Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jfern

(5,204 posts)
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:52 AM Oct 2015

Hillary is the ultimate hawk

A good but scary read. Do you want to vote for war?

Cliff notes:

Libya: We came, we saw, he died

Syria: Hillary was too warmongery for Obama. But not for Richard Armitrage, Bush Deputy Sec. of State who said "Secretary Clinton has dramatically changed the face of U.S. foreign policy globally for the good. But I wish she had been unleashed more by the White House."

Afghanistan: supported a failed surge

Arms deals: Approved $165 billion, a 143% increase from Bush

Closer connections between State and Defense to make State more involved with wars

Saved the inhumane cluster bombs

Claimed that there was an Iraq Al Qaeda connection when voting for Iraq.

Pro-torture

Pals with Kissinger

And more

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/10/30/1442802/-Make-no-mistake-A-vote-for-Hillary-is-a-vote-for-war

54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary is the ultimate hawk (Original Post) jfern Oct 2015 OP
Well, Mr. Sanders does not seem to get your vote, so your best bet is akbacchus_BC Oct 2015 #1
The status quo has to end. The killing has to end. tecelote Oct 2015 #2
how? reddread Oct 2015 #4
right wing trope. stonecutter357 Oct 2015 #3
Calling someone a warhawk is *praise* in the wingosphere Fumesucker Oct 2015 #5
This is actually true though artislife Oct 2015 #15
Yea, she's pretty terrible. bigwillq Oct 2015 #6
Her glee over the killing of Gaddafi leaves me shocked and saddened. willvotesdem Oct 2015 #7
"I will not be able to vote for her in the general if she is our candidate" BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #18
I think anyone saying they will not vote Democratic if Sanders is not the nominee is not a Democrat. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #20
I am now convinced that IS the case, FS. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #23
And I think this is the case: Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #24
The "horseshoe theory" in American politics. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #27
Good theory....explains a few happenings on DU and Sanders courting of the far right. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #28
Yeah. Allowing banks to run amok and stopping banks from running amok are exactly the same goal. GoneFishin Oct 2015 #31
Well, that seems pretty damned obvious now ... NanceGreggs Nov 2015 #51
Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #34
7 posts and already telling longtime DUers what to do? BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Oct 2015 #36
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #53
Yeah, sure, new poster....we all believe you! Libya did it for you? Made me laugh! Fred Sanders Nov 2015 #54
Can we stop pretending Bernie is going to end wars. JaneyVee Oct 2015 #8
Nobody is pretending that. It is a fantasy in your own head. Vattel Oct 2015 #10
They are pressing the weird fallacy that any and all military actions are exactly the same TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #13
No. "They" are pressing the issue that Sanders is NO anti-war politician, BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #21
Is today the day they shift from "Bernie is a sexist" to "Bernie is a warhawk"? GoneFishin Oct 2015 #29
Don't know, GoneFishin. I'm just stating the facts and keepin' it real. eom BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #30
Right on que with the same tortured bullshit. TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #40
Yes, you are, TK. BlueCaliDem Oct 2015 #42
No, a warhawk is someone who laughs at the thought of war with Iran: beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #46
For the 0.1% who supply the munitions and other billion$ and billion$ of military gear GoneFishin Oct 2015 #26
He's not a peacenik, but he only supports war as a last resort jfern Oct 2015 #44
Great read. Vattel Oct 2015 #9
These are the kind of speculative future-gazings one does when your candidate is so far behind. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #11
"The past is prolog." 99Forever Oct 2015 #14
I get it that Clinton is occupying space closer to Sanders and taking away much of his appeal. Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #16
I don't know what the hell you are even talking about. 99Forever Oct 2015 #17
And that comment reminds me of Trump! Fred Sanders Oct 2015 #19
Whatever dude. 99Forever Oct 2015 #22
I wouldn't say the ultimate that goes to John McShame who even manage to rattle his rusty old saber TheKentuckian Oct 2015 #12
No, that term might describe McCain treestar Oct 2015 #25
Republicans think that the only way to gain respect Internationally is through warring. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #32
Correction --> Libya: "We came, we saw, he died." *Giggle*, *Giggle*, *Giggle* Which makes the in_cog_ni_to Oct 2015 #33
I think Hillary will soar.... FarPoint Oct 2015 #37
The Zeal To Elect A Female President Has Become The War Hawks Wet Dream cantbeserious Oct 2015 #38
start sending out this link antigop Oct 2015 #39
This thread is the ultimate hyperbole Persondem Oct 2015 #41
Monday morning quarterbacking? beam me up scottie Oct 2015 #48
You obviously don't get what I was saying. Nevermind. nt Persondem Oct 2015 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2015 #52
Apparently nearly everyone posting on this forum at the time of the Iraq vote, was smarter than sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #43
Hillay would sell out anyone who votes for her olddots Oct 2015 #45
True that jfern Oct 2015 #47
KnR! n/t Admiral Loinpresser Nov 2015 #50

