Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:28 PM
RandySF (36,447 posts)
Bernie zeros in on Hillary's 'butt'
CONCORD, N.H. — As he filed Thursday to run in New Hampshire’s Democratic contest for president, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) fielded a colorful question from someone crammed into the secretary of state’s office here: “You ready to kick some Republican butt, Bernie?”
“There’s some earlier butt we have to deal with,” the Vermont senator replied, in a less-than-graceful reference to the Democratic front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton. The remark, which prompted some nervous laughter in a room packed with reporters and supporters, comes as Clinton’s camp has already suggested that Sanders and his team are treating her in a sexist fashion — a notion Sanders has vigorously denied. Thursday’s comment seemed likely to provide additional fodder. There had been controversy of another sort prior to Sanders’s filing Thursday, with some questioning whether the longest-serving independent in Congress would be eligible to run as a Democrat in the nation’s first primary state. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/11/05/sanders-says-theres-earlier-butt-to-kick-before-the-gops/
|
182 replies, 7308 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
RandySF | Nov 2015 | OP |
Kalidurga | Nov 2015 | #1 | |
jfern | Nov 2015 | #2 | |
Arugula Latte | Nov 2015 | #3 | |
HerbChestnut | Nov 2015 | #5 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #12 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #35 | |
Bernblu | Nov 2015 | #49 | |
840high | Nov 2015 | #80 | |
peacebird | Nov 2015 | #161 | |
Doubledee | Nov 2015 | #106 | |
villager | Nov 2015 | #157 | |
George II | Nov 2015 | #174 | |
jfern | Nov 2015 | #176 | |
azmom | Nov 2015 | #4 | |
earthside | Nov 2015 | #6 | |
Arugula Latte | Nov 2015 | #8 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #39 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Nov 2015 | #101 | |
frazzled | Nov 2015 | #7 | |
Fearless | Nov 2015 | #19 | |
frazzled | Nov 2015 | #25 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #27 | |
Fearless | Nov 2015 | #28 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #32 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #40 | |
treestar | Nov 2015 | #116 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #24 | |
Armstead | Nov 2015 | #71 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #73 | |
Armstead | Nov 2015 | #77 | |
Bernblu | Nov 2015 | #56 | |
yardwork | Nov 2015 | #97 | |
yardwork | Nov 2015 | #96 | |
ibegurpard | Nov 2015 | #9 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #13 | |
Armstead | Nov 2015 | #63 | |
SusanCalvin | Nov 2015 | #10 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #14 | |
SusanCalvin | Nov 2015 | #16 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #50 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #15 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #22 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #41 | |
Gloria | Nov 2015 | #11 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #17 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #23 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #30 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #33 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #36 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #43 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #47 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #55 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #60 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #86 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #91 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #95 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #34 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #38 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #44 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #52 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #58 | |
okasha | Nov 2015 | #142 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #66 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #57 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #59 | |
Fearless | Nov 2015 | #18 | |
Aerows | Nov 2015 | #26 | |
pinebox | Nov 2015 | #20 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #21 | |
SusanCalvin | Nov 2015 | #29 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #48 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #31 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Nov 2015 | #103 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #109 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Nov 2015 | #110 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #112 | |
VanillaRhapsody | Nov 2015 | #113 | |
sheshe2 | Nov 2015 | #182 | |
840high | Nov 2015 | #82 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #83 | |
aspirant | Nov 2015 | #100 | |
cui bono | Nov 2015 | #88 | |
aspirant | Nov 2015 | #99 | |
treestar | Nov 2015 | #117 | |
Tommy2Tone | Nov 2015 | #37 | |
JonLeibowitz | Nov 2015 | #42 | |
Armstead | Nov 2015 | #69 | |
JonLeibowitz | Nov 2015 | #75 | |
Tommy2Tone | Nov 2015 | #76 | |
JonLeibowitz | Nov 2015 | #78 | |
TheFarS1de | Nov 2015 | #94 | |
CBGLuthier | Nov 2015 | #70 | |
melman | Nov 2015 | #84 | |
Marrah_G | Nov 2015 | #98 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #123 | |
SunSeeker | Nov 2015 | #45 | |
InAbLuEsTaTe | Nov 2015 | #54 | |
SunSeeker | Nov 2015 | #74 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #79 | |
Starry Messenger | Nov 2015 | #87 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #64 | |
MrWendel | Nov 2015 | #46 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #61 | |
SunSeeker | Nov 2015 | #81 | |
leftofcool | Nov 2015 | #108 | |
treestar | Nov 2015 | #118 | |
sheshe2 | Nov 2015 | #51 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #62 | |
Gothmog | Nov 2015 | #53 | |
MrWendel | Nov 2015 | #65 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #89 | |
