2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forum538 now gives Obama a 74.5% probability of winning...
No commentary yet, but I assume this means we're about to get something about how Mitt's campaign bounce is still elusive.
The latest information.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,588 posts)If it happens at all?
I hope so.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)On July 18th, two days after the Democratic Convention, Clinton went from trailing Bush to leading him 55-31.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Bush did whittle Clinton's lead down over the months, but it was too big a deficit to make up.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Which cracks me up because it essentially proves Clinton was hurt far more by Perot's candidacy than Bush.
For some odd reason, a few months ago, I caught a FOX News special on George H.W. Bush and it briefly touched on his reelection loss. During the discussion about it, everyone agreed that, had Perot not run, Bush would've won fairly easy. I disagree. I do think Perot hurt Bush early, since Perot was hammering Bush during a time when Clinton was still fighting primary battles, but in the end, as the polling suggests shortly after the convention, those voters who backed Perot were not going to vote for Bush ... and even if he won a significant portion of their vote, assuming they wouldn't have just stayed home, he still would have lost the electoral college.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)...that any swings attributable to specific events don't show up in the polls until 2 weeks after that event. Don't quote me on that, though, it's just something I read on the internet, which may or may not be true.
davidn3600
(6,342 posts)This election appears a bit odd because there does not seem to be much movement in either direction for the last few months. Seems either most people have already made up their minds and/or they are not paying attention.
Most of the swing states are stuck within the margin of error and don't seem to be moving. It will be interesting to see what they do after the DNC convention.
nxylas
(6,440 posts)I'm more worried about Congress. There's not much difference for me between Republicans winning all three branches of government and Obama squeaking through with a narrow victory and facing another 2-4 years of deadlock with an obstructionist Republican Congress. In fact, the latter may be worse, as Obama will continue to get the blame.
bluestateguy
(44,173 posts)Not so much polling numbers.
Silver's model also includes economic data.
speedoo
(11,229 posts)I think we will be hearing that from Nate by tomorrow at the latest.. PPP polls in FL and NC today showed no bounce.. The economic good news was in his model a couple of days ago, I think this latest bump is more from polls good news.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Which is sketchy at best.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)No bounce for Romney in Florida
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/09/no-bounce-for-romney-in-florida.html
NC enters convention tied up
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/09/nc-enters-convention-tied-up.html
TroyD
(4,551 posts)PPP will be releasing polls in Colorado & Michigan within the next day as well.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)MFM008
(19,805 posts)yet we are told its neck and neck....tied..... zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)If you keep coming with hat in hand for gobs of money, but you can't show anything for it, the rich folks finally figure out you are just stealing their money and burning it.
Karl is going to be thrown onto that heap soon enough because he has been picking GOP pockets for awhile now with nothing to show for it.
Poor silly little man.