akbacchus_BC

(5,704 posts)
1. Well, Mr. Sanders does not seem to get your vote, so your best bet is
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:56 AM
Oct 2015

to support Mrs Clinton unless you want another republican in office. I like Mr. Sanders but Mrs. Clinton seems inevitable as the nominee!

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
2. The status quo has to end. The killing has to end.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 06:10 AM
Oct 2015

How can we justify the killing? How can you justify a vote to continue the "collateral damage" our wars cause?

Bernie or Martin are not perfect but way better than Hillary or any Republican.

“We live in a difficult and dangerous world, and there are no easy or magical solutions. As President and Commander-in-Chief, I will defend this nation, its people, and America’s vital strategic interests, but I will do it responsibly. America must defend freedom at home and abroad, but we must seek diplomatic solutions before resorting to military action. While force must always be an option, war must be a last resort, not the first option." - Bernie Sanders

Why is the media so pro-Hillary? Because she will keep the spigot turned on full force. War profiteering will not suffer under a Hillary Presidency.

It's a sin.

How can you justify the killing and vote to continue killing?

 

artislife

(9,497 posts)
15. This is actually true though
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:21 AM
Oct 2015

Another example when h gives the RW their ammo.

We don't care if the RW approves or disapproves, we know where we stand on the issues.

 

willvotesdem

(75 posts)
7. Her glee over the killing of Gaddafi leaves me shocked and saddened.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:14 AM
Oct 2015

Unfortunately I will not be able to vote for her in the general if she is our candidate. I will instead "write-in" a protest vote or leave the president blank.. Oh yeah I'm in a swing state too, FL.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
18. "I will not be able to vote for her in the general if she is our candidate"
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:44 AM
Oct 2015

Screen name: "Will Votes Dem".

Maybe you should reconsider your screen name because, by your own words in your post, " I will instead "write-in" a protest vote or leave the president blank.. Oh yeah I'm in a swing state too, FL." you'd rather write in a protest vote or leave it blank, so no. You don't vote Dem., especially in a critical must-win State in a critical presidential election.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
27. The "horseshoe theory" in American politics.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:04 AM
Oct 2015

The horseshoe theory in political science stipulates that the far-left and far-right are more similar to each other in essentials than either are to the political center.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #18)

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
35. 7 posts and already telling longtime DUers what to do?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:19 AM
Oct 2015

What unmitigated BALLS.

BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Response to BlueCaliDem (Reply #35)

Response to willvotesdem (Reply #7)

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
8. Can we stop pretending Bernie is going to end wars.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:21 AM
Oct 2015

This is yet another area where the myth of Bernie doesn't match the reality of Bernie. He voted for HR Res 64, voted for Afghanistan, voted for Kosovo and Somalia, voted for sanctions, voted to fund every war, voted for more military spending, said he supports more troops in the mid east, and keep using drones. He also voted against closing GITMO and doubles down on courting makers of weapons of mass destruction in his state i.e. F-35 and Sandia.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
13. They are pressing the weird fallacy that any and all military actions are exactly the same
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:15 AM
Oct 2015

Apparently, WWII = Vietnam = Kosovo = Iraq = Afpak = Anything future or past because...uhmm...something nonsensical.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
21. No. "They" are pressing the issue that Sanders is NO anti-war politician,
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:55 AM
Oct 2015

and that he's a warhawk, no different than Hillary Clinton or any other presidential candidate. I.O.W., "they" are trying to keep it real on a site where too many of its members are in La-La-Land when it comes to Senator Sanders.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
29. Is today the day they shift from "Bernie is a sexist" to "Bernie is a warhawk"?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:05 AM
Oct 2015

I didn't get the memo.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
26. For the 0.1% who supply the munitions and other billion$ and billion$ of military gear
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:59 AM
Oct 2015

they are exactly the same.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
9. Great read.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:23 AM
Oct 2015

I don't want a hawk like Clinton to be the CIC. She doesn't get it. She doesn't really comprehend that the rights of innocent bystanders are huge moral obstacles to the pursuit of war.