CBGLuthier | Nov 2015 | #67 | |
Art_from_Ark | Nov 2015 | #72 | |
melman | Nov 2015 | #68 | |
cui bono | Nov 2015 | #85 | |
Vattel | Nov 2015 | #177 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #90 | |
aspirant | Nov 2015 | #104 | |
Cha | Nov 2015 | #105 | |
aspirant | Nov 2015 | #107 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #125 | |
mhatrw | Nov 2015 | #92 | |
merrily | Nov 2015 | #93 | |
MohRokTah | Nov 2015 | #102 | |
okasha | Nov 2015 | #148 | |
Vattel | Nov 2015 | #111 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #114 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #122 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #124 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #126 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #130 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #131 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #136 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #138 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #141 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #146 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #149 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #153 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #156 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #159 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #160 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #162 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #127 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #129 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #132 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #134 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #137 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #143 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #145 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #147 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #150 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #151 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #152 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #154 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #164 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #165 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #168 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #169 | |
phleshdef | Nov 2015 | #171 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #172 | |
Vattel | Nov 2015 | #173 | |
NurseJackie | Nov 2015 | #175 | |
treestar | Nov 2015 | #115 | |
Go Vols | Nov 2015 | #119 | |
leftofcool | Nov 2015 | #120 | |
Romulox | Nov 2015 | #121 | |
workinclasszero | Nov 2015 | #128 | |
BillZBubb | Nov 2015 | #135 | |
workinclasszero | Nov 2015 | #139 | |
Arkana | Nov 2015 | #133 | |
tularetom | Nov 2015 | #140 | |
Autumn | Nov 2015 | #144 | |
riversedge | Nov 2015 | #155 | |
MoonRiver | Nov 2015 | #158 | |
blackspade | Nov 2015 | #163 | |
WorseBeforeBetter | Nov 2015 | #179 | |
blackspade | Nov 2015 | #180 | |
NCTraveler | Nov 2015 | #166 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Nov 2015 | #167 | |
Tierra_y_Libertad | Nov 2015 | #170 | |
GeorgeGist | Nov 2015 | #178 | |
Beacool | Nov 2015 | #181 |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:34 PM
jfern (5,204 posts)
2. You guys don't have any real issues to talk about, do you?
Response to Arugula Latte (Reply #3)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:38 PM
HerbChestnut (3,649 posts)
5. Yeah that's all I'm getting out of this too
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:47 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
12. Why discuss the issues?
Detract and distract is a political ploy when your record doesn't match up with what you are doing.
Nobody anywhere is fooled. It's almost like her campaign is giving its last breath. |
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:12 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
35. Seriously...but we know Bernie leads on all major progressive issues, so Hillary needs to distract...smart strategy actually.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:23 AM
Bernblu (441 posts)
49. They don't want to talk about the issues!
Perhaps, this is because they are not sure what Hillary's positions are on any given day.
|
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:51 AM
Doubledee (137 posts)
106. You nailed it
Of all the increasingly absurd criticisms of Sanders by Clinton supporters this one leads the pack thus far. Is it, I wonder, a sign that these Clintonistas are nervous about Senator Sanders chances? Is it that some are simply far too childish in their approach to actual grown up political discussion?
Our elections have become absurd, whichever party one supports I fear. Perhaps it is attributable to the length of the process, campaigning for years, spending money like water, becoming, over time, repetitious and running out of things to say. I do prefer to believe that silly childish accusations like the one that heads this thread come from a small minority of aggressive and thoughtless folks. |
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:11 PM
villager (26,001 posts)
157. I'm trying to remember the last post that was actually a substantive discussion of issue differences
...I honestly can't summon one to mind.
|
Response to jfern (Reply #2)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:57 PM
George II (60,827 posts)
174. At least Clinton supporters don't make up phony claims that Clinton called Sanders a:
Last edited Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:28 PM - Edit history (1) "racist" or "sexist".
|
Response to George II (Reply #174)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:10 PM
jfern (5,204 posts)
176. What the hell are you even talking about?
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:35 PM
azmom (5,208 posts)
4. Kick ass Bernie!
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:40 PM
earthside (6,942 posts)
6. OMG!!!
Butt is a sexist word -- especially if spoke on in any context involving Hillary Clinton!
