Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
4. Generally...Clinton received a 29 point bounce after his convention in '92...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:10 AM
Sep 2012

On July 18th, two days after the Democratic Convention, Clinton went from trailing Bush to leading him 55-31.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
6. which was aided by the Ross Perot drop out on Day Three of convention
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:24 AM
Sep 2012

Bush did whittle Clinton's lead down over the months, but it was too big a deficit to make up.

 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
8. Yes. Perot leaving helped immensely...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 03:18 AM
Sep 2012

Which cracks me up because it essentially proves Clinton was hurt far more by Perot's candidacy than Bush.

For some odd reason, a few months ago, I caught a FOX News special on George H.W. Bush and it briefly touched on his reelection loss. During the discussion about it, everyone agreed that, had Perot not run, Bush would've won fairly easy. I disagree. I do think Perot hurt Bush early, since Perot was hammering Bush during a time when Clinton was still fighting primary battles, but in the end, as the polling suggests shortly after the convention, those voters who backed Perot were not going to vote for Bush ... and even if he won a significant portion of their vote, assuming they wouldn't have just stayed home, he still would have lost the electoral college.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
10. I thought the general rule was...
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 04:34 AM
Sep 2012

...that any swings attributable to specific events don't show up in the polls until 2 weeks after that event. Don't quote me on that, though, it's just something I read on the internet, which may or may not be true.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
12. Dont have the stats in front of me but have read bounces have dimenished in recent years
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:15 AM
Sep 2012

This election appears a bit odd because there does not seem to be much movement in either direction for the last few months. Seems either most people have already made up their minds and/or they are not paying attention.

Most of the swing states are stuck within the margin of error and don't seem to be moving. It will be interesting to see what they do after the DNC convention.

nxylas

(6,440 posts)
14. Electoral college math still favors Obama
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 07:56 AM
Sep 2012

I'm more worried about Congress. There's not much difference for me between Republicans winning all three branches of government and Obama squeaking through with a narrow victory and facing another 2-4 years of deadlock with an obstructionist Republican Congress. In fact, the latter may be worse, as Obama will continue to get the blame.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
2. Silver has noted that this is more because of some better economic data that has come in of late
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:03 AM
Sep 2012

Not so much polling numbers.

Silver's model also includes economic data.

speedoo

(11,229 posts)
3. Yeah, RNC bounce is either elusive or non existent.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 02:07 AM
Sep 2012

I think we will be hearing that from Nate by tomorrow at the latest.. PPP polls in FL and NC today showed no bounce.. The economic good news was in his model a couple of days ago, I think this latest bump is more from polls good news.

TroyD

(4,551 posts)
11. Colorado & Michigan
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 05:27 AM
Sep 2012

PPP will be releasing polls in Colorado & Michigan within the next day as well.

MFM008

(19,805 posts)
13. yes, I noticed Prez keeps going up.
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 06:21 AM
Sep 2012

yet we are told its neck and neck....tied..... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

tomm2thumbs

(13,297 posts)
15. Karl Rove will have squeezed enough juice from GOP donors to KEEP THEM AWAY the next 8 -12 yrs
Mon Sep 3, 2012, 08:12 AM
Sep 2012

If you keep coming with hat in hand for gobs of money, but you can't show anything for it, the rich folks finally figure out you are just stealing their money and burning it.

Karl is going to be thrown onto that heap soon enough because he has been picking GOP pockets for awhile now with nothing to show for it.

Poor silly little man.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»538 now gives Obama a 74....