2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumKristol Blasts Romney For Ignoring Afghanistan, U.S. Troops In Convention Speech
Even Bill Kristol has moments of clarity...
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/08/31/783701/kristol-romney-afghanistan/
Kristol Blasts Romney For Ignoring Afghanistan, U.S. Troops In Convention Speech
By Ben Armbruster on Aug 31, 2012 at 11:16 am
Weekly Standard editor and influential right-wing foreign policy voice Bill Kristol criticized Mitt Romney for ignoring the war in Afghanistan and the military in his speech to the Republican National Convention last night. In a short, scathing piece Kristol put up on the Standards website shortly after the speech, the neocon don scolded Romney for not uttering a word of appreciation to American troops fighting in Afghanistan:
Leave aside the question of the political wisdom of Romneys silence, and the opportunities it opens up for President Obama next week. What about the civic propriety of a presidential nominee failing even to mention, in his acceptance speech, a war were fighting and our young men and women who are fighting it? Has it ever happened that weve been at war and a presidential nominee has ignored, in this kind of major and formal speech, the war and our warriors?
Perhaps Romney didnt mention Afghanistan because he has no plan. Back in July, the then-presumptive GOP presidential nominee had a chance talk about his Afghanistan policy in a major foreign policy speech but Romney offered no specifics, saying his goal would be to withdraw U.S. troops by 2014 which is exactly what President Obama is going to do. In fact, Romneys own advisers dont know what Romneys Afghanistan policy is.
And maybe Romney ignored the military and veterans in his speech last night because he has no plan to address those issues either. We havent heard any specific plans yet from Governor Romney or his campaign, a VFW official said recently.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)Election 2000 was the tragedy, this is the farce.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)Guess it was just the veterans turn.
Who needs no steenkin' veterans. I've got my base and my $$$.
qwlauren35
(6,147 posts)I think many veterans vote Republican. Not sure whether all of Obama's efforts over the last 4 years will change that. I'm curious, though. I think I'll google it.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)Yeah, I think we got the vets and the soldier votes locked up.
Obama ended the war in Iraq and should speed up withdrawal of Afghanistan immediately and begin butchering the hell out of the DoD budget and redirecting the excess money to K-12, college (should be free) jobs, healthcare, and the general welfare of America.
Once that is done, increase the number of Revenue Agents that are highly skilled on finding tax evaders and have permission to freeze assets of any companies involved with the tax evasion and all assets are taken out and turned over to the U.S. Treasury for repayment of back taxes plus the rest of their assets. The number of arrests to bankers, investors and people fucking around with money should be extremely high - and no first class lawyers - all tax evaders will be only allowed a poor public defender or go pro se.
Their choice, their fate.
Fat cat oil companies? Gone - nationalized by the United States of America. Gas drops to its corrected price of maybe $2.25.
And all gas revenues are no longer in the fat cat's pockets but rather to continue to improve the infrastructure that the fat cats damaged for the last 30 years.
Bridges, roads, airports, railroad (high speed! We need bullet trains!) Internet access capabilities, and much more needs the money to fix and it's right there, at that insane $711 billion spent on defense.
Finally, the Republicans will have no choice but to concede the minimum wage needs to be increased by $20 to $27.75/hour - a living wage. No Americans should be poor.