Where are the tar and feathers? ![]() |
Response to earthside (Reply #6)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:43 PM
Arugula Latte (50,566 posts)
8. He probably SHOUTED it at her 'cuz she's a woman!
![]() |
Response to earthside (Reply #6)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:14 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
39. haha...good one! Hillary and her handlers need a thicker skin...
Can I say that?!
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!! ![]() |
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #39)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:42 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
101. Hillary does?
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:42 PM
frazzled (17,962 posts)
7. Oh no he di'nt
That was very inelegant. A lot of ways to say you're going to have to fight hard first to win the nomination. That wasn't one of them. Foot.In.Mouth.
And by the way, I'd find it to be a gaffe if he even had said it about another Democratic opponent who was male. You can kick butt, but you don't say you have to deal with a "butt." |
Response to frazzled (Reply #7)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:54 PM
Fearless (18,417 posts)
19. Uh-oh naughty words!!>!>!111!!!
Give me a break. This isn't kindergarten.
|
Response to Fearless (Reply #19)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:58 PM
frazzled (17,962 posts)
25. True: only 5 year olds call people butts.
He has to deal with a butt? That's pretty juvenile.
|
Response to frazzled (Reply #25)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:00 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
27. I'm juvenile
I take great pleasure in calling people that act like buttheads wait for it - buttheads.
I could be more vulgar, by why? ![]() |
Response to frazzled (Reply #25)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:01 AM
Fearless (18,417 posts)
28. Grasping at straws my dear.
Response to Fearless (Reply #28)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:06 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
32. Nailed it
Fearless!
![]() |
Response to frazzled (Reply #25)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:16 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
40. Please tell me you're not bein serious.
Response to frazzled (Reply #25)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:25 AM
treestar (78,373 posts)
116. people who work in the Secretary of State's office
should have a better vocabulary! Too informal to use on that job.
|
Response to frazzled (Reply #7)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:56 PM
Cha (269,359 posts)
24. But, he's such a tough guy.. has to talk tough.
Response to Cha (Reply #24)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:47 AM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
71. I assume you also object to President Obama's use of the term "kick ass" too
Response to Armstead (Reply #71)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:51 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
73. #berniesoscary Hillary must be shaking by now
![]() |
Response to Cha (Reply #73)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:55 AM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
77. That's not what I said
Brniee made a bad joke. You get all "oooooo he;s trying to be a tough guy, he has no class."
So if the phrase bothers your sensitivities and sense of Emily Post rectitude so much, does it bother you when President Obama uses it? |
Response to frazzled (Reply #7)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:28 AM
Bernblu (441 posts)
56. Oh poor delicate Hillary might get her feathers ruffled!
Response to Bernblu (Reply #56)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:24 AM
yardwork (52,392 posts)
97. You're completely missing the point.
Response to frazzled (Reply #7)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:24 AM
yardwork (52,392 posts)
96. That's my reaction too. This wasn't sexist. It was stupid.
A presidential candidate can probably get away with saying "Kick some butt!" I wouldn't advise it though - you're going to offend people and you want to avoid that when running for president.
Turning the phrase into "There's some earlier butt we have to deal with" sounds awkward and leaves that word "butt" just hanging there. Stupid thing to say. |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:44 PM
ibegurpard (16,402 posts)
9. Did it give you the vapors?
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #9)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:49 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
13. I am clutching
the shit out of my pearls right this very moment.
|
Response to ibegurpard (Reply #9)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:37 AM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
63. LOL. I was abouot to say "Break out the fainting couch."
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:46 PM
SusanCalvin (6,592 posts)
10. Good Lord.
All he did was echo a common term that the interviewer used. Might have made a better choice? Yes. Big deal? No.
|
Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #10)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:50 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
14. Hillary will end up being successful at one thing
Hillary Clinton: "I have been able to make mountains out of mole hills!"
|
Response to Aerows (Reply #14)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:52 PM
SusanCalvin (6,592 posts)
16. Dunno if it's Hillary herself,
But it's definitely a molehill.
|
Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #16)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:23 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
50. More like an ant hill.
Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #10)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:51 PM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
15. With these guys, no molehill is so small
that it can't become a Mount Everest.
![]() |
Response to Art_from_Ark (Reply #15)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:55 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
22. Absolutely, Art
I wish I was living outside of the US at this point, but I love my country too damn much to see it flushed down the proverbial toilet.
