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/what-happens-in-vegas/2015/10/sanders-on-states-moving-to-legalize-marijuana-i-suspect-i-would-vote-yes-214763
Response to UglyGreed (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)Big Pharma ties perhaps???
Response to UglyGreed (Reply #8)
Name removed Message auto-removed
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)big pharm is a huge benefactor of clinton. and any kind of natural product that cures or treats disease is death for their profit margin. And since they are in the business of making money not making people feel better, it makes sense that they would oppose the reality that marijuana used medically can be very effective.
and since her campaign is brought to you in part by the big pharms, she will not take a stand against their interests.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)Nothing. HRC is republican lite like POTUS himself. Trying to convince O'Malley and Bernie Supporters is futile because they have facts and data on their side.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)states that legalized it. It is a reasonable approach to me. You can attack that using the revenue it raises and bring up prohibition again but lots of really horrible problems are caused by abuse of alcohol. Whynot learn from the experience of others?
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)I imagine we will hear some kind of vague statement of support, something which can be "clarified" later, when she runs back to the middle for the general election.
Response to HassleCat (Reply #2)
Name removed Message auto-removed
appal_jack
(3,813 posts)Being undecided about mj legalization now is as bad as being undecided about (or even against) marriage equality in the 1990's. The morality of each issue is equally clear. The government has no right to destroy people's lives over whom they choose to love, nor whether they choose to cultivate and enjoy a plant. These are natural parts of being human, not criminal acts.
Hillary can triangulate herself straight to hell, and probably will. As usual, she is far behind and outside of any movement toward sanity and true civil rights and liberties.
-app
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)as long as you don't inhale.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Then she will bravely lead us all on this issue, and we will have to get down on our knees to thank her for having so much initiative.
Or something.
Of course, the only poll that may matter to her is the one taken among pharmaceutical executives.
virtualobserver
(8,760 posts)She will be behind us, every step of the way.....far behind us.
Autumn
(45,012 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)be the case.
randys1
(16,286 posts)are willing to discuss?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)blaming my on going symptoms from Hydrocephalus after getting a shunt and my neck fused on the oxycodone. I decided that I was done allowing them to use that as an excuse so I weaned myself off of the low dose I was on. Of course the pain medication was not the cause as I still have the same problems. I may go back on them if the medical mj does not help but I fear that with all propaganda against pain medication I may not be able to or I will be forced to stop once again.
randys1
(16,286 posts)we are losing our minds with this crap taking pain meds away from people
dammit
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)is very restrictive on MJ, as in you can not smoke, only certain conditions blah, blah blah I don't feel comfortable with my chances or being to be able to afford it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)I knew someone who had to get a prescription for pain meds, and they had to continually go to the doctors office to pick up the prescription on paper to bring it to the pharmacy and this has to be done every month. The doctors cannot call or fax in refills for pain meds anymore. They're making it impossible especially for people who have mobility issues to get medicine.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)about ten years. I was also charged for random urine tests on top of $40 co-pays each month. I had insurance but imagine the burden it would if someone does not or has crappy insurance coverage. Many times my wife needed leave work to take me in which thank God her company was more than understanding.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)was it for work or the insurance? if you are ok sharing that
i can see work sort of if you are a pilot or something but whst the hell?
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)the test to prove that I was not abusing the medication and I was taking the medication and not selling it.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)edit..if there is a legitimate medical reason to determine therapeutic level in the blood, then that might be OK. That does happen with some medications. But that doesn't sound like that's why they were doing it to you.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)give or take so I don't believe it was to monitor anything but drug use. I know the test also included testing for marijuana and I believe but not sure about other illicit drugs such as coke.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i wonder if they planned to deny pain relief to those who used/ addicted to drugs. hate to be a cynic, but why else test? i guess to offer treatment, that would be the noncynical rendering.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)an agreement that if was caught with pot in my system they would weaned me off of the pain medication and then send me on my way. here is one I found online. Not sure if mine was the same since I signed it a few years ago.
http://www.webmd.com/pain-management/pain-management-pain-treatment-agreement
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)but not surprising given what passes for compassion these days.
TheKentuckian
(25,023 posts)A lot get run through the ringer, they test for every damn thing including steroids, coke, heroine, whatever you can name.
You can bet your ass all that isn't required to make sure they have the right levels of their med but they do it anyway under that false flag and then the sick person gets another bill.
