Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(58,774 posts)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:13 AM Nov 2015

Sanders's staff perfectly illustrated why it's so hard to have a sane discussion about gender bias

The Sanders campaign started preparing for battle at the suggestion that Clinton might be accusing their candidate of sexism.

"If they’re going to have a campaign that attacks Bernie on gun safety and implies he engages in sexism, that’s unacceptable," chief strategist Tad Devine told Politico. "If they’re going to engage in this kind of attack, they need to understand we’re not going to stand there and take it." Devine also told Bloomberg that Clinton's remark basically forced Sanders to "fire a shot across their bow."

In that same Bloomberg interview, Sanders's campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, made some remarks about Clinton that came off as incredibly patronizing. "Look, she'd make a great vice president," Weaver said, later adding, "We'll even interview her."

Reporter John Heilemann said Weaver was "at least half-joking" when he said that, but a lot of people didn't find it funny. The comment reeked of head-patting condescension, the kind that highly qualified women often endure from men who don't take them seriously. Weaver insisted that his comments were "edgy or snarky but nothing more," and also doubled down on the idea that Clinton had launched a "vicious attack" on the Sanders campaign with her "accusations of sexism."

The media also went nuts over "accusations of sexism" and overamplified women's concerns about it until they sounded like "shouting" (literally, in the case of one Politico headline). When Emily's List president Stephanie Schriock criticized Weaver's remarks on Twitter as a "condescending insult by a team who knows better," a New York Times headline blew up her tweet into, "Emily's List Official Accuses Bernie Sanders Team of Sexism." At Slate, William Saletan said that Clinton was "smearing" Sanders as "a sexist" and "manipulating women and abusing feminist anger for her own advantage."


http://www.vox.com/identities/2015/11/5/9671830/bernie-sanders-sexism

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

hedda_foil

(16,372 posts)
1. Isn't it time yet to take out the recycling?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:29 AM
Nov 2015

This one's been around so long it's starting to stink like bad fish. It's long past its sell by date.

InAbLuEsTaTe

(24,122 posts)
3. Sorry, Hillary would NOT make a great VP for Bernie...one of the few times I hafta disagree with his campaign.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 01:48 AM
Nov 2015

So many real progressives who are much better choices for VP.

Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!

Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #3)

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
7. Yep. The Hiilary campaign was totally patting Obama on the head when
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 02:17 AM
Nov 2015

they suggested that Obama would make a good VP.

Do you agree?

I expect no response. Because Hillary supporters regularly do not respond when challenged by their own hypocrisy.

Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #7)

Cha

(297,154 posts)
13. yeah yeah.. bernie's gonna kick Hillary's butt by giving the gop his permission to waste more
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 04:41 AM
Nov 2015

taxpayers $$$$$$$ on the faux scandal.. just like Benghazi.

They'll never learn. #berniesoscary

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Sanders's staff perfectly...