Still, I envy you, my friend. |
Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #10)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:18 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
41. Precisely! Why are people gettin all butt hurt?! Ooooops...sorry!
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:46 PM
Gloria (17,663 posts)
11. He's proving to be an ass...
eom
|
Response to Gloria (Reply #11)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:52 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
17. Who?
The OP? The interviewer?
Clarification, if you will. |
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #30)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:09 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
33. If you are eager
for another Arne Duncan, I won't stand in your way.
|
Response to Aerows (Reply #33)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:12 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
36. I am not eager for another Bill Bennett, which a Republican would appoint.
Bernie's descent into amateur-hour would make that even more of a possibility, but he isn't going to win, so I don't put much energy into worrying about it.
|
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #36)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:19 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
43. I'm pretty sure
it is amateur-hour somewhere, but I like to think we are a little bit more intelligent on DU.
I want to refrain from yelling at my allies, and I count you among my allies because of your many posts about the educational system. I would ask you this: Will Bernie Sanders be better for the educational system, and he pledged that he would not privatize it, or will Hillary Clinton be better? You don't have to answer. Just think about it. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #43)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:22 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
47. He doesn't have a strong record on broadly advocating for educational issues.
A real shame, since we could have used an advocate against corporate privatization over the last 20 years.
If he'd been out in front on that issue for many years, the endorsements with education unions would have reflected that. |
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #47)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:28 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
55. Hillary Clinton has spoken up for charter schools.
Bernie Sanders has not done so.
As an educator, I would hope that means something. My sister has a Master's in Early Education. She knows exactly the threat that charter schools have become. I speak from a place that gives a good goddamn, not just to blow smoke on DU and score a point. |
Response to Aerows (Reply #55)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:33 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
60. Bernie is a teacher's best friend.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to Aerows (Reply #55)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:27 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
86. If Bernie had done anything of substance, he'd have won the confidence of the education unions.
HRC has been a lifelong proponent of early childhood education and child health care and has created policy in this area. She has stated that she believes that teachers are part of the education solution, and she wants to limit testing.
If Bernie had thrown himself into the fray of opposing education reform as a visible ally before he decided to run for higher office, he'd be in a stronger position vis a vis education. But he didn't. |
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #86)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:15 AM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
91. Well, I'm sorry you don't have all of the information on his record
But he has been an advocate to cease the testing the crap out of kids.
|
Response to Aerows (Reply #91)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:15 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
95. Sorry you don't have all the info on HRCs
Teachers' unions are confident in it.
|
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #30)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:10 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
34. #berniesoscary
![]() |
Response to Cha (Reply #34)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:14 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
38. Maybe he needs to talk to a few people outside of his bubble.
He's turning into a gaffe-machine!
|
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #38)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:20 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
44. LOL, you call that a gaffe? Now THAT'S funny!
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #44)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:24 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
52. The media does. They focus on that kind of inappropriate remark.
You can disregard that phenomenon if you like, but that doesn't change reality.
|
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #52)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:30 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
58. All the media accomplishes in focusing on a completely innocuous remark is make Bernie look more like the regular kinda guy he is.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #58)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:34 PM
okasha (11,573 posts)
142. A guy you'd like to have a beer with?
That didn't turn out too well last time, did it?
|
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #52)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:41 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
66. But bernie's so scary.. he wanted to make sure everyone knew he was gonna kick Hillary's butt..
Oh he's so scary ... I bet Hillary's just shaking..
![]() That and helping out the gop wasting taxpayer's money on the damn emails he said everyone was tired of hearing about. Way to beat a dead horse Bernie. |
Response to Starry Messenger (Reply #38)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:30 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
57. Yeah, like he's this big tough.. he's so ready to Hillary's butt. Good Grief.. #berniesoclassy
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:53 PM
Fearless (18,417 posts)
18. It seems the Hillary camp is trying to actually.
Let me guess? Sexist?
|
Response to Fearless (Reply #18)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:58 PM
Aerows (39,961 posts)
26. Hey, we have a better candidate.
You can tell that by what they accuse his supporters of because at this point, projection is all that they have.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Thu Nov 5, 2015, 11:54 PM
Cha (269,359 posts)
21. Yeah, bernie.. you're such a big scary person. Talking about Hillary's butt.
I bet she's really scared of you now..