Like everything else, this bullshit is an extraction scheme not a public health effort.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)which has decided that if one has sex or gets high, one is not obeying god and must be punished.
We need to grow up, treat drugs like drugs.
Provide them to addicts and provide rehab, remove ENTIRELY the criminal aspect
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)give people med they need, threaten to take it away, meanwhile make them pay for the mandatory drug test, and then hold the spectre of prosecution over their heads so they either end up in the system or go to mandated rehab.
its quite brilliant,actually. inhumane and depraved, but brilliant from a profit standpoint.
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)She's taking money from the private prison industry which directly benefits from draconian cannabis laws. That's not even weighing in on the needless waste of life and resources this insane and absolutely ineffectual War on Drugs has brought upon this nation.
It's not a hard question, Hillary.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,829 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)It affects my life and may others. Isn't that what we vote for, representation?
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,829 posts)UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)your reply.
UglyGreed
(7,661 posts)and stenosis of the spine in my cervical and lower lumber areas. I have had two lower back surgeries, three level fusion in my neck and shunt surgery for hydrocephalus. I suffer from neuropathic pain and arthritis in my spine and knees.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Would he lie to us about something like that?
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)Here's what he SHOULD have said: "Yeah, I smoked a joint 25 years ago but I'm pretty sure the effects have worn off by now." The end. But no, he had to try to weasel his way out of it -- much like what his wife is doing with this issue.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)People who pretend to take a hit so that they won't be made fun of or thought of as uncool. He may very well have been in that situation, but to include that in a yes/no question was a silly thing to say.
GusBob
(7,286 posts)that follows this segment and she said she was for it
I may be mistaken
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That's the biggest no-brainer there is.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)firm and unequivicating. I wish we would hear something like "will you cut social security benefits? No." "will you jail bankers? Yes."
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)And still be all things, to all people.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Go Vols
(5,902 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)I never knew you could inject MJ and in your buttock of all places. I'm flabbergasted
Truprogressive85
(900 posts)plz say you are
KansDem
(28,498 posts)zappaman
(20,606 posts)It's a parody site.
'Nuff said.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landover_Baptist_Church
KansDem
(28,498 posts)I'll update my brain.
on edit: So your original post was sarcasm?
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)The criminalization of marijuana and how those laws are unfairly used against POC has destroyed so many lives needlessly.
I think Hillary needs to have a few more meetings with Black Lives Matter personally.
Drug laws are targeted towards POC disproportionately (because we live in a racist country). Hillary, if she doesn't "evolve", will be responsible, in part, for continuing this outrageously racist policy.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...just like her husband.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)The number is even higher for Democrats and independents.
TheSarcastinator
(854 posts)than any president before him. Of course she is going to continue prohibition if she is able.
Response to UglyGreed (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)AzDar
(14,023 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)Hiraeth
(4,805 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)She won't take a stand on any controversial issue - gay marriage, TPP, marijuana legalization - until her polling mills, spin doctors and PR mavens are certain it won't hurt her.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)"I'm not just saying that, I think it's hard to tell," Holder said in a jury room at the federal courthouse in Charleston, which he visited as part of the Justice Department's Smart on Crime initiative. "I think there might have been a burst of feeling that what happened in Washington and Colorado was going to be soon replicated across the country. I'm not sure that is necessarily the case. I think a lot of states are going to be looking to see what happens in Washington, what happens in Colorado before those decisions are made in substantial parts of the country."
Under Holder, the Justice Department has allowed marijuana legalization to move forward in Washington and Colorado and has issued guidance to federal prosecutors that is intended to open up banking access for pot shops that are legal on the state level."
I think Hillary took a thoughtful position on marijuana legalization.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)just like all the other issues - copy cat
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I get on her for a lot of things, I concede (I think she's center-right; a displaced moderate Republican)...but this more than anything drives me nuts.
It drives me nuts when anybody does it...take an unpopular but correct position, advocate that position, defend and stand-by that position. It's not hard...it, not all the other crap she does, is the singular way you can prove you're up to the job. Not doing it proves you're unfit to the office. Dare to defiantly disagree, dare to be wrong. (Because you're going to be very-publicly wrong from time-to-time in that job.) A candidate that can't take a resolute stand because it's what they unwaveringly believe is a candidate that lacks foundational values...they're a sturdy as a feather castle in a fart storm.