Our incredible military strength is a wonderful deterrent to military aggression towards us. That is its primary function: to prevent violence. Clinton is far too quick to use it in a violent fashion for things like regime change, or for addressing potential threats rather than immediate threats. Like far too many Americans, she is too willing to accept the death of innocent bystanders for the sake of highly speculative benefits.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
16. I get it that Clinton is occupying space closer to Sanders and taking away much of his appeal.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:38 AM
Oct 2015

But that is not a bad thing for the Democratic Party.....bad for Bernie and capturing the nomination, no doubt - but if he was ever in his own heart serious about being President and not just running to move Clinton and the Democraric Party he just now joined to the left, he might be secretly pleased.

Which is after all is said and done and a distinctly more open leftist is occupying the WH, it is all not a bad thing at all what Sanders has accomplished.....I will give him a lot of the credit for that.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
12. I wouldn't say the ultimate that goes to John McShame who even manage to rattle his rusty old saber
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:10 AM
Oct 2015

at Spain randomly in the 2008 cycle and even Joe Scum Scarborough had to admit the crazy fucker made Dick Cheney look like Mother Theresa in a rare bout of truthfulness but yeah she is in that next tier with the likes of Darth, Condi, Rummy, Petraeus, and possibly the lower profile Susan Rice who I don't trust either.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
25. No, that term might describe McCain
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 09:59 AM
Oct 2015

You are using it to mean supports any war any where at any time. Equally as unreasonable as the right wingers who support any war any where any time.

Baitball Blogger

(46,699 posts)
32. Republicans think that the only way to gain respect Internationally is through warring.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:14 AM
Oct 2015

They think that Obama is weak because we're not engaging in war every time a leader from another country begins mouthing off. They think Putin right now, does not respect us and that Obama should retaliate with some force of strength.

I really didn't realize how ready Republicans are to sacrifice our youth, just because they can't stand the heat.

in_cog_ni_to

(41,600 posts)
33. Correction --> Libya: "We came, we saw, he died." *Giggle*, *Giggle*, *Giggle* Which makes the
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 10:15 AM
Oct 2015

remark even more disgusting. NOTHING IN WAR IS FUNNY!

She's a warmonger.

A vote for Hillary, is a vote for ENDLESS WAR.

PEACE
LOVE
BERNIE

Persondem

(1,936 posts)
41. This thread is the ultimate hyperbole
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:58 AM
Oct 2015

Not sure why getting rid of Kaddafi was a bad thing at the time. At least it gave the Libyans a chance at self determination.

And I'll bet if you asked most Syrians who are not Assad supporters if they wanted a more forceful US intervention they would say yes. Imagine if that conflict had been ended 2-3 years ago with Assad gone, before Hezbollah and IS got involved.

Calling her pro-torture is pure hyperbole as well. She said in certain time dependent situations perhaps it should be a consideration.

The surge in Afghanistan did rather well and has given the Afghans a chance for a decent life.

Exaggeration, Monday morning quarterbacking and crystal ball bullshit really do nothing to make your case. The world is a complicated place but you make every decision sound like its some easy choice between right and wrong with perfect knowledge of all possible outcomes.

How many life and death decisions have you ever had to make in the moment, in your life??

beam me up scottie

(57,349 posts)
48. Monday morning quarterbacking?
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:53 PM
Oct 2015

More like a coach warning the team the night before the biggest game of the year:


Response to Persondem (Reply #41)

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
43. Apparently nearly everyone posting on this forum at the time of the Iraq vote, was smarter than
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 12:16 PM
Oct 2015

Hillary. we KNEW Bush/Cheney were lying.

I want a leader who is smarter than the average American.

Smart members of Congress knew they were lying and voted against giving those liars the power to do the awful damage they did to so many human lives.

 

olddots

(10,237 posts)
45. Hillay would sell out anyone who votes for her
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:44 PM
Oct 2015

and those that vote for her would sell out anyone they know .If this annoys you it is meant to .

jfern

(5,204 posts)
47. True that
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:47 PM
Oct 2015

I actually voted for her in the 2000 Senate primary and general election. I guess my vote was a vote for the Iraq war. Ugh. Not making that mistake again.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary is the ultimate h...