![]() ![]() LOL.. Bernie needs to stop referring to Hillary's butt and worry about his own. |
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:02 AM
SusanCalvin (6,592 posts)
29. Please see post 10. nt
Response to SusanCalvin (Reply #29)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:22 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
48. It's no use trying to reason with these people.
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:04 AM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
31. He made no mention at all about Hillary
None whatsoever.
And given the fact that TPP is very much in the news now, and Bernie is very much against it, he could very well have been referring to that, as far as anyone knows. |
Response to Art_from_Ark (Reply #31)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:45 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
103. He wants to kick O'Malley's butt?
Punching down is so undignified...
|
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #103)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:06 AM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
109. He didn't say anyone's butt
Geez. He said *some* butt, and right now he's focused on kicking some TPP butt!
|
Response to Art_from_Ark (Reply #109)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:14 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
110. who else is there before the election?
hahahaha...right...he meant the TPP....because the TPP has an actual Butt!
Paging Dr Carson....paging Dr Carson! |
Response to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #110)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:22 AM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
112. Oh for crying out loud
"Kick some butt" is a common expression used to refer to giving all of one's effort to defeating someone-- or something.
Bernie has stated unequivocally that he is opposed to the TPP, and will do what he can to stop it, and the TPP is very much in the news now. Obama has also stated that he intends to sign TPP "sometime after January" so yeah, defeating TPP would be higher on Bernie's list right now than defeating Republicans. |
Response to Art_from_Ark (Reply #112)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:26 AM
VanillaRhapsody (21,115 posts)
113. First he has to "kick some butt"
in order to even make it to the Primary at this point....the TPP is not in his way for that....
|
Response to Art_from_Ark (Reply #31)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 10:48 PM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
182. Ummmm~
All the outrage about him caving on the pipeline nixed. The hair on fire, he will cave cave cave and now no kudos to the fact that he nixed it. Nope, crickets on DU.
Now let's move to TPP. He is selling us out!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:03 AM
840high (17,196 posts)
82. Why are you repeating yourself? Not
that clever to begin with.
|
Response to 840high (Reply #82)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:07 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
83. #berniesoscary Hillary is shaking in her boots by now! Big scary bernie gonna kick Hillary's butt
yeah, he is.. you just wait. Scary Bernie.
![]() ![]() |
Response to Cha (Reply #83)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:41 AM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
100. Was Hills scared of your comments in 2007-8?
Were you scary then too?
|
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:28 AM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
88. So Cha, tell me, what changed about Hillary that made you stop hating her with a passion
and support her this time?
|
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:38 AM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
99. Was Hills scared of you in 2007-8?
Response to Cha (Reply #21)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:26 AM
treestar (78,373 posts)
117. It's Bernie's butt that is going to get kicked
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:13 AM
Tommy2Tone (1,307 posts)
37. It was a sexist remark and I see his faithful are here in force to say BFD
Shameful.
|
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #37)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:18 AM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
42. Is there anything these days Sanders can say about Clinton that isn't interpreted as sexist? Sheesh.
Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #42)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:44 AM
Armstead (47,803 posts)
69. You ued the word Sheesh....Alert!
That must have sexist connotations.
|
Response to Armstead (Reply #69)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:53 AM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
75. Go ahead...make my day! :-) n/t
Response to JonLeibowitz (Reply #42)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:54 AM
Tommy2Tone (1,307 posts)
76. It wasn't interpreted, it was sexist.
Is there anything Bernie can say or do to offend you?
|
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #76)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:55 AM
JonLeibowitz (6,282 posts)
78. Absolutely: something offensive will do just fine. This obviously does not qualify. n/t
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #76)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:54 AM
TheFarS1de (1,017 posts)
94. Is there anything Sanders can say ...
that isn't sexist in your mind ? Or is it just you have an issue with him because your candidate has only the gender card working for her ?
|
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #37)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:45 AM
CBGLuthier (12,723 posts)
70. In what way is it sexist? Are you capable of following a conversation?
Last edited Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:23 AM - Edit history (1) Does mentioning a candidate's butt imply sexism when it happens to be a female butt? How does that work? Are you saying that referring to kicking a man's butt is OK but when it is a woman it is sexist? Seems to me that treating a woman's metaphorical butt the same as a man's metaphorical butt is the opposite of sexism.
