2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumSanders's staff perfectly illustrated why it's so hard to have a sane discussion about gender bias
The Sanders campaign started preparing for battle at the suggestion that Clinton might be accusing their candidate of sexism.
"If theyre going to have a campaign that attacks Bernie on gun safety and implies he engages in sexism, thats unacceptable," chief strategist Tad Devine told Politico. "If theyre going to engage in this kind of attack, they need to understand were not going to stand there and take it." Devine also told Bloomberg that Clinton's remark basically forced Sanders to "fire a shot across their bow."
In that same Bloomberg interview, Sanders's campaign manager, Jeff Weaver, made some remarks about Clinton that came off as incredibly patronizing. "Look, she'd make a great vice president," Weaver said, later adding, "We'll even interview her."
Reporter John Heilemann said Weaver was "at least half-joking" when he said that, but a lot of people didn't find it funny. The comment reeked of head-patting condescension, the kind that highly qualified women often endure from men who don't take them seriously. Weaver insisted that his comments were "edgy or snarky but nothing more," and also doubled down on the idea that Clinton had launched a "vicious attack" on the Sanders campaign with her "accusations of sexism."
The media also went nuts over "accusations of sexism" and overamplified women's concerns about it until they sounded like "shouting" (literally, in the case of one Politico headline). When Emily's List president Stephanie Schriock criticized Weaver's remarks on Twitter as a "condescending insult by a team who knows better," a New York Times headline blew up her tweet into, "Emily's List Official Accuses Bernie Sanders Team of Sexism." At Slate, William Saletan said that Clinton was "smearing" Sanders as "a sexist" and "manipulating women and abusing feminist anger for her own advantage."
http://www.vox.com/identities/2015/11/5/9671830/bernie-sanders-sexism
hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)This one's been around so long it's starting to stink like bad fish. It's long past its sell by date.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)hedda_foil
(16,372 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)So many real progressives who are much better choices for VP.
Bernie & Elizabeth 2016!!!
Response to InAbLuEsTaTe (Reply #3)
Name removed Message auto-removed
riversedge
(70,192 posts)jfern
(5,204 posts)Was that racial bias?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)they suggested that Obama would make a good VP.
Do you agree?
I expect no response. Because Hillary supporters regularly do not respond when challenged by their own hypocrisy.
Response to Luminous Animal (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Fearless
(18,421 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)taxpayers $$$$$$$ on the faux scandal.. just like Benghazi.
They'll never learn. #berniesoscary