This may be the most ludicrous complaint in the history of American politics. |
Response to CBGLuthier (Reply #70)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:17 AM
melman (7,681 posts)
84. +1
to all of that.
|
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #37)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:25 AM
Marrah_G (28,581 posts)
98. This was so NOT sexist
For christ sake, get a grip
|
Response to Tommy2Tone (Reply #37)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:06 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
123. No it wasn't and you don't believe it was.
No honest person is buying that bullshit.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:21 AM
SunSeeker (44,166 posts)
45. Bernie is really not good with that off the cuff thing. nt
|
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #45)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:27 AM
InAbLuEsTaTe (23,141 posts)
54. Actually, he's great at it...comfortable in his own skin, unlike other, pre-programmed candidates.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
![]() |
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #54)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:52 AM
SunSeeker (44,166 posts)
74. LOL. Almost as great as he is at kissing babies...
![]() |
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #74)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:57 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
79. OH dear.. #berniesoscary! poor little thing!
![]() |
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #74)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:28 AM
Starry Messenger (32,326 posts)
87. Oh dear!
Response to SunSeeker (Reply #45)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:38 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
64. Apparently so.. not good. #berniesoscary
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:22 AM
MrWendel (1,881 posts)
46. Watch yourself Hillary...
take it from Obama and watch your butt!
![]() |
Response to MrWendel (Reply #46)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:27 AM
treestar (78,373 posts)
118. No matter how many times I see that
It still makes me laugh
![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:24 AM
sheshe2 (70,691 posts)
51. KnR
Thanks Randy.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:26 AM
Gothmog (92,351 posts)
53. So Bernie is going negative
Sanders' promise not to go negative was really sad and was not going to last
This is the DU member formerly known as Gothmog.
|
Response to Gothmog (Reply #53)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:41 AM
MrWendel (1,881 posts)
65. Well you know...
he's evolving.
|
Response to Gothmog (Reply #53)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:35 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
89. #berniescary.. give him a wide path, pardner!
![]() ![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:42 AM
CBGLuthier (12,723 posts)
67. So if they treat her like anyone else it is sexist?
What a crock of shit.
Nice biased reporting. |
Response to CBGLuthier (Reply #67)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:49 AM
Art_from_Ark (27,247 posts)
72. Biased is right
Bernie made no mention at all of Hillary. The reporter just assumed that he meant Hillary, when he could very well have been referring to the TPP, which he has vowed to do everything he can to defeat.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:44 AM
melman (7,681 posts)
68. lol. Trying way too hard
So much fail on this one.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:26 AM
cui bono (19,926 posts)
85. Thank you for this idiotic OP.
The ridiculousness of it is helping to make it clear to me that DU is more of a waste of time than it used to be. Hopefully I'll remember that before I log on in the future.
|
Response to cui bono (Reply #85)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:20 PM
Vattel (9,289 posts)
177. That is my feeling too.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:29 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
90. Yeah yeah yeah.. bernie's wants to kick Hillary's butt.. but he wants the gop to do for him..
by wasting more taxpayers money on the . months of headlines about faux-scandals like “email” and “Benghazi”. It's only makes Hillary stronger but Bernie and his managers haven't figured that out yet.
Big tough Bernie.. "..earlier butt he has to deal with". LOL |
Response to Cha (Reply #90)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:48 AM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
104. "Big tough" Hillary
Did she kick some male and female Republicons "butt" at the hearings
How sexist of her. |
Response to aspirant (Reply #104)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:50 AM
Cha (269,359 posts)
105. Big tough talkin' bernie.. get dealing with kicking Hillary's butt, bernie.. we're waiting.
Response to Cha (Reply #105)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:55 AM
aspirant (3,533 posts)
107. You forget O'Malley is running too
So now it is a challenge, nice evolution
|
Response to Cha (Reply #105)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:08 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
125. He can't kick her butt. He'd had to run into the sniper fire to get close enough to do it.
Look, I like Hillary and will vote for her in the general election, but please, stop pretending like Bernie said anything wrong here. He didn't. You know it. And entertaining this silliness should be beneath you.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:20 AM
mhatrw (10,786 posts)
92. Get it? Republican candidates have male butts, so you can figuratively kick them.
Hillary Clinton has a female butt, so you can only kick it literally, not figuratively, which somehow makes you sexist because you said "butt" while discussing a female, so you must have meant you want to kick her literal, actual female butt.
And only a sexist would use the same expression for winning a campaign against a male candidate that he uses for winning a campaign against a female candidate. ![]() Was this article written by Beavis and Butthead? |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:31 AM
merrily (45,251 posts)
93. Oh, for the love of Was kicking "Republican butt" misandrist and misogynistic?
Keep this up and we are going back to 1955 as far as employers being willing to hire women. All they are going to see walking through the door are potential EEOC complaints and lawsuits. Actually, much worse than 1955 because there was no EEOC then and the law was not as favorable to women as it is now.
Remember the Civil Rights Act? They included women in it only because they thought including women would surely kill the bill, that Congress would be more willing to give equal rights to people of color than it would be to give them to women! Under one measure, they could have been right: The Fourteenth Amendment got ratified. The ERA got killed. No one back then moved out of the neighborhood when (hetero) women moved in, but no one wanted them in the business district unless they could type at least 60 words a minute and take shorthand, and Congress didn't even have bathrooms for them. |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:42 AM
MohRokTah (15,429 posts)
102. Sanders really isn't ready for this. eom
Response to MohRokTah (Reply #102)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:01 PM
okasha (11,573 posts)
148. No, he isn't, and that's the real problem.
Going for the GWB macho doesn't dispell the fact that he was a pseudo-intellectual little dweeb for the first forty years of his life, who never held a steady job until he was elected Mayor of Burlington, after which he sat on his butt in Congress for 20 years and has precious little to show for it besides his pay stubs.
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:16 AM
Vattel (9,289 posts)
111. Sigh, another excuse for irrational outrage. Much ado about nothing
Response to Vattel (Reply #111)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:32 AM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
114. I guess I have never taken sexism lightly.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #114)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:03 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
122. Asking for special protection for the female candidate *is* sexist. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #122)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:06 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
124. Okaaaaayyyy .... :-/
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #124)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:08 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
126. Nobody thinks "kicks some butt" is sexist. Nobody. So the pretense falls flat. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #122)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:14 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
130. I'm not sure where this is going. (Did you intend to reply to someone else?)
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #130)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:16 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
131. Nobody thinks "kicks some butt" is sexist. Nobody. So the pretense falls flat. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #131)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:21 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
136. So you said. Apparently somebody does, so the "nobody" defense falls flat.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #136)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:23 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
138. It's an obvious pretense. It's a charge looking for a place to hang its hat. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #138)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:29 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
141. Perhaps a misstep that a better candidate wouldn't have made. Or would have handled better…
after the fact. He created an opening and folks were ready to take advantage of it. It happens all the time. This will all blow over in a few days.
|
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #141)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:56 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
146. You can't explain how it's "sexist", which speaks for itself. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #146)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:02 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
149. You can't explain how he didn't make a mis-step, which speaks for itself.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #149)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:04 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
153. The onus is on you to support your assertion of sexism. Not on others to disprove it. nt
Response to Romulox (Reply #153)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:09 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
156. I didn't assert anything. Again, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #156)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:18 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
159. NurseJackie, post #114: "I guess I have never taken sexism lightly."
I guess I have never taken sexism lightly.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=772995 You are just too slick! ![]() |
Response to Romulox (Reply #159)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:23 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
160. That's not an assertion. Where's the assertion?
I realize I'm an easy target that you're fascinated with right now, but if this is something that truly bothers you, then you should probably follow things further back in the chain. I'm not sure what you're accomplishing by badgering me.
That's my best advice to you. |
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #160)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:25 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
162. Too clever by half. nt
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #114)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:09 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
127. It wasn't sexist and you don't think it was.
Response to phleshdef (Reply #127)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:13 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
129. Oooo! A mind reader! (I'll bet you already know what I'm thinking now.)
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #129)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:16 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
132. Not a mind reader, just a bullshit detector.
No one is buying that nonsense. People who do what you are attempting to do accomplish nothing but staining the fight against real sexism with phony sexist allegations. Cut it out.
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #132)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:19 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
134. That's it? It's difficult to take your demands seriously.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #134)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:22 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
137. After your allegations of sexism here...
...you really shouldn't be talking about "difficulty taking someone seriously". You've already lost on that front.
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #137)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:34 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
143. As did you, with the mind reading trick.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #143)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:55 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
145. There was no mind reading trick
Just a call out of painfully obvious bullshit that just about anyone who is a thinking person would be capable of detecting
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #145)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:01 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
147. So you said. I don't believe you. I know better.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #147)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:02 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
150. No you really don't know better
If you knew better about anything, you would drop this facade of believing that Sanders said something sexist. No one is dumb enough to buy that even if they pretend to be. You're just embarrassing yourself at this point.
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #150)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:03 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
151. No, not really. (But apparently I'm annoying you, so there's that.)
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #151)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:04 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
152. I'm not annoyed.
I'm laughing at you in a very condescending fashion
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #152)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:05 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
154. Work on your delivery.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #154)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:50 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
164. Work on your honesty
Response to phleshdef (Reply #164)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:02 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
165. You're really in no position to lecture on that.
I stand by my original statement. I believe what I believe, and your efforts to prove otherwise will always fail. Always.
|
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #165)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:12 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
168. Yes I am and I am exercising that position on you
And no you don't stand by your statement, up thread you tried to deny even making it to another poster.
|
Response to phleshdef (Reply #168)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:18 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
169. I guess I have never taken sexism lightly.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #169)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:26 PM
phleshdef (11,936 posts)
171. I don't know about that but you certainly don't take honesty very seriously
Response to phleshdef (Reply #171)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:28 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
172. I guess I have never taken sexism lightly.
Response to NurseJackie (Reply #114)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:57 PM
Vattel (9,289 posts)
173. If only there were some sexism to complain about.
Response to Vattel (Reply #173)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:07 PM
NurseJackie (37,807 posts)
175. We see things differently.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:23 AM
treestar (78,373 posts)
115. LOL. I don't think sexism is the cause of that
but simply repeating the word as used in the question to refer to other candidates.
But it is the type of thing Obama would have handled better. |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 11:52 AM
leftofcool (19,460 posts)
120. I really hope Bernie gets more ready for the big leagues.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:01 PM
Romulox (25,960 posts)
121. This is embarassing for the OP and those who recommended this. nt
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:11 PM
workinclasszero (28,270 posts)
128. Words of wisdom by that great socialist thinker and the savior of us all
Bernie Sanders...“There’s some earlier butt we have to deal with,”
Sounds like a quote right out of a republican clown car debate. ![]() |
Response to workinclasszero (Reply #128)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:20 PM
BillZBubb (10,650 posts)
135. Trying to make this statement a big issue is what is right out of the republican clown car.
The right wing always blows up the littlest things into huge "scandals." It looks like the Hillary fanatics are taking a page right out of the republicans playbook.
|
Response to BillZBubb (Reply #135)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:23 PM
workinclasszero (28,270 posts)
139. I think St Bernie is going to pull back a bloody stump...
after trying to kick that "earlier butt"
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:17 PM
Arkana (24,347 posts)
133. No one cares. It's a figure of speech.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:26 PM
tularetom (23,664 posts)
140. I'm not sure what your point is
Does she not have a butt or is she somehow exempt from having it figuratively kicked in an election?
Make up your mind, dude. Is she a strong independent woman or is she a member of a protected class? You may think she can have it both ways but the voters won't. |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 12:35 PM
Autumn (40,166 posts)
144. Thank god he didn't zoom in on Hillary's 'butt'
![]() ![]() |
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:06 PM
riversedge (60,185 posts)
155. As the article said-it was a less than graceful comment from Sanders.
But it happens. Joe Biden is still the King of less than graceful comments IMHO.
|
Response to riversedge (Reply #155)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:13 PM
MoonRiver (35,066 posts)
158. Yes, and he is still not President.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:27 PM
blackspade (10,056 posts)
163. This has to be one of the fucking dumbest ginned up 'controversies' yet.
The M$M is pathetic and open in it's attempt to create strife within the Democratic Party.
Shame on those buying this garbage. |
Response to blackspade (Reply #163)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 05:52 PM
WorseBeforeBetter (11,441 posts)
179. Is this what counts as hard-hitting journalism from the once mighty Washington Post?
How utterly depressing.
Well, at least we all have a clearer understanding as to who all the "poutraged emoprogs" are... such delicate little micro-aggrieved flowers. |
Response to WorseBeforeBetter (Reply #179)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:23 PM
blackspade (10,056 posts)
180. No doubt.
I expect way more from a campaign that's 'winning.'
|
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:04 PM
NCTraveler (30,481 posts)
166. He needs to zero in on it now. He is losing sight of it as it pulls away. nt.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:04 PM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
167. Tsk. Tsk.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:20 PM
Tierra_y_Libertad (50,414 posts)
170. Not nearly as much as Hillary's supporters zero in on it.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 04:23 PM
GeorgeGist (23,878 posts)
178. Conservatives have no sense of humor.
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:29 PM
Beacool (29,977 posts)
181. I see, NOW he's a Democrat. Isn't that special?
As for the butt kicking, I don't find it sexist, only a bit crass. Besides, if anyone is going to do some butt kicking I doubt that it's him.
![]() |